Does anyone know what the maximum rear tire width can be without complications? I would like to upgrade to a 140 or 150 if possible.
Thanks
|
Widest I've seen so far is a 130. Anybody seen larger? Why would you be going with a wider tire?
Jake
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "bushido47" <bushido47@...>
Does anyone know what the maximum rear tire width can be without complications? I would like to upgrade to a 140 or 150 if possible.
Thanks
|
I'm not sure I would call that an upgrade unless you are just going for a custom look. I went the other way with my new rear, a 120/80. Call me crazy but I think it handles better at slow speeds with the narrower tire. And yes, I like the look better.
Leonard
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
--- In W650riders@..., "bushido47" <bushido47@...> wrote: Does anyone know what the maximum rear tire width can be without complications? I would like to upgrade to a 140 or 150 if possible.
Thanks
|
?
I would hesitate to put a 120/80 on. These bikes
are prone to sitting down at the rear and a 120/80 will lower the back more than
the stock 130/80.
?
The tyre you want is a 120/90...slightly
taller.
?
Either tyre will improve low speed handling because
the rolling radius is closer to the front tyre's.
?
Putting a fat rear tyre on will simply bugger up
the handling. It will feel wierd tipping into bends because the rear radius is
so much bigger than the front's, it'll have significantly LESS
grip, especially in the wet, because the LARGER contact patch will have less
pressure ( weight) per square inch...And it'll look stupid, like someone fitted
a big rear tyre to pretend they have a really powerful engine and never go round
corners. ...:-)
?
Jon
?
?
> I'm not sure I would call that an upgrade unless you are just going
for > a custom look.? I went the other way with my new rear, a
120/80.? Call > me crazy but I think it handles better at slow
speeds with the narrower > tire.? And yes, I like the look
better. > > Leonard > > --- In W650riders@...,
"bushido47" wrote: >> >> Does anyone
know what the maximum rear tire width can be without >>
complications?? I would like to upgrade to a 140 or 150 if
possible. >> >> Thanks >> > > >
> > Go to temporary photos site - :: >
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: > Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to
resume email delivery. > Yahoo! Groups Links > > <*>
To visit your group on the web, go to: >??? > > <*> Your email settings: >???
Individual Email | Traditional > > <*> To change settings
online go to: >??? >??? (Yahoo! ID required) > >
<*> To change settings via email: >??? mailto:W650riders-digest@... >??? mailto:W650riders-fullfeatured@...> > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send
an email to: >??? W650riders-unsubscribe@...> > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to: >??? >? > > > -- > No virus found in this
incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.476
/ Virus Database: 269.9.14/880 - Release Date: 29/06/2007 14:15 >
>
|
You should know that a wider tire than the stock 130 will slow lean over, so this isn't a performance "upgrade", it will mostly be an appearance change..and the older bikes had skinnier tires than our 130s though, so you are going to change that nostalgic look. Sport bikes don't have fat tires to get more traction, the compound their tire is made of gives them the traction..the wider tire gives more surface area which helps dissapate heat. Sport bikes compensate for the additional weight and resistance to lean by using shorter rims, typically 17 inch rims, although 16s were popular front rim size in the 80s. A wider tire will most likely require a wider rim as well. James Franklin 2411 Pine Summit DR. E Jacksonville, Florida 32211 808-225-0994 (cell) From: "bushido47" <bushido47@...> Reply-To: W650riders@... To: W650riders@... Subject: [W650riders] Rear tire width question Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 06:23:04 -0000
Does anyone know what the maximum rear tire width can be without complications? I would like to upgrade to a 140 or 150 if possible.
Thanks
_________________________________________________________________ PC Magazines 2007 editors choice for best Web mailaward-winning Windows Live Hotmail.
|
Why would a 120/80 lower the bike more than the stock 130/80? Isn't the 120/130 designating the width only? If they're both 80s they should be the same height. As far as putting a 90 on the rear come closer to the rolling radius of the front, why not put a lower height tire on the front to come closer to the rolling radius of the rear? --- In W650riders@..., "Jonhaddock@..." <jonhaddock@...> wrote:
I would hesitate to put a 120/80 on. These bikes are prone to
sitting down at the rear and a 120/80 will lower the back more than the stock 130/80. The tyre you want is a 120/90...slightly taller.
Either tyre will improve low speed handling because the rolling
radius is closer to the front tyre's. Putting a fat rear tyre on will simply bugger up the handling. It
will feel wierd tipping into bends because the rear radius is so much bigger than the front's, it'll have significantly LESS grip, especially in the wet, because the LARGER contact patch will have less pressure ( weight) per square inch...And it'll look stupid, like someone fitted a big rear tyre to pretend they have a really powerful engine and never go round corners. ...:-) Jon
I'm not sure I would call that an upgrade unless you are just
going for a custom look. I went the other way with my new rear, a 120/80.
Call me crazy but I think it handles better at slow speeds with the
narrower tire. And yes, I like the look better.
Leonard
--- In W650riders@..., "bushido47" <bushido47@> wrote:
Does anyone know what the maximum rear tire width can be without complications? I would like to upgrade to a 140 or 150 if possible.
Thanks
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email
delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email
delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/880 - Release Date:
29/06/2007 14:15
|
Ed
?
The "80" part is the percentage of the width (the 120 or 130
part). So, 80% of 120 is less than 80% of 130, so you get a less tall tire with
a 120/80.
?
Dennis
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 9:33
AM
Subject: [W650riders] Re: Rear tire width
question
Why would a 120/80 lower the bike more than the stock 130/80? Isn't the
120/130 designating the width only? If they're both 80s they should be the
same height. As far as putting a 90 on the rear come closer to the rolling
radius of the front, why not put a lower height tire on the front to come
closer to the rolling radius of the
rear?
.
|
Is the 120/90 as close to the 4.00/!* you use such
as to make no difference?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 5:54
AM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Rear tire
width question
?
I would hesitate to put a 120/80 on. These bikes
are prone to sitting down at the rear and a 120/80 will lower the back more
than the stock 130/80.
?
The tyre you want is a 120/90...slightly
taller.
?
Either tyre will improve low speed handling
because the rolling radius is closer to the front tyre's.
?
Putting a fat rear tyre on will simply bugger up
the handling. It will feel wierd tipping into bends because the rear radius is
so much bigger than the front's, it'll have significantly
LESS grip, especially in the wet, because the LARGER contact
patch will have less pressure ( weight) per square inch...And it'll look
stupid, like someone fitted a big rear tyre to pretend they have a really
powerful engine and never go round corners. ...:-)
?
Jon
?
?
> I'm not sure I would call that an upgrade unless you are just
going for > a custom look.? I went the other way with my new rear,
a 120/80.? Call > me crazy but I think it handles better at slow
speeds with the narrower > tire.? And yes, I like the look
better. > > Leonard > > --- In W650riders@...,
"bushido47" wrote: >> >> Does anyone
know what the maximum rear tire width can be without >>
complications?? I would like to upgrade to a 140 or 150 if
possible. >> >> Thanks >> > >
> > > Go to temporary photos site - :: >
Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to
stop email delivery. :: > Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to
resume email delivery. > Yahoo! Groups Links > > <*>
To visit your group on the web, go to: >??? > > <*> Your email
settings: >??? Individual Email | Traditional >
> <*> To change settings online go to: >???
>??? (Yahoo! ID required) > >
<*> To change settings via email: >??? mailto:W650riders-digest@... >??? mailto:W650riders-fullfeatured@... > > <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send
an email to: >??? W650riders-unsubscribe@... > > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to: >??? >? > > > -- > No virus found in this
incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version:
7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/880 - Release Date: 29/06/2007
14:15 > >
|
Thanks for that info Dennis. Stock 130/80 sidewall height = 104mm 100/90 sidewall height = 90mm So with a 14mm sidewall height difference x 2 as there are two sidewalls in the diameter) the rear has 28mm or one inch taller overall sidewall height than the front tire. So the stock 100/90 19 and the stock 130/80 18 fully assembled and inflated are actually the same size. If this is true then why go to a 120/90 rear and upset the balance? --- In W650riders@..., "Dennis J. Guggemos" <djguggms@...> wrote: Ed
The "80" part is the percentage of the width (the 120 or 130 part).
So, 80% of 120 is less than 80% of 130, so you get a less tall tire with a 120/80. Dennis
----- Original Message ----- From: ed_massey To: W650riders@... Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 9:33 AM Subject: [W650riders] Re: Rear tire width question
Why would a 120/80 lower the bike more than the stock 130/80? Isn't the 120/130 designating the width only? If they're both 80s they should be the same height. As far as putting a 90 on the rear come closer to the rolling radius of the front, why not put a lower height tire on the front to come closer to the rolling radius of the rear? Recent Activity a.. 12New Members b.. 2New Photos Visit Your Group SPONSORED LINKS a.. Kawasaki w650 b.. Recreation c.. Outdoor recreation d.. Recreation equipment e.. Recreation vehicles Health Zone Look your best!
Groups to help you
look & feel great.
Yahoo! News Odd News
You won't believe
it, but it's true
Official Samsung Yahoo! Group for
supporting your
HDTVs and devices. .
|
No...the '80' is a percentage of the other figure so a 120/80 is 80% of 120 mm which is 96 mm...Or 9.6 cms tall. The 120/90 is 108mm or 10.8 cms tall and the 130/80 is 10.5 cms. The 120/90 is 1.2 cms, or half an inch taller...And when we are talking about the weave occurring somewhere within the 4" of rear end travel, half an inch is significant...even that 3mm between the 120/90 and the 130/80 seems to make a difference!
It's not the '90' bit that is the rolling radius, but the 120. The rear tyre is 120mm wide, the front is 100mm wide so the 120 is 20mm, or 2cms wider than the front whereas the 130 is, yup, you guessed it, 30mm wider. Getting the tyre widths similar helps the bike roll smoothly over
Jon
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message ----- From: "ed_massey" <emassey@...> To: <W650riders@...> Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 5:33 PM Subject: [W650riders] Re: Rear tire width question Why would a 120/80 lower the bike more than the stock 130/80? Isn't the 120/130 designating the width only? If they're both 80s they should be the same height. As far as putting a 90 on the rear come closer to the rolling radius of the front, why not put a lower height tire on the front to come closer to the rolling radius of the rear?
--- In W650riders@..., "Jonhaddock@..." <jonhaddock@...> wrote:
I would hesitate to put a 120/80 on. These bikes are prone to sitting down at the rear and a 120/80 will lower the back more than the stock 130/80.
The tyre you want is a 120/90...slightly taller.
Either tyre will improve low speed handling because the rolling radius is closer to the front tyre's.
Putting a fat rear tyre on will simply bugger up the handling. It will feel wierd tipping into bends because the rear radius is so much bigger than the front's, it'll have significantly LESS grip, especially in the wet, because the LARGER contact patch will have less pressure ( weight) per square inch...And it'll look stupid, like someone fitted a big rear tyre to pretend they have a really powerful engine and never go round corners. ...:-)
Jon
I'm not sure I would call that an upgrade unless you are just going for
a custom look. I went the other way with my new rear, a 120/80. Call
me crazy but I think it handles better at slow speeds with the narrower
tire. And yes, I like the look better.
Leonard
--- In W650riders@..., "bushido47" <bushido47@> wrote:
Does anyone know what the maximum rear tire width can be without complications? I would like to upgrade to a 140 or 150 if possible.
Thanks
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. ::
Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery.
Yahoo! Groups Links
-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/880 - Release Date: 29/06/2007 14:15
Go to temporary photos site - :: Send an email to W650riders-nomail@... to stop email delivery. :: Send an email to W650riders-normal@... to resume email delivery. Yahoo! Groups Links
-- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/880 - Release Date: 29/06/2007 14:15
|
?
The 120 is taller actually. The 120/90 is 12cms
wide and 10.8 cms tall. The 4.00/18 is 4 inches ( 10.2cms) wide and 4 inches (
10.2cms) tall. I traded height for fast turning. It's also ?10 cheaper!
Is the 120/90 as close to the 4.00/!* you use
such as to make no difference?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 5:54
AM
Subject: Re: [W650riders] Re: Rear tire
width question
?
I would hesitate to put a 120/80 on. These
bikes are prone to sitting down at the rear and a 120/80 will lower the back
more than the stock 130/80.
?
The tyre you want is a 120/90...slightly
taller.
?
Either tyre will improve low speed handling
because the rolling radius is closer to the front tyre's.
?
Putting a fat rear tyre on will simply bugger
up the handling. It will feel wierd tipping into bends because the rear
radius is so much bigger than the front's, it'll have significantly
LESS grip, especially in the wet, because the LARGER
contact patch will have less pressure ( weight) per square inch...And it'll
look stupid, like someone fitted a big rear tyre to pretend they have a
really powerful engine and never go round corners. ...:-)
?
Jon
?
?
> I'm not sure I would call that an upgrade unless you are just
going for > a custom look.? I went the other way with my new
rear, a 120/80.? Call > me crazy but I think it handles better
at slow speeds with the narrower > tire.? And yes, I like the
look better. > > Leonard > > --- In W650riders@...,
"bushido47" <bushido47@...> wrote: >> >> Does anyone
know what the maximum rear tire width can be without >>
complications?? I would like to upgrade to a 140 or 150 if
possible. >> >> Thanks >> > >
> > > Go to temporary photos site -
:: > Send an email to W650riders-nomail@...
to stop email delivery. :: > Send an email to W650riders-normal@...
to resume email delivery. > Yahoo! Groups Links > >
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: >???
> > <*> Your email
settings: >??? Individual Email | Traditional >
> <*> To change settings online go
to: >??? >??? (Yahoo! ID required) >
> <*> To change settings via email: >???
mailto:W650riders-digest@... >??? mailto:W650riders-fullfeatured@... > > <*> To unsubscribe from this group,
send an email to: >??? W650riders-unsubscribe@... > > <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to: >??? >? > > > -- > No virus found in
this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. >
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/880 - Release Date: 29/06/2007
14:15 > >
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free
Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/880 - Release Date:
29/06/2007 14:15
|
Actually Jon is better at sorting this, as he did
post.
?
Dennis
?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 12:09
PM
Subject: [W650riders] Re: Rear tire width
question
Thanks for that info Dennis. Stock 130/80 sidewall height =
104mm 100/90 sidewall height = 90mm So with a 14mm sidewall height
difference x 2 as there are two sidewalls in the diameter) the rear has
28mm or one inch taller overall sidewall height than the front tire. So the
stock 100/90 19 and the stock 130/80 18 fully assembled and inflated are
actually the same size. If this is true then why go to a 120/90 rear and
upset the balance?
.
|
?
They are not the same size. The rear tyre is 30
mm wider.
?
There are two issues here. The height issue is
to do with handling, the width issue to do with matching radii. The 120/90 is
slightly taller than the 130, which is good for high speed stability and
secure handling. The 120 is also not as wide as the 'picked for fashion looks'
130 and so is nearer to the 100 front. The front is also a 90 profile so has a
similar curve to the 120/90. The 80's are a shallower side to side
radius.
?
Jon
?
Actually Jon is better at sorting this, as he did
post.
?
Dennis
?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 12:09
PM
Subject: [W650riders] Re: Rear tire
width question
Thanks for that info Dennis. Stock 130/80 sidewall height =
104mm 100/90 sidewall height = 90mm So with a 14mm sidewall height
difference x 2 as there are two sidewalls in the diameter) the rear has
28mm or one inch taller overall sidewall height than the front tire. So
the stock 100/90 19 and the stock 130/80 18 fully assembled and inflated
are actually the same size. If this is true then why go to a 120/90 rear
and upset the balance?
.
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free
Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/880 - Release Date:
29/06/2007 14:15
|
Thanks everyone, for all the info. I am a former Harley guy who has recently converted to the cult of cafe racer. About wanting a wider rear tire... I guess old habits die hard. You have a wonderfuly responsive community here. Thanks again, --- In W650riders@..., "Jonhaddock@..." <jonhaddock@...> wrote:
They are not the same size. The rear tyre is 30 mm wider.
There are two issues here. The height issue is to do with
handling, the width issue to do with matching radii. The 120/90 is slightly taller than the 130, which is good for high speed stability and secure handling. The 120 is also not as wide as the 'picked for fashion looks' 130 and so is nearer to the 100 front. The front is also a 90 profile so has a similar curve to the 120/90. The 80's are a shallower side to side radius. Jon
Actually Jon is better at sorting this, as he did post.
Dennis
----- Original Message ----- From: ed_massey To: W650riders@... Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2007 12:09 PM Subject: [W650riders] Re: Rear tire width question
Thanks for that info Dennis. Stock 130/80 sidewall height = 104mm 100/90 sidewall height = 90mm So with a 14mm sidewall height difference x 2 as there are two sidewalls in the diameter) the rear has 28mm or one inch taller overall sidewall height than the front tire. So the stock
100/90 19 and the stock 130/80 18 fully assembled and inflated are actually the same size. If this is true then why go to a 120/90 rear and upset the balance?
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.14/880 - Release Date:
29/06/2007 14:15
|