开云体育

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 开云体育

Succesfully upgraded TDS620 to TDS640.


 

Hello everybody,

I managed to upgrade my TDS620 to a TDS640 by changing resistors on the acquisition-board.
I now have 4 channels active and this is working fine and the scope reports that it is a TDS640.
The only thing which is bothering me is a message added in the error-log every time when I start the scope.
Error: 242 wrong hardware configuration
Acq number of digitizer probe, expect: 2, actual 4

This is not limiting the functionality but is just annoying.
Does somebody have some advise how to get rid of this message?

Regards,

Wamor


 

Hi Wamor,

Some years ago i started to fill a table with model's IDs. Maybe, is your
case: the Processor board ID does not correspond to Acq configuration.
See U3, U4 on Proc. board.
This two are on:
00E0 0000 Register (read only) ID Register 1
00E0 0001 Register (read only) ID Register 2
Try this ID and send your to me, please:
TDS640A 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0

Regards,

Peter

Contact me offboard, if you need a part of schematics from TDS520 regarding
this registers, because this board does not allow attachments

чт, 20 мар. 2025?г. в 14:51, wamor2006 via groups.io <tektronix=
[email protected]>:

Hello everybody,

I managed to upgrade my TDS620 to a TDS640 by changing resistors on the
acquisition-board.
I now have 4 channels active and this is working fine and the scope
reports that it is a TDS640.
The only thing which is bothering me is a message added in the error-log
every time when I start the scope.
Error: 242 wrong hardware configuration
Acq number of digitizer probe, expect: 2, actual 4

This is not limiting the functionality but is just annoying.
Does somebody have some advise how to get rid of this message?

Regards,

Wamor






 

Hello Peter,

Thank you for your quick response!!
I do have the schematics of the TDS520 so I can locate U3 and U4 and the corresponding resistors on my TDS620 (=>TDS640).
I will open my scope tomorrow so I can send you the ID of my scope.
The only thing what I see in the schematics is that only 3 pin's of U3 and U4 are connected with resistors.
The other pin's are fixed to +5.1V or ground. This confuses me with the code you gave me (=>8 bits)
I only could configure 3 pins of U3 and 3 pins of U4 with resistors (=> 6 bits).
Do I have to split the ID between U3 and U4?

Regards,

Wamor


 

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 12:51 PM, wamor2006 wrote:


Does somebody have some advise how to get rid of this message
As far as I know TDS620 and TDS640 don't share the same Firmware although the version numbers are the same.

/H?kan


 

Hello H?kan,

Thank you for the information!
I will take it into account. Until now the scope is working perfectly.
I only got the annoying message in the error log.

Regards,

Wamor


 

Hello Peter,

On my scope U4 is not mounted so there is no setting.
On U3 I got the following configuration:
KD24 KD25 KD26 KD27 KD28 KD29 KD30 KD31
U3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

Any suggestion how to setup the scope to TDS640 with the configuration?

Regards,

Wamor


 

Hi Wamor,

As far as I see the IDs on my boards, in my table, and your ID, the ID
refers to something else. TDS520,TDS540,TDS620 use the same ID. Sorry to be
encouraging.
Maybe, H?kan is right. The only question is, where can we get the firmware
from the TDS640?

I'm doing similar research: how to convert TDS544A to TDS644A. The processor
board is the same, the Acquisition board is different. The firmware of the
TDS544A board does not see the Acquisition board from the TDS644A

Regards,

Peter

пт, 21 мар. 2025?г. в 15:57, wamor2006 via groups.io <tektronix=
[email protected]>:

Hello Peter,

On my scope U4 is not mounted so there is no setting.
On U3 I got the following configuration:
KD24 KD25 KD26 KD27 KD28 KD29 KD30 KD31
U3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

Any suggestion how to setup the scope to TDS640 with the configuration?

Regards,

Wamor






 

Hi Peter,

No problem, your are not encouraging me. This only gives me more energy to sort this out.
Could you give me the ID to set with U3 for the TDS640 which you have in your table?
And maybe also for the TDS620?
I saw some pictures in the internet of the TDS640 CPU board and there the resistors connected to U3 are the same as on my TDS620 CPU board?
When I look at the pictures I also see that the version numbers of the software are the same
Another reason that H?kan is right.
What I also see on my scope that the extra channels are identified on the screen as AUX1 and AUX2 and not CH3 and CH4 what I was expecting.

Yes, your right. I need to find the firmware for the TDS640 then. I will post a new question on this group for that.
Maybe I could remove the resistors connected to U3 and connect switches to check each configuration.
Its only 7 new possibilities. I hope I don't destroy my scope when doing this. Or corrupt the NVRAM.
I did the same with the acquisition board which worked really well.
I am still busy creating a program in Labview to backup the NVRAM using the Prologix GPIB interface.

Regards,

Wamor


 

Wamor,

If you see the service manual, there is an annotation: "Version ID resistor
placement: place U4 & R12-R17 only on boards that have exceeded the ID
number 11110XXX. In this case, the version number is decoded via pins 2,3,4
of U4. R7,R9,R11 are not placed & pins 5-9 of U3 are wired high"

Regarding TDS640 ID,
I sent the ID from TDS640A to you. I do not have them for TDS640, but I can
see that TDS520,TDS540, and your TDS620 have the same IDs.

Regarding AUX and Ch,
Aux input has a simplified schematics than Channel on two channel boards.
Maybe new firmware will fix the wrong names. And maybe some additional
calibrations will be needed after the wrong hardware error will be fixed.

Regarding NVRAM backup,
See tektool program here:
!-(firmware-flash-tools-for-old-tds-series)/
This one do not work on my PCII/IIA card, which i bought for Field
Adjustment, but works on Prologix, as i know.

WBR,

Peter

сб, 22 мар. 2025?г. в 18:27, wamor2006 via groups.io <tektronix=
[email protected]>:

Hi Peter,

No problem, your are not encouraging me. This only gives me more energy to
sort this out.
Could you give me the ID to set with U3 for the TDS640 which you have in
your table?
And maybe also for the TDS620?
I saw some pictures in the internet of the TDS640 CPU board and there the
resistors connected to U3 are the same as on my TDS620 CPU board?
When I look at the pictures I also see that the version numbers of the
software are the same
Another reason that H?kan is right.
What I also see on my scope that the extra channels are identified on the
screen as AUX1 and AUX2 and not CH3 and CH4 what I was expecting.

Yes, your right. I need to find the firmware for the TDS640 then. I will
post a new question on this group for that.
Maybe I could remove the resistors connected to U3 and connect switches to
check each configuration.
Its only 7 new possibilities. I hope I don't destroy my scope when doing
this. Or corrupt the NVRAM.
I did the same with the acquisition board which worked really well.
I am still busy creating a program in Labview to backup the NVRAM using
the Prologix GPIB interface.

Regards,

Wamor






 

Hi Wamor,

Would this work on a TDS620A?

Rafael