开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

012-0482-00/01


 

Due to a mistake on a drawing Tektronix had 012-0482-00/01 cables made with RG-58/U cable.
They have now corrected the error and have the 012-0482-00/01 made with RG-223/U cable.
--
Jeffeelcr


 

Jeff: All of my 012-0482-00/01 (have ! 10-15!) are RG-223/U cable.

I have never seen one made with RG-58U.

Do you know the exact specs, eg VSWR, frequency resp, ?

Enjoy,


Jon


 

Jon, recently I ordered a cable from a distributer I received a sub-par non Tektronix cable even though I ordered 012-0482-00.
I returned that cable and contacted Tek tech to be sure if I ordered another cable I would receive the correct type.
Their search determined the problem and the cause, they informed me of the circumstances and have supplied me with the corrected cable
as 012-0482-01.
No, I had no reason to test an Amphenol 36" cable assembly made with Southwire RG-58/U cable $17.00 new in bag as an 012-0482-00? for $88.00+ as it was obviously incorrect. The surprise was that Tektronix had a mislabeled drawing and had some RG-58/U made and in stock.
As I said this has been corrected, no further information was passed to me.
--
Jeffeelcr


 

Dear Jeff,
The Tektronix high quality crimp BNC and cables diameter, stiffness are distinctive

Any photos of a comparison the RG58/U vs RG 233 cables ?

I acquired the Tektronix c?bles decade's ago, from a silent key friend.s estate.

Later , a bunch new in original Tektronix package, labels
from our old friend Richard Cabot, ex Tektronix and founder of Audio Precision

I wonder if the cable you received was a Chinese knock-off ?

Bonsoir

Jon


 

Jon, the newer RG223/U cables have a lot more flexibility.
--
Jeffeelcr