开云体育

Hi Lee, I'm glad you were able to link up using axtcp, and I'm happy to say that my connection still works :-) I have the port quality set low on the axtcp port so that my mobile node doesn't upset

Hi Paula, As we found out, the XR and BPQ TCP implementations are different/incompatible. Just to let you know, I do have a link up with G8PZT using AXTCP (client) on XRLin, K5DAT-5 using port 9394

Oh well, at least I now know that it doesn't work, and why it doesn't. Sent from my Huawei tablet

Yes, I just send kiss encapsulated packets. 73, John

Hi Red, thank you for the test. I haven't yet decoded the packet, but I think there's a major difference between how xrouter and bpq do axtcp. I don't know how bpq does it, but in xrouter the server

I got the DV Switch installed an working with my phone. pretty neat stuff. I run 4 raspberry pi's with dmr brandmiester, tgif, d-star an wires-x Ray N3HYM -- Ray Adkins │

Just made the change Ray N3HYM -- Ray Adkins │ American Red Cross Ray V. Adkins N3HYM│ American Red Cross Disaster Service Technology Team Lead National Capital and Greater Chesapeake

To BPQ users that lost a link with K5DAT-7, my node. I apologize for that - I have moved, and the Internet access is wireless based with no port forwarding. Therefore I can no longer support

Hi Paula, I am not using Xrouter here but do have several active BPQ AXTCP links where my end is the slave. Outside of my own lab testing I have not had an opportunity to test an external AXTCP link

On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 05:10 AM, Paula wrote: > > Hi Lee, > > In case you (or anyone else :-) are interested, my XRPi node G8PZT:KIDDER > in > the middle of England has an open AXTCP server on

Thanks Paula! I'll try both BPQ and XRouter when I get a chance. Lee K5DAT [email protected]> wrote:

Hi Lee, In case you (or anyone else :-) are interested, my XRPi node G8PZT:KIDDER in the middle of England has an open AXTCP server on "g8pzt.noip.me" port 9393. It has been in use for many years

If you want to host more than one TCP-Slave links they must use different ports, but a TCP-Master can connect to more than one site using the one port. 73, John

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 05:03 PM, Lee Bengston wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023, 6:17 PM PacketCat Red PE1RRR < rrrtuby@... > > wrote: > >> >> Hi Lee >> >> Can you do an experiment to see

wrote: Great catch. I can use the

Hi Lee Can you do an experiment to see if you can use 10200 outbound to my two nodes and see if they work. It is my limited understanding that when traversing NAT, the source port exiting the NAT is

Thanks Red, yes, the keyboard on the laptop is getting worn out - a symptom of inheriting it from my wife. I have a few links up now with others thus proving it works. :-) I assume from your

Hi Lee Same situation for YD0BCX which is the solution I implemented for him in Indonesia. Dang typo monster ate your map line - for anyone reading its: TCP-Slave. I have updated your maps on both

Hi Lee - I had a similar experience when I switched to a wireless internet provider.? I found a simple way to tunnel through my ISP's CGNAT network architecture and it works very well with BPQ.

Hello to those on the list. I've just moved to new rural location, and it appears my wireless based internet service does not pass any unsolicited communication from the Internet to me. Even though I