¿ªÔÆÌåÓý


Re: Making a Q-meter /

 

On Mon, 8 Aug 2022 at 12:38, nigel adams via <bristol.rell6l=[email protected]> wrote:
Marconi Instruments also made a well respected Q Meter (TF1245) along with accompanying Oscillators (TF1246 & 1247), they were not far behind Boonton in this and published their own booklets on Q Meters and principles of measurement.

Worth a look, if anyone needs to see the manuals they are on the various archive sites as well as ours.
Just my 2p worth
Regards
Nigel Adams - Marconi Instruments Heritage Collection
?
I did place a bid one of the Marconi instruments, but the highest bidder bid ?1 more than me. There's another on eBay UK, but that lacks a source, and the source is unusual as the output impedance is low.


Re: AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Then you're lucky.? If you removed any of the RTV around the memory pins (it's noted on the layout), it's used to minimize leakage from the CMOS memory.? You may want to put it back.

Harvey


On 8/8/2022 12:03 PM, dan.meeks222@... wrote:

Yes thanks, I have started the cal process and it seems to be happy.

dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Harvey White
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 10:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

The real problem with the meters is the battery damage.? Go partway through the calibration procedure (just very rough), and see if the processor will store the cal constants.? If so, you're lucky.? I have one or two that do not store the cal constants and are of little current use.? All that I have are battery damaged.? The cal procedure adjusts (IIRC) the readings down, as the meter is designed to read high without calibration.?

The high voltage needed for the AC calibration is the one real problem in calibration.? Tek recommends the 5200 series calibrator with the AC amplifier needed to get to the high voltage.? I haven't solved that problem yet, but haven't needed it since none of mine are yet working.??

Harvey

?

On 8/8/2022 11:37 AM, dan.meeks222@... wrote:

Thanks Eric ¨C yep when I got it, there was battery gom all over that part of the board. I got it up and running, but this meter, as you may know, doesn¡¯t just come up and work when the cal coefficients have been lost. It¡¯s way off, so a calibration is a must. I¡¯ll keep my eyes open for one of those Flukes.

Dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Eric
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 10:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

Be on the lookout for a fluke 5200A and if possible the 5205 amplifier. These are currently my best AC standards in the lab. Also there is known issues on the DM5010 (battery damage on the processor board) just mentioning this if this has not be checked and corrected in this unit.

?

The High AC volts on the dial a frequency is some of the hard part of doing meters. I have run in to meters that need 2 or 3 different voltage and frequency combinations to get an alignment done.

?

Eric/Zen

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of dan.meeks222@...
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 10:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

I have a DM5010 that I would love to calibrate. The difficult items in the cal procedure are 190V and 700V at 200Hz.

I have tried to string some standard 70V line audio transformers together and use an audio power amp, but it doesn¡¯t seem to like that load and it disconnects. Haven¡¯t tried anything else yet.

I have other good meters to use as my ¡°standard¡± so I am thinking I don¡¯t need a sophisticated calibrator. Not trying to get NBS traceability here, just a working meter.

I don¡¯t even really need this meter¡­ just want to complete the repair! I really should just try to sell it as-is maybe.

Thanks

Dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of tgerbic
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 4:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

I have lots of equipment to do what I would call hobby level (non-NIST) equipment calibration. Perhaps quite a few of us can say the same but I think the one area of weakness for most of us is a variable frequency, variable AC voltage source.? I have, for example, a bunch of Fluke bench multimeters I thought I would test/calibrate last year. Everything was easy till I hit the AC cal sections. An AC calibrator would be very useful to me as I have a lot of meters, many have high frequency ranges up to or beyond 1Mhz, that call for different frequencies and a wide range of voltages.

What I would expect would be a low distortion sinewave with calibrated voltages from millivolts to over 300V. Frequency might range from perhaps 10hz to 1Mhz. Not necessarily continuous frequency but a range of frequencies required by most test equipment for calibration. It would be convenient to have output voltages that were calibrated/selectable for RMS, average, peak and peak to peak to align with calibration procedures across a large variety of test equipment. This would just be selections to vary the sinewave amplitude and perhaps a peak selector. Ideally it would have a low source impedance such that on at least some ranges you could have a calibrated AC current source.?

I can think of several designs that would provide the functionality but really need to think this through and limit the features to a more targeted amount. I have done some preliminary investigations to determine what ranges and frequencies I need for most of my HP, Fluke, Heath, Instek, Simpson, and other brand multimeters.

I think this would solve a big hole in hobbyist metrology. DC voltage, DC current and resistance are pretty easy to setup on the average workbench and get pretty accurate results. Frequency is pretty easy as well with GPS disciplined oscillators. AC is harder to deal with. While equipment exists to purchase/repair, it is generally pretty expensive and may have a limited range of voltage or frequency, unless it is really expensive.? I suspect most of us end up kludging up a test setup to at least get some of the required voltages and frequencies, unfortunately skipping many combinations.

I would like to get some thoughts from others about how they do AC calibration outside of a rheostat/isolation transformer on a 50/60Hz power line, or a sinewave generator for low voltages.


Re: AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Yes thanks, I have started the cal process and it seems to be happy.

dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Harvey White
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 10:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

The real problem with the meters is the battery damage.? Go partway through the calibration procedure (just very rough), and see if the processor will store the cal constants.? If so, you're lucky.? I have one or two that do not store the cal constants and are of little current use.? All that I have are battery damaged.? The cal procedure adjusts (IIRC) the readings down, as the meter is designed to read high without calibration.?

The high voltage needed for the AC calibration is the one real problem in calibration.? Tek recommends the 5200 series calibrator with the AC amplifier needed to get to the high voltage.? I haven't solved that problem yet, but haven't needed it since none of mine are yet working.??

Harvey

?

On 8/8/2022 11:37 AM, dan.meeks222@... wrote:

Thanks Eric ¨C yep when I got it, there was battery gom all over that part of the board. I got it up and running, but this meter, as you may know, doesn¡¯t just come up and work when the cal coefficients have been lost. It¡¯s way off, so a calibration is a must. I¡¯ll keep my eyes open for one of those Flukes.

Dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Eric
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 10:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

Be on the lookout for a fluke 5200A and if possible the 5205 amplifier. These are currently my best AC standards in the lab. Also there is known issues on the DM5010 (battery damage on the processor board) just mentioning this if this has not be checked and corrected in this unit.

?

The High AC volts on the dial a frequency is some of the hard part of doing meters. I have run in to meters that need 2 or 3 different voltage and frequency combinations to get an alignment done.

?

Eric/Zen

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of dan.meeks222@...
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 10:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

I have a DM5010 that I would love to calibrate. The difficult items in the cal procedure are 190V and 700V at 200Hz.

I have tried to string some standard 70V line audio transformers together and use an audio power amp, but it doesn¡¯t seem to like that load and it disconnects. Haven¡¯t tried anything else yet.

I have other good meters to use as my ¡°standard¡± so I am thinking I don¡¯t need a sophisticated calibrator. Not trying to get NBS traceability here, just a working meter.

I don¡¯t even really need this meter¡­ just want to complete the repair! I really should just try to sell it as-is maybe.

Thanks

Dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of tgerbic
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 4:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

I have lots of equipment to do what I would call hobby level (non-NIST) equipment calibration. Perhaps quite a few of us can say the same but I think the one area of weakness for most of us is a variable frequency, variable AC voltage source.? I have, for example, a bunch of Fluke bench multimeters I thought I would test/calibrate last year. Everything was easy till I hit the AC cal sections. An AC calibrator would be very useful to me as I have a lot of meters, many have high frequency ranges up to or beyond 1Mhz, that call for different frequencies and a wide range of voltages.

What I would expect would be a low distortion sinewave with calibrated voltages from millivolts to over 300V. Frequency might range from perhaps 10hz to 1Mhz. Not necessarily continuous frequency but a range of frequencies required by most test equipment for calibration. It would be convenient to have output voltages that were calibrated/selectable for RMS, average, peak and peak to peak to align with calibration procedures across a large variety of test equipment. This would just be selections to vary the sinewave amplitude and perhaps a peak selector. Ideally it would have a low source impedance such that on at least some ranges you could have a calibrated AC current source.?

I can think of several designs that would provide the functionality but really need to think this through and limit the features to a more targeted amount. I have done some preliminary investigations to determine what ranges and frequencies I need for most of my HP, Fluke, Heath, Instek, Simpson, and other brand multimeters.

I think this would solve a big hole in hobbyist metrology. DC voltage, DC current and resistance are pretty easy to setup on the average workbench and get pretty accurate results. Frequency is pretty easy as well with GPS disciplined oscillators. AC is harder to deal with. While equipment exists to purchase/repair, it is generally pretty expensive and may have a limited range of voltage or frequency, unless it is really expensive.? I suspect most of us end up kludging up a test setup to at least get some of the required voltages and frequencies, unfortunately skipping many combinations.

I would like to get some thoughts from others about how they do AC calibration outside of a rheostat/isolation transformer on a 50/60Hz power line, or a sinewave generator for low voltages.


Re: AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

The real problem with the meters is the battery damage.? Go partway through the calibration procedure (just very rough), and see if the processor will store the cal constants.? If so, you're lucky.? I have one or two that do not store the cal constants and are of little current use.? All that I have are battery damaged.? The cal procedure adjusts (IIRC) the readings down, as the meter is designed to read high without calibration.?

The high voltage needed for the AC calibration is the one real problem in calibration.? Tek recommends the 5200 series calibrator with the AC amplifier needed to get to the high voltage.? I haven't solved that problem yet, but haven't needed it since none of mine are yet working.??

Harvey


On 8/8/2022 11:37 AM, dan.meeks222@... wrote:

Thanks Eric ¨C yep when I got it, there was battery gom all over that part of the board. I got it up and running, but this meter, as you may know, doesn¡¯t just come up and work when the cal coefficients have been lost. It¡¯s way off, so a calibration is a must. I¡¯ll keep my eyes open for one of those Flukes.

Dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Eric
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 10:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

Be on the lookout for a fluke 5200A and if possible the 5205 amplifier. These are currently my best AC standards in the lab. Also there is known issues on the DM5010 (battery damage on the processor board) just mentioning this if this has not be checked and corrected in this unit.

?

The High AC volts on the dial a frequency is some of the hard part of doing meters. I have run in to meters that need 2 or 3 different voltage and frequency combinations to get an alignment done.

?

Eric/Zen

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of dan.meeks222@...
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 10:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

I have a DM5010 that I would love to calibrate. The difficult items in the cal procedure are 190V and 700V at 200Hz.

I have tried to string some standard 70V line audio transformers together and use an audio power amp, but it doesn¡¯t seem to like that load and it disconnects. Haven¡¯t tried anything else yet.

I have other good meters to use as my ¡°standard¡± so I am thinking I don¡¯t need a sophisticated calibrator. Not trying to get NBS traceability here, just a working meter.

I don¡¯t even really need this meter¡­ just want to complete the repair! I really should just try to sell it as-is maybe.

Thanks

Dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of tgerbic
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 4:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

I have lots of equipment to do what I would call hobby level (non-NIST) equipment calibration. Perhaps quite a few of us can say the same but I think the one area of weakness for most of us is a variable frequency, variable AC voltage source.? I have, for example, a bunch of Fluke bench multimeters I thought I would test/calibrate last year. Everything was easy till I hit the AC cal sections. An AC calibrator would be very useful to me as I have a lot of meters, many have high frequency ranges up to or beyond 1Mhz, that call for different frequencies and a wide range of voltages.

What I would expect would be a low distortion sinewave with calibrated voltages from millivolts to over 300V. Frequency might range from perhaps 10hz to 1Mhz. Not necessarily continuous frequency but a range of frequencies required by most test equipment for calibration. It would be convenient to have output voltages that were calibrated/selectable for RMS, average, peak and peak to peak to align with calibration procedures across a large variety of test equipment. This would just be selections to vary the sinewave amplitude and perhaps a peak selector. Ideally it would have a low source impedance such that on at least some ranges you could have a calibrated AC current source.?

I can think of several designs that would provide the functionality but really need to think this through and limit the features to a more targeted amount. I have done some preliminary investigations to determine what ranges and frequencies I need for most of my HP, Fluke, Heath, Instek, Simpson, and other brand multimeters.

I think this would solve a big hole in hobbyist metrology. DC voltage, DC current and resistance are pretty easy to setup on the average workbench and get pretty accurate results. Frequency is pretty easy as well with GPS disciplined oscillators. AC is harder to deal with. While equipment exists to purchase/repair, it is generally pretty expensive and may have a limited range of voltage or frequency, unless it is really expensive.? I suspect most of us end up kludging up a test setup to at least get some of the required voltages and frequencies, unfortunately skipping many combinations.

I would like to get some thoughts from others about how they do AC calibration outside of a rheostat/isolation transformer on a 50/60Hz power line, or a sinewave generator for low voltages.


Re: AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Thanks Eric ¨C yep when I got it, there was battery gom all over that part of the board. I got it up and running, but this meter, as you may know, doesn¡¯t just come up and work when the cal coefficients have been lost. It¡¯s way off, so a calibration is a must. I¡¯ll keep my eyes open for one of those Flukes.

Dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Eric
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 10:25 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

Be on the lookout for a fluke 5200A and if possible the 5205 amplifier. These are currently my best AC standards in the lab. Also there is known issues on the DM5010 (battery damage on the processor board) just mentioning this if this has not be checked and corrected in this unit.

?

The High AC volts on the dial a frequency is some of the hard part of doing meters. I have run in to meters that need 2 or 3 different voltage and frequency combinations to get an alignment done.

?

Eric/Zen

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of dan.meeks222@...
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 10:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

I have a DM5010 that I would love to calibrate. The difficult items in the cal procedure are 190V and 700V at 200Hz.

I have tried to string some standard 70V line audio transformers together and use an audio power amp, but it doesn¡¯t seem to like that load and it disconnects. Haven¡¯t tried anything else yet.

I have other good meters to use as my ¡°standard¡± so I am thinking I don¡¯t need a sophisticated calibrator. Not trying to get NBS traceability here, just a working meter.

I don¡¯t even really need this meter¡­ just want to complete the repair! I really should just try to sell it as-is maybe.

Thanks

Dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of tgerbic
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 4:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

I have lots of equipment to do what I would call hobby level (non-NIST) equipment calibration. Perhaps quite a few of us can say the same but I think the one area of weakness for most of us is a variable frequency, variable AC voltage source.? I have, for example, a bunch of Fluke bench multimeters I thought I would test/calibrate last year. Everything was easy till I hit the AC cal sections. An AC calibrator would be very useful to me as I have a lot of meters, many have high frequency ranges up to or beyond 1Mhz, that call for different frequencies and a wide range of voltages.

What I would expect would be a low distortion sinewave with calibrated voltages from millivolts to over 300V. Frequency might range from perhaps 10hz to 1Mhz. Not necessarily continuous frequency but a range of frequencies required by most test equipment for calibration. It would be convenient to have output voltages that were calibrated/selectable for RMS, average, peak and peak to peak to align with calibration procedures across a large variety of test equipment. This would just be selections to vary the sinewave amplitude and perhaps a peak selector. Ideally it would have a low source impedance such that on at least some ranges you could have a calibrated AC current source.?

I can think of several designs that would provide the functionality but really need to think this through and limit the features to a more targeted amount. I have done some preliminary investigations to determine what ranges and frequencies I need for most of my HP, Fluke, Heath, Instek, Simpson, and other brand multimeters.

I think this would solve a big hole in hobbyist metrology. DC voltage, DC current and resistance are pretty easy to setup on the average workbench and get pretty accurate results. Frequency is pretty easy as well with GPS disciplined oscillators. AC is harder to deal with. While equipment exists to purchase/repair, it is generally pretty expensive and may have a limited range of voltage or frequency, unless it is really expensive.? I suspect most of us end up kludging up a test setup to at least get some of the required voltages and frequencies, unfortunately skipping many combinations.

I would like to get some thoughts from others about how they do AC calibration outside of a rheostat/isolation transformer on a 50/60Hz power line, or a sinewave generator for low voltages.


Re: AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Be on the lookout for a fluke 5200A and if possible the 5205 amplifier. These are currently my best AC standards in the lab. Also there is known issues on the DM5010 (battery damage on the processor board) just mentioning this if this has not be checked and corrected in this unit.

?

The High AC volts on the dial a frequency is some of the hard part of doing meters. I have run in to meters that need 2 or 3 different voltage and frequency combinations to get an alignment done.

?

Eric/Zen

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of dan.meeks222@...
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 10:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

I have a DM5010 that I would love to calibrate. The difficult items in the cal procedure are 190V and 700V at 200Hz.

I have tried to string some standard 70V line audio transformers together and use an audio power amp, but it doesn¡¯t seem to like that load and it disconnects. Haven¡¯t tried anything else yet.

I have other good meters to use as my ¡°standard¡± so I am thinking I don¡¯t need a sophisticated calibrator. Not trying to get NBS traceability here, just a working meter.

I don¡¯t even really need this meter¡­ just want to complete the repair! I really should just try to sell it as-is maybe.

Thanks

Dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of tgerbic
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 4:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

I have lots of equipment to do what I would call hobby level (non-NIST) equipment calibration. Perhaps quite a few of us can say the same but I think the one area of weakness for most of us is a variable frequency, variable AC voltage source.? I have, for example, a bunch of Fluke bench multimeters I thought I would test/calibrate last year. Everything was easy till I hit the AC cal sections. An AC calibrator would be very useful to me as I have a lot of meters, many have high frequency ranges up to or beyond 1Mhz, that call for different frequencies and a wide range of voltages.

What I would expect would be a low distortion sinewave with calibrated voltages from millivolts to over 300V. Frequency might range from perhaps 10hz to 1Mhz. Not necessarily continuous frequency but a range of frequencies required by most test equipment for calibration. It would be convenient to have output voltages that were calibrated/selectable for RMS, average, peak and peak to peak to align with calibration procedures across a large variety of test equipment. This would just be selections to vary the sinewave amplitude and perhaps a peak selector. Ideally it would have a low source impedance such that on at least some ranges you could have a calibrated AC current source.?

I can think of several designs that would provide the functionality but really need to think this through and limit the features to a more targeted amount. I have done some preliminary investigations to determine what ranges and frequencies I need for most of my HP, Fluke, Heath, Instek, Simpson, and other brand multimeters.

I think this would solve a big hole in hobbyist metrology. DC voltage, DC current and resistance are pretty easy to setup on the average workbench and get pretty accurate results. Frequency is pretty easy as well with GPS disciplined oscillators. AC is harder to deal with. While equipment exists to purchase/repair, it is generally pretty expensive and may have a limited range of voltage or frequency, unless it is really expensive.? I suspect most of us end up kludging up a test setup to at least get some of the required voltages and frequencies, unfortunately skipping many combinations.

I would like to get some thoughts from others about how they do AC calibration outside of a rheostat/isolation transformer on a 50/60Hz power line, or a sinewave generator for low voltages.


Re: AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

 

An obvious sample design to look at is?, at least to give some parameters to circumscribe what's done out there.?
I have not looked at the design close enough to figure?out how it's done, but it'd be interesting to unwrap?it.
Radu.?


On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 7:33 AM dan.meeks222@... <dan.meeks222@...> wrote:

I have a DM5010 that I would love to calibrate. The difficult items in the cal procedure are 190V and 700V at 200Hz.

I have tried to string some standard 70V line audio transformers together and use an audio power amp, but it doesn¡¯t seem to like that load and it disconnects. Haven¡¯t tried anything else yet.

I have other good meters to use as my ¡°standard¡± so I am thinking I don¡¯t need a sophisticated calibrator. Not trying to get NBS traceability here, just a working meter.

I don¡¯t even really need this meter¡­ just want to complete the repair! I really should just try to sell it as-is maybe.

Thanks

Dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of tgerbic
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 4:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

I have lots of equipment to do what I would call hobby level (non-NIST) equipment calibration. Perhaps quite a few of us can say the same but I think the one area of weakness for most of us is a variable frequency, variable AC voltage source.? I have, for example, a bunch of Fluke bench multimeters I thought I would test/calibrate last year. Everything was easy till I hit the AC cal sections. An AC calibrator would be very useful to me as I have a lot of meters, many have high frequency ranges up to or beyond 1Mhz, that call for different frequencies and a wide range of voltages.

What I would expect would be a low distortion sinewave with calibrated voltages from millivolts to over 300V. Frequency might range from perhaps 10hz to 1Mhz. Not necessarily continuous frequency but a range of frequencies required by most test equipment for calibration. It would be convenient to have output voltages that were calibrated/selectable for RMS, average, peak and peak to peak to align with calibration procedures across a large variety of test equipment. This would just be selections to vary the sinewave amplitude and perhaps a peak selector. Ideally it would have a low source impedance such that on at least some ranges you could have a calibrated AC current source.?

I can think of several designs that would provide the functionality but really need to think this through and limit the features to a more targeted amount. I have done some preliminary investigations to determine what ranges and frequencies I need for most of my HP, Fluke, Heath, Instek, Simpson, and other brand multimeters.

I think this would solve a big hole in hobbyist metrology. DC voltage, DC current and resistance are pretty easy to setup on the average workbench and get pretty accurate results. Frequency is pretty easy as well with GPS disciplined oscillators. AC is harder to deal with. While equipment exists to purchase/repair, it is generally pretty expensive and may have a limited range of voltage or frequency, unless it is really expensive.? I suspect most of us end up kludging up a test setup to at least get some of the required voltages and frequencies, unfortunately skipping many combinations.

I would like to get some thoughts from others about how they do AC calibration outside of a rheostat/isolation transformer on a 50/60Hz power line, or a sinewave generator for low voltages.


Re: AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

I have a DM5010 that I would love to calibrate. The difficult items in the cal procedure are 190V and 700V at 200Hz.

I have tried to string some standard 70V line audio transformers together and use an audio power amp, but it doesn¡¯t seem to like that load and it disconnects. Haven¡¯t tried anything else yet.

I have other good meters to use as my ¡°standard¡± so I am thinking I don¡¯t need a sophisticated calibrator. Not trying to get NBS traceability here, just a working meter.

I don¡¯t even really need this meter¡­ just want to complete the repair! I really should just try to sell it as-is maybe.

Thanks

Dan

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of tgerbic
Sent: Monday, August 8, 2022 4:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

?

I have lots of equipment to do what I would call hobby level (non-NIST) equipment calibration. Perhaps quite a few of us can say the same but I think the one area of weakness for most of us is a variable frequency, variable AC voltage source.? I have, for example, a bunch of Fluke bench multimeters I thought I would test/calibrate last year. Everything was easy till I hit the AC cal sections. An AC calibrator would be very useful to me as I have a lot of meters, many have high frequency ranges up to or beyond 1Mhz, that call for different frequencies and a wide range of voltages.

What I would expect would be a low distortion sinewave with calibrated voltages from millivolts to over 300V. Frequency might range from perhaps 10hz to 1Mhz. Not necessarily continuous frequency but a range of frequencies required by most test equipment for calibration. It would be convenient to have output voltages that were calibrated/selectable for RMS, average, peak and peak to peak to align with calibration procedures across a large variety of test equipment. This would just be selections to vary the sinewave amplitude and perhaps a peak selector. Ideally it would have a low source impedance such that on at least some ranges you could have a calibrated AC current source.?

I can think of several designs that would provide the functionality but really need to think this through and limit the features to a more targeted amount. I have done some preliminary investigations to determine what ranges and frequencies I need for most of my HP, Fluke, Heath, Instek, Simpson, and other brand multimeters.

I think this would solve a big hole in hobbyist metrology. DC voltage, DC current and resistance are pretty easy to setup on the average workbench and get pretty accurate results. Frequency is pretty easy as well with GPS disciplined oscillators. AC is harder to deal with. While equipment exists to purchase/repair, it is generally pretty expensive and may have a limited range of voltage or frequency, unless it is really expensive.? I suspect most of us end up kludging up a test setup to at least get some of the required voltages and frequencies, unfortunately skipping many combinations.

I would like to get some thoughts from others about how they do AC calibration outside of a rheostat/isolation transformer on a 50/60Hz power line, or a sinewave generator for low voltages.


Re: Making a Q-meter /

 

On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 04:18 AM, tgerbic wrote:
I built a Q meter based on the ring down method that used an atmel processor. It was originally in the Silicon Chip magazine but you need a subscription to see the back issues. It was republished in EPE magazine in October and November 2007 and the PCB could be gotten from them back then. I etched my own. It works pretty well but is designed to read no higher than a Q of 120 mostly due to processor tech available. I suspect it could be expanded to higher values now that faster processors are available.? One nice thing is that the source code is available.
The EPE articles are on archive.org so you can see how the author designed it.
Thank you. I guess if one uses a fast sample and hold, the data acquisition could be done at a slower rate, as there's very little bandwidth of the signal. So there would be no need to sample at twice the resonate frequency of the coil. That's still quite a bit of work though - at least it would be for me, as not really an area I am good at.


Re: Making a Q-meter /

 

On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 04:19 AM, G8HUL wrote:
I seem to recall that most of the R&S LCR meters also measured Q, can't recall the tolerance on the measurement.

73
Jeff G8HUL

If they are anything like my HP 4284A and 4285A Precision LCR meters, the uncertainty of Q is extremely high for a Q of 20 or more.

An example from the 4285A user manual
L = 220
nH (measured)
f = 25.2 MHz
Q = 30 (measured)

Uncertainty +106/-13, so the actual Q is between 17 and 136.

I think the Practical Wireless design I attached is pretty poor, but I think even that would be more accurate. Those figures above are a reactance of j 34.8 ohm and a resistance of 1.16 ohm. The 2 ohm injection resistance in the PW design would introduce a significant error - much more so than resistors of 20 milli ohm used by Boonton, HP and Marconi. But I think even the PW design would not be as bad at Q measurements as the 4285A Precision LCR meter.


Re: Making a Q-meter /

 

Marconi Instruments also made a well respected Q Meter (TF1245) along with accompanying Oscillators (TF1246 & 1247), they were not far behind Boonton in this and published their own booklets on Q Meters and principles of measurement.

Worth a look, if anyone needs to see the manuals they are on the various archive sites as well as ours.
Just my 2p worth
Regards
Nigel Adams - Marconi Instruments Heritage Collection

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of G8HUL
Sent: 08 August 2022 08:47
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] Making a Q-meter /

I seem to recall that most of the R&S LCR meters also measured Q, can't recall the tolerance on the measurement.

73
Jeff G8HUL

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jfphp via groups.io
Sent: 07 August 2022 15:18
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] Making a Q-meter /

I am not at home.When back I will give more details (catalog 1970 lf I remember)





On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 03:16:30 PM GMT+2, Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...> wrote:


Someone suggested Rohde and Schwarz made Q-meters, but a Google did not get me anything useful. I asked on an R&S group and got the following from someone. He gives the German name for the Q-meter ( "G¨¹te-Messger?t"). I don't speak German, so I can't glean much from anything from R&S.

===


An example is the R&S QDM, a Q-meter for inductors:
.

According to this document:
,
the QDM is from 1970.

An even older one is the model RVQ, one is currently on German ebay:
.

There also was a model QVH:
, a user manual is
here: .

You may be able to find more by googling for "G¨¹tefaktormessger?t" or "G¨¹te-Messger?t" (Q-meter in German).



Dr David Kirkby Ph.D
Email: drkirkby@... <mailto:drkirkby@...> Web:
Kirkby Microwave Ltd (Tel 01621-680100 / +44 1621-680100) Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT.






On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 09:19, Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@... <mailto:drkirkby@...> > wrote:


I am looking at the possibility of making a Q meter for the frequency range 1.5 MHz to 150 MHz. One common way to do this is to inject a voltage from a LOW impedance source, into a series tuned circuit, then measure the voltage developed across the tuned circuit with a high input impedance voltmeter. The Q is the ratio of those two voltages.


Designs for Q meters usually include an oscillator, but I don¡¯t think I will bother with that as I can easily use a signal generator.


One design appeared in Practical Wireless in the November 1978 issue. I stuck a copy of that in a sub-directory for Q measurements in the files section of the forum

/g/Test-Equipment-Design-Construction/files/Q-factor%20%28Q%20is%20the%20inverse%20of%20dissipation%20factor%20DF%29. </g/Test-Equipment-Design-Construction/files/Q-factor%20%28Q%20is%20the%20inverse%20of%20dissipation%20factor%20DF%29.>

There are two problems I see with that design

1) The meter has measurement ranges of only 0-20 and 0-100, but many inductors have Q¡¯s much higher than 100. The HP 4342A can measure Qs from 5 to 1000. The old Boonton 160-A measures Q up to 640 (from memory).

2) The output impedance of source is too high - it is approximately 2 ohm on the Q=0-20 range and 10.2 ohm on the Q=0-100 range.

Can anyone think of a way of turning a signal generator to have an output impedance of 1 milli ohm? I think I have a 5 W Minicircuits amplifier around, so I can afford to waste a bit in heat. But it is not practical to put 50 ohm in series with 1 milli ohm to terminate the amplifier in the required 50 ohm. I will have so little voltage left, it will be difficult to measure the output voltage, even though it¡¯s multipled by the Q of the coil.

A step-down transformer seems the most obvious way, but that requires a turns ratio of sqrt(50000)=224. Even with a single turn on the secondary, there will be too many turns on the primary for this to work at 150 MHz.



I have not yet looked at the HP 4343A meter service manual. That will probably give me some ideas.

I suspect the answer is to not try to get such a low output impedance, accept that the voltage generated across the LC combination will be less than the Q, and correct for that in software.

Any other thoughts?


PS, Does anyone have any documentation, apart from the user manual, on the HP 42851A Q-adapter, which is used with the HP/Agilent 4285A Precision LCR meter?


Re: Making a Q-meter /

 

I seem to recall that most of the R&S LCR meters also measured Q, can't recall the tolerance on the measurement.

73
Jeff G8HUL

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of jfphp via groups.io
Sent: 07 August 2022 15:18
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Test Equipment Design & Construction] Making a Q-meter /

I am not at home.When back I will give more details (catalog 1970 lf I remember)





On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 03:16:30 PM GMT+2, Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...> wrote:


Someone suggested Rohde and Schwarz made Q-meters, but a Google did not get me anything useful. I asked on an R&S group and got the following from someone. He gives the German name for the Q-meter ( "G¨¹te-Messger?t"). I don't speak German, so I can't glean much from anything from R&S.

===


An example is the R&S QDM, a Q-meter for inductors:
.

According to this document:
,
the QDM is from 1970.

An even older one is the model RVQ, one is currently on German ebay:
.

There also was a model QVH:
, a user manual is
here: .

You may be able to find more by googling for "G¨¹tefaktormessger?t" or "G¨¹te-Messger?t" (Q-meter in German).



Dr David Kirkby Ph.D
Email: drkirkby@... <mailto:drkirkby@...> Web:
Kirkby Microwave Ltd (Tel 01621-680100 / +44 1621-680100) Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT.






On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 09:19, Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@... <mailto:drkirkby@...> > wrote:


I am looking at the possibility of making a Q meter for the frequency range 1.5 MHz to 150 MHz. One common way to do this is to inject a voltage from a LOW impedance source, into a series tuned circuit, then measure the voltage developed across the tuned circuit with a high input impedance voltmeter. The Q is the ratio of those two voltages.


Designs for Q meters usually include an oscillator, but I don¡¯t think I will bother with that as I can easily use a signal generator.


One design appeared in Practical Wireless in the November 1978 issue. I stuck a copy of that in a sub-directory for Q measurements in the files section of the forum

/g/Test-Equipment-Design-Construction/files/Q-factor%20%28Q%20is%20the%20inverse%20of%20dissipation%20factor%20DF%29. </g/Test-Equipment-Design-Construction/files/Q-factor%20%28Q%20is%20the%20inverse%20of%20dissipation%20factor%20DF%29.>

There are two problems I see with that design

1) The meter has measurement ranges of only 0-20 and 0-100, but many inductors have Q¡¯s much higher than 100. The HP 4342A can measure Qs from 5 to 1000. The old Boonton 160-A measures Q up to 640 (from memory).

2) The output impedance of source is too high - it is approximately 2 ohm on the Q=0-20 range and 10.2 ohm on the Q=0-100 range.

Can anyone think of a way of turning a signal generator to have an output impedance of 1 milli ohm? I think I have a 5 W Minicircuits amplifier around, so I can afford to waste a bit in heat. But it is not practical to put 50 ohm in series with 1 milli ohm to terminate the amplifier in the required 50 ohm. I will have so little voltage left, it will be difficult to measure the output voltage, even though it¡¯s multipled by the Q of the coil.

A step-down transformer seems the most obvious way, but that requires a turns ratio of sqrt(50000)=224. Even with a single turn on the secondary, there will be too many turns on the primary for this to work at 150 MHz.



I have not yet looked at the HP 4343A meter service manual. That will probably give me some ideas.

I suspect the answer is to not try to get such a low output impedance, accept that the voltage generated across the LC combination will be less than the Q, and correct for that in software.

Any other thoughts?


PS, Does anyone have any documentation, apart from the user manual, on the HP 42851A Q-adapter, which is used with the HP/Agilent 4285A Precision LCR meter?


Re: Making a Q-meter /

 

I built a Q meter based on the ring down method that used an atmel processor. It was originally in the Silicon Chip magazine but you need a subscription to see the back issues. It was republished in EPE magazine in October and November 2007 and the PCB could be gotten from them back then. I etched my own. It works pretty well but is designed to read no higher than a Q of 120 mostly due to processor tech available. I suspect it could be expanded to higher values now that faster processors are available.? One nice thing is that the source code is available.
The EPE articles are on archive.org so you can see how the author designed it.


Re: Making a Q-meter /

 

A few ideas were presented by Lloyd Butler VK5BR (Revised 2004), on how a simple analogue Q meter (LF & HF to approx. 40MHz), could be realised and descriptions of design problems and resolutions.?
An RF signal generator being used as the signal source with a suggested amplifier design to raise signal generator output signal levels to required value. Employs a wideband voltage follower output stage which develops a voltage across a 0.2 ohm resistor.
Measurable Q up to ~ 500.
See www.http://users.tpg.com.au/users/ldbutler/QMeter.htm
John_M0JES


AC Voltage Calibrator, home built

 

I have lots of equipment to do what I would call hobby level (non-NIST) equipment calibration. Perhaps quite a few of us can say the same but I think the one area of weakness for most of us is a variable frequency, variable AC voltage source.? I have, for example, a bunch of Fluke bench multimeters I thought I would test/calibrate last year. Everything was easy till I hit the AC cal sections. An AC calibrator would be very useful to me as I have a lot of meters, many have high frequency ranges up to or beyond 1Mhz, that call for different frequencies and a wide range of voltages.

What I would expect would be a low distortion sinewave with calibrated voltages from millivolts to over 300V. Frequency might range from perhaps 10hz to 1Mhz. Not necessarily continuous frequency but a range of frequencies required by most test equipment for calibration. It would be convenient to have output voltages that were calibrated/selectable for RMS, average, peak and peak to peak to align with calibration procedures across a large variety of test equipment. This would just be selections to vary the sinewave amplitude and perhaps a peak selector. Ideally it would have a low source impedance such that on at least some ranges you could have a calibrated AC current source.?

I can think of several designs that would provide the functionality but really need to think this through and limit the features to a more targeted amount. I have done some preliminary investigations to determine what ranges and frequencies I need for most of my HP, Fluke, Heath, Instek, Simpson, and other brand multimeters.

I think this would solve a big hole in hobbyist metrology. DC voltage, DC current and resistance are pretty easy to setup on the average workbench and get pretty accurate results. Frequency is pretty easy as well with GPS disciplined oscillators. AC is harder to deal with. While equipment exists to purchase/repair, it is generally pretty expensive and may have a limited range of voltage or frequency, unless it is really expensive.? I suspect most of us end up kludging up a test setup to at least get some of the required voltages and frequencies, unfortunately skipping many combinations.

I would like to get some thoughts from others about how they do AC calibration outside of a rheostat/isolation transformer on a 50/60Hz power line, or a sinewave generator for low voltages.


Re: Making a Q-meter /

 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Hi:

Stumbled on this Inductor Tester.? It hits the inductor with a pulse and by using a scope determines the frequency of the damped wave to get the inductance.? There are provisions for various drive currents and reasonating caps.? At the end he talks about adding an Arduino to eliminate the need for an external scope, but the very same setup would be ideal for a ring down Q-meter.
, 10:00
-- 
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke, N6GCE

axioms:
1. The extent to which you can fix or improve something will be limited by how well you understand how it works.
2. Everybody, with no exceptions, holds false beliefs.


Re: Making a Q-meter /

 

QDM. Idea is explained in the first article





On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 03:16:30 PM GMT+2, Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...> wrote:


Someone suggested Rohde and Schwarz made Q-meters, but a Google did not get me anything useful. I asked on an R&S group and got the following from someone. He gives the German name for the Q-meter ( "G¨¹te-Messger?t"). I don't speak German, so I can't glean much from anything from R&S.
===

An example is the R&S QDM, a Q-meter for inductors:
.

According to this document:
,
the QDM is from 1970.

An even older one is the model RVQ, one is currently on German ebay:
.

There also was a model QVH:
, a user manual is
here: .

You may be able to find more by googling for "G¨¹tefaktormessger?t" or
"G¨¹te-Messger?t" (Q-meter in German).

Dr David Kirkby Ph.D
Email: drkirkby@... Web:
Kirkby Microwave Ltd (Tel 01621-680100 / +44 1621-680100)
Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT.





On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 09:19, Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...> wrote:

I am looking at the possibility of making a Q meter for the frequency range 1.5 MHz to 150 MHz. One common way to do this is to inject a voltage from a LOW impedance source, into a series tuned circuit, then measure the voltage developed across the tuned circuit with a high input impedance voltmeter. The Q is the ratio of those two voltages.?


Designs for Q meters usually include an oscillator, but I don¡¯t think I will bother with that as I can easily use a signal generator.?


One design appeared in Practical Wireless in the November 1978 issue. I stuck a copy of that in a sub-directory for Q measurements in the files section of the forum?

/g/Test-Equipment-Design-Construction/files/Q-factor%20%28Q%20is%20the%20inverse%20of%20dissipation%20factor%20DF%29.

There are two problems I see with that design

1) The meter has measurement ranges of only 0-20 and 0-100, but many inductors have Q¡¯s much higher than 100. The HP 4342A can measure Qs from 5 to 1000. The old Boonton 160-A measures Q up to 640 (from memory).?

2) The output impedance of source is too high?- it is approximately 2 ohm on the Q=0-20 range and 10.2?ohm on the Q=0-100 range.?

Can anyone think of a way of turning a signal generator to have an output impedance of 1 milli ohm? I think I have a 5 W Minicircuits amplifier around, so I can afford to waste a bit in heat. But it is not practical to put 50 ohm in series with 1 milli ohm to terminate the amplifier in the required 50 ohm. I will have so little voltage left, it will be difficult to measure the output voltage, even though it¡¯s multipled by the Q of the coil. ?

A step-down transformer seems the most obvious way, but that requires a turns ratio of sqrt(50000)=224. Even with a single turn on the secondary, there will be too many turns on the primary for this to work at 150 MHz.

?

I have not yet looked at the HP 4343A meter service manual. That will probably give me some ideas.?

I suspect the answer is to not try to get such a low output impedance, accept that the voltage generated across the LC combination will be less than the Q, and correct for that in software.?

Any other thoughts??


PS, Does anyone have any documentation, apart from the user manual, on the HP 42851A Q-adapter, which is used with the HP/Agilent 4285A Precision LCR meter??

?


?


Re: Making a Q-meter /

 

I am not at home.When back I will give more details (catalog 1970 lf I remember)





On Sunday, August 7, 2022 at 03:16:30 PM GMT+2, Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...> wrote:


Someone suggested Rohde and Schwarz made Q-meters, but a Google did not get me anything useful. I asked on an R&S group and got the following from someone. He gives the German name for the Q-meter ( "G¨¹te-Messger?t"). I don't speak German, so I can't glean much from anything from R&S.
===

An example is the R&S QDM, a Q-meter for inductors:
.

According to this document:
,
the QDM is from 1970.

An even older one is the model RVQ, one is currently on German ebay:
.

There also was a model QVH:
, a user manual is
here: .

You may be able to find more by googling for "G¨¹tefaktormessger?t" or
"G¨¹te-Messger?t" (Q-meter in German).

Dr David Kirkby Ph.D
Email: drkirkby@... Web:
Kirkby Microwave Ltd (Tel 01621-680100 / +44 1621-680100)
Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT.





On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 09:19, Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...> wrote:

I am looking at the possibility of making a Q meter for the frequency range 1.5 MHz to 150 MHz. One common way to do this is to inject a voltage from a LOW impedance source, into a series tuned circuit, then measure the voltage developed across the tuned circuit with a high input impedance voltmeter. The Q is the ratio of those two voltages.?


Designs for Q meters usually include an oscillator, but I don¡¯t think I will bother with that as I can easily use a signal generator.?


One design appeared in Practical Wireless in the November 1978 issue. I stuck a copy of that in a sub-directory for Q measurements in the files section of the forum?

/g/Test-Equipment-Design-Construction/files/Q-factor%20%28Q%20is%20the%20inverse%20of%20dissipation%20factor%20DF%29.

There are two problems I see with that design

1) The meter has measurement ranges of only 0-20 and 0-100, but many inductors have Q¡¯s much higher than 100. The HP 4342A can measure Qs from 5 to 1000. The old Boonton 160-A measures Q up to 640 (from memory).?

2) The output impedance of source is too high?- it is approximately 2 ohm on the Q=0-20 range and 10.2?ohm on the Q=0-100 range.?

Can anyone think of a way of turning a signal generator to have an output impedance of 1 milli ohm? I think I have a 5 W Minicircuits amplifier around, so I can afford to waste a bit in heat. But it is not practical to put 50 ohm in series with 1 milli ohm to terminate the amplifier in the required 50 ohm. I will have so little voltage left, it will be difficult to measure the output voltage, even though it¡¯s multipled by the Q of the coil. ?

A step-down transformer seems the most obvious way, but that requires a turns ratio of sqrt(50000)=224. Even with a single turn on the secondary, there will be too many turns on the primary for this to work at 150 MHz.

?

I have not yet looked at the HP 4343A meter service manual. That will probably give me some ideas.?

I suspect the answer is to not try to get such a low output impedance, accept that the voltage generated across the LC combination will be less than the Q, and correct for that in software.?

Any other thoughts??


PS, Does anyone have any documentation, apart from the user manual, on the HP 42851A Q-adapter, which is used with the HP/Agilent 4285A Precision LCR meter??

?


?


Re: Making a Q-meter /

 

Someone suggested Rohde and Schwarz made Q-meters, but a Google did not get me anything useful. I asked on an R&S group and got the following from someone. He gives the German name for the Q-meter ( "G¨¹te-Messger?t"). I don't speak German, so I can't glean much from anything from R&S.
===

An example is the R&S QDM, a Q-meter for inductors:
.

According to this document:
,
the QDM is from 1970.

An even older one is the model RVQ, one is currently on German ebay:
.

There also was a model QVH:
, a user manual is
here: .

You may be able to find more by googling for "G¨¹tefaktormessger?t" or
"G¨¹te-Messger?t" (Q-meter in German).

Dr David Kirkby Ph.D
Email: drkirkby@... Web:
Kirkby Microwave Ltd (Tel 01621-680100 / +44 1621-680100)
Stokes Hall Lodge, Burnham Rd, Chelmsford, Essex, CM3 6DT.





On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 at 09:19, Dr. David Kirkby, Kirkby Microwave Ltd <drkirkby@...> wrote:

I am looking at the possibility of making a Q meter for the frequency range 1.5 MHz to 150 MHz. One common way to do this is to inject a voltage from a LOW impedance source, into a series tuned circuit, then measure the voltage developed across the tuned circuit with a high input impedance voltmeter. The Q is the ratio of those two voltages.?


Designs for Q meters usually include an oscillator, but I don¡¯t think I will bother with that as I can easily use a signal generator.?


One design appeared in Practical Wireless in the November 1978 issue. I stuck a copy of that in a sub-directory for Q measurements in the files section of the forum?

/g/Test-Equipment-Design-Construction/files/Q-factor%20%28Q%20is%20the%20inverse%20of%20dissipation%20factor%20DF%29.

There are two problems I see with that design

1) The meter has measurement ranges of only 0-20 and 0-100, but many inductors have Q¡¯s much higher than 100. The HP 4342A can measure Qs from 5 to 1000. The old Boonton 160-A measures Q up to 640 (from memory).?

2) The output impedance of source is too high?- it is approximately 2 ohm on the Q=0-20 range and 10.2?ohm on the Q=0-100 range.?

Can anyone think of a way of turning a signal generator to have an output impedance of 1 milli ohm? I think I have a 5 W Minicircuits amplifier around, so I can afford to waste a bit in heat. But it is not practical to put 50 ohm in series with 1 milli ohm to terminate the amplifier in the required 50 ohm. I will have so little voltage left, it will be difficult to measure the output voltage, even though it¡¯s multipled by the Q of the coil. ?

A step-down transformer seems the most obvious way, but that requires a turns ratio of sqrt(50000)=224. Even with a single turn on the secondary, there will be too many turns on the primary for this to work at 150 MHz.

?

I have not yet looked at the HP 4343A meter service manual. That will probably give me some ideas.?

I suspect the answer is to not try to get such a low output impedance, accept that the voltage generated across the LC combination will be less than the Q, and correct for that in software.?

Any other thoughts??


PS, Does anyone have any documentation, apart from the user manual, on the HP 42851A Q-adapter, which is used with the HP/Agilent 4285A Precision LCR meter??

?


?


Re: Making a Q-meter /

 

I previously listed a video with a Ring down Q Meter, that was designed by a fellow in China and sold by mkmak222 on Ebay, he was down to six the last time I heard.
The same fellow in China has designed a new Ring Down Q Meter, I don't new what the new spec's are, and in my conversation with mkmak222, mkmak ask him to produce it for sale and he declined. There is a website with a schematic and picture of the PCB and loads of info. It uses an atmega88-20au, I don't know if the code is on the website. The page is in Chinese, so you will need to translate, I have not tried, so know how good the translation is. I see a picture of the front it says 400kHz to 10 MHz. 30 Q to 2500 Q .
http://www.crystalradio.cn/thread-1613531-1-1.html
?