¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Slightly OT: How can I dissolve Potting Compound?

 

I've been working with MEK for years with no apparent health issues. MEK is the solvent of choice for virtually al adhesives except CA and epoxies used in speaker building and repair. I do have positive ventilation running when I'm working with the stuff, but have never worn a mask or gloves.

I might add that MEK is nowhere near as volatile as acetone or methylene chloride and for most things is a better solvent.

I'm 69 years old and as long as I get my afternoon nap, I'm OK to go. Maybe if I had spent my life avoiding all potential toxicity, I might be in better shape, but I doubt it. It would also have likely been a much less enjoyable and productive experience, living like that.

For cleaner/defluxer/degreaser, I have found that solvent blends are often more effective than a single solvent full strength. Water (as a solvent with tri sodium phosphate surfactant) plus orange oil plus alcohol plus MEK in various combinations can be pretty amazing. To make an excellent defluxer, you usually don't need more than about 30% MEK to get it done and can have as much as 50% water. The MEK, alcohol and, to a lesser extent, orange oil, are the most aggressive parts of the mix but without the water and TSP, the MEK and alcohol quickly dissipate and the gunk redeposits. The water with TSP float it up to where its relatively easy to mop up with absorbent towel or even just wash off in running water, if that's practical.

Thomas Garson
Aural Technology, Ashland, OR
By my calculation, the dynamic range of the universe is roughly 679dB,
which is approximately 225 bits, collected at a rate 1.714287514x10^23 sps.

On 1/3/21 1:49 PM, Roy Thistle wrote:
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 10:08 AM, Greg Muir wrote:


If you want to kill your liver, soak your hands in MEK. Acetone and lacquer
thinner are just as bad. All can be very destructive on components.
MEK is not MEKP... and MEK is not known to be toxic to the liver. Acetone is not as "bad" (whatever that means) as MEK... and acetone is present in the human body, and disposed by it, during normal metabolic processes.
Respect chemicals; but running in a panic for the hazmat suit, at the mention of the word "chemical" isn't necessary.
On the other hand... worrying about being bored to death, by studying too much chemistry... doesn't seem to be much of a problem.


Re: Odd 2247A problem, looking for insight

 

Any clue as to its provenance? Harvey's xmtr shot was the first thing that crossed my mind. One of those little resistors could go before you finished saying 'Oh sh**!'
-ls-


Re: Slightly OT: How can I dissolve Potting Compound?

Bob Albert
 

I recall my late sister telling me 'everything in moderation'.? She was referring to food, but the same applies to solvents.? If you are involved with the stuff, do so very sparingly and you probably won't be harmed.
I am reminded of the Burgess Battery Company which I believe was shuttered due to hazardous chamicals harming its employees.? The batteries were good but the employees paid the price.

On Sunday, January 3, 2021, 02:53:18 PM PST, Greg Muir via groups.io <big_sky_explorer@...> wrote:

I figured that I would probably elicit an over reactive response from you, Roy.

To those not familiar with handling chemicals dangerous to one¡¯s health it is better to be more safe than sorry.? If you peruse the medical research reports you will most likely come across some of the deleterious effects from these solvents.

If you can stand up and definitely say that using such chemicals do not have physiological effects on the internal organs I welcome the proof.? Otherwise it is bet to err on the cautious side.

Hopefully the end of another spitting match.

Regards,

Greg


Re: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?

 

I have similar ideas, phase detection, AC and DC voltage measurement, and PNP/NPN transistor lead ID, beta, and leakage to frame.? Going to be more complicated than the existing projects because I threw a bit of technology at it.

Chasing hardware redesign bugs for the moment, then on to the software.

Harvey

On 1/3/2021 4:57 PM, Andy Warner wrote:
I have also thought about a TM500 tester that included:

- Presence/absence (but not correctness or ripple) of each of the supply
voltages
- Brought out all supplies to banana jacks for metering and load testing
- Indicated correct/incorrect phasing of the AC supplies
- Pass/fail indication for the pass transistors

The Tek fixture demonstrates how to indicate the correct phasing.

After looking into those cheap component testers, they all seem to be AVR
based, the code and principles of operation are openly available, and I was
thinking that it should be possible to bludgeon the code into submission to
expect an NPN transistor on one set of pins, and a PNP on another, measure
the hFE and provide red/amber/green indication for each transistor (amber
being low hFE (< 20.)

At first, I was thinking of making a board that fitted into a module, but
bringing all the supplies out to jacks/binding posts, and the indications
just seemed like a headache given the front panel real-estate - plus the
PCB would be large, but mostly empty, therefore not very cost effective.

I am coming round to the idea of an external box plus a butchered Jamma
cable, thoughts ?

On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 9:35 AM Colin Herbert via groups.io <colingherbert=
[email protected]> wrote:

Some time ago I had similar thoughts on accessing the connections to the
pass transistors, as well as accessing the 25 VAC connections. I had a
problem on one of my TM50X mainframes with one of these windings wired up
incorrectly, so that a plug-in module worked fine in one mainframe, but not
in another. After some fiddling about, I purchased a JAMMA male connector
which would mate with the backplane of the TM50X and modified it slightly
to make it compatible. I also soldered bare copper wires to the appropriate
connections for 25 VAC and the EBC of both pass-transistors. With the use
of an extender, I was able to check the pass-transistors with one of those
cheap Chinese testers and to bring out all three 25VAC points to a scope.
Triggering off the 17.5 VAC winding, I was able to see if the 25 VAC
windings were in phase or not.

After showing the proof of concept, I thought that I might make a very
simple custom plug-in module to bring the interesting connections out to
the front panel in order to be able to do the job more easily. This project
is still in my imagination, but it shouldn't take too long to put together
when I get "a round tuit".

I have already made some posts on these ideas on this Forum a while ago.

Keep Safe, Colin.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Michael W. Lynch via groups.io
Sent: 02 January 2021 04:44
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the
design. Someone might find this useful?

Jared,

Is there a way to easily bring the EBC of each pass transistor to the
front panel? These transistors are items that often fail and need to be
tested, especially on these old frames. Not trying to throw a wrench into
the works, but those pass transistors are a major point of failure and they
can cause all sorts of damage to the plug ins when they are bad. Even if
you could add some pads near the appropriate connections at the rear to
allow those of us who wanted to add such functionality at our option?

--
Michael Lynch
Dardanelle, AR












Re: Slightly OT: How can I dissolve Potting Compound?

 

I figured that I would probably elicit an over reactive response from you, Roy.

To those not familiar with handling chemicals dangerous to one¡¯s health it is better to be more safe than sorry. If you peruse the medical research reports you will most likely come across some of the deleterious effects from these solvents.

If you can stand up and definitely say that using such chemicals do not have physiological effects on the internal organs I welcome the proof. Otherwise it is bet to err on the cautious side.

Hopefully the end of another spitting match.

Regards,

Greg


Re: Slightly OT: How can I dissolve Potting Compound?

 

Dennis,

Can't help much on the spectral tube side of things, but I used to work in thick film hybrids many moons ago where we had to occasionally 'de-pot' circuits.

One of the few things which will attack epoxy is dichloromethane, also known by its older name methylene chloride. Its availability has become a little more restricted under the CFC regulations but it is available as a reagent. It doesn't /dissolve/ epoxy, but it does cause it to jellify, swell, and lose strength allowing it to be unpicked. It will attack almost all synthetics including the polyethylenes and polypropylenes: a handful of materials are more tolerant of it such as PTFE, PEEK and PVDF.

Dichloromethane is a very aggressive chemical which boils at a low temperature; we used to use it with a water blanket which prevented loss to atmosphere - water is considerably less dense than dichloromethane and immiscible, so it forms a barrier layer above the solvent.


Jon.

On 03/01/2021 02:18, Dennis Tillman W7pF wrote:
I need to dissolve the black HV potting compound of a 12VDC powered
Helium-Neon laser inverter power supply I have that stopped working. I would
appreciate any suggestions on what works to do this. I¡¯m guessing it may be
epoxy. I stuck the tip of a hot soldering iron in it for a few seconds
without much effect.

When it was working it turned out to be perfect for powering gas filled
Spectrum Tubes. These spectrum tubes (smaller versions of neon signs) filled
with a variety of gasses are an excellent source of spectral lines for the
7J20 / J20 Rapid Scan (Optical) Spectrometer to measure.

Spectrum tubes require an initial high voltage (1,000V to 1,500V for
example) to break down the gas and start it conducting. Once the gas in the
spectrum tube conducts the voltage across the gas drops (250V to 450V for
example) and unless you limit the current (to a few mA) it will destroy the
tube. Can anyone can point me to a source of information on how to determine
the proper voltage and current I need to power these spectrum tubes? Is
there a web site or group devoted to Spectrum Tubes?

Something happened to the inverter and it stopped working. The input is now
open. The inverter is a black potted brick 3¡± x 1?¡± x 1¡±. The ballast
resistor has continuity so that is not the problem. The original label on
the inverter is partially destroyed so I can¡¯t tell what its initial high
voltage output was or what it current limits at. All I do know is that it
was made by
Laser Drive Inc.
5465 Wm. Flynn Hwy. Gibsonia, PA 15044
Model: 1150-6330, S/N: 610574
The input was +12VDC at 0.35A.

I wrote to the company that took over the company that took over Laser Drive
Inc. asking if they could tell me the output voltage and limiting current
but I didn¡¯t receive a reply.

At this point I am hoping if I can remove the potting compound I can figure
out what went wrong with it.

I have a different, bigger Laser Drive Inc. potted inverter which is powered
by 115VAC. It puts out 2350VDC at 6.5mA. This causes the Spectrum Tubes to
flicker. They do not run continuously. I am guessing that this because 6.5mA
is more current than the tube can conduct. The amount of current the tube
draws increases in proportion to the inside diameter of the tube but I don¡¯t
know much about this matching the power supply to the tube. All I do know is
the one that went bad seems to be an ideal match for the spectrum tubes I
have.

Battery operated (DC input) inverters are much more desirable than AC input
inverters for this application because the AC rectification and poor
filtering shows up on the output DC as significant ripple causing the
amplitude of each spectral line to be blurred.

Dennis Tillman W7pF




Re: Spectrum analyzer Tektronix 7L13 on mainframe Tektronix 7603

 

Hi Jim,

Very interesting -- could you post a link to where you found that information?

Thanks!

-- Tom

--
Prof. Thomas H. Lee
Allen Ctr., Rm. 205
350 Jane Stanford Way
Stanford University
Stanford, CA 94305-4070

On 1/3/2021 10:24, J Mcvein wrote:
Greetings Attilio - I did some research on the 502, and the xtal that tek used.
It is a SC cut 3d overtone series resonant crystal in a TO-5 transistor package.
Bliley Crystal in the US still might offer this cut.
The parts I have are AT cut 3 OT 7pF shunt resonant. My experience with them
is that they have a sharp resonance range. In the 502, the crystal Fc is stretched in
a VCXO circuit to effect the tracking of the SA. An AT cut crystal will move a bit
in frequency then just quit oscillating. It will also not fit in the available space. -J-
-----Original Message-----
From: "Attilio" <a.alovisetti@...>
Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2021 12:48pm
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Spectrum analyzer Tektronix 7L13 on mainframe Tektronix 7603



Jim Mcvein,
do you have any news for me in relation to 52.5 MHz crystal?
I am in Italy, if you give me your bank details and the amount I have to pay for the crystal and the shipping costs, I will make you an international bank transfer
Alternatively I can pay with PayPal..

Thanks

-- Cheers
Attilio









Re: 2230 storage deja vu

 

On 1/3/2021 8:24 AM, Kevin via groups.io wrote:
Hi all

Quite a lot of years ago there was a topic posted here that went on for some time but never reached any conclusion as to the cause of the problem...unfortunately the exact problem I think I'm having right now. I wonder if any of you have encountered this and with fresh insight perhaps shine light on the cause? I've done a fair bit of investigation so far but I'm loathe to really get stuck in and start pulling the thing to bits without at least a better likelihood of being sure where the problem probably lies. Some basics - in NON storage everything is perfect and ALL diagnostics pass OK. In this respect there is zero problem. I re-calibrated it all about 18 months ago and have loved this scope for many years. PROBLEM - In STORAGE mode everything seems a bit mixed up. Channel 1 displays a trace but the amplitude is half or less of the real value. Channel 2 is similar but probably a quarter of the real value. Switching to BOTH it looks like there is only one trace but actually they are both overlaid on top of each other and it is not possible to separate them at all. Putting a sine into 1 and a square into 2 then the resulting waveform is an odd hybrid of both but not in the way 'add' would do that. Similar strange things happen with the amplitude also and all the other issues are a combination of this general characteristic. With the 4 wire connector going to channel 2 on the storage board removed and grounded appropriately leaving only channel plug connected watching a sine trace in store mode as I write it is just 20% of the real value but but does keep expanding to around 50% every now and then. The post from years ago seemed to point to U2101 on the storage board that both channels go to first but I'm not sure. Someone actually said it was that chip mixing up the signals but never gave evidence as to why that was so. Those chips just do not exist anymore so if it is then it's game over. I de-soldered mine and put it in a socket so I could take it out easily if I needed to. Is it an issue with the vector board perhaps? That's a pain to get to so I'd like a good idea the issue might be there before I go that route. Finally, time measurements are NOT affected. So, if you've got this far reading I thank you and if anyone has any thoughts please do share, I'd be very grateful. Cheers.
Kevin

Are all of these combinations OK in analog mode?

I would check the cables and the switches that play into the mode changes.

I have a bunch of the 2230. 2221A, and 2232 scopes and I have had to replace a few of the ribbon cables because of some really strange problems.


My 2230 is off the air right now, the line input filter blew up and I still haven't gotten everything back together.

I think that the only scope that is harder to work on than the 2230 is the Sony Tek 335 which is damn near impossible to service!

If you like your 2230 you will love the 2232, it seems like Tek improved almost everything between the two models.

Feel free....

? Bert






Re: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?

 

I have also thought about a TM500 tester that included:

- Presence/absence (but not correctness or ripple) of each of the supply
voltages
- Brought out all supplies to banana jacks for metering and load testing
- Indicated correct/incorrect phasing of the AC supplies
- Pass/fail indication for the pass transistors

The Tek fixture demonstrates how to indicate the correct phasing.

After looking into those cheap component testers, they all seem to be AVR
based, the code and principles of operation are openly available, and I was
thinking that it should be possible to bludgeon the code into submission to
expect an NPN transistor on one set of pins, and a PNP on another, measure
the hFE and provide red/amber/green indication for each transistor (amber
being low hFE (< 20.)

At first, I was thinking of making a board that fitted into a module, but
bringing all the supplies out to jacks/binding posts, and the indications
just seemed like a headache given the front panel real-estate - plus the
PCB would be large, but mostly empty, therefore not very cost effective.

I am coming round to the idea of an external box plus a butchered Jamma
cable, thoughts ?

On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 9:35 AM Colin Herbert via groups.io <colingherbert=
[email protected]> wrote:

Some time ago I had similar thoughts on accessing the connections to the
pass transistors, as well as accessing the 25 VAC connections. I had a
problem on one of my TM50X mainframes with one of these windings wired up
incorrectly, so that a plug-in module worked fine in one mainframe, but not
in another. After some fiddling about, I purchased a JAMMA male connector
which would mate with the backplane of the TM50X and modified it slightly
to make it compatible. I also soldered bare copper wires to the appropriate
connections for 25 VAC and the EBC of both pass-transistors. With the use
of an extender, I was able to check the pass-transistors with one of those
cheap Chinese testers and to bring out all three 25VAC points to a scope.
Triggering off the 17.5 VAC winding, I was able to see if the 25 VAC
windings were in phase or not.

After showing the proof of concept, I thought that I might make a very
simple custom plug-in module to bring the interesting connections out to
the front panel in order to be able to do the job more easily. This project
is still in my imagination, but it shouldn't take too long to put together
when I get "a round tuit".

I have already made some posts on these ideas on this Forum a while ago.

Keep Safe, Colin.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Michael W. Lynch via groups.io
Sent: 02 January 2021 04:44
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the
design. Someone might find this useful?

Jared,

Is there a way to easily bring the EBC of each pass transistor to the
front panel? These transistors are items that often fail and need to be
tested, especially on these old frames. Not trying to throw a wrench into
the works, but those pass transistors are a major point of failure and they
can cause all sorts of damage to the plug ins when they are bad. Even if
you could add some pads near the appropriate connections at the rear to
allow those of us who wanted to add such functionality at our option?

--
Michael Lynch
Dardanelle, AR











--
Andy


Re: Slightly OT: How can I dissolve Potting Compound?

 

On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 10:08 AM, Greg Muir wrote:


If you want to kill your liver, soak your hands in MEK. Acetone and lacquer
thinner are just as bad. All can be very destructive on components.
MEK is not MEKP... and MEK is not known to be toxic to the liver. Acetone is not as "bad" (whatever that means) as MEK... and acetone is present in the human body, and disposed by it, during normal metabolic processes.
Respect chemicals; but running in a panic for the hazmat suit, at the mention of the word "chemical" isn't necessary.
On the other hand... worrying about being bored to death, by studying too much chemistry... doesn't seem to be much of a problem.


Re: Odd 2247A problem, looking for insight

 

Let's see, 62 ohm resistor (that feels like a 1/10 watt just to start), input capacitance of some sort (20 pf, but you'd think that wouldn't be much), feed the scope RF.? 27 Mhz, 20pf gives about 294 ohms, 144 mhz gives about 55 ohms.? I'll suggest someone was trying to look at the output of a transmitter directly.? I'm surprised more didn't go....

Harvey

On 1/3/2021 2:35 PM, walter shawlee wrote:
I have a nice looking Tek 2247A scope here that has been sitting on the shelf for a while, due to a bad Channel i input. the signal is a horribly attenuated and differentiated replica of the actual input. Everything else is perfect. In a moment of covid-induced boredom, I felt I had to get to the bottom of this. I had a hunch that this was the input resistor being broken or damaged (there is always a flying resistor from the input BNC to the vertical input on 2200 series scopes). It was the only thing I could think of that could give this result.

It takes some effort to de-can the scope, and remove the complex shield over the vertical inputs, but sure enough, when opened, the barely visible input resistor (62 ohm carbon film) was BURNED. I replaced it, and ta-da, everything is working. What the heck?

Here's what I just can't figure out, this scope has no 50 ohm input function, so no low impedance path exists to help burn this resistor due to over-driving, SO HOW DID it get burned and leave the scope undamaged?

I am totally mystified by this, and keen to hear any opinions. I just can't see how this fault happened without vaporizing the vertical input channel.

all the best for the new year,
walter (walter2 -at- sphere.bc.ca)
sphere research corp.









Re: Spectrum analyzer Tektronix 7L13 on mainframe Tektronix 7603

 

Thank you so much Jim,
therefore your 52.5 MHz crystal cannot be used to convert the TR503 to TR502.
Patience I will try to find a TR502.
I thank you for the help you have given me.

--Cheers
Attilio


Re: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?

 

I see no significant advantage to a group purchase of the wafer switch for this tester. DigiKey has 100+ available and the discount for a quantity purchase is not that much. Further, it is likely that most folks will need to buy some other parts so just combine the switch with that order.

Packaging a chunky wafer switch with planar circuit boards will complicate the packaging for me and I really have enough to do already.

But, it does make good sense to do a single buy of a quantity of the board sets. I expect significant cost savings from that and ordering boards by Gerber files is not in everyone's experience.

Larry

On 1/3/2021 9:36 AM, Craig Cramb wrote:
...
Larry is there a chance that there might be a purchase of the Rotary switch as a group purchase from DigiKey or all parts sourced up to the individuals.
Craig...
--
Best wishes,

Larry McDavid W6FUB
Anaheim, California (SE of Los Angeles, near Disneyland)


Re: Peter Keller's Book Mailing Status (Minor Correction)

 

My many thanks to Dennis for a job well done. From a PhD in EE, I want to thank you for all the work that you have done.
I will think of you and your efforts when I read and enjoy his book!! Marvin


Re: I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?

 

Colin, I don't know a cost yet for the board set and I am not sure I can get an accurate estimate of shipping to the UK. My experience shipping to Europe is that it cost a *lot* more than our domestic USA shopping. You may know more about those shipping costs than do I.

But, you can't sit on the fence. I will know more about the cost for USA deliveries in total but I will need commitments from international buyers so that I know how many board sets to order. Remember, too, that you will most likely need to buy some of the parts, surely that $25 switch from DigiKey.

Karry

On 1/3/2021 7:07 AM, Colin Herbert via groups.io wrote:
Hi Larry,
I might well be interested in a board set, so long as the cost and shipping to London, UK aren't too crazy. I have been intending to build one of these testers for a while and have a few of the components necessary, plus a main board that would certainly do the job, but Jared's looks like it could make the job fairly straightforward. I especially like the front panel - very nice-looking!
Colin.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Larry McDavid
Sent: 31 December 2020 23:13
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] I built a TM500 mainframe tester, and updated the design. Someone might find this useful?
Anyone interested in buying sets of boards to share?
Larry
On 12/31/2020 11:27 AM, Jared Cabot via groups.io wrote:
Hi all,

I have been accumulating TM500 modules and mainframes for a little while, so I recently finished building an 067-1201-99 TM500 mainframe tester from the Tek construction notes floating around.
I updated the design somewhat and designed it for simplified construction (Not a single wire to strip and solder!) and I thought someone here might be interested in taking a look or even building one themselves.
Here's a link to the youtube video:


And here's a link to the google drive with all the gerbers and schematics and stuff. I went so far as to rewrite the manual with the alterations and corrections included.


Direct link to the new manual:


Let me know what you think, and let me know if you see any errors that need correcting. :)

Regards
Jared.




--
Best wishes,

Larry McDavid W6FUB
Anaheim, California (SE of Los Angeles, near Disneyland)


Re: Odd 2247A problem, looking for insight

 

Walter,
I suppose it is possible that U112 has beefy input protection (diode clamps to the supplies?) that might survive enough current to burn a small 62 ohm resistor. At maximum sensitivity the attenuators would be switched out of the circuit.
--John Gord

On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 11:35 AM, walter shawlee wrote:


I have a nice looking Tek 2247A scope here that has been sitting on the shelf
for a while, due to a bad Channel i input. the signal is a horribly attenuated
and differentiated replica of the actual input. Everything else is perfect. In
a moment of covid-induced boredom, I felt I had to get to the bottom of this.
I had a hunch that this was the input resistor being broken or damaged (there
is always a flying resistor from the input BNC to the vertical input on 2200
series scopes). It was the only thing I could think of that could give this
result.

It takes some effort to de-can the scope, and remove the complex shield over
the vertical inputs, but sure enough, when opened, the barely visible input
resistor (62 ohm carbon film) was BURNED. I replaced it, and ta-da, everything
is working. What the heck?

Here's what I just can't figure out, this scope has no 50 ohm input function,
so no low impedance path exists to help burn this resistor due to
over-driving, SO HOW DID it get burned and leave the scope undamaged?

I am totally mystified by this, and keen to hear any opinions. I just can't
see how this fault happened without vaporizing the vertical input channel.

all the best for the new year,
walter (walter2 -at- sphere.bc.ca)
sphere research corp.





Odd 2247A problem, looking for insight

walter shawlee
 

I have a nice looking Tek 2247A scope here that has been sitting on the shelf for a while, due to a bad Channel i input. the signal is a horribly attenuated and differentiated replica of the actual input. Everything else is perfect. In a moment of covid-induced boredom, I felt I had to get to the bottom of this. I had a hunch that this was the input resistor being broken or damaged (there is always a flying resistor from the input BNC to the vertical input on 2200 series scopes). It was the only thing I could think of that could give this result.

It takes some effort to de-can the scope, and remove the complex shield over the vertical inputs, but sure enough, when opened, the barely visible input resistor (62 ohm carbon film) was BURNED. I replaced it, and ta-da, everything is working. What the heck?

Here's what I just can't figure out, this scope has no 50 ohm input function, so no low impedance path exists to help burn this resistor due to over-driving, SO HOW DID it get burned and leave the scope undamaged?

I am totally mystified by this, and keen to hear any opinions. I just can't see how this fault happened without vaporizing the vertical input channel.

all the best for the new year,
walter (walter2 -at- sphere.bc.ca)
sphere research corp.


Re: SC-502 transistor

 

I put the BD911(NPN) and BD912(PNP) in mine. D44H10 TiP73 (B or C) and D45H10 TIP74 (B or C) should also work OK


Re: Slightly OT: How can I dissolve Potting Compound?

 

Dennis I have some of those laser PSU, 12V input I think.

Please PM if you want more info, photos etc.


Jon


Re: Spectrum analyzer Tektronix 7L13 on mainframe Tektronix 7603

 

Greetings Attilio - I did some research on the 502, and the xtal that tek used.
It is a SC cut 3d overtone series resonant crystal in a TO-5 transistor package.
Bliley Crystal in the US still might offer this cut.
The parts I have are AT cut 3 OT 7pF shunt resonant. My experience with them
is that they have a sharp resonance range. In the 502, the crystal Fc is stretched in
a VCXO circuit to effect the tracking of the SA. An AT cut crystal will move a bit
in frequency then just quit oscillating. It will also not fit in the available space. -J-

-----Original Message-----
From: "Attilio" <a.alovisetti@...>
Sent: Sunday, January 3, 2021 12:48pm
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] Spectrum analyzer Tektronix 7L13 on mainframe Tektronix 7603



Jim Mcvein,
do you have any news for me in relation to 52.5 MHz crystal?
I am in Italy, if you give me your bank details and the amount I have to pay for the crystal and the shipping costs, I will make you an international bank transfer
Alternatively I can pay with PayPal..

Thanks

-- Cheers
Attilio