¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: SG503 - low output frequency on 100-250MHz range?

 

Today I removed the variable capacitor, disassembled it, cleaned it (including ultrasonic cleaner with isopropyl alcohol to remove all the old flux etc) then reassembled with new grease and a tiny bit of deoxit on the sliding contacts.
Testing it out, it feels really smooth now :) BUT, my 100-250MHz range is still outputting 87.2-230MHz, it now stays leveled until 230MHz, but after that it unlevels every time (I can adjust LR40 to get me up to 233MHz maximum).

I just thought actually, I replaced some drifted carbon composite resistors around the place with metal film. Could they be having an effect if they are slightly inductive or capacitive?


Re: DM502 with problems

 

Oops -- never mind. Responding to a thread that's almost as old as COVID. (Sorted by subject, which ...)

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070

On 4/20/2022 00:17, Tom Lee wrote:
Hi Rich,

Not a hijack at all -- you properly changed the subject heading, so you're good. :)

If the 555 is getting the proper supply voltage (measure that at the chip), then there are very few things that could cause a no-clock condition. Either the frequency-determing RC is bad (watch out for bad or dirty trimmers), or the output is being loaded down. The latter is easy to check -- just disconnect the output from the rest of the circuit. If you start seeing clock, you know where to look next.

Check the resistances in the RC network. The capacitor is almost certainly not bad. Don't bother to try checking it (other than, say, to verify that it's not a short) unless you exclude all other possibilities.

Good luck!

--Tom


Re: DM502 with problems

 

Hi Rich,

Not a hijack at all -- you properly changed the subject heading, so you're good. :)

If the 555 is getting the proper supply voltage (measure that at the chip), then there are very few things that could cause a no-clock condition. Either the frequency-determing RC is bad (watch out for bad or dirty trimmers), or the output is being loaded down. The latter is easy to check -- just disconnect the output from the rest of the circuit. If you start seeing clock, you know where to look next.

Check the resistances in the RC network. The capacitor is almost certainly not bad. Don't bother to try checking it (other than, say, to verify that it's not a short) unless you exclude all other possibilities.

Good luck!

--Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070

On 7/16/2021 16:36, Richard Peterson wrote:
Sorry for hijacking this discussion, but i'm working on a DM502 as well and wonder if you all could help. The unit powers on and has +5V and +/- 12V (step 1 of the check/adjustment procedure) but I don't have a clock signal - step 2. I'm guessing the NE555 timer IC is fried, but before i start randomly replacing parts, I checked out as much as i could. Voltages at various other points i tested seem OK and the resistors, capacitors and transistors within the display drive circuit all test OK as well. When the unit is powered up, i get a '0' on the display no mater what setting the switch is on with the decimal point showing up on a couple of the switch settings. Sometimes the display will go dark after being on for a while but not always. The sn7447 and LD110 ICs both feel very warm but not too hot to touch - maybe OK?

I tried Roger's suggestion to pull, clean and reseat the ICs but that didn't change anything. So . . . should i try just changing the NE555 to see if it comes back on line. Replace all the ICs? Are there other tests I can try to isolate the root cause of the problem? possibly a dirty switch?

Mouser has the NE555, the SN7447 and the SN7416N but the LD110 and LD111 appear to be approaching extinction although there is one seller on the fleabag selling sets.

Thanks for your help.

Rich




Re: DM501A Input Leakage Source

 

First, what Ed said. :)

Second, you're looking for leakage on the board, but you won't find it there, so don't tear things apart in a hunt for what is a ghost. The leakage is coming from the protective clamping diodes and/or the gate of the input FET. For the latter, one can expect a gate leakage current that is very, very approximately, roughly 6-7 orders of magnitude below IDSS. So, a 10mA IDSS (a reasonable guess for the input FETs) gets you leakage of the order that you are inferring.

Third, what Ed said.

--Cheers,
Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070

On 4/19/2022 21:56, romeo987 wrote:
I have a pair of DM501As that I use as my every day go-to DMMs on my bench. They work well. I have noticed, though, that with an open input on the 200mV range, one reads about +11mV, and the other about +3mV. Goes to zero when the input is shorted. On the 11mV unit, this corresponds to about 1.1nA on board leakage into the A/D input node and the associated 10Mohm input resistance. When I isolate the A/D input and ground it through 10Meg, the reading is around 0.01mV. So it is not the A/D chip itself.

The schematic shows a chain of switches in the S1 assembly, between the input attenuator assembly and the A/D. By watching the display as I switch ranges and short the input, it appears that the leakage injection is into that chain of switches. I isolated the relatively long pc track from the last switch (S1-N) to the A/D (R1613) and it looks like the injection is somewhere in the S1 assembly itself. I sprayed PC cleaner in, around and through the switches liberally, but after drying it - same result. But mere dirty switches aren't enough - there has to be a source of +V somewhere close by. To isolate possible switch leakage from other parts of the circuit, I have grounded, in turn, all of the feeds from the ohms, AC and temperature circuits at the respective switch terminals, with no difference to the display. I can't readily see any other sources.

And now I am out of ideas.
So I am appealing to the wealth and breadth of knowledge in this forum for any suggestions. What else can I do to identify the leakage source?
Is switch removal REALLY as simple as the manual suggests "...by carefully unsoldering the connections and pulling....". Dozens of pins have to be completely cleanly unsoldered for this to work... I really do not want to go there just yet.

Yes, I realise that this parameter is not specified in the manual, and this effect does not detract from the usability of the instrument. It's because I can :-)!

Roman




Re: DM501A Input Leakage Source

 

Hi Roman

If despite Eds argument you need to fix the switches. There is a document
here
that explains how to open the switches and clean them.

I do have a few DM501A that are waiting to be cleaned and I would like info
on how to lubricate them properly after assembly and what
lubricants to use.

Regards
Gudjon


Re: DM501A Input Leakage Source

 

Don't worry about it too much. Any input amplifier of any system needs to have a certain DC input bias current for operation. It may be very small, but won't be zero, or constant, over operating conditions. Whenever the input is scaled beyond its native range with resistive attenuators, it should read very close to zero with no input connected. Inside the native range, the bias current still needs to flow, but can't go into any attenuator resistance (open circuit), so the voltage indicated is the bias current times the leakage resistance to anything and everything around, including non-zero potentials. Some DMMs always have some attenuation or termination resistance (like 1 meg or 10 meg), so you usually won't see much effect. If your DMMs have a definite, fixed input resistance in all ranges, yet still read a definite voltage, then there is some leakage from somewhere, or a definite bias current large enough to show.

If the amount is "in spec," then these various leakages were anticipated and specified accordingly. If you suspect the switching system, then look at all the switch poles and circuit board runs for any adjacent the signal path, or even far removed. This may not be apparent from a single schematic view - range and function switches often have logical coding for decimal points, relay drive, and such, that may show up on different schematics. It doesn't have to be a supply voltage, but anything with a potential away from ground, under any condition. For instance, the input of a TTL gate is a voltage source, not just a passive item.

Ed


DM501A Input Leakage Source

 

I have a pair of DM501As that I use as my every day go-to DMMs on my bench. They work well. I have noticed, though, that with an open input on the 200mV range, one reads about +11mV, and the other about +3mV. Goes to zero when the input is shorted. On the 11mV unit, this corresponds to about 1.1nA on board leakage into the A/D input node and the associated 10Mohm input resistance. When I isolate the A/D input and ground it through 10Meg, the reading is around 0.01mV. So it is not the A/D chip itself.

The schematic shows a chain of switches in the S1 assembly, between the input attenuator assembly and the A/D. By watching the display as I switch ranges and short the input, it appears that the leakage injection is into that chain of switches. I isolated the relatively long pc track from the last switch (S1-N) to the A/D (R1613) and it looks like the injection is somewhere in the S1 assembly itself. I sprayed PC cleaner in, around and through the switches liberally, but after drying it - same result. But mere dirty switches aren't enough - there has to be a source of +V somewhere close by. To isolate possible switch leakage from other parts of the circuit, I have grounded, in turn, all of the feeds from the ohms, AC and temperature circuits at the respective switch terminals, with no difference to the display. I can't readily see any other sources.

And now I am out of ideas.
So I am appealing to the wealth and breadth of knowledge in this forum for any suggestions. What else can I do to identify the leakage source?
Is switch removal REALLY as simple as the manual suggests "...by carefully unsoldering the connections and pulling....". Dozens of pins have to be completely cleanly unsoldered for this to work... I really do not want to go there just yet.

Yes, I realise that this parameter is not specified in the manual, and this effect does not detract from the usability of the instrument. It's because I can :-)!

Roman


Re: A6302 Current Probe - AM503B 588 Error, No DC function

 

Hi David,

Did you ever resolve this issue? I'm observing something similar, though I can't see any signal in DC or AC coupling. I'm trying to determine if the AM503B or A6302 is at fault (or both). FYI I also posted about this on EEVBlog ((error-code-588)/msg4127581/).]

Thanks
Matt


Re: OT: Looking for info on Scientific Atlanta 4647 IF noise tester

Don Bitters
 

I had never seen this unit until I ¡°googled¡± it, however if you google this phrase ¡° Scientific Atlanta 4647 IF noise tester document¡± I found ATE Corp.,they
rented this unit to customers, they have a brochure and specs for download, and phone no. They might have support documents or can tell you who last supported this unit. Also ¡°manualzz.com¡± has a listing for this unit. They might have a manual in their archive. Free is nice, but you might actually have to pay for a manual. Have you checked with Scientific Atlanta? They built this unit.
Don Bitters


Re: 2465 Calibration

 

We used TEK PG506 and,TM501. The Leo Bodnar 40 ps pulser is only ?49 and very useful.

Perhaps someone nearby has the TEK,CAL plug-ins ?

Jon


Re: Modifying W Plugin to use 6DJ8 Tubes

 

The traces are no signal, input open-circuit, with attenuator x1 and 1mV/div, i.e. worst case. I was just showing how much the transformer¡¯s magnetic field affected the plugin. ¡°Transformer power off¡± is the baseline noise with no power on the transformer. The other two show ripple due to the active transformer in different locations/orientations. Enclosing the transformer should eliminate it completely, but I was satisfied with bracket vertical as pictured.

I have several 120-0252-00, available for the cost of shipping. I rectify, filter, insert a series diode to prevent backfeed in case of tube burnout, and current-regulate with an LM317.

Yes, on the 12AT7-adapted units I¡¯m using CR2032¡¯s. At 10-60uA drain, only while the instrument is running, they should last for their shelf life. I put them in insulated holders, mostly to avoid stray capacitance and shorts, but it also makes replacement trivial. In normal instrument position they dangle below the ceramic strip circuitry. Out of caution, I bypassed them with 0.1uF ceramic, right at the former junctions between Q154 emitters and the grid-stopper resistors. The grid current occurs because the 12AT7 has such a low bias, only -0.5V vs about 2.5V for 8416 or 6DJ8. That -0.5V is not negative enough to drive away electrons on a collision trajectory. The 3V battery minus 0.5V i.e. 2.5V becomes Vce on Q154. (Actually it¡¯s more like 2V due to drop through the 82-ohm cathode resistors.)

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jeff Dutky via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 4:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Modifying W Plugin to use 6DJ8 Tubes

Dave,

I've been looking at the pictures in the album you created ("Type W Plugin 8416-to-6DJ8 Conversion" here /g/TekScopes/album?id=261883</g/TekScopes/album?id=261883>) and I'm wondering about the three pictures noted "Mounted on the back upper right corner with bracket vertical," "Mounted on the back with bracket horizontal," and "Transformer power off." What is the signal being shown here?

I assume that the change in orientation is affecting nearby tubes due to the transformer's magnetic field: would enclosing the transformer in mu-metal help?

It seems like finding a suitable transformer is challenging, or more challenging than buying 12AT7s, at least.

You are using coin cells (CR2032) to bias the grids of V114B/V214B: how long do they last?

-- Jeff Dutky


Re: Thinking of Jumping into a Spectrum Analyzer

 

Thanks to everyone who responded, both in this thread and privately. I am now suffering from the paradox of choice, which is fine: it gives me good subjects for research while I sock away money for whatever I end up buying, all of the suggested options coming out to real money (SAs are expensive, and in demand, it would appear).

I did find a number of interesting resources on line, including an issue of HP Journal (Dec 1984) discussing the hardware and software implementation of the 3561A dynamic signal analyzer, including their FFT implementation on a TMS320 DSP. The HP data sheets for several low frequency SAs gave me a lot of insight into what these instruments would be used for (e.g. detection of failed or failing mechanical parts, or audio spectral analysis). This specifically validates my plan to use an SA to calibrate my FG502 sine wave output for minimum distortion (sadly, the TinySA will not work, as it does not go down to 10 kHz, where the FG502 calibration is done).

-- Jeff Dutky


Re: Modifying W Plugin to use 6DJ8 Tubes

 

Dave,

I've been looking at the pictures in the album you created ("Type W Plugin 8416-to-6DJ8 Conversion" here /g/TekScopes/album?id=261883) and I'm wondering about the three pictures noted "Mounted on the back upper right corner with bracket vertical," "Mounted on the back with bracket horizontal," and "Transformer power off." What is the signal being shown here?

I assume that the change in orientation is affecting nearby tubes due to the transformer's magnetic field: would enclosing the transformer in mu-metal help?

It seems like finding a suitable transformer is challenging, or more challenging than buying 12AT7s, at least.

You are using coin cells (CR2032) to bias the grids of V114B/V214B: how long do they last?

-- Jeff Dutky


Re: 2465 Calibration

 

I'm located in a suburb of the Minneapolis/St. Paul area of Minnesota.


Re: 2465 Calibration

 

The fast edge low-aberration. This means a 1ns or better edge with good settling at the transition, no ringing or other issues this is usually a cal source or a tunnel diode pulser to speed up the edge time. If you are located close, I could use some 2xxx content and have all the cal gear needed. Being 300 Mhz when you get to the high frequency compensation section this most likely going to need TD signals or type 284 edges. TD pulsers will need high amplitude squairwaves. Mine needs about 70ish Vpk-pk for the TD to start doing its thing.

Zen

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tom Miller
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 5:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] 2465 Calibration

Square wave, 0.5 VPP, from ground to +0.5 volts at 1 kHz.

Where are you located? Maybe someone close has the cal generator.

Regards,

Tom in MD WA3PZI

On 4/19/2022 5:30 PM, jimbert4 via groups.io wrote:
I'm trying to calibrate my 2465 but don't have the Tektronix calibration equipment. For the CAL 01 Horizontal adjustments, I used square waves from my Hantek oscilloscope/multimeter/waveform generator, which only goes up to 10MHz square waves. I think this was not great but was adequate for these calibrations. However, when I progressed to the vertical calibrations, I'm not even sure what was required. When it says to connect a 0.5 V, standard-amplitude signal from the Calibration Generator, what does that mean? The service manual says that the Calibration Generator is "Fast-rise, low-abberation amplitudes: to 1V. Rise time: 1ns or less. Repetition rate: 1 kHz to 100 kHz. Precision amplitudes: 0.01 V to 50 V +/-0.25%." Okay, so when they say a 0.5V standard-amplitude, what frequency do they want? Is that 0.5V peak-to-peak? Is it AC (goes positive and negative) or DC (all positive)? Do they want a square wave, or do they want a constant DC voltage?




--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.


Re: 2465 Calibration

 

Square wave, 0.5 VPP, from ground to +0.5 volts at 1 kHz.

Where are you located? Maybe someone close has the cal generator.

Regards,

Tom in MD? WA3PZI

On 4/19/2022 5:30 PM, jimbert4 via groups.io wrote:
I'm trying to calibrate my 2465 but don't have the Tektronix calibration equipment. For the CAL 01 Horizontal adjustments, I used square waves from my Hantek oscilloscope/multimeter/waveform generator, which only goes up to 10MHz square waves. I think this was not great but was adequate for these calibrations. However, when I progressed to the vertical calibrations, I'm not even sure what was required. When it says to connect a 0.5 V, standard-amplitude signal from the Calibration Generator, what does that mean? The service manual says that the Calibration Generator is "Fast-rise, low-abberation amplitudes: to 1V. Rise time: 1ns or less. Repetition rate: 1 kHz to 100 kHz. Precision amplitudes: 0.01 V to 50 V +/-0.25%." Okay, so when they say a 0.5V standard-amplitude, what frequency do they want? Is that 0.5V peak-to-peak? Is it AC (goes positive and negative) or DC (all positive)? Do they want a square wave, or do they want a constant DC voltage?



--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.


2465 Calibration

 

I'm trying to calibrate my 2465 but don't have the Tektronix calibration equipment. For the CAL 01 Horizontal adjustments, I used square waves from my Hantek oscilloscope/multimeter/waveform generator, which only goes up to 10MHz square waves. I think this was not great but was adequate for these calibrations. However, when I progressed to the vertical calibrations, I'm not even sure what was required. When it says to connect a 0.5 V, standard-amplitude signal from the Calibration Generator, what does that mean? The service manual says that the Calibration Generator is "Fast-rise, low-abberation amplitudes: to 1V. Rise time: 1ns or less. Repetition rate: 1 kHz to 100 kHz. Precision amplitudes: 0.01 V to 50 V +/-0.25%." Okay, so when they say a 0.5V standard-amplitude, what frequency do they want? Is that 0.5V peak-to-peak? Is it AC (goes positive and negative) or DC (all positive)? Do they want a square wave, or do they want a constant DC voltage?


Re: SG503 - low output frequency on 100-250MHz range?

 

With the low side being way below expected I would suspect the capacitor it seems like the entire frequency range is shifted. On thing to not in tuning the 503 is some of the ranges are not tuned for frequency range but harmonic suppression as well as making the expected range.

Zen

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jared Cabot via groups.io
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 11:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] SG503 - low output frequency on 100-250MHz range?

Ok, I gave LR140 a tweak, and found that squeezing the coils closer shifts the frequency range down a little (a couple MHz) and spreading the coils apart raises it by the same.
I also found that the unit is flashing the display to say the output is unleveled above 228MHz. So at the moment I have the inductor set so that the maximum frequency is 228MHz, this means at the moment the 100-250MHz range has a span from 85MHz to 228MHz

So still on the hunt.... I'll have to look deeper to see if some component is out of spec. I might give the variable capacitor a careful teardown and clean too.


Re: Need help diagnosing and repairing a Tektronix 491 Spectrum Analyzer

Jim W3FAW
 

I haven't been able to get this HT operating so I'll have to wait until the budget allows for some kind of receiver. Please don't give up on me, but it may be a minute before I can continue this project. Thanks Tom and W9RP for your help. I believe we are on the right track with this local oscillator issue. Regards, Jim


Re: not a tek but philips

 

Here you go:

There are multiple websites that have the manual. Just google Philips PM 3262 .

Hope this helps, Gordon