¿ªÔÆÌåÓý


Building a DIY 11801 class TDR?

 

I?just?received?one?of?Leo?Bodnar's?new?LBE-1322?pulsers.??I?measured?19?ps?rise?time?for?the?1322?vs?15?ps?for?the?11801?calibrator?and?the?two?pulsers?in?my?SD-24?using?an?11801?and?40?GHz?SD-32?sampling?head?fed?through?a?2.92?to?3.5?adapter.??That?is?superb.??There?are?very?few?circuits?with?that?performance.??And?none?are?as?cheap.??Leo's?pulsers?are?a?steal.??I'm?one?of?those?who?requested?external?trigger?from?a?GPSDO.

Unfortunately,?fast?sampling?scopes?are?a?disappearing?item.??However,?Leo's?product?makes?building?a?low?cost,??functional?equivalent?of?an?11800?mainframe?&?SD-24?viable.??The?really?hard?part?is?that?step?response.?Leo's?done?that.

Based?on?list?price?for?the?existing?bits?I?think?that?a?20?GHz?single?channel?TDR?for?<$1000?is?economically?practical,?mostly?based?on?existing?COTS?products.??The?sampler?is?the?missing?piece.

If?you?have?not?used?20?GHz??level?TDR?for?connector?and?cable?testing,?you?cannot?imagine?how?useful?it?it.??It?will?catch?intermittents?that?sweeping?misses.??It?will?also?show?you?if?it's?the?connector?or?the?cable?crimp!??No??way?to?see?that?in?the?frequency?domain.

I?think?that?Leo?Bodnar?has?demonstrated?that?there?is?huge?potential?in?low?cost?<mm?TDR. Happy to work with anyone who wants to poke at the beast.

Have Fun!
Reg


Re: Extending Q Meter Terminals

 

Awesome Brian.? Thanx for all the stuff on your k6sti site.
--
-Blob


Extending Q Meter Terminals

Brian Beezley
 

I've noticed that the enclosure of my HP 4342A Q meter can seriously degrade the Q of a physically large coil. I wrote a Windows program that lets you extend the meter terminals with a parallel wire transmission line. You suspend the coil a foot or more above the enclosure, run parallel wires to the meter terminals, and record Q and capacitance. The program solves the telegraphers equation and provides the coil inductance and Q as if no transmission line were present. It uses the Getsinger equations to account for transmission line end-effects. Results for a small coil with no enclosure interaction with and without terminal extension were very close.

The program is part of the Q meter utilities listed in the middle of the following page. Another utility compensates for the Q of an auxiliary capacitor used to extend Q meter range. It calculates the Q the meter would indicate if the auxiliary capacitor had no loss. See the end of the page for downloading instructions.



Brian


Re: Measuring input impedance of transformer.

 

Thanks much for that input.
????????? Mikek


Re: Measuring input impedance of transformer.

 

Referenced paper does not include resistive core loss, therefor, incomplete.

See
"Real transformer equivalent circuit" which includes magnetizing branch.

Previous SimNEC model includes ferrite core loss, magnetizing branch,
and demonstrates your measurements are as expected.

John KN5L

On 1/16/25 5:02 PM, Mikek wrote:
I see I forgot the link in my previous post.


Re: Measuring input impedance of transformer.

 

Hi John KN5L,
?I see I forgot the link in my previous post.
?The paper has the derivation of the graph at the end.
The numbers don't quite match, and I wonder why?
Is it the Leakage inductance?
?I next plan to try a toroid and see if it gets closer to the derived curve on the graph.
???????????????????????? Mikek
?


Re: Measuring input impedance of transformer.

 

Not too far off from expected, see attached SimNEC model for 73
material, 60uH primary, 1:1 transformer,

John KN5L

On 1/16/25 2:33 PM, Mikek wrote:
1,342,000Hz??????? 48.68¦¸??????????????????? 47.1¦¸
537,000Hz????????? 46.77¦¸ ?????????????????? 46.6¦¸
400,000Hz????????? 46.77¦¸ ?????????????????? 45.8¦¸


Re: Measuring input impedance of transformer.

 

I borrowed a friends NanoVNA and ran a scan.
?
?The frequencies below, correspond to 10X, 4X, 3X, 2X, 1X.
???????????? ?? My Voltage????????????? ?? Using the
???????????? ? Divider method??????????? ?? NanoVNA
1,342,000Hz??????? 48.68¦¸??????????????????? 47.1¦¸
537,000Hz????????? 46.77¦¸ ?????????????????? 46.6¦¸
400,000Hz????????? 46.77¦¸ ?????????????????? 45.8¦¸
265,400Hz ? ? ? ?? 46.15¦¸ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?? 43.8¦¸ ???????
134,300Hz????????? 39.29¦¸??????????????????? 31.9¦¸
67,100Hz?????????? 26.14¦¸??????????????????? 16.7¦¸
?So far nothing follows the graph that is derived in this paper.
The math is beyond my ability, the graph at the end presents the result
of the math.
????????????????????????????????????? Mikek
?


Re: Measuring input impedance of transformer.

 

Morris said, "It would be interesting to plot the transformer input impedance across the frequency range with both an open and short circuited secondary."
?My interested started, because I wanted to know what Z normalized really meant, I kind of assumed the Z would drop, but I wanted to verify.
Here is the paper where I found the Z normalized graph.
A lot of math and the graph at the end.
?
?I added my results to the graph, (in Blue) to show how poorly it matches the original line.
OK, it's really not that bad, but it is consistent over multiple tests, I'm 3.5% low compared to the
only source I know that discusses the 4 percent rule.
???????????????????????????????????????? Mikek
?


Re: Measuring input impedance of transformer.

 

Hi Mike,
?
I think what you are seeing is not unusual. No transformer is perfect. The parallel magnetizing and loss current across the 50 ohms is bringing it down to 46 ohms. At the lowest frequency transformer action is failing as the core can't sustain the higher flux required so it begins to look like a short circuit. It would be interesting to plot the transformer input impedance across the frequency range with both an open and short circuited secondary. That's how we were taught to measure transformer characteristics (admittedly at power frequencies but there's no reason why it can't be done at RF).?
?
A VNA, nano or otherwise, would be very helpful in analysing this. Ditto a vector impedance meter. I'd love to duplicate your experiment but can't do it soon as my bench is totally occupied and will be for while with another project.
?
Cheers,
?
Morris
?
?


Measuring input impedance of transformer.

 

Years ago I found graph of Input Z of a transformer vs the multiple of the primary inductance to the drive impedance.
Most amateurs us a 4 time multiple, as in 50¦¸ drive, the transformer primary would require 200¦¸ at the lowest frequency of operation.
I'll post the graph at the end.
My transformer is 1 to 1 ratio, with a 2 turn primary and secondary on a BN72-202 binocular core.
I'm using a basic voltage divider circuit to measure the input impedance of the transformer. I'm on my second iteration of my test jig but have not found a great change in my numbers. My primary has a 59.3?H primary. This is 50¦¸ XL at 134,300 Hz or 1X. 4X is 200¦¸ at 537,000 Hz. You will need to recalculate these frequencies for you primary inductance.
?I have a jig as shown. A drawing describing the method and the graph showing the 4 X rule.
?
I'm a little disappointed I can not get my transformer to look like 50¦¸ with a 50¦¸ load.
At multiple of
10X I get 48.68¦¸
4X I get 46.77¦¸
3X I get 46.77¦¸ ? ?? Notice 3X and 4X are the same, I have found this consistent over about 15 tests.
2X I get 46.15¦¸
1X I get 39.29¦¸
At 0.5X I get 26.14¦¸
Can I get anyone to verify my figures?
Use any method you want, a VNA, an NanoVNA, etc.
You can also use any core you want, would be interesting to see how a toroid does.
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Mikek
?
?


Re: Service o aligment manual

 

Thank you Harold !
I'm going to have to learn to read German? ;-)
?
Saludos, Marcelo - LU2DR


Re: Service o aligment manual

 

https://elektrotanya.com/philips_pm6301_1khz_rlc_bridge_1968_sm.pdf/download.html


Re: Service o aligment manual

 

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 07:51 AM, David Holland wrote:
?
Thank you so much David !
?
Saludos, Marcelo - LU2DR
?


Re: Service o aligment manual

 



/me finds two files, but they appear to be in German, so they may (or
not) be of limited use...

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 7:30?AM Marcelo - LU2DR via groups.io
<lu2dr@...> wrote:

Hello good morning. I have a Philips PM6301 LCR meter that I need to review.
I need if someone could send me the circuit and/or the service manual or
alignment procedure.

Thank you so much.

73, Marcelo - LU2DR


Service o aligment manual

 

Hello good morning. I have a Philips PM6301 LCR meter that I need to review.?
I need if someone could send me the circuit and/or the service manual or?
alignment procedure.?
?
Thank you so much.
?
73, Marcelo - LU2DR


Re: Booton 170 and 260 Thermocouple?

 

Do you mean the 190 and 260?
Follow the instruction manual to turn on. The power switch is on the Q multiplier knob. Turn it just past the turn on point and allow the meter to warm up for a few minutes. You must have a coil connected to the coil terminals on top of the meter to get an indication on the Q multiplier meter. Connect the coil and check for zero reading. Then bring the Q multiplier knob up slowly until you get a reading. If you get a reading the thermocouple is OK. Set the meter for ! and adjust the frequency for resonance on the second meter, which indicates Q. You will need at least one standard Q coil. The meter should indicate close to the marking on the standard coil. It will have calibrations at three frequencies. The adjustment procedure requires a fairly accurate AC VTVM. The oscillator has a single frequency adjustment for all bands.
Note that the power supply uses a constant voltage transformer. These can go bad, the usual symptom is that it runs very hot. They run hot normally but can get hot enough to melt the potting material. If bad must be replaced, have to get one from a junker meter. For the most part they are quite reliable.
Note that the Q multiplier meter and thermocouple were supplied as a pair, the calibration of the meter depends on the characteristics of the meter. In general it is the older version of the Q-Meter, 160-A that is the delicate one. The 260-A can be burnt out but its rare.
Keep the coarse Q control at zero when changing bands and you won't have trouble.
Note that Q was sort of invented by Boonton. The NBS would never certify Q standards because they considered them indefinite. However, if your meter is working correctly it should give you the Q and capacitance values on the standard coils pretty closely. Make sure the frequency is set accurately, use a counter.
I have a couple of 190-A, the VHF version of the meter. AFAIK the thermocouples in them are quite rugged. Boonton made standrd coils for them but they are quite rare.
Note: Boonton made both "standard" and "working" coils. The standard coils are the ones for checking calibration. The working coils mostly have higher Q than the standards and are useful for measuring capacitors etc when you want a coil of known inductance without having to wind them.
Q-Meters are sort of forgotten instruments. IMO they are still very useful but few even know what they are.
Boonton was bought by Hewlett-Packard and the HP History site has manuals and the Boonton Notebook along with various service notes, etc. There have been a couple of replacement designs for the special tube used as the electronic voltmeter. I have one but it throws the calibration of the meter off. I have a note somewhere on what the generic tube was but they were selected and its hard to find replacements. For the most part they have extremely long lives.
Do NOT bend the plates on the main capacitor. The trimmer cap can be adjusted slightly to bring the vernier cap into calibration, again, should be calibrated using a standard coil.
Read everything available, lots of little secrets buried in the literature.

On 5/13/2024 5:44 AM, Ray, W4BYG wrote:
I have had the above Qmeters for some time, which I have not attempted to use. Is there a way to test the thermocouples to see if these units are worth trying to restore?
Your attention is appreciated.
Ray, W4BYG
--
"If you want to build a strong house, I'll give you my engineer's number.
If you want to build a strong life, I'll introduce you to my carpenter."
Lebron and Heather Lackeya
<> Virus-free.www.avg.com <>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL
SKCC 19998


Characterising an unknown thermistor

 

I acquired some 100k¦¸ 1.6mm glass bead thermistors of the type used in 3D printers for a flow soldering project, but the manufacturer¡¯s characteristics were not available. ?0¡ãC and 100¡ãC temperatures are fairly easily established at sea level with ice and water, but it would have been be messy to set up an oil bath or similar.?

A piece of 3.5mm aluminium bar approximately 23 x 15mm was drilled in two places approximately 5mm apart on the narrow edge to a depth of 15mm as pockets for the thermistor and a type K thermocouple and held by a ¡°third hand¡± clip by the wires so that hot air from a de-soldering tool could be applied safely.? The thermal mass of the bar was sufficient to allow the temperature and corresponding resistance to be measured repeatably.? The bar was heated to a number of temperatures at 20 degree intervals as indicated by the thermocouple and the resistance recorded.? On plotting out and comparison with a number of Arduino library results [1] the thermistor was found to be very close to the Type 1 characteristic.

Measurement accuracy is maybe 1-2% at 200¡ãC, good enough for my purposes, and may be useful to others.

PeterS? G8EZE

?

[1] ?? ???? The tables are expressed as counts scaled 0-1023 on a 5V ADC


Re: Booton 170 and 260 Thermocouple?

 

Well, looking at the schematic, if you get a reading on the multiply by Q meter, it would seem good. If you don't get a reading on that meter, it is not necessarily bad, it could be missing a drive signal. Schematic below to show the simple thermocouple circuit
? There is also a write up here,
It has a line, "A quick check of the heater/thermocouple assy (aluminum block under the gold plated terminals) is to measure from the BNC connector center pin to the LOW terminal, if that's open the heater/thermocouple is bad. If it's OK, measure from the LOW terminal to Ground with an AC RMS millivoltmeter (HP 3400, RCA WV-74A, Heathkit AC Voltmeter, etc). Use an oscillator frequency the voltmeter will handle (1-5Mhz for the good RF millivoltmeters, 500Khz or less for the audio millivoltmeters). The LOW terminal should measure 20mV when the XQ meter is at "X1" (1.0Amp into a .02 ohm resistor provides 20mv for reference). "


Booton 170 and 260 Thermocouple?

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I have had the above Qmeters for some time, which I have not attempted to use. Is there a way to test the thermocouples to see if these units are worth trying to restore?
Your attention is appreciated.
Ray, W4BYG
-- 
"If you want to build a strong house, I'll give you my engineer's number. 
 If you want to build a strong life, I'll introduce you to my carpenter."
  Lebron and Heather Lackey

Virus-free.