On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 04:45 AM, Roy Endersby wrote:
Z21 Loconet to DR4088LN <---- 6m-----> DR4088CS <-----0.5m---->DR4088CS <----3m--->YD6016CS
<----4m---->DR4088CS <----5m------> YD6016CS Total Cable length 18.5m
Waaayyyy too long !! 3m advised, 5m max. from
DR4088LN until last s88N module.
I’m using Cat 7 RJ45 Flat Cables between the CS’s
UTP is better. Flatcable is not twisted, for which s88N has been designed
I needed to add a couple more YD6016CS, but on seeking advice I was told that the max length in total between all units was 3m, as you can see I’m exceeding the by quite a bit.
Yep, see above.
So does the layout work, well yes, I only have a few false positives nothing that I was concerned about until now!.
You should have, because it is inherent to such cable-lengths ;)
I’m planning to add a YD6016LN and split the network up into smaller legs something on these lines
Z21
Leg 1 LN to DR4088LN <----0.5m----> DR4088CS <---6.0m---> DR4088CS <---0.5m --> DR4088CS
Total Cable length 7m
Marginal, but considering you already ran 18.5m without significant problems, will probably work.
Leg 2 LN to YD6016LN <-----4m----> YD6016CS <----0.5m--->YD6016CS <----1m---> YD6016CS
Total Cable length 5.5m
Very well ! This could very well work in your situation. It almost adheres to the specs ;)
Remarks:
1) It's YD6016
ES-CS, not YD6016CS, and it's YD6016
LN-CS ;) CS is the Sensor-Type, ES/LN is the Bus-Type :)
2) we advise: Need "long" distance ( > 3m ) ? Use LocoNet. Below 3m s88N is perfectly safe. Why ? LN is designed for long cable runs. s88N is not. Although the use of RJ45 Network-Cable might suggest this.
Greets,
Karst