Re: 2440: GPIB
Well, no, it isn't "telling you" anything The OS is doing the polling on your behalf in a way that makes it look asynchronous to your code, but is not. At GPIB speeds it's normally just fine to do
By
John Miles <jmiles@...>
·
#88976
·
|
Re: 2440: GPIB
Not one bit. An example to a DM5010 to setup async reading of measures: -> ACV; RQS ON; MODE RUN now when SRQ is raised with a status byte from it of 132 returned from the serial poll, I call ibrd()
By
David Gravereaux
·
#88975
·
|
Re: Could please any one give a clue about this nice pulsed line generator??
Seems that a good friend will send-me as a gift, 5 meters of RG405 Teflon dielectric!!.. I hope this work very fine and fit inside the plugin. Gabriel.
By
iglesia_cristiana_arpas_eternas
·
#88974
·
|
Re: Could please any one give a clue about this nice pulsed line generator??
Gabriel, Tek didn't use the helical-type line you are thinking of - it's straight through with solid conductors, and quite a length of cable. The propogation velocity should be similar to regular
By
Ed Breya
·
#88973
·
|
Re: 2440: GPIB
I just noticed my email address shows up as kcowjn@... and not as kc0wjn@.... Hmmm...
By
Dave Daniel
·
#88972
·
|
Re: 2440: GPIB
Sure.. Had to do something similar with the linux port of my stuff, but if you're using the prologix, that thread won't be idle blocking on ibwait(SRQI); followed by a FindRQS() but busy polling over
By
David Gravereaux
·
#88971
·
|
Re: 2440: GPIB
Exactly... Unless one knew about it earlier and petitions the Patent Office?before the patent is issued.? Good luck unless one sees a "Pat. Pend." notification.
By
druid_noibn
·
#88970
·
|
Re: 2440: GPIB
That is true, but it takes a lawsuit to do so. DaveD
By
Dave Daniel
·
#88969
·
|
Re: 2440: GPIB
Hi, ? I won't start a war - but.... if one can show prior art, it can be used to?invalidate?a patent.? ? I was called?in for expert testimony in one case (only one case).? The result - all
By
druid_noibn
·
#88968
·
|
Re: 2465BDV and P6137 weirdness
I did a quick search of the operation manual and found that the probe configuration menu for the newer firmware versions is under: Measure - Configure - Probe With the earlier firmware, apparently the
By
David Hess
·
#88967
·
|
Re: 2465BDV and P6137 weirdness
More quality time with the manual is required. Between the 2465B and the 7854 manuals, I'm not finding any time to read "Bill and Dave". Thanks for the information. Cheers, DaveD
By
Dave Daniel
·
#88966
·
|
Re: 2465BDV and P6137 weirdness
It makes it very convenient in a production environment to return the scope to a preset setup, so yes, it is a feature. I don't know if it can be disabled. Maybe explore the Oddly enough, my paper
By
Dave Daniel
·
#88965
·
|
Re: 2465BDV and P6137 weirdness
That feature can be disabled on the contemporary oscilloscopes that have it. They have a menu selection which sets what the probe ID button does. <hpnpilot@...> wrote:
By
David Hess
·
#88964
·
|
Re: 2465BDV and P6137 weirdness
And that's a *feature*? Can that be disabled?
By
Peter Gottlieb <hpnpilot@...>
·
#88963
·
|
Re: 2465BDV and P6137 weirdness
My 2465BDV manual states the following: "The following function is available for instruments with serial numbers B049999 and below with firmware version 10 and below or for instruments with serial
By
Dave Daniel
·
#88962
·
|
2465BDV and P6137 weirdness
I have a 2465BDV I'm using as a bench scope and I recently picked up an unused P6137 probe which I started to use. The scope seems to work perfectly, everything as it should be so far as I can tell,
By
Peter Gottlieb <hpnpilot@...>
·
#88961
·
|
Re: Tektronix jewelry
I calculated 6 dollars worth of gold...and that's if the chain is gold filled too. If not...about $1. Les
By
LESLIE WATTS
·
#88959
·
|
Re: Could please any one give a clue about this nice pulsed line generator??
Ed you say"I found that the outer foil has a longitudinal gap so that it doesn't totally enclose the conductors, so it may behave strangely as a single line - it's really optimized for differential
By
iglesia_cristiana_arpas_eternas
·
#88958
·
|
Re: Need help with P6133
I pushed it out the back. I remember I also used a very small hammer, sometimes called a 'tap' hammer and lightly tapped on the needle nose while it gripped the hook. Note: the part of the hook that
By
Robert Simpson
·
#88957
·
|
Re: Need help with P6133
Thanks Bob. You pulled the hook out from the front? Or did you push it out the back?
By
tonyp2422
·
#88956
·
|