¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Tektronix 492BP chassis heat.

arthurok
 

alot of modern equipment either just has a 115/230 vlt switch "like a pc" or a uni
versal input switching supply.
one simple solution for high line voltage is a filament transformer with n its secondary connected as a bucking winding
bucking down your high aussie voltage 25 vac down probably wont bother modern equipment
most modern equipment will work quite well on even 105 vac thats 210 vac on your settings
"experiment using a variac just be carefull about cranking the variac up very high on older equipment"
130 volts is plenty high for checking older stuff my variacs will put out almost 145vac with my high line voltage.
that could blow up and older piece of equipment.
some old radio buffs suggest using a bucking transformer inside of old radios to keep the input voltage down.
alot of very old stuff was designed to work on 110vac.
my 123 vac line voltage is a bit high.
look at the back of even a tek 547 "115 vac" i think the 547 has internal taps my 7904 just has the 115/230 vlt settings "switching supply

----- Original Message -----
From: JOHN BYERS
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 7:31 PM
Subject: [TekScopes] Re:Tektronix 492BP chassis heat.


Hi, Gerald
Dont know in what part of Aussie you be, but over here in the West we are
often plagued with
higher than normal Line Voltages, specially if u live near an industrial
area
or near a feeder transformer / substation

No doubt u have already checked this , but just in case check yr own line
voltage
preferable with a true RMS meter or known caiibrated (standard AC) average
reading one
Test the line waveform too. Generally its a good enough sine wave but I
have seen
line waveform distortions in some of the places ive been that u woudn't
believe!

Check out that the 492P is on its max line taps (if it has such a selection)
and not
just on 220V.
Does it get so hot all the time, or only in the evenings? If the latter it
coulf be that
industrial area shut downs around knock off time leave an uncompensated line
voltage too high

For these very reasons my own GP bench in Perth is ran from a metered step
down auto transformer
with selectable taps and my test bench outlets from a number of AC
stabilizers to keep RMS
line volts to 220v with good AC waveform
If all this seems obvious and u are well aware of it all, my apologies, but
I have ran into
the same issue myself in the past and others with similar problems may
benefit

Whats the ambient temp in yr shop /room ? Probably an external fan is a good
idea anyway
in our ever warming climate for those items of lab gear really intended to
work
in a protected lab environment (not that ime saying the 492P is)

Of course,you could have a fault with the 492P that others are better
quailfied to comment
on but the above seems a good place to start.

Hope yr 492P gives u years of trouble free use. Happy new year

John (hpxref)


Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.

 

--- In TekScopes@..., Lars Ahlstr?m <lea56@...> wrote:

Yeah, I understand. Its just to accept.



But the whole brain of mine want to give the result [ sqrt(-1) = -
1 ]
!!! =)



If I draw a carthesian coordinate system and pinpoint X=1 and Y=1 I
get a
square of the sides = 1.

The square is 1. meter, mm, inch, foot or whatever
Your square of area=1 in the first quadrant of the XY plane, this is
correct.


And if I pinpoint X= -1 and Y= -1 I get a square with the sides -1,
and the
area is then -1. foot, inch, yard or whatever.
The area of the square in the third quadrant is area=1 as well.
Remember that Area = length * height for a square, that being Area = -
1 *-1 = 1, Area is not negative unless it is of a hole or empty space.


The root of -9 is -3 !!! (I think¡­;)
Almost. The root of -1 is "i" for math people, and is "j" for
electronics people.
i or j being root(-1)
i or j squared = -1,remember (root(-1))^2 the root and exponent cancel
i or j ^4th power = -1 *-1 = 1

you get the idea.

So, root(-9)= 3i or 3j for electronics people.

This ordinate in the complex plane is O= 0 + 3j, or simply 3 in the y
direction, and 0 in the x direction. There are lots of ways you can
play with this to give all kinds of phasors and vectors.



Matt



-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Fr?n: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...]
F?r
arthurok
Skickat: den 30 december 2006 23:57
Till: tekscopes@...; Kuba Ober
?mne: Re: SV: [TekScopes] Invitation for another exchange of
questionably
useful information.



its a shared "delusion"
----- Original Message -----
From: Kuba Ober
To: tekscopes@yahoogrou <mailto:tekscopes%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: SV: [TekScopes] Invitation for another exchange of
questionably
useful information.

On Friday 29 December 2006 05:38, you wrote:
That post reminds me of my own high school drama: The j-omega
method.

The root of minus 1¡­ still bugs me. Haven't yet figured it out
after 33
years...

For me it was too mind blowing. Had to stop thinking before I got
a
±è²õ²â³¦³ó´Ç²õ¾±²õ¡­



And¡­ our teacher back then, was a well known idiot, that (by the
rumour)
got a anonymously job advertise in his mail for this teacher job
from a
former headmaster. He was totally incompetent as a mathematician
teacher,
and had one item in his track record only: as a mechanical
instrument tech
at ASEA. He was totally unable to give me the idea (part from my
own
brains
lack of fantasy) of the "root of minus one".
Well, it's an abstract concept, I guess it's better treated like
one. Your
only "idea" should be of the properties of this number, and some
applications
that suit your interests.

I don't think I have any other "ideas" here. You can go pretty far
by just
knowing that the number has "otherwise" normal properties, i.e. you
treat it

like any other number that only doesn't "mix" (in addition) with
real
numbers. And when you square it, it goes away. I did my grad level
vibrations
course without using any other "higher" properties (whatever those
might be)

of sqrt(-1). I guess it shows what a powerful concept it is: only
minimal
properties are necessary to extract a lot of mathematical
expression power.

Cheers, Kuba









Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.

Lars Ahlstr?m
 

Yeah, I understand. Its just to accept.



But the whole brain of mine want to give the result [ sqrt(-1) = -1 ]
!!! =)



If I draw a carthesian coordinate system and pinpoint X=1 and Y=1 I get a
square of the sides = 1.

The square is 1. meter, mm, inch, foot or whatever

And if I pinpoint X= -1 and Y= -1 I get a square with the sides -1, and the
area is then -1. foot, inch, yard or whatever.

The root of that square is -1 !!!

The root of -9 is -3 !!! (I think¡­;)



That¡¯s why I cant accept it, I guess. I also see cube root of -1 = -1, no
problem! ;)



But Im just a fool¡­



/Lars







-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Fr?n: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] F?r
arthurok
Skickat: den 30 december 2006 23:57
Till: tekscopes@...; Kuba Ober
?mne: Re: SV: [TekScopes] Invitation for another exchange of questionably
useful information.



its a shared "delusion"

----- Original Message -----
From: Kuba Ober
To: tekscopes@yahoogrou <mailto:tekscopes%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: SV: [TekScopes] Invitation for another exchange of questionably
useful information.

On Friday 29 December 2006 05:38, you wrote:
That post reminds me of my own high school drama: The j-omega method.

The root of minus 1¡­ still bugs me. Haven¡¯t yet figured it out after 33
years...

For me it was too mind blowing. Had to stop thinking before I got a
±è²õ²â³¦³ó´Ç²õ¾±²õ¡­



And¡­ our teacher back then, was a well known idiot, that (by the rumour)
got a anonymously job advertise in his mail for this teacher job from a
former headmaster. He was totally incompetent as a mathematician teacher,
and had one item in his track record only: as a mechanical instrument tech
at ASEA. He was totally unable to give me the idea (part from my own
brains
lack of fantasy) of the ¡°root of minus one¡±.
Well, it's an abstract concept, I guess it's better treated like one. Your
only "idea" should be of the properties of this number, and some
applications
that suit your interests.

I don't think I have any other "ideas" here. You can go pretty far by just
knowing that the number has "otherwise" normal properties, i.e. you treat it

like any other number that only doesn't "mix" (in addition) with real
numbers. And when you square it, it goes away. I did my grad level
vibrations
course without using any other "higher" properties (whatever those might be)

of sqrt(-1). I guess it shows what a powerful concept it is: only minimal
properties are necessary to extract a lot of mathematical expression power.

Cheers, Kuba

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.

 

Reactance, Negative Frequency, Imaginary numbers, Inductance,
Capacitence, complex phasors, complex exponentials, Transform math...

If you have issues with these concepts then look at your options:
1. Become an EE student (I am one and it has done miracles for my
understanding of systems)
2. Get yourself a copy of the ARRL Handbook
3. Get copies of older electronics books
4. Read Wikipedia articles
5. Take an Applied Math class

It's all out there all you have to do is read.

What I don't understand is why my inbox gets filled up with sillyness
that EE students understand at a basic level.

P.S. If you don't believe in Negative Frequency, don't debate it with
me, just take a Communications Systems class or a DSP class and you
will see where the math and concepts are justified.


Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.

arthurok
 

its a shared "delusion"

----- Original Message -----
From: Kuba Ober
To: tekscopes@...
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 12:02 PM
Subject: Re: SV: [TekScopes] Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.


On Friday 29 December 2006 05:38, you wrote:
> That post reminds me of my own high school drama: The j-omega method.
>
> The root of minus 1? still bugs me. Haven?t yet figured it out after 33
> years...
>
> For me it was too mind blowing. Had to stop thinking before I got a
> psychosis?
>
>
>
> And? our teacher back then, was a well known idiot, that (by the rumour)
> got a anonymously job advertise in his mail for this teacher job from a
> former headmaster. He was totally incompetent as a mathematician teacher,
> and had one item in his track record only: as a mechanical instrument tech
> at ASEA. He was totally unable to give me the idea (part from my own brains
> lack of fantasy) of the ?root of minus one?.

Well, it's an abstract concept, I guess it's better treated like one. Your
only "idea" should be of the properties of this number, and some applications
that suit your interests.

I don't think I have any other "ideas" here. You can go pretty far by just
knowing that the number has "otherwise" normal properties, i.e. you treat it
like any other number that only doesn't "mix" (in addition) with real
numbers. And when you square it, it goes away. I did my grad level vibrations
course without using any other "higher" properties (whatever those might be)
of sqrt(-1). I guess it shows what a powerful concept it is: only minimal
properties are necessary to extract a lot of mathematical expression power.

Cheers, Kuba


Re: Chopper wanted (the electromechanical kind)

 

Looking for GAP/R (Philbrick) amplifiers might help. Some of those were
chopper-stabilized and used IIRC Airpax choppers.
Yes, I had though of that. I think, though, that I would be just as
guilty of a crime doing that as I would be taking the tubes out of an
early Tek scope to make an guitar amp. I think that if I got one of
those amplifiers, I'd have to build it a little shrine...

There's one in that auction place right now, too, taunting me.


Re: Bringing up a 555

 

This is not for filtering. The L manual says:

"Low-frequency peaking for the X10 amplifier is provided mainly by
C6002A and C6002B in the plate circuits of V5942 and V6042. With
their associated resistors, these capacitors form a low-frequency
boost network to compensate for the low-frequency attenuation
introduced in the cathode circuits, the screen circuits, and the RC
coupling network between the Second amplifier and the Second cathode
follower. ... the amount of attenuation can be varied with the LOW
FREQ. ADJ. control in the grid of V6132."

This technique is discussed in detail in "Typical Oscilloscope
Circuitry."

Larry Christopher





--- In TekScopes@..., "morriso2002" <vilgotch@...> wrote:

I'm not sure what you mean by the big honking filter cap in the L.
It
certainly has quite comprehensive decoupling of the B+ to the low
level amps which is pretty standard practice. I'm too lazy to get
out
my L to check, but that's almost certainly what it's for. That
quite
a high gain wideband amplifier and keeping such devices stable is
not
a trivial design task!


Re: 7D15 COUNTER TIMER , FAULTY U688

Lars Ahlstr?m
 

I have an invaluable book from Fairchild, published 1973. ¡°The TTL
Application Hanbook¡±.



I checked your need, and what I can see, the only thing you need is a divide
by 10 counter.

The 8292 is very like the old 7490, today probably the 74LS90, in that it
can easily divide by 10.



The 7490 is two counters, one modulo 2 and one modulo 5. Together they
divide by 10.



You need to make a pin adapter.











In the pdf you need the LS90 B config, I guess, in order to get a
symmetrical output.



I hope this was a step in rite dir 4 u.



/Lars











-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Fr?n: TekScopes@... [mailto:TekScopes@...] F?r
arthurok
Skickat: den 30 december 2006 12:26
Till: TekScopes@...; Craig Sawyers
?mne: Re: [TekScopes] 7D15 COUNTER TIMER , FAULTY U688



maybe dean kidd has one

----- Original Message -----
From: Craig Sawyers
To: TekScopes@yahoogrou <mailto:TekScopes%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 1:41 AM
Subject: RE: [TekScopes] 7D15 COUNTER TIMER , FAULTY U688

the XTAL osc/divider board. In fact a faulty N8292A (U688) Tek PN
156 0091 00
it seems to be wired in just as a
simple /10 divider.
Only thing I could find was a reference to it as a decade counter. Perhaps
someone on the list with an old Signetics logic book could confirm the
details (IOW why it was chosen compared with 74xx logic).

Craig

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Re: Chopper wanted (the electromechanical kind)

Kuba Ober
 

There used to be such a thing as an electromechanical chopper (AKA
vibrator), kind of like a relay tuned to operate at many 100's of Hz,
or faster. Airpax was a popular manufacturer. Tek used them in some
instruments (for example, part #119-0016-00), and I have a need for
one of fairly relaxed specs. Of course, I'd like to spend a little
money as possible. If you have one, please email me OFFLIST - thanks!

This will go into a piece of Tek-related equipment, by the way, if
that helps :)
Looking for GAP/R (Philbrick) amplifiers might help. Some of those were
chopper-stabilized and used IIRC Airpax choppers.

Cheers, Kuba


Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information

Kuba Ober
 

Being myself a remarkably stupid fellow, I have had to unteach myself the
difficulties,
Hadn't we all :)

and now beg to present to my fellow fools the parts that are
not hard. Master these thoroughly, and the rest will follow. What one fool
can do, another can."
That's like with some "advanced" and "seemingly complex" ultra-low-current
measurement. If you look for it on-line, there's a Bob Pease EDN article
where he explains how he measured femtoampere op-amp input currents using the
op amp itself, a capacitor, some teflon standoffs, and some ingeniuity. One
could come up with a thousand more complicated methods that wouldn't even
work as well.

A similar "complex made simple" example is the outstanding L/C Meter IIB (no
relationship to the maker, yada yada), at . It
gives big bang for the buck, considering the "trivial" circuit it employs.
The "triviality" is only a crooked impression -- it took some insight to come
up with a device so simple and so powerful. It doesn't measure certain
classes of components (large dissipation/slow cores like laminated iron), but
for RF work you don't really need much else.

One could come up with thousand more such examples which set apart the "enkelt
och geniallt" (my favourite Swedish saying: simple and ingenious) from the
mundane and complex.

Cheers, Kuba


Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably useful information.

Kuba Ober
 

On Friday 29 December 2006 05:38, you wrote:
That post reminds me of my own high school drama: The j-omega method.

The root of minus 1? still bugs me. Haven?t yet figured it out after 33
years...

For me it was too mind blowing. Had to stop thinking before I got a
psychosis?



And? our teacher back then, was a well known idiot, that (by the rumour)
got a anonymously job advertise in his mail for this teacher job from a
former headmaster. He was totally incompetent as a mathematician teacher,
and had one item in his track record only: as a mechanical instrument tech
at ASEA. He was totally unable to give me the idea (part from my own brains
lack of fantasy) of the ?root of minus one?.
Well, it's an abstract concept, I guess it's better treated like one. Your
only "idea" should be of the properties of this number, and some applications
that suit your interests.

I don't think I have any other "ideas" here. You can go pretty far by just
knowing that the number has "otherwise" normal properties, i.e. you treat it
like any other number that only doesn't "mix" (in addition) with real
numbers. And when you square it, it goes away. I did my grad level vibrations
course without using any other "higher" properties (whatever those might be)
of sqrt(-1). I guess it shows what a powerful concept it is: only minimal
properties are necessary to extract a lot of mathematical expression power.

Cheers, Kuba


Re: Tektronix 492BP chassis heat.

 

--- In TekScopes@..., Didier Juges <didier@...> wrote:
"... Over here, this is the season where a little bit more heat in the
shack is a good thing :-) The 494P is the second best shack heater in
my stable, at 170W. The HP 5370A is close behind at 160W. The best is
the HP 8673M at 200W.

------------------------------------------------------------------

The clear winner here is the DSA602A at 585 Watts!


Re: Tektronix 492BP chassis heat.

Didier Juges
 

I have both a 492 and a 494P and both run quite hot (measured with my finger). I did not put a thermometer on it, but 56 degrees C sounds about right, I can lightly touch it but would not want to press my finger against it.

Over here, this is the season where a little bit more heat in the shack is a good thing :-) The 494P is the second best shack heater in my stable, at 170W. The HP 5370A is close behind at 160W. The best is the HP 8673M at 200W.

I think the small fan blowing over the heat sink makes sense, I am considering adding one to the rack where the instrument resides.

If you have ever opened the instrument, the cooling fan is quite small and it's not clear where the air circulates, but one thing is sure, not much blows over the heat sink. Some air may find its way through the holes, but I have not been able to feel any air flow.

On the other hand, the heat sink supports power transistors that can run at 80 degrees or more pretty much forever, so there should not be real concerns for the reliability of the instrument (I think that should be established by now, these instruments have great reliability), but it is a concern for handling it when it has just been powered.

Didier KO4BB


Gerald wrote:

Hi all,

I felt the rear if my Spectrum Analyser 492BP. I can not touch the metal strip just above the plastic cover it's that hot. So I got out my Fluke IR Thermometer and the surface read 56 Degrees C, wow.
I have discussed this with other people before, however it is now summer down here and not being able to touch the rear in a hotter climate is of real concern.

I have checked the entire unit from top to bottom, AC ripple, excessive current consumption on each supply rail put in a new fan, added a second mini fan internally, I simply can not fault the power supply and the unit.

I am keen to get as many views, termperature values and advise on this subject matter from users of the 492BP's or 494P's. Seriously, I now have to run the SA with a small PC fan blowing air over the rear.

Happy new year to every one.

Regards

Gerald


Re: 7D15 COUNTER TIMER , FAULTY U688

Chuck Harris
 

The 8292A is a low power presettable decade counter that can be connected
as a /2 or /5 counter. In the biquinary mode, it is a /5 followed by a
/2, and produces a square wave.

The outputs can be set to the D inputs on the transition of the data
strobe line. The minimum count rate is 5MHz, and typical 10MHz.

The 7490 is a better counter; the only reason to use an 8292A is if you
need the presettable characteristic.

-Chuck Harris

Craig Sawyers wrote:

the XTAL osc/divider board. In fact a faulty N8292A (U688) Tek PN
156 0091 00
it seems to be wired in just as a
simple /10 divider.
Only thing I could find was a reference to it as a decade counter. Perhaps
someone on the list with an old Signetics logic book could confirm the
details (IOW why it was chosen compared with 74xx logic).
Craig
Yahoo! Groups Links


Re: Invitation for another exchange of questionably

Russ
 

Just need to remember ELI the ICE man. This is the way I learned it in the early 70s. See . I think you have it reversed.

Russ WQ3X




>>>>>>>>>>
I'm lost with you going down too deep into details, right hand and left hand
rule....

Back from school times I just simple memorized (sometimes it's helping to
memorize!) -
phase shift between AC current flow vs voltage drop on same element
(cap/inductor) , and it is helping all the way till today....If current (of
coarse AC) is ahead by 90 deg from voltage -> inductor, then opposite if
voltage is ahead by 90 deg from current -> capacitor.

Greg

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around


Re: Tek 50 ohm cable type

 

--- In TekScopes@..., "trigview" <trigview@...> wrote:

Hello all. Does anyone in the group know the type of coax Tek used for
part number 012-0649-00?
Thanks,
Joe
------------
RG223/U (28.5" with SMA connectors)
/Hakan


hp 8640b off topic card extenders

arthurok_2000
 

does anyone have any 30 pin or even 15 pin hp card
extenders?? also extenders for the cards "inside of 7000
series plug ins"


Re: 7D15 COUNTER TIMER , FAULTY U688

arthurok
 

maybe dean kidd has one

----- Original Message -----
From: Craig Sawyers
To: TekScopes@...
Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 1:41 AM
Subject: RE: [TekScopes] 7D15 COUNTER TIMER , FAULTY U688


> the XTAL osc/divider board. In fact a faulty N8292A (U688) Tek PN
> 156 0091 00
> it seems to be wired in just as a
> simple /10 divider.

Only thing I could find was a reference to it as a decade counter. Perhaps
someone on the list with an old Signetics logic book could confirm the
details (IOW why it was chosen compared with 74xx logic).

Craig


Re: 7D15 COUNTER TIMER , FAULTY U688

 

--- In TekScopes@..., "hpxref" <face1941@...> wrote:

gate board , which led me a bit astray as the fault was actually on
the XTAL osc/divider board. In fact a faulty N8292A (U688) Tek PN
156 0091 00
Now this chip seems totally unavailable on the Net or on epay
Ime thinking of making up a plug in DIL header with a 7490 to
substitute it, as the application seems non critical and its actually
driven by a 7490 up front of it.
John (hpxref)
------------
The 156-0091-00 was replaced by 156-0727-01 in all it's appearances.
No reference to any parts repl or mod kits so it should be a direct
replacement.
According to the databook 156-0727-01 is either:
Motorola 74LS196ND
National 74LS196N/A+
or
Texas 74LS196N3

/Hakan


Re: Bringing up a 555

 

Hi Andy,

I have sent you the 21A/22A manual extract off list.

I'm not sure what you mean by the big honking filter cap in the L. It
certainly has quite comprehensive decoupling of the B+ to the low
level amps which is pretty standard practice. I'm too lazy to get out
my L to check, but that's almost certainly what it's for. That quite
a high gain wideband amplifier and keeping such devices stable is not
a trivial design task!

Good luck with your scoposaurus, it's worth the effort

Morris




--- In TekScopes@...,
"faustian.spirit" <faustian.spirit@...> wrote:

Hi all,

recently got my hands on a 555 System in unknown working condition
(probably been stored 10+ years). Can anybody here give me good
hints
from experience on bringing this up without risking unnecessary
damage?

Especially, can the PSU (these things are [expletive deleted]
heavy!)
be bench-tested separately, or will there be unexpected effects
(underload)? I am aware that I will probably need to take out and
reform all the lytics....

What happens if I operate the unit with only one vertical, or only
one
horizontal, or one only each...? Don't want to switch on and fry
everything in one session :)

I can work on the verticals with the 545B (doing so at the moment...
an extender cable would help with the Type D, it would.... I'd
rather
avoid turning the scope on its side... oh well...)... BTW, does
anyone
of the history buffs here know why a Type L has such a big honking
filter cap on board?

Oh, and BAMA does not have any 21A/22A schematics... oh well
again...

And finally... what ARE the differences between different serial
numbers of the PSU? It is often claimed they are not
interchangeable... why?

Cheers,

Andy