开云体育

can the 1A1 dual pre-amp be used with a 561a scope?

Given a million years I would have never thought these were so hard to track down. I have the PM403 for the 6502. I'm looking for others, primarily the PM406 and PM407 for the 6800/6809. If you have

That's how I feel about my 453 - an absolute piece of jewelry - and also the reason I could never let it go, as crammed my space may get to be or as rarely as I may use it (effectively, never, as of

Those 500 series scopes are heavy, but we’ll never see that kind of quality again.

Don't forget the last of the 500's... I just packed a 556 rack mount for Eric Boyle. With spacers and double boxing it came to 103 lbs.

Roy, Speaking if hernia, the 11000-series and 7000-series were developed by the Lab Instrument Division (LID). We often used the acronym for convenience. Guys from the other scope divisions , PID

Tektronix 11800 or CSA800... for examples... use 'sampling heads' like the the 7S11 sampling plugin (with an S-X sampling head), for 7000 series frames. Those are what I would call 'sampling

IMO, it's the acronymization, which produces an acronym ambiguity... which isn't sufficiently disambiguated by the context... at least by some. For example: Digital Storage Oscilloscope Digital

... The best DSOs are the ones that run their maximum sampling rate at all sweep speeds. Eg, 1Gs/s when sweeping at 1sec/dev. The screen pixels are the result of high speed multiply/accumulate or

<vondicher@...> wrote: These scopes are all wildly different in construction. The 11401 is a 500MHz equivalent time sampling 10bit scope with a (nowadays..) very slow sample rate of

I think "Digital Sampling Oscilloscope" is a misnomer or at least a pleonasm: *All* digital oscilloscopes do their thing by sampling, most doing some analog processing before digitizing. There is no

Dave: Yes, I totally forgot about the aliasing. I remember many college grads over the years using a digital scope for the first time and looking at a waveform at the wrong sample rate. ed

[email protected]> wrote:

Reading with great deal of interest all the great input! Roy - thank you for pointing out to me the weight aspect, which is extremely important. I didn't know what sort of behemoth the 602A

That's commonly called (at least common to me)... equivalent time sampling. Both DSO, and DSO, can do that... but DSO is not the same thing as DSO. One is a digital sampling oscilloscope, and the

At over 80 pounds... I can't pick the thing up, to move it. 11401 is about half the weight, at about 40 pounds.

Ah, perhaps a bit less help here, but I can make a few comments. I have a 7S11 and a 7T11 along with a sampling head (S6) and the probe that comes with another sampling head.? This effectively

From what I remember, the DSA602 had a large selection of waveform math functions. Hugh Gilbert [email protected]> wrote:

Two things come to mind. The extremely fast & the extremely slow signals. The time base on the DSA is quicker then then time base on the 7104 so especially for edge work the 7104 gets down to

That's a good summary. One aspect of DSOs that you didn't mention is aliasing. DaveD KC0WJN ============================== All spelling mistakes are the responsibilty of the reader (Rick Renz, STK,