Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
RF cal club?
Is there any interest here in circulating a set of RF related references? The voltnuts on EEVblog are now in the 3rd round.
A set of voltage references, resistors and a temperature and humidity logger are sent hub and spoke so that each time it's sent out it's been checked. I have in mind a set of capacitors, inductors and resistors, power meter calibrator, OXCO/GPSDO, SMA and N cal kits, etc of sufficient accuracy to calibrate common hobbyist instruments. Have Fun! Reg |
Hi Reg. I'm in. For a start, there are lots of 1ppm precision resistors here that could be put in boxes or indeed just left as they are. The 4 terminal ones are fairly large like Vishay VCS332 16R000 The two terminal ones are small like Vishay S102J. These could be popped into a jiffy bag and send around quite cheaply. My 6 1/2 digit Rigol DM3068 is just out of cal date but seems pretty stable. Other bits of kit are MSF Off air frequency standard, Fluke 335D Voltage Standard, Radiometer AFM 3 Modulation Meter, Rigol DSA832E Spectrum Analyser. Is that what you had in mind? I'm in the UK, Thetford, Norfolk. Let us know what you think. Best regards, Chris Hayes On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 16:24, Reginald Beardsley via <pulaskite=[email protected]> wrote: Is there any interest here in circulating a set of RF related references? The voltnuts on EEVblog are now in the 3rd round. |
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 9:25?PM Chris Hayes <krizhz@...> wrote:
Nice to see another UK user. I'm quite close to you, in Bedford.? I have Keithley and HP 6 1/2 digit meters but well out of cal. I have an HP53310A which aiui will give FM modulation measurements correct by design and dependent only on it's 10MHz reference.? GPSDOs are so cheap and common now that frequency references don't seem worth worrying about, but I have several GPSDOs and a Rubidium. Nothing definitive for power measurement? except out-of-cal Hameg spectrum analyser and Marconi power meter with its built-in reference.? |
Chris, It is, but I'm in the US. Resistors are easy. It's the inductors and capacitors that are hard. However, an SMD string of capacitors which can be trimmed by hand by adding a capacitor in parallel should be a pretty simple PCB layout. Have them assembled without the trimmers by JLCPCB. Measure and add the appropriate values. It's not to the standard I had in mind when I posted, but it would be a very practical way to help people self cal their kit. And with a sensitive bridge one could be circulated to cal personal versions. Have Fun Reg On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 03:25:22 PM CST, Chris Hayes <krizhz@...> wrote: Hi Reg. I'm in. For a start, there are lots of 1ppm precision resistors here that could be put in boxes or indeed just left as they are. The 4 terminal ones are fairly large like Vishay VCS332 16R000 The two terminal ones are small like Vishay S102J. These could be popped into a jiffy bag and send around quite cheaply. My 6 1/2 digit Rigol DM3068 is just out of cal date but seems pretty stable. Other bits of kit are MSF Off air frequency standard, Fluke 335D Voltage Standard, Radiometer AFM 3 Modulation Meter, Rigol DSA832E Spectrum Analyser. Is that what you had in mind? I'm in the UK, Thetford, Norfolk. Let us know what you think. Best regards, Chris Hayes On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 16:24, Reginald Beardsley via <pulaskite=[email protected]> wrote: Is there any interest here in circulating a set of RF related references? The voltnuts on EEVblog are now in the 3rd round. |
Hi Adrian, good to hear from you... especially as you are local. Maybe we need to start with a portable Voltage Standard. I made a 5 Volt ref in a box some time back but have not checked it's tempco yet. It is about 20mm thick, so it might go as a large letter.? Does your HP53310A use the vanishing carrier technique? I used to enjoy doing that manually while working at Cossor Electronics in Harlow. On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 21:39, Adrian Godwin <artgodwin@...> wrote:
|
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 9:55?PM Chris Hayes <krizhz@...> wrote:
Sounds interesting. I have a few LM399s but not done the work to make a transfer standard. But it would be very good to get a UK cal group together, for both DC and the stuff Reg is talking about. ?
No, it's a very high speed counter that measures the carrier frequency at modulation speed (and then displays a graph of frequency against time with min/max measurements). So it's an absolute measurement of frequency change rather than a calibrated demodulator (or, I guess, a mathematical technique as I imagine the vanishing carrier to be). |
On Monday 18 December 2023, Adrian Godwin <artgodwin@...> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 9:55?PM Chris Hayes <krizhz@...> wrote: >> >> Hi Adrian, good to hear from you... especially as you are local. >> Maybe we need to start with a portable Voltage Standard. I made a 5 Volt ref in a box some time back but have not checked it's tempco yet. It is about 20mm thick, so it might go as a large letter.? > > Sounds interesting. I have a few LM399s but not done the work to make a transfer standard. But it would be very good to get a UK cal group together, for both DC and the stuff Reg is talking about. > ? >> >> Does your HP53310A use the vanishing carrier technique? I used to enjoy doing that manually while working at Cossor Electronics in Harlow. > > No, it's a very high speed counter that measures the carrier frequency at modulation speed (and then displays a graph of frequency against time with min/max measurements). So it's an absolute measurement of frequency change rather than a calibrated demodulator (or, I guess, a mathematical technique as I imagine the vanishing carrier to be). > The Time Interval Analyser has other tricks up its sleeve, e.g. measuring subnanosecond risetimes. In Brizzle, I have a small selection of resistance standards that are meant to be in oil baths, a couple of Sullivan mica capacitors, a well aged Trancell II transfer voltage reference, a Cropico voltage standard, an in-spec Weston standard cell thermometer (sic), a Julie Labs 7decade KVD. I wonder if there is scope for a big meeting somewhere central, rather than trusting items to the post? |
May I suggest ordering some of these from JCLPCB? https://oshpark.com/shared_projects/PzvtIxv4 I have 3x of these: https://oshpark.com/shared_projects/DMMaC4j1 which Jason sent me. I also have 10x more used LM399s for which I'll use the first cited design. The 3x basic LM399s and 3x AD584s are mounted awaiting a decision on where to put 3x LM317s for the cleanest wiring to the 4492A on my 3457A for long term data collection. You've inspired another thread. Have Fun! Reg On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 04:46:56 PM CST, Adrian Godwin <artgodwin@...> wrote: On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 9:55?PM Chris Hayes <krizhz@...> wrote:
Sounds interesting. I have a few LM399s but not done the work to make a transfer standard. But it would be very good to get a UK cal group together, for both DC and the stuff Reg is talking about. ?
No, it's a very high speed counter that measures the carrier frequency at modulation speed (and then displays a graph of frequency against time with min/max measurements). So it's an absolute measurement of frequency change rather than a calibrated demodulator (or, I guess, a mathematical technique as I imagine the vanishing carrier to be). |
Tom et al, May I suggest to arrange a meeting room at a restaurant or hotel for a day once a year and everyone bring their cal standards. With a strong turnout, NPL might do the honors. Such an event is impossible (at least for me) in the US because of distance, but in the UK a pair of such weekend events, one north and one south, would help a lot of people. Have Fun! Reg On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 05:27:30 PM CST, Tom Gardner <tggzzz@...> wrote: [snip] I wonder if there is scope for a big meeting somewhere central, rather than trusting items to the post? |
We've wondered before about getting some standards (hired or borrowed) at EMF Camp The thought from the camp organisers was that hiring wouldn't be justified by the usage (and tbh, a camping event isn't the best place to compare precision standards!) but I think they'd do their best to support a meeting if it wasn't unreasonably expensive.? Better still might be to ask NPL at one of their regular open days to provide access to some high-end? equipment but they might be wary of creating something that might be swamped by some fringe trade sellers. The BATC (amateur TV) group used to get an array of expensive RF test gear at their annual conference but I don't know if they still do that.? ? I do think that although individually we might have only one or two useful instruments, when working together we could put up quite an array. I'm not at all sure what sort of precision we could get to though with perhaps poor climate control and limited time for settling and careful testing. On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:50?PM Reginald Beardsley via <pulaskite=[email protected]> wrote:
|
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHere in New England we are blessed to have the nice folks from R&S come with their latest high end test equipment to our Microwave Update conference and its Northeast equivalent so we can all test the goodies we bought at the conference. I usually bring a set of my well dated HP gear for the 'also rans' to test with and relieve some of the pressure on the R&S folks. Perhaps folks could also bring standards. A well settled GPSDO would be easy enough, some other standards would also be nice to have.? Maybe the Cesium and Rubidium standards as well. Would be a delight to see a bank of counters all running against a single standard for two days of the conference for example. Bob On 12/18/23 6:50 PM, Reginald Beardsley
via groups.io wrote:
|
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýMeant to add I can probably provide SMA and N SOL near metrology grade cal kits that have had the cal data/factors lost. If someone wanted to cal them against a know good get to get the data, that might be a great addition. Bob On 12/18/23 11:24 AM, Reginald
Beardsley via groups.io wrote:
Is there any interest here in circulating a set of RF related references? The voltnuts on EEVblog are now in the 3rd round. A set of voltage references, resistors and a temperature and humidity logger are sent hub and spoke so that each time it's sent out it's been checked. I have in mind a set of capacitors, inductors and resistors, power meter calibrator, OXCO/GPSDO, SMA and N cal kits, etc of sufficient accuracy to calibrate common hobbyist instruments. Have Fun! Reg |
I'd like to suggest an EMF camp project. Create a PCB with a set of SMD binary step capacitor pairs such that the preceding 2 can be paralleled to adjust the next step. Have them made with the capacitance too low and space to add capacitors in parallel. Take care to account for jumper inductance. Then have the participants adjust them using a log amplifier detector and bridge. The last step is to perform absolute calibration by measuring the water temperature rise with it in shunt with a non-inductive 50 ohm load immersed in water at 2 frequencies. It won't yield specific values, but it will deliver accurate and precisely known values if the participants make the effort to match the values. Have Fun! Reg On Monday, December 18, 2023 at 06:16:51 PM CST, Adrian Godwin <artgodwin@...> wrote: We've wondered before about getting some standards (hired or borrowed) at EMF Camp The thought from the camp organisers was that hiring wouldn't be justified by the usage (and tbh, a camping event isn't the best place to compare precision standards!) but I think they'd do their best to support a meeting if it wasn't unreasonably expensive.? Better still might be to ask NPL at one of their regular open days to provide access to some high-end? equipment but they might be wary of creating something that might be swamped by some fringe trade sellers. The BATC (amateur TV) group used to get an array of expensive RF test gear at their annual conference but I don't know if they still do that.? ? I do think that although individually we might have only one or two useful instruments, when working together we could put up quite an array. I'm not at all sure what sort of precision we could get to though with perhaps poor climate control and limited time for settling and careful testing. On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:50?PM Reginald Beardsley via <pulaskite=[email protected]> wrote:
|
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýSounds good, Can it be a "sub group" --
Regards, EMAIL ADDRESS?????????? use????????? geoffsmithoz@...
Delivery /
Physical Address: Mobile:?? 0412 299 922 ? Postal Address:
I
acknowledge the Gadigal
people of the Eora nation In the absence of justice, what is
sovereignty
but organized robbery?? St. Augustine |
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 01:25, Geoffrey Smith <geoffsmithoz@...> wrote:
I don¡¯t wish to create any subgroups. Dave (group owner)? |
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHi, wifey and me would fly in.
Tam With best regards Tam HANNA -- Enjoy electronics, 3D printing and cigars? Join more than 21000 followers on my Instagram at On 2023. 12. 19. 0:50, Reginald
Beardsley via groups.io wrote:
|
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:27 PM, Tom Gardner wrote:
On Monday 18 December 2023, Adrian Godwin <artgodwin@...> wrote: In Brizzle, I have a small selection of resistance standards that are meant to be in oil baths, a couple of Sullivan mica capacitors, a well aged Trancell II transfer voltage reference, a Cropico voltage standard, an in-spec Weston standard cell thermometer (sic), a Julie Labs 7decade KVD.
|
Hey I'm up in Aberdeen, and I have access to a Fluke 8588A (8.5 DMM) as well as quite a few 6.5/7.5 DMMs. I have some old GenRad standard inductors and capacitors for low frequency stuff, as well as a range of cal and verification kits for VNAs of various/limited provenance. I don't fancy circulating my kit, but would happily bring it somewhere local for a meetup, and have checked out kit posted to me for others in the past. Would hapilly participate in a UK round robin so if someone sets it up please let me know.
|
The purpose of the "cal club" is to improve the ability to have accurate references or do accurate measurements in the RF domain
What not to include: voltage references and resistors. These are addressed by the volt nut community That leaves: L and C standards to verify calibration of LC meters.? As long as these are stable and have been measured at known temperatures and frequencies, the exact value is unimportant, as long as they cover a certain range of values Impedance standards in a 50 ohm setting with agreed interconnects to verify calibration of VNA's and local calibration standards Again, as long as these have been characterized, the actual values are less important as long as they span both the S11 smith chart and relevant S21 variants Stable and accurate RF sources at some frequencies or a calibrated wide band noise source Sources with very stable output levels covering a limited frequency range can be build and characterized enabling the level verification of SA and power meters. Maybe a wide band noise source with calibrated power level is possible? Frequency references are not useful. Unless you include a cesium clock anything you ship will be drifting for a long time after being shipped unless being shipped in a on state with strict temperature controll. GPS is probably the best way to do frequency transfer. Including a known good gpsdo may be an option but only for long term stability Phase stability standard. I'm talking about stability below a Tau of 100 s. Possibly 100 s is not feasible due to drift after shipping A very high stabily oscillator with a well characterized ADEV can be used as a reference for characterizing local reference oscillators Maybe include a calibrated wide band power meter to verify and calibrate signal sources. |
The voltage and resistance requirements for RF are adequately met by more economical standards, e.g. LM399 and some 20 ppm resistors. Crazy not to include them. The CTI OXCOs are within a few ppb in 10 minutes. FWIW Here's the spectrum of a cheap ebay diode noise source. It needs a 2nd regulator, but I'd say not bad for under $30. Very flat if you're patient enough to find the right voltage setting. Have Fun! Reg On Tuesday, December 19, 2023 at 02:37:26 PM CST, Erik Kaashoek <erik@...> wrote: The purpose of the "cal club" is to improve the ability to have accurate references or do accurate measurements in the RF domain What not to include: voltage references and resistors. These are addressed by the volt nut community That leaves: L and C standards to verify calibration of LC meters.? As long as these are stable and have been measured at known temperatures and frequencies, the exact value is unimportant, as long as they cover a certain range of values Impedance standards in a 50 ohm setting with agreed interconnects to verify calibration of VNA's and local calibration standards Again, as long as these have been characterized, the actual values are less important as long as they span both the S11 smith chart and relevant S21 variants Stable and accurate RF sources at some frequencies or a calibrated wide band noise source Sources with very stable output levels covering a limited frequency range can be build and characterized enabling the level verification of SA and power meters. Maybe a wide band noise source with calibrated power level is possible? Frequency references are not useful. Unless you include a cesium clock anything you ship will be drifting for a long time after being shipped unless being shipped in a on state with strict temperature controll. GPS is probably the best way to do frequency transfer. Including a known good gpsdo may be an option but only for long term stability Phase stability standard. I'm talking about stability below a Tau of 100 s. Possibly 100 s is not feasible due to drift after shipping A very high stabily oscillator with a well characterized ADEV can be used as a reference for characterizing local reference oscillators Maybe include a calibrated wide band power meter to verify and calibrate signal sources. |