Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
2245 has uncontrolled intensity
I have been working on a 2245 for a while that has multiple issues but
this particular problem is stumping me as it's become clear I don't really understand how the Z-axis/Focus circuits in this unit actually work. I started with no horizontal and traced that to Q805 being shot. Those FETs are pretty rare so I replaced with a "best I could find" substitute that got the horizontal running. I have since found a source for the FETs and can replace with correct replacement once I finish the other debug. With the horizontal working, it became clear that the scope seems to be running at max intensity and the controls on the front have little to no effect on the intensity level. It's so bright that it is "blooming" and defocusing what might otherwise be a sharp display. The FOCUS control has some effect but only to defocus it more. There is no in-focus point that the control can reach. I've done many of the measurements on sheet 7 and most are pretty good and within tolerance except one, At the emitter of Q2708, I measure -0.18v rather than the spec'd +0.18v so that is suspicious. However, I do not understand how the circuit ahead of that-- including the testpoint 7B is supposed to work. I can actually disconnect this circuit, by opening W2701, and with that disconnected, there is no change in the display. Everything is still at max brightness and everything is still visible on the display-- trace and readouts. I've tried putting some voltage into the external Z-axis input, also without getting any change in the display. I've measured the outputs of the op-amps U1001, which the front panel INTEN pots control and there is full range of swing on the outputs of these op-amps. So, the knobs and the followers after them appear to be working. So, I'm looking for some guidance on how the circuit just ahead of testpoint 7B is supposed to work? eg, what purpose do Q1001 ... Q1004 serve? Some kind of bias maybe? Or, the Z-axis circuit in general as my problem might be around Q2708 or Q2712/Q2713 ... I put a photo of the display here, /g/TekScopes2/photo/302416/3915732 You can see what I think is the retrace of the readout "drawing" since the intensity is so high or there is lack of blanking. Thanks for any input! Chris -- Chris Elmquist N?JCF |
Hi Chris,
This may be the common DC restorer diode failure. You can search this group or other Tekscopes group for many lack of intensity posts for DC restorer issues (search for "DC restorer"). If node 7G signal is correct, and grid bias trimpot can't control intensity then most likely one or multiple of CR2701-CR2704 are bad. You can also observe node 7I, note that other side of C1712 is high voltage -2.7kV.?
?
Q2708 collector (I assume you meant collector, not emitter) voltage might be OK based on test conditions. I don't think voltage difference is the root cause of maximum brightness. I wouldn't touch it before confirming grid bias restorer.?
?
Q1001-Q1004 form a current summer, collector current is sum of all the branches at the emitter. Gating signals turn off the intensity paths when that path should be disabled (for example turn off A/B intensity paths when readout is active). I don't expect this section to be bad if waveform 7G was correct.
?
Ozan
?
?
?
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 10:04 AM, Chris Elmquist wrote:
I have been working on a 2245 for a while that has multiple issues but |
Hi Ozan,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Thanks so much for the detailed reply. I will look into the DC restoration next. That is a very good suggestion. Most of these test nodes do have correct or nearly correct voltage levels and waveforms except the duty cycle or rep rate seems to be wrong. Granted, I have struggled to get the scope sweep rate on the correct setting because it's very difficult to read it off the display, so it could be measurement error too. But this didn't seem like a time domain problem either. Again, I appreciate the response and I will report back on what I find. Chris On Monday (05/12/2025 at 02:06PM -0700), Ozan wrote:
Hi Chris, --
Chris Elmquist |
On Tue, 13 May 2025 at 14:42, Chris Elmquist via <chrise=[email protected]> wrote: Thanks so much for the detailed reply.? I will look into the DC This is one of those times when a second scope and an HV probe (>3kV, so P6013/5 etc) is handy - but not necessary. The key observation is that the voltage variation at node 7G relative to 0V (call it V7g) is translated up to the grid-cathode voltage (Vgk) by the DC restorer circuit mentioned above. Hence the voltage Vgk between CRT pins 2 and 3 and associated components should be the same as V7g, but the cathode voltage relative to 0V (Vk) will be -2.7kV or so.? Now V7g as measured by a voltmeter will be an "unpredictable" average determined by many front panel setting such as A intensity, B intensity, flyback and dead periods etc. If you are careful, you can use a simple voltmeter to measure Vgk and V7g, and check they both vary in sympathy with the control settings. If they do, then the DC restorer is unlikely to be the fault. I once used that technique with a Tek465 that was doing a good impression of a torch, illuminating the wall on the other side of the room. I eventually traced it to a fault inside the CRT: the grid had become detached. Pictures at |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss