Re: BPQ32/LinBPQ vulnerability.
Thank you Eric and Ben. Learned something new today.73 Chrisww2bsa
By
Chris Lance WW2BSA
·
#41985
·
|
Re: BPQ32/LinBPQ vulnerability.
Common Vulnerability and Exposures[0], or CVE, is a system that provides a reference method for vulnerabilities. A unique identifier is given to every vulnerability along with related information
By
Eric H. Christensen
·
#41984
·
|
Re: BPQ32/LinBPQ vulnerability.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Vulnerabilities_and_Exposures
The security community uses a vulnerabiliy's CVE number when working with a vulnerability. The data in the CVR database links to
By
Ben Kuhn
·
#41983
·
|
Re: BPQ32/LinBPQ vulnerability.
Hmmm...never heard of that....what is a CVE and why is it important?ChrisWw2bsa
By
Chris Lance WW2BSA
·
#41982
·
|
Re: BPQ32/LinBPQ vulnerability.
We're CVEs issued for these vulnerabilities?
73,
Eric WG3K
FM18rp
Packet: WG3K@WG3K.#SMD.MD.USA.NOAM
E-Mail: wg3k@...
Sent from Proton Mail Android
By
Eric H. Christensen
·
#41981
·
|
Re: BPQ32/LinBPQ vulnerability.
BPQMail and BPQChat have also been updated....
By
Mark Taylor
·
#41980
·
|
BPQ32/LinBPQ vulnerability.
Someone has published an exploit for two buffer overflow vulnerability in BPQ32/LinBPQ.
The most serious one was fixed in 6.0.24.36 but many people may still be running older versions.
I suggest you
By
John G8BPQ
·
#41979
·
|
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
[email protected]> wrote:
all other internet facing ports besides the port that applies to Matt's
network. Then to address the one port where AUTOADDMAP is enabled, add
firewall rules to allow port
By
Lee Bengston
·
#41978
·
|
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
There are no credentials or keys for axudp/tcp mapping.
Its down to the sysop to allow the udp/tcp traffic. And then add to the
bpq32.cfg as a link partner.
73
Steve
[email protected]> wrote:
By
Steve G7TAJ
·
#41977
·
|
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
Hi, John:
I think I will add an additional AXIP port for the 1 neighbor not in Matt's network.
Thanks.
73, Chuck
By
Chuck Gelm
·
#41976
·
|
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
Hi, Gary:
Unknown to me, but not unknown to Matt.
Matt issues a credential/key for access.
Access is not 'open'.
I think.
73, Chuck
--
By
Chuck Gelm
·
#41975
·
|
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
John and Steve,
Thanks for the pointers, John. The tcp KISS connection worked just fine after I changed that one ip address and got rid of the KISSoptions. I'm new to the concept of ports and ip
By
reede7376@...
·
#41974
·
|
Connecting as a client with QtTermTCP
Hey everybody,
After adjusting and trying new things, I finally was able to access my node with my other radio and use the irc and browse the web without losing my connection. Now I'm trying to
By
reede7376@...
·
#41973
·
|
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
127.0.0.1 can only be used for connections within the same machine and one end of a KISS TCP connection must be set up to listen for connections and the other end to connect. So one (the listener)
By
John G8BPQ
·
#41972
·
|
Re: Packets don't get acknowledged by the receiving node
I tried the config that they showed on the page for kiss tcp connections, with both computers setup on the same wlan. I used 127.0.0.1 as the ip address in computer 1's config and computer 1's ip
By
reede7376@...
·
#41971
·
|
Re: Building with libminiupnpc 2.2.8
I'll see if I can determine which version is installed and change the call accordingly.
UPNP allows bpq to open the ports you need through your router. I'd be reluctant to remove the facility.
73,
By
John G8BPQ
·
#41970
·
|
Re: Building with libminiupnpc 2.2.8
Does upnp do anything major in bpq? Is it safe to exclude from builds in the future or will that impact functionality at all?
Starting with Ubuntu 24.10 this will impact anyone trying to build, and
By
Dave Hibberd
·
#41969
·
|
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
You shouldn't have AUTOADDMAP on any port exposed to the internet. You can have more than one AXIP port so long as they use different UDP ports.
73, John
By
John G8BPQ
·
#41968
·
|
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
That's why you should always know your linking partner, what their software
is, what their capabilities are and making sure that a solid AXIP connection
exists between both of you. The OSI 7 layer
By
Charles Hargrove
·
#41967
·
|
Re: Unidentified node appeared on AXIP
That being the case, we have a serious security problem. With AUTOADDMAP active, unknown non ham entities can? gain access to what's supposed to be a closed network. It's like opening the border.
By
Gary - K7EK
·
#41966
·
|