Re: Tek 549 storage board anomaly
Thanks. Here's rev. "PE" picture: /g/TekScopes/album?id=66032The technically-commented revision history should be in the IRB for the '549. Hopefully available in VintageTek's microfiche database. Thanks, Sebastian. Rajesh VS wrote: Thanks Sebastian, Interesting, Mine as well as the one Kurt posted back in 2008 have marking "PC" Both have (c) of 1965. Pics here - The one in Manual is PB,mine is PC, and what you have is PE, So I assume there is manual for later Revs and possibly a PD board too ? . . .
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Sebastian Garcia <sg-listas@...> wrote: Thank you, Rajesh. Yes it seems so, as this one is #5202 (Portland facilities).
The mod has been done in 1965, as both the board picture in the available manuals and my physical board have printed "1965" in a copper/gold area. The figure shows also the "PB" inscription, while this physical board shows "PE". A revision version?
For reference, the mentioned picture is the following: - (BAMA manual, S/N 1408) Fig. 4-16 in page 4-11 (with a typo in the overlay label for R1185). - (manoman.sqhill.com manual) Fig. 4-15 in page 4-10. Both manuals are available on Kurt's site.
Regards, Sebastian.
Rajesh VS wrote:
just for reference, I DO see R1185 in my 549, Scope Serial # - 001295. May be the change happened in later Revs?
regds Rajesh . . . On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Sebastian Garcia <sg-listas@...> wrote: Hi, I know this is an old post, but same puzzle here.
Trimpot R1185 and nearby flood-gate related components (appearing in the available PDF manuals) aren't physically present in my storage board (dated 1965).
Any clues on the storage circuits evolution of this model?
Regards, Sebastian.
Tim Phillips <tim@...> 06/20/10 #49860 from Tim P (UK)
I am trying to cal a 549 storage 'scope ser# 701529 The manual refers to FG cathode level R1195, but on this instrument this pot does not exist. In fact it appears to have never existed on this storage board (dated 1965). Both my manual and the BAMA one show it (sectn 6-45 and the schematic) There must be another manual with a different cal procedure. Anyone have any insights ? many thanks (confused) Tim P
|
Hi Jim, If you look at the picture of this same board on the TekWiki website (here: ) , you will see that those vias are also not filled with solder... I don't know exactly why Tek did it like that back then, but apparently they either covered those vias / pads during wave soldering, or - maybe - the solder mask is covering those vias and therefore, preventing them to be filled with solder.
Apologies for the following outrageous question but... Do you know what I mean when I say PLATED through holes? That those holes, regardless not having any component lead traversing them, are copper plated and therefore, connects the traces on both sides of the board? Did you really check that the traces are not connected, or you're just assuming they aren't because you didn't see any sign of solder there? Please don't feel insulted, but it just crossed my mind that depending on one's line of business, one may have never seen a plated through hole (or plated "via"), as we call it, and may just think that the component leads MUST be soldered at both sides to establish that connection.
If, however, you DO know what the plated holes are, and if - still - your board is really missing the plating and both sides of those traces are indeed disconnected, I can't explain how in this world it could have happened, but it doesn't change the fact that the cure for this problem is to just solder tiny pieces of wire to both sides. Sure enough, if the failed plating is present anywhere else on the board, you will need to look for missing connections under components that may hide the traces, like the ICs, and the connectors J5 & J6
Rgrds,
Fabio
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 07:22 PM, Jim Olson wrote: Fabio thanks for some reason I did not receive the PM responce but oh well I have it now. The only problem with your idea on this board is that none of the through hole vias is they were never soldered at all absolutely no trace of solder anywhere around all the holes. I have not investigated the A6 inter board to see if something has been done there and also with any extra wiring from somewhere else.
Jim
On August 6, 2018 at 11:58 AM Fabio Trevisan <fabio.tr3visan@...> wrote:
Hello Jim, The pictures did arrive correctly to me and I just posted the pictures to the Tekscopes photo section:
link is here: /g/TekScopes/album?id=65983
As I already replied in PM to you, I'll repeat it here... This rather odd missing of the through hole plating of **ONLY** the power supply rails, to me, seems like an effort of a previous owner to isolate a short-circuit in the power rails.
Given the age of those scopes, it can very well have happened before this group even existed, and before it became common knowledge that this kind of problem is often caused by a shorted tantalum capacitor, and then the scope was tossed away for - say - 20 years.
I would suggest you take advantage that the through holes are stripped out, and try to measure ohms from each of those traces to ground, everywhere that you can follow them and, if you happen to find some spot that is showing low impedance to ground... you'd have probably found the culprit.
If you can't find any of those traces shorted to ground, I would just rebuild the through-hole vias and try to apply power to the thing.
As I mentioned earlier, I don't think the presence or absence of the DM44 is too involving, in regards to the A5 trigger board and, sure enough, it has nothing to do with this mystery of the missing vias.
The only there is between the DM44 & the A5 trigger board, is the pick-off signal from the ALT TRACE SYNC PULSE, from the emitter of Q916, shown on diagram <8> of the 464 and connected through a 20K resistor, from this transistor, to a wire and then to the DM44 through pin 2 of P3201, as shown on the DM44's service manual, diagram <3> "TIME & 1/TIME <3>" and diagram <9> "464,465 & 466 INTERFACE".
The latter is the signal that tells the DM44 the end of a sweep, to allow the DM44 to switch the delay time control voltage at the end of every sweep, between the scope's own Delay time multiplier pot, and the DM44's Delta time pot (and v-v) which, ultimately is what allows the measurement of TIME and 1/TIME.
Please let us know what else did you find on this board power rails.
KRgrds,
Fabio
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 09:23 PM, Jim Olson wrote:
Hi Fabio I sent the picts in an email to you PM but comcast has changed
there
email to a new system so I'm not sure if you got it or not.
Jim
On August 3, 2018 at 12:23 PM Fabio Trevisan <fabio.tr3visan@...> wrote:
Hi Jim,
Feel free to send me the pictures (PM to fabio.tr3visan@...). I will be glad to post it to the photos area of Tekscopes.io, and reply
to
you with a link to the folder.
Rgrds, Fabio
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 03:07 PM, Jim Olson wrote:
Fabio I have the pictures but I'm not using any kind of photo posting
service
it's gotten to complicated and I don't post much to forums anyway so
can I
send them to you and you can post them up?
Jim
On August 3, 2018 at 7:26 AM Fabio Trevisan
<fabio.tr3visan@...>
wrote:
Hello Jim,
I owed and restored a 464 with DM44 (now given to a friend) and I
don't
think there are any other "optional" boards linked to the presence (or absence) of the DM44.
The only optional boards that apply to the 464 / 466 are: A. The optional DC inverter board (option 7)... That one can't
co-exist
with
the DM44 (the inverter uses the same windings on the main transformer
that
are
used to power the DM44).
B. The composite video Sync Separator (Option 5), which bears some relation
to the A5 sync board and could explain some changes.
I did hear once, from someone of this group, there was two versions
of
the
A5 Sync board... one that used the Tunnel Diodes, and another one
which
used a
Custom Tek IC to discriminate the trigger edge.
I`m not sure, but maybe this is what the -01 means... I've never landed my eyes, however, on a schematic of the latter, or
a
later
manual that included both.
But regardless of this board versioning, It seems rather odd to me
that
the
connections to the J6 are disconnected, and more so, that there is no connection between the top and bottom side THROGUHOUT the board...
Moreover, there's nothing about the DM44 vs power to the A5 Trigger board...
The DM44 takes its power from its own power supply and it's neither
fed by
the
A5 board, nor the A5 board feeds it.
Yet, the only reason I can think of for the through hole plating is missing
throughout the board is, either a mass murderer technician stripped
them
off
by careless unsoldering, or yet, that it's a prototype board...
If it's the latter case, it could explain many things... Maybe you can take a picture, post somewhere and link it here.
KRgrds,
Fabio
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Jim Olson wrote:
I have a question about the A5 trigger generator sweep logic board differences. I have two 466's with out the DM44 with the same
trigger
board
670-3324-00 boards. I have a 464 with a DM44 with the 670-3324-01
board
and it
is vastly different from the 466 boards. All the DC voltage traces
from
J-6
are disconnected all the through holes are unsoldered so there is
no
interconnection from top to bottom through out the board. There
appears to
be
no cable connection to the board from the DM44 to supply these? The DM44 manual parts list's don't show that part number used for
the
464/466
with the DM44 it shows the later 466 board and I can not find the
optional
boards listed in the service manuals listed in the DM44 one. The installation sheets for installing the DM44's don't list
different
or
optional boards used like the service manuals do? So whats up with this bunch of missing info here!
Jim O
|
Re: scanned: 545B and 561 Instrument Reference Books
HI, I must have suffered from a slow internet connection - I was able to get both documents.
THANKS again.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Aug 7, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Roy Morgan <k1lky68@...> wrote:
Hello,
I got the first of these (thanks!) but the second one seem to not be there.
|
Re: scanned: 545B and 561 Instrument Reference Books
I was able to download both just now.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 8/7/2018 11:23 AM, Roy Morgan wrote: Hello, I got the first of these (thanks!) but the second one seem to not be there. Have others been able to download the thing?
These PDFs were by made possible by Deane Kidd and his family and friends. Roy Morgan k1lky68@... <mailto:k1lky68@...>
-- Richard Knoppow dickburk@... WB6KBL
|
Re: scanned: 545B and 561 Instrument Reference Books
Hello, I got the first of these (thanks!) but the second one seem to not be there. Have others been able to download the thing?
These PDFs were by made possible by Deane Kidd and his family and friends.
Roy Morgan k1lky68@... <mailto:k1lky68@...>
|
Re: 1502 internal wiring question.
On 07/08/18 17:14, Adrian wrote: The recorder I have seems to have a full roll and I found a UK company that claims to sell it but at a stupid 'go-away' price (~30 bucks a roll!!) with an MOQ of ten rolls, so I'm not really tempted! If it wasn't for the sprocket holes, which aren't driven but have a LED/Photodiode looking through them (for timing?) a roll of thermal 2" till-roll would work I suspect. ISTR a modification that synthesised the timing signals from the sprocket holes - with the obvious and not very important disadvantage of losing the timing calibration. You make a good point, I will look out for an X-Y module - I still have a working HP7035B Chart Recorder somewhere too! They are easy enough to bodge if you just want to capture an output; stuff a PCB in the bottom PCB socket, not the upper D-connector. Alternatively they sometimes appear on fleabay.
On 8/7/2018 4:36 PM, Tom Gardner wrote:
Do you have a source of the paper?
If not then I prefer the XY chart recorder outputs, since they can drive a digitising scope and (theoretically!) allow it to be stored underwater :)
On 07/08/18 15:52, Adrian wrote:
Hi Tom,
Had a look at the stripline and yes, I have a short bit of braid hanging out the end too, Fig 4-26 on Page 4-27 of the manual seems to show it just hanging loose (didn't know they were that laid back in Oregon?) so I guess that's how it's meant to be.
Just waiting for the last of the correct replacement parts to arrive from Digikey (takes a day or two longer to get to the UK) and I'll replace the tacked-in temporary bits and then see if I can run through the test/calibration procedures, but it's looking good so far! Just the chart recorder to look at now.
On 8/6/2018 10:46 PM, Tom Gardner wrote:
I have one other 'loose end' wire on the 1502 which also puzzled me, what looks like it could have been an earth connection at the rear (TD end) of the strip line, but nowhere obvious that it might have linked to.? My 1502 has a somewhat below spec rise time and I wondered if this could be linked to the missing earth connection.
|
Re: Tek 549 storage board anomaly
Thanks Sebastian, Interesting, Mine as well as the one Kurt posted back in 2008 have marking "PC" Both have (c) of 1965. Pics here - The one in Manual is PB,mine is PC, and what you have is PE, So I assume there is manual for later Revs and possibly a PD board too ? On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:32 AM, Sebastian Garcia <sg-listas@...> wrote: Thank you, Rajesh. Yes it seems so, as this one is #5202 (Portland facilities).
The mod has been done in 1965, as both the board picture in the available manuals and my physical board have printed "1965" in a copper/gold area. The figure shows also the "PB" inscription, while this physical board shows "PE". A revision version?
For reference, the mentioned picture is the following: - (BAMA manual, S/N 1408) Fig. 4-16 in page 4-11 (with a typo in the overlay label for R1185). - (manoman.sqhill.com manual) Fig. 4-15 in page 4-10. Both manuals are available on Kurt's site.
Regards, Sebastian.
Rajesh VS wrote:
just for reference, I DO see R1185 in my 549, Scope Serial # - 001295. May be the change happened in later Revs?
regds Rajesh . . . On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Sebastian Garcia <sg-listas@...> wrote: Hi, I know this is an old post, but same puzzle here.
Trimpot R1185 and nearby flood-gate related components (appearing in the available PDF manuals) aren't physically present in my storage board (dated 1965).
Any clues on the storage circuits evolution of this model?
Regards, Sebastian.
Tim Phillips <tim@...> 06/20/10 #49860 from Tim P (UK)
I am trying to cal a 549 storage 'scope ser# 701529 The manual refers to FG cathode level R1195, but on this instrument this pot does not exist. In fact it appears to have never existed on this storage board (dated 1965). Both my manual and the BAMA one show it (sectn 6-45 and the schematic) There must be another manual with a different cal procedure. Anyone have any insights ? many thanks (confused) Tim P
-- /Rajesh
|
Re: 1502 internal wiring question.
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:52:42 +0100, you wrote: Hi Tom,
Had a look at the stripline and yes, I have a short bit of braid hanging out the end too, Fig 4-26 on Page 4-27 of the manual seems to show it just hanging loose (didn't know they were that laid back in Oregon?) so I guess that's how it's meant to be. Isn't that attached (as a pull) to the tunnel diode or part of the holder? Harvey Just waiting for the last of the correct replacement parts to arrive from Digikey (takes a day or two longer to get to the UK) and I'll replace the tacked-in temporary bits and then see if I can run through the test/calibration procedures, but it's looking good so far! Just the chart recorder to look at now.
On 8/6/2018 10:46 PM, Tom Gardner wrote:
I have one other 'loose end' wire on the 1502 which also puzzled me, what looks like it could have been an earth connection at the rear (TD end) of the strip line, but nowhere obvious that it might have linked to.? My 1502 has a somewhat below spec rise time and I wondered if this could be linked to the missing earth connection.
|
Re: 1502 internal wiring question.
The recorder I have seems to have a full roll and I found a UK company that claims to sell it but at a stupid 'go-away' price (~30 bucks a roll!!) with an MOQ of ten rolls, so I'm not really tempted! If it wasn't for the sprocket holes, which aren't driven but have a LED/Photodiode looking through them (for timing?) a roll of thermal 2" till-roll would work I suspect.
You make a good point, I will look out for an X-Y module - I still have a working HP7035B Chart Recorder somewhere too!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 8/7/2018 4:36 PM, Tom Gardner wrote: Do you have a source of the paper?
If not then I prefer the XY chart recorder outputs, since they can drive a digitising scope and (theoretically!) allow it to be stored underwater :)
On 07/08/18 15:52, Adrian wrote:
Hi Tom,
Had a look at the stripline and yes, I have a short bit of braid hanging out the end too, Fig 4-26 on Page 4-27 of the manual seems to show it just hanging loose (didn't know they were that laid back in Oregon?) so I guess that's how it's meant to be.
Just waiting for the last of the correct replacement parts to arrive from Digikey (takes a day or two longer to get to the UK) and I'll replace the tacked-in temporary bits and then see if I can run through the test/calibration procedures, but it's looking good so far! Just the chart recorder to look at now.
On 8/6/2018 10:46 PM, Tom Gardner wrote:
I have one other 'loose end' wire on the 1502 which also puzzled me, what looks like it could have been an earth connection at the rear (TD end) of the strip line, but nowhere obvious that it might have linked to.? My 1502 has a somewhat below spec rise time and I wondered if this could be linked to the missing earth connection.
|
Re: 1502 internal wiring question.
Do you have a source of the paper?
If not then I prefer the XY chart recorder outputs, since they can drive a digitising scope and (theoretically!) allow it to be stored underwater :)
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 07/08/18 15:52, Adrian wrote: Hi Tom,
Had a look at the stripline and yes, I have a short bit of braid hanging out the end too, Fig 4-26 on Page 4-27 of the manual seems to show it just hanging loose (didn't know they were that laid back in Oregon?) so I guess that's how it's meant to be.
Just waiting for the last of the correct replacement parts to arrive from Digikey (takes a day or two longer to get to the UK) and I'll replace the tacked-in temporary bits and then see if I can run through the test/calibration procedures, but it's looking good so far! Just the chart recorder to look at now.
On 8/6/2018 10:46 PM, Tom Gardner wrote:
I have one other 'loose end' wire on the 1502 which also puzzled me, what looks like it could have been an earth connection at the rear (TD end) of the strip line, but nowhere obvious that it might have linked to.? My 1502 has a somewhat below spec rise time and I wondered if this could be linked to the missing earth connection.
|
Re: Desoldering Iron, was Re: [TekScopes] 466-464 stray wire
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018, 8:21 AM Pete Lancashire <pete@...> wrote: California air tools Amazon Prime hundred sixty bucks. Very quiet oil free excetera excetera.
Gives you the pressure most desoldering tools need such as my metcal which needs 90 PSI.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018, 10:56 AM stefan_trethan <stefan_trethan@...> wrote:
FWIW I have also built a "silent" compressor. Well, I had to, after switching that monster from the DIY store on the first time I knew I wouldn't put up with that racket.
I took a refrigeration compressor, a slightly larger one from a commercial unit, and cut it open to clean it (it was rusted solid), and replaced the oil with regular motor oil. You really need to replace that oil since refrigeration oil is hygroscopic and everything will rust like crazy if you run it in air. I simply cut open the case with an angle grinder, and later sealed it back up with a rubber strip and a metal band. Mine is from 1970 or thereabouts, made in Scotland of all places. The old cast iron ones are better than the aluminium ones, in my mind anyway. It fills up the tank of the noisy compressor, but has it's own pressure switch, I just didn't have a suitable pressure vessel at the time.
Refrigeration compressors typically don't have piston rings, so they introduce more oil into the the air than other piston compressors. But it tends to settle out in the tank and not cause any issue.
Some commercial silent compressors look suspiciously like refrigeration compressors anyway, with an added sight glass for the oil level. I guess a scroll compressor from a modern AC unit would be neat too, but those are usually higher powered and not really silent.
ST
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Pete Lancashire <xyzzypdx@...> wrote:
Eric I'm curious on your air compressor since the metcal seed 90 PSI can you contact me off group and tell me how you build it thanks
|
Re: Desoldering Iron, was Re: [TekScopes] 466-464 stray wire
California air tools Amazon Prime hundred sixty bucks. Very quiet oil free excetera excetera.
Gives you the pressure most desoldering tools need such as my metcal which needs 90 PSI.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018, 10:56 AM stefan_trethan <stefan_trethan@...> wrote: FWIW I have also built a "silent" compressor. Well, I had to, after switching that monster from the DIY store on the first time I knew I wouldn't put up with that racket.
I took a refrigeration compressor, a slightly larger one from a commercial unit, and cut it open to clean it (it was rusted solid), and replaced the oil with regular motor oil. You really need to replace that oil since refrigeration oil is hygroscopic and everything will rust like crazy if you run it in air. I simply cut open the case with an angle grinder, and later sealed it back up with a rubber strip and a metal band. Mine is from 1970 or thereabouts, made in Scotland of all places. The old cast iron ones are better than the aluminium ones, in my mind anyway. It fills up the tank of the noisy compressor, but has it's own pressure switch, I just didn't have a suitable pressure vessel at the time.
Refrigeration compressors typically don't have piston rings, so they introduce more oil into the the air than other piston compressors. But it tends to settle out in the tank and not cause any issue.
Some commercial silent compressors look suspiciously like refrigeration compressors anyway, with an added sight glass for the oil level. I guess a scroll compressor from a modern AC unit would be neat too, but those are usually higher powered and not really silent.
ST
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Pete Lancashire <xyzzypdx@...> wrote:
Eric I'm curious on your air compressor since the metcal seed 90 PSI can you contact me off group and tell me how you build it thanks
|
Re: 1502 internal wiring question.
Hi Tom,
Had a look at the stripline and yes, I have a short bit of braid hanging out the end too, Fig 4-26 on Page 4-27 of the manual seems to show it just hanging loose (didn't know they were that laid back in Oregon?) so I guess that's how it's meant to be.
Just waiting for the last of the correct replacement parts to arrive from Digikey (takes a day or two longer to get to the UK) and I'll replace the tacked-in temporary bits and then see if I can run through the test/calibration procedures, but it's looking good so far! Just the chart recorder to look at now.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On 8/6/2018 10:46 PM, Tom Gardner wrote:
I have one other 'loose end' wire on the 1502 which also puzzled me, what looks like it could have been an earth connection at the rear (TD end) of the strip line, but nowhere obvious that it might have linked to.? My 1502 has a somewhat below spec rise time and I wondered if this could be linked to the missing earth connection.
|
Re: Tek 549 storage board anomaly
Thank you, Rajesh. Yes it seems so, as this one is #5202 (Portland facilities).
The mod has been done in 1965, as both the board picture in the available manuals and my physical board have printed "1965" in a copper/gold area. The figure shows also the "PB" inscription, while this physical board shows "PE". A revision version?
For reference, the mentioned picture is the following: - (BAMA manual, S/N 1408) Fig. 4-16 in page 4-11 (with a typo in the overlay label for R1185). - (manoman.sqhill.com manual) Fig. 4-15 in page 4-10. Both manuals are available on Kurt's site.
Regards, Sebastian.
Rajesh VS wrote:
just for reference, I DO see R1185 in my 549, Scope Serial # - 001295. May be the change happened in later Revs?
regds Rajesh . . .
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Sebastian Garcia <sg-listas@...> wrote: Hi, I know this is an old post, but same puzzle here.
Trimpot R1185 and nearby flood-gate related components (appearing in the available PDF manuals) aren't physically present in my storage board (dated 1965).
Any clues on the storage circuits evolution of this model?
Regards, Sebastian.
Tim Phillips <tim@...> 06/20/10 #49860 from Tim P (UK)
I am trying to cal a 549 storage 'scope ser# 701529 The manual refers to FG cathode level R1195, but on this instrument this pot does not exist. In fact it appears to have never existed on this storage board (dated 1965). Both my manual and the BAMA one show it (sectn 6-45 and the schematic) There must be another manual with a different cal procedure. Anyone have any insights ? many thanks (confused) Tim P
|
Re: Tek 549 storage board anomaly
just for reference, I DO see R1185 in my 549, Scope Serial # - 001295. May be the change happened in later Revs? regds Rajesh On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 8:39 PM, Sebastian Garcia <sg-listas@...> wrote: Hi, I know this is an old post, but same puzzle here.
Trimpot R1185 and nearby flood-gate related components (appearing in the available PDF manuals) aren't physically present in my storage board (dated 1965).
Any clues on the storage circuits evolution of this model?
Regards, Sebastian.
Tim Phillips <tim@...> 06/20/10 #49860 from Tim P (UK)
I am trying to cal a 549 storage 'scope ser# 701529 The manual refers to FG cathode level R1195, but on this instrument this pot does not exist. In fact it appears to have never existed on this storage board (dated 1965). Both my manual and the BAMA one show it (sectn 6-45 and the schematic) There must be another manual with a different cal procedure. Anyone have any insights ? many thanks (confused) Tim P
-- /Rajesh
|
Re: scanned: 545B and 561 Instrument Reference Books
Interesting material Kurt, so thanx for the good work. Maybe more in the pipeline from other scopes? ¸é±ð²Ô¨¦
|
Re: Tek 549 storage board anomaly
Hi, I know this is an old post, but same puzzle here.
Trimpot R1185 and nearby flood-gate related components (appearing in the available PDF manuals) aren't physically present in my storage board (dated 1965).
Any clues on the storage circuits evolution of this model?
Regards, Sebastian.
Tim Phillips <tim@...> 06/20/10 #49860 from Tim P (UK)
I am trying to cal a 549 storage 'scope ser# 701529 The manual refers to FG cathode level R1195, but on this instrument this pot does not exist. In fact it appears to have never existed on this storage board (dated 1965). Both my manual and the BAMA one show it (sectn 6-45 and the schematic) There must be another manual with a different cal procedure. Anyone have any insights ? many thanks (confused) Tim P
|
Re: 1L20 for $95 BIN - OREGON USA
500-series plug-ins such as the 1L20 put out 0.1V/division. In contrast, 560-series mainframes expect the vertical plug-in to put out about 19.5 V/cm, due the architectural decision to have the vertical amplifier reside in the plug-ins rather than in the mainframe.
|
Re: 1L20 for $95 BIN - OREGON USA
No, and not that I'm aware of.... I'm sure some enterprising soul could come up with an adapter tho.
The 561 takes 2xx, and 3xx series plugins. For a 561, you're looking for a 3L5, or 3L10....
See the TekWiki for further details.
David
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 5:48 PM, John Griessen <john@...> wrote: Would it fit in a 561? Is there a plugin adapter for that purpose?
|
Fabio thanks for some reason I did not receive the PM responce but oh well I have it now. The only problem with your idea on this board is that none of the through hole vias is they were never soldered at all absolutely no trace of solder anywhere around all the holes. I have not investigated the A6 inter board to see if something has been done there and also with any extra wiring from somewhere else.
Jim
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On August 6, 2018 at 11:58 AM Fabio Trevisan <fabio.tr3visan@...> wrote:
Hello Jim, The pictures did arrive correctly to me and I just posted the pictures to the Tekscopes photo section: link is here: /g/TekScopes/album?id=65983
As I already replied in PM to you, I'll repeat it here... This rather odd missing of the through hole plating of **ONLY** the power supply rails, to me, seems like an effort of a previous owner to isolate a short-circuit in the power rails. Given the age of those scopes, it can very well have happened before this group even existed, and before it became common knowledge that this kind of problem is often caused by a shorted tantalum capacitor, and then the scope was tossed away for - say - 20 years. I would suggest you take advantage that the through holes are stripped out, and try to measure ohms from each of those traces to ground, everywhere that you can follow them and, if you happen to find some spot that is showing low impedance to ground... you'd have probably found the culprit. If you can't find any of those traces shorted to ground, I would just rebuild the through-hole vias and try to apply power to the thing. As I mentioned earlier, I don't think the presence or absence of the DM44 is too involving, in regards to the A5 trigger board and, sure enough, it has nothing to do with this mystery of the missing vias. The only there is between the DM44 & the A5 trigger board, is the pick-off signal from the ALT TRACE SYNC PULSE, from the emitter of Q916, shown on diagram <8> of the 464 and connected through a 20K resistor, from this transistor, to a wire and then to the DM44 through pin 2 of P3201, as shown on the DM44's service manual, diagram <3> "TIME & 1/TIME <3>" and diagram <9> "464,465 & 466 INTERFACE". The latter is the signal that tells the DM44 the end of a sweep, to allow the DM44 to switch the delay time control voltage at the end of every sweep, between the scope's own Delay time multiplier pot, and the DM44's Delta time pot (and v-v) which, ultimately is what allows the measurement of TIME and 1/TIME.
Please let us know what else did you find on this board power rails.
KRgrds,
Fabio
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 09:23 PM, Jim Olson wrote:
Hi Fabio I sent the picts in an email to you PM but comcast has changed there email to a new system so I'm not sure if you got it or not.
Jim
On August 3, 2018 at 12:23 PM Fabio Trevisan <fabio.tr3visan@...> wrote:
Hi Jim,
Feel free to send me the pictures (PM to fabio.tr3visan@...). I will be glad to post it to the photos area of Tekscopes.io, and reply to you with a link to the folder.
Rgrds, Fabio
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 03:07 PM, Jim Olson wrote:
Fabio I have the pictures but I'm not using any kind of photo posting
service
it's gotten to complicated and I don't post much to forums anyway so can I send them to you and you can post them up?
Jim
On August 3, 2018 at 7:26 AM Fabio Trevisan <fabio.tr3visan@...> wrote:
Hello Jim,
I owed and restored a 464 with DM44 (now given to a friend) and I don't think there are any other "optional" boards linked to the presence (or absence) of the DM44.
The only optional boards that apply to the 464 / 466 are: A. The optional DC inverter board (option 7)... That one can't co-exist with
the DM44 (the inverter uses the same windings on the main transformer that are
used to power the DM44).
B. The composite video Sync Separator (Option 5), which bears some relation
to the A5 sync board and could explain some changes.
I did hear once, from someone of this group, there was two versions of
the
A5 Sync board... one that used the Tunnel Diodes, and another one which used a
Custom Tek IC to discriminate the trigger edge.
I`m not sure, but maybe this is what the -01 means... I've never landed my eyes, however, on a schematic of the latter, or a later
manual that included both.
But regardless of this board versioning, It seems rather odd to me that
the
connections to the J6 are disconnected, and more so, that there is no connection between the top and bottom side THROGUHOUT the board...
Moreover, there's nothing about the DM44 vs power to the A5 Trigger board...
The DM44 takes its power from its own power supply and it's neither fed by the
A5 board, nor the A5 board feeds it.
Yet, the only reason I can think of for the through hole plating is missing
throughout the board is, either a mass murderer technician stripped them off
by careless unsoldering, or yet, that it's a prototype board...
If it's the latter case, it could explain many things... Maybe you can take a picture, post somewhere and link it here.
KRgrds,
Fabio
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:40 PM, Jim Olson wrote:
I have a question about the A5 trigger generator sweep logic board differences. I have two 466's with out the DM44 with the same trigger
board
670-3324-00 boards. I have a 464 with a DM44 with the 670-3324-01
board
and it
is vastly different from the 466 boards. All the DC voltage traces
from
J-6
are disconnected all the through holes are unsoldered so there is no interconnection from top to bottom through out the board. There
appears to
be
no cable connection to the board from the DM44 to supply these? The DM44 manual parts list's don't show that part number used for the 464/466
with the DM44 it shows the later 466 board and I can not find the
optional
boards listed in the service manuals listed in the DM44 one. The installation sheets for installing the DM44's don't list different
or
optional boards used like the service manuals do? So whats up with this bunch of missing info here!
Jim O
|