Fw: BYE ALL
By
"ken johnson" <ken@...
·
#2045
·
|
IGATEs and NoV's etc etc
I just phoned the RSGB to find out about getting an NoV for this. The nice lady said: "Oh, I don't know anything about this. Let me find the notice from the Gazette and see what it's all about and
By
Keith Maton <feek@...>
·
#2044
·
|
Re: UI-View (16) new upgrades/add-ons ??
Hi Mike, You managed to raise my few hairs to a full upright postion.... You are a selfish and unthankful let's say person. Instead of complaining you could do yourself a big favour: Switch to UI-View
By
Ferry van Eeuwen <eeuwen.ky@...>
·
#7111
·
|
Re: WIDE only digipeaters
only? The answer is YES. There are many digipeaters in use that do not support TRACE. Our local digi (G1SEH - Alias WIDLEY) only supports RELAY and WIDE. It is a stand alone TNC and has no provision
By
lawrence.hill@...
·
#2043
·
|
Re: New restrictive regulations :-(
In article <004501bf5e38$898d94c0$0600a8c0@alanw>, Alan Wallace <alan.wallace@...> writes Etc... I must apologise for being responsible for turning this list into a griping forum, and I
By
Roger Barker <roger@...
·
#2042
·
|
Re: Happy New Year
Hi from the 16 to 17 teen of us in south Sweden (Scaniaarea) that looking for the 20 in OZ land. Where are you all, we are on 144.800 on this side of the Oresund...... Can we make something together ?
By
"Rolle" <sm7wdl@...
·
#2041
·
|
Re: New restrictive regulations :-(
It seems that every time a new mode or band is proposed it becomes the subject, according to the RSGB, of a NoV. When Digital SSB becomes available, will that require a NoV? At this rate, how long
By
dave.g0dja@...
·
#2035
·
|
Re: WIDE only digipeaters
I agree that the 1st 'WIDE' would have to be at the end of the string of TRACEn-n digipeaters, but the point is that if most people set WIDEn-n as well as TRACEn-n, it will do exactly the same as
By
dave.g0dja@...
·
#2029
·
|
Re: Use of single port laptops
How come the sign became a $ sign? Was it 'finger trouble' here? This will prove it, is there a in this line and the 1st line? Sorry for the bandwidth, just seeing if it's me or Onelist :-) Cheers de
By
dave.g0dja@...
·
#2030
·
|
Re: New restrictive regulations :-(
I intend to apply to the RA for 'written permission', and not to accept any instruction to apply to the RSGB for a NoV. Perhaps others could do the same? I will do this at the same time as applying
By
dave.g0dja@...
·
#2025
·
|
Re: New restrictive regulations :-(
Oh great! OK, if that's the way the land lies, I am severing my last connections with the RSGB as of when I send an email later tonight. Experimentation? What experimentation? de Dave (G0DJA)
By
dave.g0dja@...
·
#2024
·
|
Re: New restrictive regulations :-(
A brief comment from the other side of the world on this matter. While I agree you seem to have had a highly restrictive regulation "dumped upon" your operation, what are you going to actually DO
By
"Alan Wallace" <alan.wallace@...
·
#2039
·
|
WIDE only digipeaters
Are there any WIDE only digipeaters in the UK, or even TRACE/RELAY only? I only ask because I have the feeling that most people, for most of the time, enable both their TRACEn-n and WIDEn-n digipeater
By
dave.g0dja@...
·
#2012
·
|
Re: Use of single port laptops
I'd be interested in the circuit for that system, to use with a KAM+ and my $20 GPS. I believe that most of the latest Kantronics TNCs support GPS input. I saw a 9612 for sale the other day, but it
By
dave.g0dja@...
·
#2011
·
|
Re: New restrictive regulations :-(
In article <1c.3e6530.25afbdb7@...>, G7GUO@... writes Yes, you're missing the whole history of packet / the RSGB / the RA over the past 15 years or so! The government hasn't made any rule. The
By
Roger Barker <roger@...
·
#2040
·
|
Re: New restrictive regulations :-(
In article <2000011322011970143@...>, Bob Sayers <bob.sayers@...> writes The point is that the RSGB are pushing internet connectivity down exactly the same path as they pushed
By
Roger Barker <roger@...
·
#2038
·
|
Re: Private Network access to RF
In article <000101bf5e06$ed0f97a0$72957ed4@amd450>, Karl G6ODT <g6odt@...> writes All you have to do is put suitable entries in IGATE.INI, and all your traffic from the other PCs will be gated
By
Roger Barker <roger@...
·
#2036
·
|
Re: UI-Path DX Announcment
Yes! Thanks for the mental jump start. I'll play with that for a while and see what happens. Btw...would it be "trivial" to have UI-Path create a text-file of the posit that tripped the DX alarm? I
By
Ev Tupis (W2EV) <propnet@...>
·
#2034
·
|
Re: Private Network access to RF
Hi Karl and the list, Have you thought about / tried Roger's BPQPIPE program? I use it here to access the BBS 2m port from a remote PC in a more comfortable part of the house from where the BBS PC is
By
gm0jqe@...
·
#2032
·
|
Re: New restrictive regulations :-(
Keep us posted Dave. I know when BT offer free phone calls (spring time) for set sub. a month. I want to run an IGATE Andy.
By
Andy Pritchard <apritch@...>
·
#2027
·
|