¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date

Re: Tek 7854 intermittent issues

 

No pictures this time but, (YET AGAIN) it's changed behavior, now its getting AVG acquisitions (mostly) fine (As in not erroring out but still occasionally having some weird defects to the wave but now everything is the right size and, mostly intact). Still refuses to do any AQS's at all. I did notice though that during an AVG acquisition (when the issue was active) if I already have it in digital mode. I could actually see it missing chunks as it gets data and then just filling it in with weird stuff at the end, making those slopes and spikes (badly trying to interpolate the missing sections of the wave?) *see first video for alright example.


Never mind, in the middle of writing this I turned on the scope to check ( sat for a few hours powered off ) and it was doing it again, but I've discovered something very strange that may have solved (at least a small part of and temporarily) the mystery of this thing when I tapped on the transistors in the horizontal section, suddenly it worked just fine! This thing is weird, doesn't make much sense to me as they aren't even the metal potted ones but the ones in the heat sink clamps. Luckily I took some video this time, first before the miraculous (and likely temporary) fix and again when it started making proper acquisitions. Still won't do AQS under any settings though.

Broken video:
Working video: (flashing on analog side is from a dirty pot I'm fairly sure)

Also Dave, you are definitely right about which transistor that is, thank you for finding it for me. According to my service manual A17Q141 to be exact . Although Q141 (and it's paired Q41) are PNPs ( tek part no.151-0220-00 ) but I can't really find any other specs than some incomplete ones I scraped together, having some difficulty locating an equivalent replacement if case I need it, but I may just be bad at looking (don't know if you can fudge the numbers a bit like some caps)

Tomorrow, if I have time after work, I'll finally check the power supply and see if it's correct or not. Sorry if this was a little rambly, I should have called it a night hours ago.


Re: Strange Tek2440 issue

 

Hi,

I would first check the power supply. I'm not a big fan of "the universal
internet method of fixing everything", that is indiscriminately recapping
stuff, but in the case of the 24xx family DSOs, I had 3 of those and all
had practically every cap failed in the PSU. So a complete replacement of
capacitors at the secondary side is one thing I would do first at the
slightest suspicion of power problems.

Szabolcs


Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> ezt ¨ªrta (id?pont: 2020. aug. 31., H,
20:04):

Acquisition stopped, doesn't happen. I can go all the way to 2ns/div.

Normal trigger but trigger set to +or- 90v (not triggering), it happens.

Single, doesn't happen, can go all the way to 2ns/div, can even trigger
it (in single) and it doesn't happen. The probe was hooked to the
calibrator for the triggers. Normally doesn't matter if there's a
signal there or not.

Thanks!
Vince.


On 08/31/2020 01:43 PM, Siggi wrote:
Hey Vince,

I have no idea what's going on there, though I'd suggest looking at the
power supplies as a first step.
You can also - perhaps - diagnose this a little ways by playing with
trigger and acquisition settings. My guess would be that a power supply
is
collapsing when the sample clock exceeds some particular rate, though
that's of course just a guess.
Does this still occur when the acquisition is stopped? If not, you can
maybe narrow this down by e.g. going to NORM sweep/trigger mode, and
setting up a trigger that never hits. Does it still happen when
acquisition
is started but no trigger fires? How about under a single-shot
acquisition
in AUTO mode, etc.

Siggi

On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 5:37 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:


I picked up a 2440 on ebay that had the dead nvram battery problem. Got
that fixed up with an external battery. Ran thru the self cal and ext
cal and all seems fine, except when the sweep rate is turned above 100
or 200 ns.

In trying to research this a bit, the only thing I could find was on one
of the Tek forums back in 2017 but there were zero responses. Here is
how the other person described the problem:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The 5 volt regulated rail is getting crowbared when the scope Sec/Div is
set to 100ns or faster. If save is pressed at a slower setting the
Sec/Div can then be set to any value without the 5 Volt rail getting
pulled down. It appears the issue only occurs during an active
acquisition cycle at 100ns Sec/Div or faster.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

While I didn't measure the 5v rail, the screen shrinks a couple of times
as the waveform changes, the inputs get switched to GND and the display
goes blank. Sometimes, if I'm quick enough, I can turn the sweep back
down (1us or slower) and it'll recover, but I still have to go to the
input coupling and switch the inputs off of GND.

Anyone seen this or have any ideas what's going on?

Thanks!
Vince.
--
K8ZW




--
K8ZW




Re: Reverse part lockups

 

That's true when looking for Tek part numbers. The added value of OCR here would be *reverse* use: "What's the Tek no. of a 2N4275?"
That's the purpose of the common parts catalogs of which we also got a release and are posted on TekWiki. I don't know if they all are there but they can be scanned and uploaded.

Dave


Re: 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)

 

The 1S1 is a fine sampler when it works. It is however what I would call "high strung". It has a way of failing in interesting and completely different ways all the time.

It is also not easy to troubleshoot because of the feedback loops and complex sequence of events.

You could keep an eye out for this



Then you could also power up the four times faster and also more reliable 1S2 should you find one.

Maybe you already know the 1S1 has a 50 ohm input, keep an eye out for these fun accessories:

800MHz+ active probe



TDR pulser add-on



Hi-Z probe adapter



Somebody, I don't know who (but he smells good), bought all of these things the picosecond they hit eBay so they are more expensive now.

These things are all over half a century old now so they are brittle and stinky and probably don't work.

But they are fun!

You can also start here and build your own adapter


Re: Strange Tek2440 issue

 

F269 is soldered but I was able to clip onto L256. A minor amount of ripple that only changed by a few millivolts when I added a 2200uf cap across it. No change when I switch below 200ns.

The 5V jumping around is the 5V regulated that C494 is on. There it drops a volt or so when I switch below 200ns. According to my Fluke, when it goes out completely it holds at 3.93v.

The 10v reference that divided and sent to U870B is solid.

Thanks!
Vince.

On 08/31/2020 06:43 PM, Siggi wrote:
Hey Vince,

My bet would be that if you go back to the 5VD supply, you'll find that
C455 and/or C262 are shot. CR354 is also a suspect, but the bulk caps on
the 5VD supply are the primaries. If you can find a way to look at the
supply before L256, I betcha you're going to find it all jaggy and
disgusting.
If you have a way to measure the two capacitors, that'd work too. Assuming
F269 is not soldered in, you can pretty much isolate the two capacitors by
popping it out.

Good luck,
Siggi

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 6:23 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:

Yep, I have a 2430A and a couple of 11402s. I used the 2430A.

I checked the + and -5 and the + and -15 volt rails. Sure enough, the
+5 volt rail drops exactly 1 volt while it's happening.

I'm thinking, would piggybacking another 5 volt source on that rail
isolate if it's the power supply or something else?

Thanks!
Vince.


On 08/31/2020 05:09 PM, Siggi wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 2:04 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:

Acquisition stopped, doesn't happen. I can go all the way to 2ns/div.

Normal trigger but trigger set to +or- 90v (not triggering), it happens.

Single, doesn't happen, can go all the way to 2ns/div, can even trigger
it (in single) and it doesn't happen. The probe was hooked to the
calibrator for the triggers. Normally doesn't matter if there's a
signal there or not.
Interesting. I'd look at the power supplies, should be easy enough to see
what's happening as this is reproducible. Do you have a second digital or
storage scope to look at what's happening on the power rails?
The only difference between single shot and run without trigger is that
the
single shot capture has a very limited duration. Maybe the problem is
that
a power rail is marginal, and so gets dragged down when the CCDs &
capture
clock keep running for a while.
Once you start capturing the CCDs start storing (and discarding) the
signal, waiting for a trigger.


--
K8ZW



--
K8ZW


Re: 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)

 

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 01:26 AM, David Collier wrote:


Forgot to mention I have TEK TAS465; HP1640A and Hantek 200MHz digital
available as test gear.
Isn't that an HP 1740A 'scope?

Didn't see a 'reply' icon previously, no idea why not.
You won't see the Reply icon unless logged in.

Raymond


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

Hi Dave,
My comments embedded

On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 01:46 AM, Dave Brown wrote:


I am of the minority opinion here. The file is linear. You grab the scroll bar
and scroll to where you need to be. For me it's quick.
That's true when looking for Tek part numbers. The added value of OCR here would be *reverse* use: "What's the Tek no. of a 2N4275?" Unless the reverse list is available.

I'm just waiting for someone to post an OCR'd/searchable file.
I was trying to find out if posting such file was acceptable, see my earlier messages.

I would like to copy and paste a couple of pages and see how well it matches the RPR.
The OCR'ed pages don't look different from the original because the searchable text normally is invisible "behind" the normally visible level.

Believe me, I tried different tools and the accuracy was absolutely awful. My opinion
is that a false search is worse than no search, hence the lack of OCR. I don't
think microfiched 132 column computer printout works all that well for this
purpose.
After looking further into my results this evening I have to agree with you, unfortunately.


Tektronix gave the museum a release. I personally spent 80+ hours scanning
these documents and put a lot of care into them. I have an OCR version of the
670 RPR. Here's what the part numbers look like when I copy and paste to see
what's really there..
670-0070-01
67o-oo71-00
67(R)07~:.:oo
670-0073-00
:67(R)07S~tr

A full search of this document is taking a very long time and it will never
find 670-0071-00. Your mileage may vary. I chose to use the scroll bar as it
is faster and accurate. Somebody prove me wrong. I'd like to know what tool
you used that gave accurate results.
As I wrote above, my results have on further study shown to be quite disappointing as well. A certain category of items, like module numbers, serial number groups etc. were pretty successful but that's not what the effort was for. Searches on e.g. a JEDEC number are far less successful and that's what I would consider an important benefit. Obviously, I didn't try "looking for" Tek numbers, because that's not what would be interesting: Simple scrolling gets you there. That is never what OCR'ing is about. It is for searches like the example I gave above.

It is my impression that the discussion in this thread has been hampered by misunderstanding of what was to be achieved: Smaller files, OCR and if so, for what purpose. Especially the latter two have caused confusion.
It turns out that OCR'ing the available files does not produce satisfactory results, as stated early during the discussion. That aspect was confused with why one would want it at all.

Raymond


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

I am of the minority opinion here. The file is linear. You grab the scroll bar and scroll to where you need to be. For me it's quick.

I'm just waiting for someone to post an OCR'd/searchable file. I would like to copy and paste a couple of pages and see how well it matches the RPR. Believe me, I tried different tools and the accuracy was absolutely awful. My opinion is that a false search is worse than no search, hence the lack of OCR. I don't think microfiched 132 column computer printout works all that well for this purpose.

Tektronix gave the museum a release. I personally spent 80+ hours scanning these documents and put a lot of care into them. I have an OCR version of the 670 RPR. Here's what the part numbers look like when I copy and paste to see what's really there..
670-0070-01
67o-oo71-00
67(R)07~:.:oo
670-0073-00
:67(R)07S~tr

A full search of this document is taking a very long time and it will never find 670-0071-00. Your mileage may vary. I chose to use the scroll bar as it is faster and accurate. Somebody prove me wrong. I'd like to know what tool you used that gave accurate results.

Dave


Re: 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)

David Collier
 

Thanks all for advice. Yes would love to get a 500-series TEK! A 535 (?) in particular, just before the multi-tubed Y amp version.
Forgot to mention I have TEK TAS465; HP1640A and Hantek 200MHz digital available as test gear.
Didn't see a 'reply' icon previously, no idea why not.
Valves (tubes) keep you warm in the winter.
Regards


Re: Strange Tek2440 issue

 

Hey Vince,

My bet would be that if you go back to the 5VD supply, you'll find that
C455 and/or C262 are shot. CR354 is also a suspect, but the bulk caps on
the 5VD supply are the primaries. If you can find a way to look at the
supply before L256, I betcha you're going to find it all jaggy and
disgusting.
If you have a way to measure the two capacitors, that'd work too. Assuming
F269 is not soldered in, you can pretty much isolate the two capacitors by
popping it out.

Good luck,
Siggi

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 6:23 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:

Yep, I have a 2430A and a couple of 11402s. I used the 2430A.

I checked the + and -5 and the + and -15 volt rails. Sure enough, the
+5 volt rail drops exactly 1 volt while it's happening.

I'm thinking, would piggybacking another 5 volt source on that rail
isolate if it's the power supply or something else?

Thanks!
Vince.


On 08/31/2020 05:09 PM, Siggi wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 2:04 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:

Acquisition stopped, doesn't happen. I can go all the way to 2ns/div.

Normal trigger but trigger set to +or- 90v (not triggering), it happens.

Single, doesn't happen, can go all the way to 2ns/div, can even trigger
it (in single) and it doesn't happen. The probe was hooked to the
calibrator for the triggers. Normally doesn't matter if there's a
signal there or not.
Interesting. I'd look at the power supplies, should be easy enough to see
what's happening as this is reproducible. Do you have a second digital or
storage scope to look at what's happening on the power rails?
The only difference between single shot and run without trigger is that
the
single shot capture has a very limited duration. Maybe the problem is
that
a power rail is marginal, and so gets dragged down when the CCDs &
capture
clock keep running for a while.
Once you start capturing the CCDs start storing (and discarding) the
signal, waiting for a trigger.


--
K8ZW




Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:03 PM, zenith5106 wrote:


Yes absolutely, it's the same one. Off course I had to unlock it first but
reference to VintageTek is still s?there.
I use an old Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro and bookmarking isn't that much work, it may
have taken me less than 30 minutes.
Hi H?kan,
Thanks for allowing me to look into your file. I don't think both are the same scan. I'll PM you re. this.
Re. bookmarking: You're using it to create a TOC, which can be as limited or extensive as you want. I like your choice. A search function after OCR'ing provides functionality a bit like a cross reference. Every search takes the role of an entry into an xref-table, which can be many thousands. In this document it would e.g. allow finding the Tek number for a particular JEDEC transistor, like a 2N4275. Can be very handy if a JEDEC-to-Tek list isn't available.
Unfortunately, I found both your and my OCR result lacking, as expected and mentioned by others in this thread.

Raymond

Raymond


Re: Strange Tek2440 issue

 

Yep, I have a 2430A and a couple of 11402s. I used the 2430A.

I checked the + and -5 and the + and -15 volt rails. Sure enough, the +5 volt rail drops exactly 1 volt while it's happening.

I'm thinking, would piggybacking another 5 volt source on that rail isolate if it's the power supply or something else?

Thanks!
Vince.

On 08/31/2020 05:09 PM, Siggi wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 2:04 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:

Acquisition stopped, doesn't happen. I can go all the way to 2ns/div.

Normal trigger but trigger set to +or- 90v (not triggering), it happens.

Single, doesn't happen, can go all the way to 2ns/div, can even trigger
it (in single) and it doesn't happen. The probe was hooked to the
calibrator for the triggers. Normally doesn't matter if there's a
signal there or not.
Interesting. I'd look at the power supplies, should be easy enough to see
what's happening as this is reproducible. Do you have a second digital or
storage scope to look at what's happening on the power rails?
The only difference between single shot and run without trigger is that the
single shot capture has a very limited duration. Maybe the problem is that
a power rail is marginal, and so gets dragged down when the CCDs & capture
clock keep running for a while.
Once you start capturing the CCDs start storing (and discarding) the
signal, waiting for a trigger.

--
K8ZW


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:03 PM, zenith5106 wrote:


If you want to have a look at it
Got it, H?kan.

Raymond


Re: Strange Tek2440 issue

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 2:04 PM Vince Vielhaber <vev@...> wrote:

Acquisition stopped, doesn't happen. I can go all the way to 2ns/div.

Normal trigger but trigger set to +or- 90v (not triggering), it happens.

Single, doesn't happen, can go all the way to 2ns/div, can even trigger
it (in single) and it doesn't happen. The probe was hooked to the
calibrator for the triggers. Normally doesn't matter if there's a
signal there or not.
Interesting. I'd look at the power supplies, should be easy enough to see
what's happening as this is reproducible. Do you have a second digital or
storage scope to look at what's happening on the power rails?
The only difference between single shot and run without trigger is that the
single shot capture has a very limited duration. Maybe the problem is that
a power rail is marginal, and so gets dragged down when the CCDs & capture
clock keep running for a while.
Once you start capturing the CCDs start storing (and discarding) the
signal, waiting for a trigger.


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:14 PM, Raymond Domp Frank wrote:


The 151 file I downloaded was 243 MB and locked. Was yours smaller or did you
reduce the size that much? And AFAIK bookmarking is done manually. With the
file being 762 pages that's a lot of work!
Are we talking about the same thing?
Yes absolutely, it's the same one. Off course I had to unlock it first but reference to VintageTek is still s?there.
I use an old Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro and bookmarking isn't that much work, it may have taken me less than 30 minutes.
Then again it's only bookmarked every 50'th P/N but it allows you to find a number close to the one you
need and then scroll only a few pages. For searching to be efficient you have to be very sure that all pages
was correctly OCR'ed and that there were no misses.
If you want to have a look at it it's here for a short while: www.hakanh.com/dl/temp/RPR151.pdf

/H?kan


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:01 PM, zenith5106 wrote:


I didn't make a complete new version, I just OCR'ed and bookmarked the one
available on the Wiki.
Hi H?kan,
The 151 file I downloaded was 243 MB and locked. Was yours smaller or did you reduce the size that much? And AFAIK bookmarking is done manually. With the file being 762 pages that's a lot of work!
Are we talking about the same thing?

Raymond


Re: 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)

 

It might be possible to power a 1S1 from an IO-14 scope but IMO it's deep into "not worth the effort" territory. Do it right and get a Tek mainframe.

The 1S1 is a fine sampling system but be aware that it contains a number of different types of tunnel diode which are not known for reliability. Plus it's easy to burn out the sampling diodes. Expect some serious troubleshooting before it's working. You'll need to build or buy a fast-rise pulser to do some of the common adjustments.

HTH,
Dave Wise
________________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Colin Herbert via groups.io <colingherbert@...>
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 10:51 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [TekScopes] 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)

Hi,
I have a copy of the IO-14 scope schematic as 4 gif files. I could email it to you if you are interested, but I don't think it would be easy (or useful) to try to connect it to a 1S1. You really need a 500-series Tek scope to use it. Others may have different ideas.
Colin.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of dc888@...
Sent: 31 August 2020 06:04
To: [email protected]
Subject: [TekScopes] 1S1 sampling unit; (also 7B53AN & 7A18 plugins)

Hi all,
just acquired the above (but missed out on the actual TEK scope), all at a local recycling centre.
Would like to buy a TEK scope, working or not, in which I can use the 1S1.
Is anyone prepared to dispose of a suitable TEK scope? Plus carriage to Oz at cost.
Alternatively there is a Heathkit IO-14 (8MHz, valves/tubes, triggers to 2.5 MHz) on its way to me.
Maybe I could use the 1S1 in this, with suitable connections? I have the IO-14 schematic, but Heathkit Manuals have now been commercialised.
Any advice appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
David C.


Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:38 PM, Raymond Domp Frank wrote:


Unfortunately, the one available contains so much "detail" that much automatic compression doesn't seem likely
I didn't make a complete new version, I just OCR'ed and bookmarked the one available on the Wiki.

/H?kan


Re: TM500 series plastic face plate repair; solvents?

 

I have repaired non-styrene plastic with a UV-cured resin called Bondic.
The kit comes with a tube of the resin and a blunt needle-type application
tip built-in. The opposite end includes a UV LED "flashlight". The stuff
cures very quickly on exposure to this light (or other shortwave UV
source). It is clear and needs to be used where the UV light can get to it
or it won't cure. The resulting plastic is hard and quite strong. I fixed
an ID card that cracked at the oval cutout for the neck lanyard. I
reinforced it front and back with pieces of clear plastic cut from a
typical semi-rigid plastic package. That repair has held up very well with
no delamination and despite some flexing of the card. To repair something
like a faceplate, if a small piece is missing, it could be built up with
the resin (best to cure it in "layers") and then sanded and painted to
match. A crack could be repaired from the back and then sanded down. Any
resin that gets into the crack by capillary action will cure when UV
exposed. I fixed a chipped piece of crystal this way - let the resin be
drawn in by capillary action, then UV zapped it. I built it up to bulge
above the surface and then once hardened. used a single-edge razor blade to
cut it down to match the underlying surface.

I admit to not having tried this on any plastic instrument faceplates, but
I think it might work given my experience.

Steve H

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 2:56 PM Dave Seiter <d.seiter@...> wrote:

In the world of modeling and slot cars (and any other place styrene is
used) there is a repair technique whereby one uses liquid styrene modeling
solvent to "melt" scrap plastic into a goo that can be applied as a filler
to holes, missing sections, or even build up new features that didn't
previously exist. Once the solvent outgasses, the new plastic can be
worked the same as the original. Slot car folks do this all the time,
because kids were encouraged to "modify" their cars, leaving endless cut
wheel wells in their wake. A really good repair is almost invisible, but
usually given away by dirt/slight discoloring in the repair.
Last night I was wondering if the same technique could be applied to all
those broken corners on the TM500 plugins. The plastic isn't styrene, and
while the styrene solvent did dissolve the plastic, it became chalky and
unusable, even the next morning.
Has anyone experimented with this before? Know what type of plastic was
used? It wouldn't be good for large missing sections (too much time
involved), but smaller missing sections could easily be repaired if the
right solvent was found.
-Dave




Re: Reverse part lockups

 

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:01 PM, zenith5106 wrote:


FYI, the 151 version I made for my own use, as mentioned in a previous post,
is about 40 Mb.
234 MB seems quite big for the file so I'm not surprised yours is smaller. Unfortunately, the one available contains so much "detail" that much automatic compression doesn't seem likely. As I mentioned in another message, my results still seemed quite OK at 196 MB.

It is OCR'ed (not so good) and bookmarked every 50 P/N. Personally I prefer bookmarking over
searching the document.
Depends on the kind of document and the intended use.
Some paper books contain bookmarks (TOC-like) *and* are searchable. Searchable is a kind of virtual xref.
With the component tables, I far prefer them being searchable over having to bookmark them.
Imagine trying to find the Tek number from a JEDEC number in a Tek component number organized list... With HP numbers I find it even worse - in HP lists that is...

You can find a specific P/N just as fast if not faster
with bookmarking.
Depending on the file, bookmarking can be a *lot* of work...

Raymond