开云体育

I was curious if there is a way that I can have a message posted to the BBS and have it rewritten so I can send out ?a ?defined list of rms express users individually. I was looking thru the system

I always have something strange, or try to do something strange that works differently.? Now my HF forwarding works fine when manually started but only two of the stations follow the intervals.? The

Hello, If you are using a station which over sees other? not seeing each other you make it a DAMA master. This master accepts stations and leaves a space for other connecting stations. This is to

Mark ??? This is working here. I used BPQTerminal? and the terminal in the console window. Both were able to receive responses from the bbs. ?I am using BPQ32 6.0.24.65.

Hi John, After some additional testing I would say unless you are really curious do not spend any time on this. The bridge itself is switching packets between the two RF ports as quickly as it can

After starting linbpq i ran this commands and then it works sudo ip route add 192.168.0.114 dev LinBPQTAB? ? (on sg0yos) and sudo ip route add 192.168.5.1 dev LinBPQTAB? ? ? ? ?(on

AA5AF you are right thanks for the reminder Robby

Hello Robby, Tough to find you at WL2K without providing your call. 73 de Rich WA3WLH

Edit to add that the BPQ Console window in the BPQMail application works normally. Just when a new terminal window is opened from the BPQ32 Console MDI and the BBS is accessed from there does this

I'm looking for some HF Forwarding partners for NTS and Emergence traffic as it becomes necessary don't need any bulletins over HF. I have a full time 24/7 BPQ32 station setup and ready to rock and

This morning I accessed BPQ Mail from a terminal window on the bpq host machine. Windows 10.? BPQ32 6.0.24.64 and BPQMail 6.0.24.62? (these were distributed together.) Anything that I enter (LM, L,

Hi Chris, What you describe is a classic hidden node problem, the mountaintop station hears all, but stations on one side can not hear the other side, so can transmit over one another when talking to

John I appreciate your help, don't know why some times I over look start from the beginning Found my error correct it and its working! Thanks Heber NP4JN

Hi Chuck. Tnx for the reply. Yes, you are correct - they are hidden from each other, but are on different user frequencies - which means, in Scenario 1, the mountaintop node would have to be

Hi, Chris: Digipeating is the fastest. Any node-mode would be more polite. In your diagram I guarantee the mountaintop node will be an 'exposed node'. https://en.wikipedia.org/

Tnx for the info Mark. Will keep you in the loop as the project progresses. Tnx es 73 de Chris ww2bsa

Tnx for the response, Jeff. If using scenario 2, yes the link would be dedicated, probably on 220. Station B only has a tri-bander: 2 meters, 220 and 440. So, a NVIS experiment won't work. Both

There is no urgent need for this it is just me playing so whenever you get around to it is fine. I'll keep experimenting in the meantime. Thanks John. 73 de Rich WA3WLH

Ok, here are your considerations. Kantronics in KA-Node is creating a NetRom link, if i am not mistaken, and creates a LOT of traffic.? I avoid this at all costs.? But that is just me in my county

Hi Chris, My opinion is K-Net since it's good for node-broadcasting and pretty sure for forwarding, And Scenario 2 with backbones for sure. You'd need a second radio at the mountaintop site for the