Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
For what it's worth I've got a Communications Concepts Inc. (CCI) digital display for my FRG-7. It sits on top. No longer available of course but if you can find one I can highly recommend it. It's
By
John Hudak
·
#411
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
Thanks Pentagrid…I thought it might be one of those myself, but the pin out doesn’t match. As previously mentioned, it looks like a TI logo on on of the images, and SN something or other for the
By
Simon Robinson
·
#410
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
Hi All,
When I looked carefully (pic time_step-01.jpg in files/DFC-7), the mixer is definitely Texas Instruments, and I thought I could make out "SN7651?". Did a search and came up? with a data sheet
By
Steve Quigg (VK2TUM)
·
#409
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
By memory I think you will find the mixer is a CA3028 transistor array or similar. Look in any 1970s? American? radio constructor books for details of these chips, they were used often before the
By
Pentagrid
·
#408
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
Enjoy it stock. Not worth the effort.
By
Arthur Smith
·
#407
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
Thanks everyone for your help on this...I've put Steve's diagram and instructions through PaintShop Pro and uploaded the results into the 'files' section on the group.
Pentagrid - I've spent most of
By
Simon Robinson
·
#406
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7 - image resolution
Hi All,
It seems that loading an image to messages reduces it's resolution :-(
So I've put various images etc into files/DFC-7; resolution is 1600x1200 vs 1024x768.
Something to remember for the
By
Steve Quigg (VK2TUM)
·
#405
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
Simon
I have fiddled with the background colour - do these help?
Andy
By
andyporter@...
·
#404
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
Yes, thats exactly how it was done, the input signal was mixed with a 3.455 MHz oscillator, a low pass filter used to remove the higher mixing product, the counter chip then? read the
By
Pentagrid
·
#403
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
Hi Simon,
Unfortunately I don't have the originals; the attachments are as I found (somewhere; too long ago to remember) the on the web.
Re the schematic,? it is readable, albeit with some
By
Steve Quigg (VK2TUM)
·
#402
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
Hi Mark
I would never spoil the radio. This kit sits in a box on top of the radio.
cheers
simon
By
Simon Robinson
·
#401
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
Thanks Steve, that’s exactly what I need. Sadly the circuit diagram is a bit low res to read clearly. Would you mind scanning the DFC-7 pages for me, or if you don’t have a scanner, could you take
By
Simon Robinson
·
#400
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
Don’t fit the digital display gents, it looks terrible and completely ruins the whole feel visually of the radio.
The whole beauty of this radio is its retro appeal and I urge you to not be tempted
By
Mark Feltham
·
#399
·
|
Re: Digital Display for FRG-7
Hi Simon,
Have attached a data sheet on the MSM5525 plus a couple of pics re the DFC-7.
Enjoy
By
Steve Quigg (VK2TUM)
·
#398
·
|
Digital Display for FRG-7
Hello
I've just joined this group and have a mint FRG-7...it came with its box and other bits.
A friend gave me an old digital display unit which turns out to be a Timestep Electronics DFC-7 from
By
Simon Robinson
·
#397
·
|
Re: New FRG-7 owner
Yes
It’s an easy mod
I had more trouble getting the radio out of the exterior case
M
73
By
Mark Feltham
·
#396
·
|
Re: New FRG-7 owner
That's roughly what I did. I'd have to take back apart to look. Was *very* minor.
By
Reginald Beardsley
·
#395
·
|
Re: New FRG-7 owner
I found the fine tune capacitance on my particular radio ?operated nicely with a series cap of 6.8pf….as the mod….
73Mark
Sent from the all-new AOL app for iOS
By
Mark Feltham
·
#394
·
|
Re: New FRG-7 owner
Miguel,
Most welcome. Be careful about who you buy a nanoVNA from as there are lots of bad copies. The H4 has the advantage you can load time-frequency FW to it, though not both at the same
By
Reginald Beardsley
·
#393
·
|
Re: New FRG-7 owner
Thanks Reg,
I will get a NanoVNA as it seems very useful. Just one doubt: where can I
see the limits of the signal we can inject in TP103? Don't we need an
attenuator in the nano-VNA to protect the
By
Miguel Frutos
·
#392
·
|