开云体育

Thank you for your comments Chris, N6CTA on Robust Packet Radio, However, I'd like to request where you are getting your data from? I just bought a SCS tracker clone called a

I think there is a fairly active group of folks in the UK using IL2P+CRC on 40 meter NVIS. The most robust HF mode in the NinoTNC now is 300 symbol/sec BPSK, switch position 1000 on recent firmware.

Mario et alia: I have 2 ports of IL2P on my QtSoundModem configured. Evenings through mornings I am on 7103.3 and 7102.8 kHz center. Mid-day I am on 14104.3 and 14103.8 kHz center. 1 port is also

Seems like Nino removed 150Bd but there are other HF mode improvements so I guess not all is lost. It was not meant for HF from the outset so I guess I shouldn't be too surprised.

Hey All, (this is really for G8BPQ) An AEA DSP-2232 is managing to crash linBPQ, not good. The frame headers and flow control look different from every other piece of hardware/software that connects

RPR either costs a lot in SCS hardware, or you run an illegally distributed piece of windows software. Neither are optimum solutions. When Direwolf officially supports the current state of IL2P I'll

Try Robust Packet Radio (RPR) Highly underrated digital mode. Great on HF.73 de Chris ww2bsa

Sounds good, Rich. I can say MN, WI, IN, OH and PA then. :-) If you see any of these stations in your MH for 7101.3 usb @ 1000Hz, you should start seeing them on IL2P @

Thanks for this info Lee. I have had QPSK V26A 600 on 7101.3 usb @ 2000Hz for 6+ months now. A few sigs were decoded shortly after I first enabled it but I have not copied anything since. I set it up

Hello, Mauro, Fyi, there is a relatively small quantity of stations in the Midwest using IL2P on HF. They span Minnesota, Wisconsin, Indiana and Ohio. As far as I know we are all running FX25 and

Hi Mauro Most of the UK hf runs on il2p +crc on 40m 7050.50 usb at 2250hz (or change dial to suit) 73s Steve [email protected]> wrote:

Hi folks. Does anyone use IL2P? I tested the QTSoundmodem's IL2P and it seems very good, but I don't see anyone commenting. Would it be better for HF than the FX25? TIA

You should be able to see if the VARA TNC has started. If not there is a problem with the program path in the ADDR line. As an additional test start VARAFM manually and see if BPQ then connects you'll

No, you should not need quotes. Just add the space.

If you're getting "Connection to TNC Failed" you aren't ATTACHED to the driver. From the terminal prompt do: ATTACH (Port# of VARA FM) C CALLSIGN or whatever the sequence of commands you need to

Thanks for the follow up, Mark. I am indeed moving to VARA with a clean start and will eliminate the packet section altogether once I verify VARA is working. When trying out a new config, I always

Well you could run them both simultaneously for a while as you phase out packet.? I never suggest running vara and packet on the same frequency for the long term because they are not aware of each

Hello all, I have been gradually converting unreliable TCP-Master/Slave links to UDP. I still have 3 left that are not reliable: MAP KD5LPB-7 <address-removed> TCP-Master 10093 B ; KD5LPB BPQ MAP

It was still happening after removing CEAM. I removed all of them other than EU and .ME.USA.NOAM is now forwarding as expected. Thank you all for the help. [email protected]> wrote:

I am working towards converting our packet instances over to VARA to be more accessable for the majority of users these days. I thought I had the config correct but get "Connection to TNC Failed" in