开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育
  1. ZA-Energie
  2. Topics

Daily Friend verminder sy vete teen Hernubares

 

开云体育

As mens deesdae Google met Daily Friend Energy, dan verskyn onderstaande artikel nie meer nie -- of altans nie meer hoog op die eerste bladsy nie.? Die skakel werk egter nog, en aldrie my kommentare wat vroeer as "spam" verwyder is, verskyn daarby.? En artikels deur anti-hernubare skrywers soos A Kenny en ? uit die afgelope 12 maande verskyn nie.?

As ek nou Google met Daily Friend Energy, dan verskynveel meer rasionele artikels soos ? en ?? Eersgenoemde nogal met 'n kommentaar "At the rate Eskom is increasing the price of electricity, my investment in solar might turn out to be the best I ever made"?? wat normaal sou wees elders, maar vroeer raar op DF.


Subject: Daily Friend se vete teen Hernubares
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:38:02 +0200
From: bernhard <bernhard@...>
To: pwvanderwalt@... <pwvanderwalt@...>, Wolhuter, Riaan, Dr <wolhuter@...>

Waarom publiseer DF sulke volgehoue valse berigte oor hernubare energie.? Een van die mees onlangse artikels deur ene ingenieur Andrew Kenny wemel van valshede en verdraaiings.

My kommentaar: "Unlike the situation here presented "coal burning China" has actually steadily reduced its (very high) percentage of coal generated electricity from 81% in 2007 to 60% in 2021. Since then it does not quote for generation from coal separately from oil and natural gas. See ?

"The same China has increased its generation from solar PV from 152 GWh in 2008 to 584 TWh in 2023 -- a more than three thousandfold increase! In 2023, its wind power generation was even higher -- 886 TWh. So much for China's attitude to these "very expensive, filthy" renewables!?

"China today leads the world in both the production and the use of both solar PV, of wind turbines and of Electric Vehicles (EVs)."

is gister summier as "spam" verwerp voordat ek die wikipedia skakel ingevoeg het.? Sedertdien verskyn daarby "Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by The Daily Friend" sedert gisteraand.
 

Ek het nie gedink hulle koppe sal gedraai kan word nie!
PW

On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 11:24?AM bernhard via <bernhard=[email protected]> wrote:

As mens deesdae Google met Daily Friend Energy, dan verskyn onderstaande artikel nie meer nie -- of altans nie meer hoog op die eerste bladsy nie.? Die skakel werk egter nog, en aldrie my kommentare wat vroeer as "spam" verwyder is, verskyn daarby.? En artikels deur anti-hernubare skrywers soos A Kenny en ? uit die afgelope 12 maande verskyn nie.?

As ek nou Google met Daily Friend Energy, dan verskynveel meer rasionele artikels soos ? en ?? Eersgenoemde nogal met 'n kommentaar "At the rate Eskom is increasing the price of electricity, my investment in solar might turn out to be the best I ever made"?? wat normaal sou wees elders, maar vroeer raar op DF.


Subject: Daily Friend se vete teen Hernubares
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:38:02 +0200
From: bernhard <bernhard@...>
To: pwvanderwalt@... <pwvanderwalt@...>, Wolhuter, Riaan, Dr <wolhuter@...>

Waarom publiseer DF sulke volgehoue valse berigte oor hernubare energie.? Een van die mees onlangse artikels deur ene ingenieur Andrew Kenny wemel van valshede en verdraaiings.

My kommentaar: "Unlike the situation here presented "coal burning China" has actually steadily reduced its (very high) percentage of coal generated electricity from 81% in 2007 to 60% in 2021. Since then it does not quote for generation from coal separately from oil and natural gas. See ?

"The same China has increased its generation from solar PV from 152 GWh in 2008 to 584 TWh in 2023 -- a more than three thousandfold increase! In 2023, its wind power generation was even higher -- 886 TWh. So much for China's attitude to these "very expensive, filthy" renewables!?

"China today leads the world in both the production and the use of both solar PV, of wind turbines and of Electric Vehicles (EVs)."

is gister summier as "spam" verwerp voordat ek die wikipedia skakel ingevoeg het.? Sedertdien verskyn daarby "Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by The Daily Friend" sedert gisteraand.
 

开云体育

Ons sal maar vorentoe moet sien of hierdie gehandhaaf word.? Terloops: die . . .? A Kenny en ? hieronder moet wees?skrywers soos A Kenny en Ivo Vegter ??

On 2025/03/04 17:17, Pieter Van der Walt via groups.io wrote:

Ek het nie gedink hulle koppe sal gedraai kan word nie!
PW

On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 11:24?AM bernhard via <bernhard=[email protected]> wrote:

As mens deesdae Google met Daily Friend Energy, dan verskyn onderstaande artikel nie meer nie -- of altans nie meer hoog op die eerste bladsy nie.? Die skakel werk egter nog, en aldrie my kommentare wat vroeer as "spam" verwyder is, verskyn daarby.? En artikels deur anti-hernubare skrywers soos A Kenny en ? uit die afgelope 12 maande verskyn nie.?

As ek nou Google met Daily Friend Energy, dan verskynveel meer rasionele artikels soos ? en ?? Eersgenoemde nogal met 'n kommentaar "At the rate Eskom is increasing the price of electricity, my investment in solar might turn out to be the best I ever made"?? wat normaal sou wees elders, maar vroeer raar op DF.


Subject: Daily Friend se vete teen Hernubares
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 07:38:02 +0200
From: bernhard <bernhard@...>
To: pwvanderwalt@... <pwvanderwalt@...>, Wolhuter, Riaan, Dr <wolhuter@...>

Waarom publiseer DF sulke volgehoue valse berigte oor hernubare energie.? Een van die mees onlangse artikels deur ene ingenieur Andrew Kenny wemel van valshede en verdraaiings.

My kommentaar: "Unlike the situation here presented "coal burning China" has actually steadily reduced its (very high) percentage of coal generated electricity from 81% in 2007 to 60% in 2021. Since then it does not quote for generation from coal separately from oil and natural gas. See ?

"The same China has increased its generation from solar PV from 152 GWh in 2008 to 584 TWh in 2023 -- a more than three thousandfold increase! In 2023, its wind power generation was even higher -- 886 TWh. So much for China's attitude to these "very expensive, filthy" renewables!?

"China today leads the world in both the production and the use of both solar PV, of wind turbines and of Electric Vehicles (EVs)."

is gister summier as "spam" verwerp voordat ek die wikipedia skakel ingevoeg het.? Sedertdien verskyn daarby "Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by The Daily Friend" sedert gisteraand.

1 - 3 of 3