¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Re: 59.5keV spectrum cleanup
You called it a source filter. It works by K-edge? s From: "DFEMER" <dfemer@...> To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 3:40:29 PM Subject: Re: FW: [XRF] 59.5keV spectrum cleanup
By GEOelectronics@... · #1533 ·
Re: 59.5keV spectrum cleanup
is the K-Edge filter stack you gave me Dud. Al Ti Cu To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 3:40:29 PM Subject: Re: FW: [XRF] 59.5keV spectrum cleanup Geo, We know you know
By GEOelectronics@... · #1532 ·
Re: FW: [XRF] 59.5keV spectrum cleanup
Geo, We know you know what you¡¯re doing but none of us know what you were doing. Please also be descriptive in what we¡¯re looking at. Pretty pictures don¡¯t do much without context. Write the
By Dude · #1531 ·
Re: FW: [XRF] 59.5keV spectrum cleanup
Not a bad trial for a quicky. The ratio of 59.5 to the lows really changed. Needs tweaking this end.
By GEOelectronics@... · #1530 ·
Re: 59.5keV spectrum cleanup
Good info, I can try those K-edge filters, will report back. To: [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 2:00:57 PM Subject: Re: FW: [XRF] 59.5keV spectrum cleanup Geo, These Am and
By GEOelectronics@... · #1529 ·
Re: FW: [XRF] 59.5keV spectrum cleanup
Geo, These Am and Np peaks are monochromatic having discrete energies not the broad bremsstrahlung you get from a X-ray tube. The tube¡¯s characteristic lines are also monochromatic. The issue is
By Dude · #1528 ·
Re: Am-241 Calibration UPDATE.
On the loss of low end excitation, we may find the 13.95 17.75 etc. are really HELPING dig out the low energies, So any metal filter will be experimental and removable until we know for sure. Geo
By GEOelectronics@... · #1527 ·
Re: Am-241 Calibration UPDATE.
Fine on the lighting setup. Lots of new lighting tech out there now. I have a dual fiberoptic illuminator for the microscope- need to press that into service for camera pictures too. The President
By GEOelectronics@... · #1526 ·
Re: Am-241 Calibration UPDATE.
Ok, so you are blocking the alphas coming from Am241 so they can't excite the target, right? But doesn't that also block the lower energy xrays we would like to detect coming from the target? It is
By Charles David Young · #1525 ·
Re: Am-241 Calibration UPDATE.
See pic of normal interfering 2 keV peak (black outline) vs Red Filled=Alpha Blocked. Is that a 2 or 3 light setup? I see 2 sidelights but can tell if there is a toplight. Geo
By GEOelectronics@... · #1524 ·
Re: Am-241 Calibration UPDATE.
Charles, If you use the Amptek DPPmca program to look at the data you¡¯ll see that the peak falls right on the Au Ma1 2.12 line. The problem here is using Theremino and its ridiculous calibration
By Dude · #1523 ·
Re: Am-241 Calibration UPDATE.
See attached. What are you trying to prove with the alpha block? Yes, between lighting and a new camera I can now get decent photos of my specimens. Charles
By Charles David Young · #1522 ·
Re: Am-241 Calibration UPDATE.
Here's the half way through scan. Check it out (very low end) if you have a minute Charles- .mcaq attached and- HEY you built a light box for photography on Mindat (right?) Great looking non specular
By GEOelectronics@... · #1521 ·
Re: Am-241 Calibration UPDATE.
" Geo, have you done something specific to get such a distinct peak at 2keV? Charles" No, Usually it proves to be ionized air, due to the exciter. Notably Argon. Sometimes it's seems to be a
By GEOelectronics@... · #1520 ·
Re: Am-241 Calibration UPDATE.
I think the lowest peak could be Au or Zr or both (see attachment). I have never been able to reliably get peaks to calibrate at 2keV so this scan is of some interest to me. Geo, have you done
By Charles David Young · #1519 ·
Am-241 Calibration UPDATE.
New scans showing the correct peaks. Discussion/corrections invited. Geo
By GEOelectronics@... · #1518 ·
Re: FW: [XRF] 59.5keV spectrum cleanup
We're using the same chart, just drawn differently. Here's the NIST standard chart that I marked up. The filters you refer to a K-edge filters, what I'm doing is above the K-edge. In radio-electronic
By GEOelectronics@... · #1517 ·
Re: FW: [XRF] 59.5keV spectrum cleanup
" The x-ray tube has a broad energy range while you have a monochromatic source." Something is not right here Dud. We WANT a monoenergetic source, we don't HAVE a monoenergetic source. That's the
By GEOelectronics@... · #1516 ·
Re: FW: [XRF] 59.5keV spectrum cleanup
Geo, Actually this is for knocking down broad energy x-rays so the skin doesn¡¯t get burned and you get a good x-ray by passing portions of the higher energy through to the target. The x-ray tube
By Dude · #1515 ·
Re: FW: [XRF] 59.5keV spectrum cleanup
" Geo, I don¡¯t see how normalizing accounts for flux?" In X-Ray jargon, what I'm doing is applying a "hardening filter" to the X-Ray beam from the exciter. In this case the exciter is a
By GEOelectronics@... · #1514 ·