Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
42 years for a dry joint from manufacturing to cause a problem!
Well, we all know that dry joints are caused by the joint not being heated enough when the joint is being formed. However, this one took 42 years to cause trouble!
From the serial number, my FT-101ZD was manufactured in 1981. Last week, I noticed that it was low on receive on 10m, but seemed perfectly fine on the lower bands. I came here and had a read about causes for the rig being deaf. Checked the ATT switch and cleaned it with switch cleaner, checked the continuity of the fuse bulb and checked that I was getting S9+10db on 14.2MHz from the calibration oscillator. All checked out fine. I didn't think that it would be any of them anyway as the rig seemed to work perfectly OK on other bands. I was then looking for something specifically related to 10m, but in the end, that wasn't the case. I connected the antenna to the RX output and the sensitivity was fine, so I started looking for issues with the components near to SO239. Sure enough a dry joint was found where the inductor from the SO239 connected to the tx/rx relay nearby. A quick resoldering of this joint and my 42 year old rig was back to her former self in terms of sensitivity. I spent most of my working life in electronics, so I have seen plenty of crystaline "dry" joints in my time, but I've never known one to take such a long time before it actually caused an issue. When I looked under the sleeve (circled in the photo), the end of the inductor went through the relay terminal and was dangling loose in mid air with an obvious dry joint on the end of it. Why it only caused issues on 10m is a bit of a mystery, 12m was OK, 15m was fine too, although I guess that on lower bands the actual receive voltage from the antenna will be greater, so that may well be why. Seems a bit odd though. Anyone can beat this record time for a dry joint to cause issues? ;-) 73 de Gordon G8WWD |
Hi Peter, It's amazing how long it has taken these dry joints to cause trouble. I guess it is all part of the "bath tub curve" theory that we were taught about reliability and the probability of failure over time. 73 Gordon On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 at 05:27, Peter Roberts G4DJB <groups@...> wrote: I can't beat that one Gordon, but I did have a dry joint on one of the circuit boards in my early FT-101 that only became apparent after ~35 years! --
Regards, Gordon Hunter |
Perhaps I can beat your 42 years now Gordon!.
I've just had another dry joint on my early FT-101 (FT-277) fail after almost 52 years. I had been working on the radio on the bench and was just doing checks before putting the covers back on and had no Tx output. The meter on Ic went full scale hard against the end stop. The meter shunt had become detached from the finals socket and so the cathode current was flowing through the meter and not the shunt. The shunt had obviously been soldered but it was probably not a well-made joint and after many years of getting warm and then cooling down had caused the joint to fail. It has now been resoldered and should last another 50+ years!
73, Peter |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss