¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

59.5keV spectrum cleanup


 

Good info, I can try those K-edge filters, will report back.


From: "DFEMER" <dfemer@...>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 2:00:57 PM
Subject: Re: FW: [XRF] 59.5keV spectrum cleanup

Geo,

These Am and Np peaks are monochromatic having discrete energies not the broad bremsstrahlung you get from a X-ray tube. The tube¡¯s characteristic lines are also monochromatic.

The issue is getting rid of the Np lines which van be done with a source filter. To optimize the 13 ¨C 17keV range of the Np lines from the source you would use 150 um Cu , 25 um Ti, and a 300 um Al filter. At 20 keV just a 0.3mm Al filter would reduce that original count to 6%. At 17 keV it would be a 1% reduction. ?Remember that the Np lines are also acting as a source for xrf of the lower Z ?elements. When using a tube source you would run 3 tube voltages 50, 40 and 15 or so to the maximize each energy region of interest.

?

Dud

?

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of GEOelectronics@...
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 5:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FW: [XRF] 59.5keV spectrum cleanup

?

"The x-ray tube has a broad energy range while you have a monochromatic source."


Something is not right here Dud. We WANT a monoenergetic source, we don't HAVE a monoenergetic source. That's the point of the experiment.

?

This is the source we all have, it is not monochromatic:

Am-Raw-Gamma-Spec.png

?