Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- Test-Equipment-Design-Construction
- Messages
Search
Re: microphone testing
For accurate measurements the "damping" material needs to be 1/2 wavelength thick, ie 6 inches at 1kHz.
The sound source should have a reasonable frequency response and reasonably low distortion. Reasonable is context sensitive ! If you have high distortion in the sound source (likely with a moving iron transducer) then a harmonic of the the frequency you mean to measure at may con-incide with a peak in the response of the system or the microphone under test, leading to large errors in measurements. The setup in your picture will be very sensitive to small changes in geometry at higher frequencies. You can asses the repeatability of your measurements easily by performing several tests (10 would be a good starting point) and completely disconnecting and disassembling your rig between tests. In my former life making accelerometers to sell into the automotive business we called this a "Gauge Repeatability Test". Results could be very disapointing, especially with mechanical measurments. We would have done 10 tests each on at least three different test samples. The accuracy of your measurements can't be determined without some kind of reference devices. MK |
Re: Boonton 260A Q Meter / Pete Orin 260A Boonton Guru communication
开云体育Use Reply To Sender, rather than broadcasting. ? From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mikek
Sent: Tuesday, 1 November 2022 1:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] Boonton 260A Q Meter / Pete Orin 260A Boonton Guru communication ? I'm pretty sure we both thought we were having a private
exchange! :-) |
Re: Boonton 260A Q Meter / Pete Orin 260A Boonton Guru communication
开云体育Ok, I appreciate it.?We live on the end of a street at major road, we don't get many people down this far, we haven't passed out candy for 15 years. Also, not many kids in our 98 home subdivision anymore. ?I had a miniwhip antenna up for a while, Hurricane Michael knocked it down. It did pretty good as a wideband antenna. I had to knock down a noise source though. I had a bad noise making it completely unusable up and down the band. I finally traced it to an outdoor light with an infrared sensor. I put a Corcom line filter on it and cleaned it up. ? We had a lot of damage from the hurricane, so when it came to to install 5 new outdoor lights, I bought a couple brands and tested them for noise, one I bought was very rf noise free, so went back and bought 4 more. A short video comparing 100ft sloping long wire, to the miniwhip to, my 300ft beverage on the ground. ???????????????????????????????? Mikek On 10/31/2022 7:36 PM, John Kolb wrote:
--
Thanks, Mikek |
Re: Boonton 260A Q Meter / Pete Orin 260A Boonton Guru communication
Hi Mike,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Tracking number: 9500 1152 6253 2304 7149 03. Should be there Friday. Postage was $ 5.40. I also included a pair of2N3866 NPN transistors. The 2N3819's and 2N3866's are leftovers from when I was selling active antennas. Lots of traffic today with all the kids out trick or treating Main St. John On 10/31/2022 6:19 AM, Mikek wrote:
Re the FET voltmeter mod: I'm only finding the 2N5245 available from China, 10 for $10.96 plus $2.50 shipping. |
Re: Boonton 260A Q Meter / Pete Orin 260A Boonton Guru communication
While looking for something else, I found a nice copy of the FET mod in the files section under Boonton / HP
of the HP/Agilent/Keysight IO group. /g/HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment/files/HP%20%20Boonton/HP%20%20Boonton%20%20535%20for%20BRC%20260%20%20Q%20meter/Boonton_535_fet_repl.pdf -- Thanks, Mikek |
Re: microphone testing
Today's update: The setup similar to what's shown in the picture seems to work well for my purposes.
- The "speaker" is an old Shure "Controlled-Magnetic Transducer", as found in old hand mics from mobile police radios and such. It's a lot better than the 4" radio speaker. [Trivia: I looked up the Shure patent filed in 1941, and it is a "magnetic translating device", not specifically a microphone, so the patent intends for it to work in either direction.] - The distance is just a couple inches, and is not very critical. - The "damping" is currently an old rag, to reduce reflections from the bench surface. I don't think I'll bother to build a complete enclosure, since I'm not trying to do precise measurements. I'll just build a simple wood fixture to hold the pieces, with a way to adjust the adjust the position of the 2 mics. Jeff Green: I hope your ulcer issue gets resolved positively in the near future! In a couple of weeks, I'm having hernia-repair surgery (it's not real troublesome, mostly just annoying). Pete |
Re: Making a Q-meter /
Usually they are made of polypropylene as well as many pharmacy supplied pill bottles (the orangish brown ones). Sam Sam Reaves
ARS W3OHM
Owner / Moderator of: LeCroy Owners Group on Groups.io Sencore Owners Group on Groups.io Sprint Layout Group on Groups.io?? Pulsonix EDA Group on Groups.io LPKF Owners Group on Groups.io
Electronics and Mechanical Hardware Design Engineering Manager Staff Scientist Andritz Rolls Global Research Center (RETIRED) On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 2:20 PM Leon Robinson <leon-robinson@...> wrote:
|
Re: Boonton 260A Q Meter / Pete Orin 260A Boonton Guru communication
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 09:37 AM, Mikek wrote:
You probably should stick to the? MMBF-J20 because of its higher voltage.I just noticed this on the MMBF-J20 datasheet, "This device is designed primarily for low level audio" Makes me wonder how it would work at 70MHz on the 260A, not that I ever get that high, but... ? -- Thanks, Mikek |
Re: Boonton 260A Q Meter / Pete Orin 260A Boonton Guru communication
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 09:18 AM, Chuck Moore wrote:
You probably should stick to the? MMBF-J20 because of its higher voltage. ?A quick voltage divider of the 258V, 170kΩ and 22kΩ? sets the drain at 29.6V with no current through the FET. The MMBF-J20 is 40V, the MMBF-J310 is only 30V. ?I have some 2SK192A FETs in an order box from China, because I don't know of a good substitute. ?Here is the only info I can find on the 2SK192A, I want to try building the high impedance amp I posted earlier and see if it will get past 30Mhz flat, I'd like to go with the transistors in the original design, or something that would do the same job. ?I could go surface mount if the proper chips were available. ?Any ideas? ? -- Thanks, Mikek |
Re: Boonton 260A Q Meter / Pete Orin 260A Boonton Guru communication
Morning Mike After a few bad experiences buying micros on e-Bay, I use it as a last resort for silicon these days. Like you I found that the 2N5245 was obsolete. So I went looking for potential replacements.? The MMBF-J201? and the MMBF-J310 look to be potential subs. The 201 is rated for 350 mW dissipation which matches the 2N5245. The 310 is rated for 250 mW. Pete did say he pulled the 2N5245 because it was what was in his parts bin, there was nothing special about it. So my guess is either the 201 or 310 will work. The MMBF-J201 and MMBF-J310 are the current variant of the Siliconix U210 and U310 from decades past. They were popular as they allowed a common gate configuration that offered decent power gain at VHF/UHF without wanting to oscillate. Chuck
|
Re: microphone testing
开云体育Exactly. A useful approximation is that sound travels about 6 orders of magnitude more slowly than light. So, for a given frequency, audio wavelengths are a million times shorter. Or, for a given wavelength, audio frequencies are a million times lower. And the product of frequency and wavelength is 300 GHz-mm for EM waves.Tom Sent from my iThing; please forgive the typos and brevity On Oct 31, 2022, at 05:18, Brian <brianclarke01@...> wrote:
|
Re: Boonton 260A Q Meter / Pete Orin 260A Boonton Guru communication
Re the FET voltmeter mod: I'm only finding the 2N5245 available from China, 10 for $10.96 plus $2.50 shipping.
If anyone orders them, I'll slip $4 in an envelope for one, or if someone finds a replacement on DigiKey, ?I would order from there. -- Thanks, Mikek |
Re: microphone testing
开云体育Hello Anonymous, Sound travels at about 300 m/s. So, the wavelength of a 1 kHz audio signal would be closer to 300 mm. You might want to trade in your calculator for calculating the wavelength of a 9.5 GHz RF signal, too. EM waves travel at about 300 Mm/s. So, the wavelength of a 9.5 GHz signal would be 31.6 mm. See if you can get your EE professor to explain how to express weights and measures. 73 de Brian, VK2GCE ? From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff
Green
Sent: Monday, 31 October 2022 10:28 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] microphone testing ? This might be relevant:? ? I’d taking some EE classes and a professor explained how British engineers used audio to verify microwave antenna for radar. It was easier and safer to work with audio then RF. 1kHz would have a wavelength of 30mm, which would be 9.5GHz…if I’ve done the math right. I suspect it was a lot easier to produce 1kHz of audio then 9.5GHz of RF. |