开云体育

I order parts off of eBay. In many cases, the supplier will ship, as Paul stated, via a "package bundle". Sometimes U.S. vendors do the same thing using DHL or FEDEX. Recently, I've seen the Chinese

Judging by the tracking on my two recent orders it appears that they bundle US (or maybe North American?) orders over some interval into a single package that is shipped to Colorado where it is

saturn5tony via groups.io wrote: Lee Hart wrote: My order took just over 2 weeks to arrive. That's pretty good! I've shipped packages internationally that have taken 4-6 weeks to arrive. Of course,

Oh great Lee. I just did my 1st order with them as well for these 1.8meg cr's for my new z80 bd. How long did it take to get them? The shipping was very reasonable.

SCOTT VITALE wrote: Thanks Scott, The terminal programs I normally use (ProComm and TeraTerm) don't support odd baud rates; I'll have to try the one you suggested. It sounds like a good tool for

glad it's working for you. Did you try other fixed baud rates? ________________________________ Sent: May 27, 2021 1:54 AM To: Z80MC@groups.io <Z80MC@groups.io> Subject: Re: [Z80MC] SD I/O 1.8MHz

FYI: for non-standard baud rates; I use Linux for all development work and?a USB-2-TTL serial converter for serial I/O. I tested with with CH340 to see how much baud-rate error would be tolerated at

Hi folks! Just a quick update, it actually works if your terminal client supports custom baud rates. I got my kit fully assembled this morning, and had it working? in no time using GtkTerm under

Z80 is 4-22 clock cycles per instruction. The longer ones are the are in the groups that increment or decrement and repeat. For Z80 the simple way is a RST (one byte call) to one of 8 locations. The

Be careful Lee,? ?all that is going to go straight to my head! The single step is definitely cool, but as I recall, it was your idea, I just coded it. For those that don't know it.? Many single

joshbensadon via groups.io wrote: Josh's source code is a wonderful example of how to write and document assembler. It's worth spending some time to read it with careful concentration on the

joshbensadon via groups.io wrote: One problem is human nature; everyone has their own idea of what an assembler "should" do. Another is that manufacturers copyright their assembler mnemonics. That

I just wanted to give a recommendation for the ASXXXX family of cross-assemblers, as I use them regularly. They are full-featured, open-source, actively updated, and work well for a very large number

Hi Allison, You've had a lot of experience on assembler, I wonder what you think about how flexible assemblers should be?To be exact, let's talk about the Z80 here.? Forgive me if I can't remember

Thanks Scott, I'm just looking at all the options you list and can only say WOW is there ever a LOT of software out there!So much software, so little time! Cheers, Josh

Wow Scott, thank you so much for all this info! (all the *above* is on my plate) I think I will start using Josh's info at 1st but I do need to also check out all the rec's you mentioned also and come

Tony: It really depends a lot on your development environment. From your list of computers you have available, I didn't see anything "modern". WINDOWS-XP support was discontinued at least a decade ago

I use a small list of assemblers due to the abundance of assemblers in the world and very few using a standard or even similar syntax. So on Z80 CPM: DRC ASM, MAC ASMZ (old version from 40years

Bob,? Thanks!? That really means a lot to me!? I just kind of thought nobody ever looks at the source code. The part of the source code I love the most is the full duplex bit banged serial

Hi Bob, Oh yes I have been looking threw it most of this afternoon, and wow, I love the stuff in there. Its great and I know it will help me to understand alot of what you guys are doing with the Z80