Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- VARA-MODEM
- Messages
Search
Re: Vara HF security encryption
Yep, you're?right.? ?Duh on me. Lloyd KO4L? On Sat, Jul 8, 2023, 4:18 PM Ed via <k7aat=[email protected]> wrote: From the responses I see here it looks like many are overlooking that the Original Poster was in New Zealand. ?.... ?not subject to FCC regulations... |
Re: Vara HF security encryption
det
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThe use of VarAC for NGO emergency response is allowed correct?EMCOMM for NGO¡¯s. LMR extensions .. Radio Over IP (ROIP) and also patching from LMR to HF or VHF/UHF amateur bands I believe is allowed during emergencies? Supporting say the Hurricane response into the US Virgin Islands, BVI, Parishes of LA etc. Thoughts? David E. Theriault KO4KHB On Jul 8, 2023, at 1:21 PM, Lloyd Mitchell <lmitchell@...> wrote:
|
Re: Digirig /vara fm
Hi Paul,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I found that although I could connect to one or two gateways with the Baofeng, I could connect to several more with a 50W mobile radio.? Some of the gateways were particularly challenging to connect to with a HT. Are you able to ¡®Ping¡¯ the gateway you are trying to reach? That gives you a kind of connection score. Hearing the audio out is half the battle. Brian NT6DX One? On Friday, July 7, 2023, Paul J Buchanan <Paulbuchanan51@...> wrote:
I have my digirig configured to my laptop which is running Winlink express. The digirig is connected to my Bofang. I am allure able to send code to my bofang and it is keying through ptt, the red light comes on.? I also have my main radio set to the fm frequency and I can hear the tone on it from the bofang. The problem is I am unable to connect to the repeater .? |
Re: Vara HF security encryption
Wes, normally any use of HF using VaraHF or any other scheme (pactor? etc) would be done via licenses issued by FEMA as a licensee of the SHARES network.? ?I suggest you ask your state Emergency Management Organization about it.? Vara HF and Vara FM would be used primarily by Amateur Radio licensees. With VARA HF just recently authorized for SHARES stations on federal Government Frequencies.? SHARES is a different service from Amateur.? ?Hope this helps Lloyd KO4L? On Sat, Jul 8, 2023, 1:36 PM Wes WB7BR <wesbflyer@...> wrote: Still unclear is how anyone will be able to use VaraHF on PLMR stations, as it seems Part 90 does not allow that mode.? |
Re: Vara HF security encryption
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýOn 7/8/2023 1:16 PM, Wes WB7BR wrote:
I am interested in EMCOMM support for both private and public entities. However, I am puzzled by how to use Vara HF for the services using Private Land Mobile here in the US. That service is regulated by the FCC Part 90 regulations, and my reading of that section seems to indicate it allows SSB operation below 25 MHz for only voice, (J3E) not any data modes (J3D). Also, since the Vara package now capable of encryption is Vara HF, what equipment would one use for operation on PLM frequencies? It would need to be certified to Part 90 standards, I believe. Also, it seems the operation of a base station would require careful coordination with controlling agencies, as frequency assignments are based on limiting coverage to a limited geographical area so as to not create interference with other licensees using the same frequency in other areas. How would one go about getting all these conditions satisfied? ? What sort of Private Land Mobile operations use HF/SSB???
Normally, land mobile, either private/commercial, or public
safety, use VHF/UHF or 800/900 MHz frequencies. Given that today virtually all LMR activity today uses digital
modulations like P25, DMR, TETRA, NXDEN, etc due to FCC
narrow-banding mandate a decade ago,?? external AUDIO-based
digimodes like VARA wouldn't work anyway.? With these digital
radio formats, you can't just stuff audio tones from an interface
or TNC into the radio's mic jack. ??
VHF/UHF propagation is relatively constant, making co-channel
coordination predictable and practical,? On the other hand, the
ever-changing and often unpredictable hour-to-hour and day-to-day
long-range propagation on HF makes this kind of co-channel
coordination almost pointless.
Stephen H. Smith??? wa8lmf (at) aol.com Skype:??????? WA8LMF EchoLink:? Node #? 14400? [Think bottom of the 2-meter band] Home Page:????????? -- APRS over FLdigi Modes? -- ?? 60-Meter APRS!?? HF NVIS APRS Igate Now Operating ?? Flying Digipeater! ?? 11 Copies of UIview in Action on One Computer! ? Live Off-The-Air APRS Activity Maps ??
|
Re: Vara HF security encryption
Thanks Roy. That fits what my years of working as a tech in the PLMR field suggested. My work was limited to VHF/UHF installations, but the regs where pretty tight. I suspect the reality is that those discussing this topic here are actually providing technical support to the agency at agency installed stations. Not trying to get their own station set up to participate.
-- VY 73, Wes WB7BR |
Re: Vara HF security encryption
Hi Wes,
That all is controlled by the licensed entity and their license.? You would not have equipment that could operate on their licensed frequencies without their permission.? The license specifies modes, frequencies, areas of coverage, locations and number of authorized devices. -- Roy Dugger, KD6R |
Re: Vara HF security encryption
I am interested in EMCOMM support for both private and public entities. However, I am puzzled by how to use Vara HF for the services using Private Land Mobile here in the US. That service is regulated by the FCC Part 90 regulations, and my reading of that section seems to indicate it allows SSB operation below 25 MHz for only voice, (J3E) not any data modes (J3D). Also, since the Vara package now capable of encryption is Vara HF, what equipment would one use for operation on PLM frequencies? It would need to be certified to Part 90 standards, I believe. Also, it seems the operation of a base station would require careful coordination with controlling agencies, as frequency assignments are based on limiting coverage to a limited geographical area so as to not create interference with other licensees using the same frequency in other areas. How would one go about getting all these conditions satisfied?
-- VY 73, Wes WB7BR |
Re: Revamped VARA support (by WZ0C) for JNOS 2.0
paul buchanan
I'll send your call sign tomorrow?morning,? via winlink express.? Paulbuchanan51@... KO4QWS? On Sat, Jul 8, 2023, 9:21 AM VE4KLM <maiko@...> wrote:
|
Re: Revamped VARA support (by WZ0C) for JNOS 2.0
paul buchanan
I live in Punta Gorda Florida.? It's a long way but if like to give it a try. Paulbuchanan51@... KO4QWS? On Sat, Jul 8, 2023, 9:21 AM VE4KLM <maiko@...> wrote:
|
Revamped VARA support (by WZ0C) for JNOS 2.0
VE4KLM
Good morning, Huge improvements to the VARA support in the latest JNOS 2.0, courtesy of Michael Ford (WZ9C). He is using this lately to regularly forward to a BPQ system on 6 meters. There seems to be support (or the beginnings of) for VARAC as well. This is a major revamp of the VARA code, very slick, starting to use it myself on 17m. 17m here in winnipeg is open mid mornings and mid evenings on a good day, let me know if anyone wants to try to connect, forward, or whatever. PS : JNOS 2.0 now has it's own IPV6 stack with tap to linux host Maiko / VE4KLM |
Re: Speed test
Tim and others,
When you want to use a UHF TRX with SSB and VARA-HF both STNS have to be EXACTLY on the same frequency! A difference of more than 100 Hz could be that there is no connection possible. Work around 1 When STN A press the TUNE butten (in VARA-HF), STN B can play with the RIT knob for the peak on 1500 Hz in the waterfall. After? that this proces STN B hit the TUNE button and STN A turn on the RIT knob for 1500 Hz in the waterfall. Work around 2 Me is told that another solution is to use VARA-SAT. I have no experience with this solution. The best preformance is to use VARA-FM in WIDE mode, with licence ($50?), on a FM-TRX with "9600 bd" connection. Avoid transformers in the audio interface (external soundcard) and avoid using VOX. After building (bad) audio-interfaces with problems I can advice you the next audio-interfaces: Manufacture 1: Manufacture 2: Good luck and best '73 Peter , PE1DCD |
Re: Digirig /vara fm
Paul; Have you entered your call sign in the "Winlink Express Setup..." window? A Winlink RMS Gateway station won't respond to a connection request if you haven't set up your call sign in Winlink Express. Are you selecting the Winlink RMS Gateway station you're trying to connect to from the 'Channel Selection" menu on the Winlink "Vara FM Winlink Session" window? Using VARA FM, you can do some diagnostics with either the 'Ping' tool that's available?on the menu bar on the VARA FM modem screen, or with the "Auto Tune" tool that's displayed?when you select "Settings -> SoundCard..." on the VARA FM menu bar, and then click the red "Auto-Tune" button on the right side of the "SoundCard" window. On either the "Ping" or "Auto-Tune" tool, you must enter the call sign of the station you're connecting to (shown on the "Connection" field on the??"Vara FM Winlink Session" window) into the corresponding "Ping to:" or "Calibrate with:" field, and then click the button with the power-plug icon.? When you run the "Auto-Tune" tool, VARA FM will transmit a sequence of 10 short bursts of digital data, at an increasing audio level for each step. If your transmit audio level is set properly, you'll hear all 10 bursts, at steadily increasing loudness, on your monitoring receiver. When your transmit audio level is set properly, a nearby VARA FM RMS Gateway should send a short digital data?burst, in response to either a "Ping" or an "Auto-Tune", that you'll hear in your receiver. If you're not hearing the response burst from the Winlink RMS Gateway station, it may be that the station can't "hear" your signal, or the Gateway station is "down" for some reason, or you don't have the call-sign of the Gateway station entered properly in the corresponding "Ping to:" or "Calibrate with:" field. Mark - AD7EF On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 4:35?PM paul buchanan <paul.buchanan51@...> wrote:
|