开云体育

Keep forwarding enabled and tick Send Personal Mail Only.? That'll work; I found out by accident a couple years ago... Personal Mail Only was ticked and I didn't know it, and wondered why Bulls were

My forwarding partner is requesting a temp stop to sending bulletins to his BBS. Should I: Un-tick? Enable Forwarding? (or will this stop ALL forwarding - personal and bulls?) Tick Send Personal

John: It was a case of bad syntax.? We had set it to: AUTOADDMAP OFF BPQ32 ignores the argument and enabled it. Correct syntax: AUTOADDMAP ...by itself with no arguments, and a semicolon to

A means automatically added as a result of AUTOADDMAP. If you don't have that then it looks like a bug. Can you send me the config? Thanks, John

For the time being, we locked out the route in the "ROUTES:" table. I found the answer to the "A" question in a previous topic. 73 - Rick KE0GB

In addition:? AUTOADDMAP is not enabled at N0HI-7. RH

John: We have a question regarding the axresolver: What does an "A" at the end of an axr <port#> line mean? e.g., appearing on N0HI-7 node: AC0VC-7 = 74.81.169.118 10093 = 74.81.169.118 B A We

Thanks, John. :-) 73 Em sex., 9 de ago. de 2024 12:34, John G8BPQ via groups.io <john.wiseman= [email protected]> escreveu:

Try ?PORT SPEED YAESU FT1000MP 73, John

Thanks, Mauro. 73 Em qui., 8 de ago. de 2024 13:12, Mauro - AG7BI via groups.io <ag7bi= [email protected]> escreveu:

The CI-V is for ICOM radios not Yaesu. For Yaesu you just need just the serial port. I don't have that model so I cannot be more specific.

Hi folks. I have an FT-1000MP with a CAT control cable, but I can't create a RIGCONTROL, don't work. I suspect it is the CI-V address. What would be the value? Does anyone know the correct line for

Thanks, Mauro. I'll look into it. 73, John

John - G8BPQ, using QSoundModem 72 and BPQ 6.0.24.40 in Linux restarting the node causes a segfault of the modem. I am not sure if this is a problem with my system or a bug since I just moved? from

This reply seems to be off topic. 73, Chuck

Hi, I hope I‘m not wrong but neither RPR nor VARA are Open Source. The one is in the hands of SCS, the other in the hands of EA5HVK - so the difference is more ore less the technology behind. RPR

that probably explains it. Thanks Rich

I'm not against Robust Packet. In fact I have RP ports on my main HF nodes. I was just questioning whether it will get any Winlink traffic - after all the question was about a WinRPR Winlink

[email protected]> wrote: John was simply reporting that Robust Packet is rarely used by Winlink, which is what Mauro was asking about. VARA, however, is widely used in that context. Are you saying

Huh? I am a bit disappointed about your answer John. In my opinion it is not a good reflection for a outstanding preforming protocol on HF, to use the amount of users on a system.? ;-). In Europ the