¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: Currency XRF
.mca data file for war penny and nickel above
By GEOelectronics@... · #525 ·
Re: XRF - comparing Dud's with my Si-PIN
Steve, Zircon HREE's are interesting. Why do the heavies kick up in the xenotime. Are there other zircons in the area that still hold the HREE without any exsolution and at what concentration? How
By Dude · #523 ·
Strickland
Charles, Attached is a bigger blowup of the Strickland. The Cursor is at Ti Ka 4.5 keV. The Si Escape peak is 9 channels to the right at 4.66 keV (on the right side of the 2 equal sized peaks past the
By Dude · #522 ·
Re: XRF - comparing Dud's with my Si-PIN
Here are a couple of examples of how messy these minerals can be. The zircon from the Coats is a variety called cyrtolite. If you look at the photos at the bottom of the sheet you can see how xenotime
By WILLIAM S Dubyk · #521 ·
Re: XRF - comparing Dud's with my Si-PIN
Geo, I would venture to say precise quantitative analysis is beyond the reach of the professionals as well. For a simple matrix it works fine but for a complicated matrix like rocks and junk it
By Dude · #520 ·
Re: XRF - comparing Dud's with my Si-PIN
Charles, I have pretty much everything in terms of base metals and REE oxides as well as base and REE metals. Some more dangerous than others. I did not get the close up Ti email that Geo got. Send me
By Dude · #519 ·
Re: XRF - comparing Dud's with my Si-PIN
"Based on the reported percentages the assay you are looking at was done using the Soils mode which is used when looking at PPM level concentrations. The Soils mode will well over report percent level
By GEOelectronics@... · #518 ·
Re: XRF - comparing Dud's with my Si-PIN
Charles, do you have pure metal element samples? I can give you titanium and a few more for use as calibration points.By the way the needed correct 5V power supply arrived for my SI-PIN, so It will be
By GEOelectronics@... · #517 ·
Re: XRF - comparing Dud's with my Si-PIN
So qualitatively the results from both XRFs seem to be similar. I will be looking at other specimens that you analyzed as well to see if they jive with my setup. So what about the FeSi escape vs TiKa1
By Charles David Young · #516 ·
Currency XRF
Setup is Amptek 1-2-3 SDD Sensor/MCA, the X-Ray tube excited ones were with a LIXI-Kevex microfocus low power X-Ray tube, parameters listed in the scans. Current? settings are always in microamps not
By GEOelectronics@... · #515 ·
Re: XRF - comparing Dud's with my Si-PIN
Charles, Based on the reported percentages the assay you are looking at was done using the Soils mode which is used when looking at PPM level concentrations. The Soils mode will well over report
By Dude · #514 ·
Re: XRF - comparing Dud's with my Si-PIN
BTW, Y PPM = 279 = 0.0279% charlesdavidyoung@...> wrote:
By Charles David Young · #513 ·
Re: XRF - comparing Dud's with my Si-PIN
BTW, the small peak at about the FeSi escape actually aligns better with TiKa1. Dud's XRF shows 0.6% Ti. Are we sure this is not TiKa1? Charles charlesdavidyoung@...> wrote:
By Charles David Young · #512 ·
XRF - comparing Dud's with my Si-PIN
Nearly 2 years ago (5/23/18) Dud was kind enough to shoot some of my specimens with his XRF "gun", which has a pinpoint xray source. Several of my rocks were found in the rubble piles of the local
By Charles David Young · #511 ·
Re: FW: microlite from Strickland
This is not unusual, as a matter of fact, they are always there. I keep a hand calculator on the counting bench and a cheat sheet of Si and Cd (and even Te) Ka and Kb energies to locate them, below
By GEOelectronics@... · #506 ·
Re: FW: microlite from Strickland
BTW, do we need to worry about the Si escape peaks from other elements as well? charlesdavidyoung@...> wrote:
By Charles David Young · #505 ·
Re: microlite from Strickland
Have you done a "background" scan of just the Am source? Mine is mounted on brass with a lead backstop and I see Fe, Cu, Zn, Np and Pb X-Rays It would be interesting to do a scan with and without a
By GEOelectronics@... · #504 ·
Re: FW: microlite from Strickland
FeKa1=6.4 - SiKa1=1.740 = 4.66 = LaLa1=4.651 Good catch, Dud! I will have to be on the lookout for that one. In fact I'll add it to my isotopes list to remind me. Charles
By Charles David Young · #503 ·
Re: microlite from Strickland
I noticed that too, and by the time it gets to 59.5 it is really muted. This is same with all the silicon based detectors I've used. It's a matter of how much mass is there to react and absorb the
By GEOelectronics@... · #502 ·
Re: FW: microlite from Strickland
Charles, As it turns out the ¡°Ti¡± peak is neither Ti or La it¡¯s the Si escape peak from Fe. After looking at Steve¡¯s assay showing Ti I went looking for that and forgot about escape peaks. The
By Dude · #501 ·