开云体育

Hi Jeff Try it again. Andy, M0CYP - Telford http://www.apritch.co.uk/uiview.htm http://www.apritch.co.uk/radioprop.htm

HI I am having a problem getting the registration for one of our Raynet Club callsigns. I was originally registered back in the day when Roger distributed them on paper. However, after a HDD

The UI-View Group is very active. Most already do so, but here are some some guidelines to follow. 1. Civility... this is practiced well by our members! 2. Sign your messages with your name and

This message is sent to all new members, and to all members every now and then. It has been revised as bounce reports have changed a bit. Any of us could experience no longer receiving email from

Matt, if you can find the time to share exactly the steps you used to get the radar images working again, I and I'm sure others would be extremely grateful. I looked on QRZ for an email but none

Correct :-) I'll post monitor logs tomorrow to show exactly what's happening. Jim ________________________________________ Sent: 13 March 2017 12:25 To: ui-view@... Subject: RE:

I also did not say the retry was UI-View. It's not, it's the T3 retry I was talking about here. I know UI-View's retry has nothing to do with it. Bob has indicated this is how it's supposed to work,

APRS ACKS every copy of a message they get, including dupes. This is because ACKS have to go via the network TWICE and have that squared lower probilibty of getting completed. If the network is

I think the extra ack that Jim is on about is the ack of the digi'd message; since B has already ack'ed the message which was received direct. I think he is querying why an ack is also sent for the

Jim G1HUL wrote... But you said below the source of the message was a T3, so UI-View's message retry interval doesn't come into it. The setting I mentioned would only affect messages originated by

In this case, wrong. Retry is set for 5 seconds, this is all happening within 2-3 seconds. A (the source) is an OpenTracker T3 B (the destination) is using UI-View C (the digi) is a KPC-3+ (running

Jim G1HUL wrote... Nope. Station A is sending the message because it didn't receive an ACK. If A keeps sending it to station B, B will keep sending an ACK each time it receives it. Assuming station

I have a situation that is generating a lot of duplicate packets. Station A sends a message to Station B, via Station C. But if Station B receives the message direct and ACK's, then receives

Keith VE7GDH..... Thanks for the hints. Turns out that I had (idiotically) put the "Filter m/250" instruction on the line entitled "text to send on connection" instead of "extra log-on text".

Bill W1WAB wrote... http://aprs.fi/?c=raw&call=W1WAB&limit=1000&view=normal What callsign-SSID are we discussing? Is it W1WAB? I can see it beaconing on RF, but it doesn't appear to be connected to

Admittedly, it has been some time since I used the APRS servers function; relying on RF TNC transmissions instead. However, in trying to setup an internet-only backup station, I failed in receiving

try this site http://www.ebay.com/p/precision-mapping-streets-and-traveler-v9/1900012942?_trksid=p2047675.l2644 ui-view@...> wrote:

thats a link too an update .exe,it is not the software. 73 gervais ________________________________ De : ui-view@... <ui-view@...> de la part de me schrege@...

I tried checking out the link and found it was not a full version. Pmap said they had no copies and to get a used copy or check eBay. I will also check out the peer file sharing. 73 Eddie

This is a totally irrelevant response. The download at the link above is only the final patch (update) for Precision Mapping. posted over three years ago. It is NOT a full version of the