Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- TekScopes2
- Messages
Search
Strange 2230 problem
开云体育I like this series of scopes,? so was drawn to a 2230 (100 Mhz digital storage) at a low price.?? The seller said it lit up but he couldn't figure out how to run it.?? Well neither can I - in it's present condition! I haven't used the storage models of this series before but after skimming the op and service manuals,? what appears to be happening is, something is forcing the digital side to run one of the "exercisers" every time on power-up.?? For the first few seconds after the beam becomes visible,? I can see normal traces that respond to controls (if you're quick about it) which indicates the analog side is working.?? But then the screen changes to a pair of concentric boxes and center axis lines.? The inner box can be moved from side to side with the horizontal position control but that's the only control that has any effect.?? Nothing other the cycling power will make this display go away. My best guess is that this is the "Box" exerciser display that would normally be enabled by pressing one of the Menu Select/DISPLAY buttons during power-up.?? If so, then it would seem that something is doing so unintentionally - i.e. a defective switch or a failure in the circuitry attached to it.?? I can see that a "stuck switch" would cause the instrument to run the Box exerciser, but it normally should be possible to exit the exerciser by pressing one of the other buttons,? which doesn't happen. I looked for a schematic of the front panel
board in the service manual but didn't find much.? Is additional
documentation on the 2230 available?? If I can get it working
I'd use it mostly in the analog non-storage mode.? Thanks for
any suggestions! |
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
If you are considering a scope to serve as an XY monitor, consider a Tektronix XY monitor such as 604, 608 or 620. Other variations are found in D10 display, 5103N and 5110 scopes. These displays are larger than the 475 and 2445 and have a smaller spot size and much simpler than a full featured scope.
The 5103N might be the lowest cost as there seem to be few 60x monitors for sale. You could ditch the plugins and wire directly to the display unit (D10).
?
Anyway, just a suggestion. |
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
On Sun, May 4, 2025 at 07:59 AM, Christian Eisert wrote:
=== Your Hameg seems to have Z-blanking and Rigol can be upgraded to 100MHz plus SPI/I2C/RS232 decoder. DS1054Z should meet most of arcade machine debugging needs, do you need more than 100MHz BW??
?
Is Hameg Z blanking not working well? Manual says shorting Z input to ground should blank trace fully.
?
Ozan
? |
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
On 4 May 2025 10:59 am, Christian Eisert wrote:
*Shortlist:*I have owned six Tek 'scopes (and used many others at work), as well as two HPs. My HP 1740A has given me more grief than all of my Tek 'scopes combined. I had to replace it with a Tek 2235 because the 1740A had become so unreliable. -- Dale H. Cook, GR/HP/Tek Collector, Roanoke/Lynchburg, VA |
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
开云体育Hi everyone, first of all: a big thank you to everyone who responded – I really appreciate the detailed input, the shared experience, and the time you’ve all taken to help me out. Also, sorry for not
replying sooner – I went on
a short holiday to Denmark and figured it was time to
give my better half the
attention she deserves :D But as someone who's into tech myself, I have to admit: there just 补谤别苍’迟 always easy answers. Especially not when the topic is vintage test equipment, where every setup, every use case, and even every unit has its quirks. So, since I'm already in deeper than planned, let me briefly summarize where I'm coming from and what I'm looking for: I collect and restore
vintage arcade machines (e.g. Asteroids Deluxe, Space Duel, Tempest). Recently, I offered to help a friend fix several vector-based games, and since I don’t want to constantly remove and reconnect a real vector monitor, I started looking for a scope that can also act as a clean vector display -- with proper Z-axis beam blanking and no retrace lines.It was honestly this one image that sparked it all: So here’s what I’m ideally looking for: Shortlist:
What matters to me (prioritized):
Again, thanks to all of you for your insights and patience. I’ve learned a lot already just from the conversation! Best regards, Am 01.05.25 um 08:20 schrieb David via
groups.io:
|
Re: identifying this Tektronix board
The layout and connector reminds me of the TM5000 series plugins - but it looks a bit bare - presumably it's for a relatively simple plugin - you could examine some service manuals for - I looked inside my FG5010 - that board runs right to the front of the plugin to interface with the rest of the gubbins and homes a CPU with support logic and ROMs... I only have one other type of plugin for the TM5000 series... Though the connector is the same, the DIP switch bank on my FG5010 is below the connector and only has 6 switches - so that could be a bit cramped. I think that some 11000 series plugins had GPIB but I don't know them... |
identifying this Tektronix board
While going through another crate of Tektronix gear I came across this board, which has the legends "GPIB", "TEK T1", and "R-0291-XB". ?My google fu might be weak but I can't find any hint to the board's use or origin.?
?
Anyone recognize it?
?
Here's a link to the photo: ?https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/7g8yxs2uy8vssnegli0ka/K7WXW-GPIB.jpeg?rlkey=q8333no7z0l761n7jpk6kwcht&dl=0
?
Thanks - Bill
|
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
Maybe not the best opinion on a tek group, but i would say some of the older HP scopes had better tubes, probably more like you'd see on an arcade machine.?
Tektronix are great as scope, triggering and so on, but the crt was never as nice or fine as some others, like HP.? |
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
Christian,
If your XY needs are fairly high frequency, be aware that the delay in the X and Y is unequal.? About 50 years ago I had to add relays to a 465 to bypass the vertical delay line in XY mode to allow a fast XY character generator to be viewed properly.
--John Gord
? |
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
After following this discussion somewhat, and considering the application, I'd suggest going toward a relatively simple scope like the 465 already mentioned, or maybe a more modern 2200 series unit. These were very high volume lines so there should be plenty out there for a long time, and readily available. I don't see any magical Z-axis requirements - unless I missed something, I think all you need is one with DC-coupled Z-axis to assure full cutoff at any data rate. AFAIK all "modern" analog scopes have this capability (if they have Z-axis input), so it should be no big deal. I also see no need for readout or high bandwidth or multi-channels or programmability or storage, just the basic XY display feature which should be common. Get something without tubes or a microprocessor and enjoy the simplicity of that sweet spot from the good old days.
?
Ed |
Tek 453 Back Cover...
Hi there,
?
I have fallen heir to a Tektronix 453 scope.? From appearances it appears to be fairly clean and complete - with one exception: The rear cover is missing, which exposes the back end of the CRT, the fan and other goodies.?
?
Might any of you have the back cover from a 453 that could be purchased?? If it would help I can send a picture of what I don't have, or better put - a picture of the back end where the cover is supposed to go so you can hopefully see what's missing.
?
Thanks,
?
Burt, K6OQK |
Photo Notifications
#photo-notice
Group Notification
Chris Elmquist <chrise@...> added the photo album 465B pack panel : wanted to show the connectors and labeling on the back panel of a 465B, specifically to get the specifications for the Z-axis input The following photos have been uploaded to the 465B pack panel photo album of the TekScopes2@groups.io group. By: Chris Elmquist <chrise@...> |
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
Actually, the EAROM on the 2465 does get written on a fairly regular basis to store front panel settings.? Not everything is an absolute physical position that can be read back.? Examples: cursors on/off, cursor position, slope.
?
When a setting is changed that needs to be stored, the scope waits for 10 seconds and then writes the new setting.? If anything else is changed that needs to be stored while waiting, the delay counter is reset.? This works fine except for the edge case where you change something and then turn off the scope in less than 10 seconds.
?
But fully agreed - much more straightforward than the A and B.
?
-mark
?
?
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 05:07 PM, Chuck Harris wrote:
...... |
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
I took a photo of the back of my 465B and uploaded to the group Photos
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
section. Shows the Z-axis input and the voltage requirements to control intensity labeled at the connector. Chris On Wednesday (04/30/2025 at 04:08PM -0500), Chris Elmquist wrote:
On Wednesday (04/30/2025 at 10:29PM +0200), Christian Eisert via groups.io wrote:sorry Dave, I didn't mean to be rude. It may have something to do with myFWIW, you might want to double check that. 465 has a Z-axis BNC input --
Chris Elmquist |
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
I have a 2465 for 33 years now and it continues to function with no issues. ?It came with the counter/timer option, and later I added the word recognizer and GPIB options.
?
I've never re-capped it, although admittedly I should probably replace the RIFA caps since they are a known frequent point of failure. ?I would leave all the other caps alone, unless they are proven to be bad through troubleshooting, direct testing, or visual inspection. ?There are power supply ripple specifications in the service manual which you can check.
?
Mine does not have the finicky (and usually noisy) squirrel-cage fan. ?As of serial number B050100, according to the service manual, Tektronix replaced it with a regular axial fan. ?I have serial number B030999, so I am not sure the manual is right here, or perhaps I have some strange Frankenstein version that was modified before my ownership. ?All boards are thru-hole.
?
I think it is possible to tell if a unit has an axial fan because the back cover is different. ?The axial fan units will have ventilation slots for the entire distance to the left of the plug, and the squirrel-cage fan will only have about an inch worth of slots on the bottom left of the plug. ?Take a look at some photos on ebay.
?
As you say, it has an EAROM and no battery to go dead. ?There is also no such thing as a "pre-calibrated" NVRAM for the A or B models. ?The NVRAM contains calibration constants for a specific serial number (i.e., a specific set of all the components). ?When you use someone else's calibration constants, it might be close, but your scope is definitely not calibrated.
?
I've used my 2465 with an HP 1607A logic analyzer. ?The 1607A connected to the X, Y, and Z inputs on the 2465 and drew the captured data as literal 1's and 0's on the scope's screen, properly blanked. ?So I know the Z input works correctly.
?
-mark
?
|
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 at 22:07, Chuck Harris via <cfharris=erols.com@groups.io> wrote: The 2465 uses an EAROM, which does fail, and is not available in If my EAROM failed, my plan would be to use a small modern MCU to replace it. I would ignore the 42V(!) logic levels and tap the TTL signals the "other side" of the TTL<->42V converters. The signals are essentially serial, and I reckon I could bit-bash them with carefully written code in the MCU. No, I won't bother unless and until it is necessary. Yes, I have a video of the test routing scrolling through the 256bytes, and would use that as the starting point. |
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
On Wednesday (04/30/2025 at 10:29PM +0200), Christian Eisert via groups.io wrote:
sorry Dave, I didn't mean to be rude. It may have something to do with myFWIW, you might want to double check that. 465 has a Z-axis BNC input on the back panel. From page 2-8 of the 465B service manual, EXT Z-AXIS -- Input bnc connector permits the application of an external signal to intensity modulate the crt display. Does not affect display wave-shape. Signals with fast rise time and fall time provide the most abrupt intensity change. Signals must be time-related to the display for a stable presentation on the crt. The connector is useful for adding time markers in uncalibrated modes of operation. What isn't clearly defined, that I have yet found, is what voltage levels you would present to this input to get maximum and minimum intensity. Chris -- Chris Elmquist |
Re: Seeking Advice: Tektronix 2465 vs. 2465B – or other suggestions?
The 2465 has a separate blower, which is hard to service, and
will need oil by now. The squirrel cage needs to be removed for safety during service, and most don't know how to remove them without damaging the collet: Hint, the screw slot is to help you NOT turn the shaft when you loosen the nut. If you turn the slot like a screw, you are virtually assured to break the collet that holds the blower to the motor shaft. Loosen the nut so that it covers the shaft's slot, and tap it gently until it releases the collet from the shaft. The 2465 uses an EAROM, which does fail, and is not available in any form new. Its life is related to the number of times the EAROM is written. Mostly, it is only written when you calibrate the scope, as the front panel settings are all analog pots and switches that remember their settings by physical positioning, unlike the 2465A and B. The 2465 is a lot smoother operating, as they didn't try to be super tricky, like they did with the A & B scopes. -Chuck Harris On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:09:46 +0200 "Christian Eisert via groups.io" <christian.eisert@...> wrote: Thanks for your comments! :-) |