Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
[TekScopes] 7934 Service Manual
It occurs to me that, if I am going to unbind my 7934 manual (re-binding is a pain) to scan pages 6-22 and 6-23 in order to update the copy on TekWiki, it would be useful to know if there are any other pages missing from the online copy. This would require someone to go through the online manual page-by-page to verify that those two pages are the only ones missing. I don't have time to do that right now. If someone is willing to do that, please let me know ASAP. DaveD KC0WJN On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 16:25 Dave Daniel via <kc0wjn=[email protected]> wrote: I should probably update the PDF of the manual on the TekWiki site. That'll |
All,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Ok, I've unbound my 7934 manual and I started scanning the missing pages. It turns out that my manual copy is Revision May 1986, but *Revised Aug 1987*. Per Bob's email below: Pages x, 9-12 and 9-24 are the last pages of their respective sections and are blank pages in my manual with no page numbers (but the facing pages are consistent). My section 7 ("Replaceable Electrical Parts") is much different than the section 7 in the May 1986 revision. Updating the May 1986 revision with my section 7 would make the former revision inconsistent, so I do not plan to do that. My manual has no page 7-61; my section 7 ends at page 7-54. However, I would guess that page 7-61 in the May 1986 revision is the last page of section 7 and therefore blank and not numbered. I have added pages 6-22 and 6-23 to my local copy of the May 1986 revision that is on the TekWiki site. I think that that omission is the only true error in the TekWiki manual revision. I will update the copy on TekWiki, hopefully later today (I am on EDT). In the meantime, I can send a copy of pages 6-22 and 6-23 to anyone that can't wait for me to update the copy on TekWiki. Please PM me in that case. kc0wjn at gmail dot com. Comments and questions welcome; those should probably be handled privately at this point so as to not clutter up the list. DaveD KC0WJN On 3/21/2025 7:04 PM, Dave Daniel via groups.io wrote:
Thank you. --
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com |
Dang. I forgot to write that I also added the missing page 3-1 to the May 1986 revision.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
DaveD KC0WJN On 3/22/2025 5:56 AM, Dave Daniel via groups.io wrote:
All, --
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com |
I don't see any duplicate pages in the TekWiki copy of the 7934 manual.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Also, the May 1986 PDF ends with section 7. My copy (Aug 1987) has sections 8 and 9. I'm a bit confused. It would be helpful if someone out there has an original, printed copy of the May 1987 (unrevised) copy of the manual. DaveD KC0WJN On 3/22/2025 7:24 AM, mst3krules via groups.io wrote:
Pages 459 - 467 --
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com |
Bob,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Yes, thank you. I see that I concluded that it doesn't have sections 8 and 9 because I was looking at the end of the PDF, which are the Change Information pages. I do see the duplicate pages. Without a copy of the original manual (or an original manual itself) I can't tell what else might be incorrect with the online copies. Since many of the pages of the online copies are partial pages, I'd have to compare the pages in the online PDFs to an original manual. Perhaps someone out there could do that, but since the 7934 is pretty rare, I doubt that there is anyone who is paying attention to this thread who will do that. I have sent pp. 31, 6-22 and 6-23 to Mark, the OP. That will have to suffice, for now. I may upload my revised PDF that contains those three missing pages. I can scan my original that is a later revision, but that will take a lot of time due to the fold-out pages. DaveD KC0WJN On 3/22/2025 9:16 AM, mst3krules via groups.io wrote:
The copy I look at came from this link: --
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss