开云体育

Chuck, NAOM is not going to be valid in an HR at all.? Even if YOU have a route in a forwarding record that BPQ try and process and even send to your forwarding partner because his record has that

Adding PA.US.NAOM.NOAM to the HR field of my forwarding neighbor caused the message to forward as hoped. Next, find out what my neighbor BBS did with it after it arrived. :-| 73, Chuck

Hi, John: Thank you. I will add #WPA.PA to the HR field of my forwarding neighbor, then try: SP KC7MRY@KC7MRY.#WPA.PA.US.NAOM.NOAM 73, Chuck

BPQMail checks if a message is to a packet or Internet address when the message is input. Basically a message is deemed to be an internet address if the @ field contains a . and the last element of

I believe there are two ways for a message to be sent via internet mail from a BBS. 1.? If you have an ISP configuration in your main BBS configuration then the message will be sent to your ISP for

240718 10:15:13 ?NC8Q????? Msg 24792 Routing Trace To RMS Via KC7MRY@KC7MRY.#WPA.PA.US.NAOM 240718 10:15:13 ?NC8Q????? Routing Trace to RMS Matches BBS RMS k3clm Hi, Jim: Thanks. This is not

Hi, Mark: Thanks. I (do not / did not) understand that BPQ-BBS treats a 'no match' as forward via internet. :-| Baffling. I am inserting a small image of my RMS Forward configuration. 73, Chuck

Two things to note. At first glance it looks like it goes to RMS because you have a typo in the HA. The “US.NAOM” should be “USA.NOAM” at the end. Unless you have a direct path to the

Probably because BPQ sees the error ( i.e.NAOM) as an internet address rather than an hierarchical address. The clue could be in the forwarding record for the user RMS.

240718 10:28:20 <NC8Q????? import /home/pi/kc7mry 240718 10:28:20 >NC8Q????? SP KC7MRY@KC7MRY.#WPA.PA.US.NAOM 240718 10:28:20 >NC8Q????? SP KC7MRY@KC7MRY.#WPA.PA.US.NAOM 240718 10:28:20

Glenn, Did you set BUSYWAIT in the CONFIG section? I usually use a value of 10 (seconds). This will give up if the channel is busy for 10 seconds and go to whatever you have next. N9SEO

Thank you for that information. I had not seen that page before. Brian N2KGC

Yes I agree the "if one goes they all go" is a definite draw back with daisy chain topology. But, on the flip side if your running your node on Raspi you can now run a multi channel TNC system with

F (Frack) Default: 500 Possible parameters: 1…15000 ?Frack“ is the maximum waiting time between the transmission of a packet and the confirmation by the distant station. (Afterwards a request

Ahhh My focus is bring back wampes. Thanks for the post OA. N9pno George Kirn had contact with this data. <do4oa@...> wrote:

Hello Brain! No. SMACK ist only KISS with CRC. http://www.symek.com/g/smack.html Am 17.07.24 um 17:56 schrieb Brian Webster N2KGC via groups.io: -- Mit freundlichen Grü?en Marc-Andre Alpers DO4OA

The one drawback to TNC’s being daisy chained together on a single serial port, is that in one of the TNC’s stops working in the chain, ALL of the TNC’s on that serial port stop working. Worth

It would be awesome if we could get the 6Pack features in to sound modem drivers of some sort! Having all AX.25 being able to adapt to the channel loading conditions to maximize channel throughput

6pack can be setup on the AX.25 Packet LAN as a Token ring with one node being the DAMA master, and all the others slaves. I this is good for busy channels. If someone wants a real challenge the linux

Yes, multiple TNCs on a serial port are supported by the BPQKISS EPROM. Although I'd heard of 6pack I'd never looked closely at it. The 6pack protocol, even if not used for controlling? more than one