Re: W-8 Lyc engine mount BOM needed
Thank you Robert. ?Zero/Zero on thrust and 10 inches. ?Easy! What drove you to add the inch on the engine mount - CG, access, or something else?
By
Michael Robinson
·
#89591
·
|
Re: W-8 Lyc engine mount BOM needed
Michael, I recently installed my O290D on my Tailwind project. I used drawing #29 from the W10 set but with a spacing of 10 - 3/16" instead of the 9 - 3/16¡± shown on the drawing. I did not add any
By
robert7721
·
#89590
·
|
Re: W-8 Lyc engine mount BOM needed
Ok, let me try ask this another way¡ Given a conical mount Lyc 4 banger, what is the current, accepted distance from the firewall to the front of the engine mount spools (the engine to mount
By
Michael Robinson
·
#89589
·
|
Re: W-8 Lyc engine mount BOM needed
Appreciate the insight, guys. ?Has the engine location evolved over the years or is the XYZ and thrust angle stable? reason I ask is because the Starduster design has had some fairly radical changes
By
Michael Robinson
·
#89588
·
|
Re: W-8 Lyc engine mount BOM needed
Here are a couple of pics. If there are any other area¡¯s you need pics of let me know and I will see if I have any of them.
By
Dom Flamini
·
#89587
·
|
Re: W-8 Lyc engine mount BOM needed
By
Dom Flamini
·
#89586
·
|
Re: W-8 Lyc engine mount BOM needed
Jim is correct, 68X is conical and I will see if I have some pics of it when we had the engine off. Dom
By
Dom Flamini
·
#89585
·
|
Re: W-8 Lyc engine mount BOM needed
Copy. ?I have enough info for a material order now. ?My thanks
By
Michael Robinson
·
#89584
·
|
Re: W-8 Lyc engine mount BOM needed
Just a vague recollection that it is similar to the typical W10 dynafocal. Pretty sure the CAFE W10 is conical. The Flamini brothers might have a photo.
By
Tailwind14855
·
#89583
·
|
Re: W-8 Lyc engine mount BOM needed
Can you describe the changes Jim?
By
Michael Robinson
·
#89582
·
|
Re: W-8 Lyc engine mount BOM needed
Michael-I don't like the conical mount design shown on the Wittman W8 drawings. Jim Clement had a much better conical mount but I don't have any photos.
By
Tailwind14855
·
#89581
·
|
W-8 Lyc engine mount BOM needed
Looking to make an order for materials for just the engine mount and I¡¯m sure someone has developed a BOM. ?Need a Lycoming 290 conical mount BOM. ?I have plans somewhere, but surely someone has
By
Michael Robinson
·
#89580
·
|
Re: Covering material quantities
With two part ( polyurethane) coatings, make sure the activator isn¡¯t more than a year old. Painted my Aeronca Chief with Aerothane years ago and experienced cracking along the stringers within a
By
Bob Matteson
·
#89579
·
|
Re: Covering material quantities
That's encouraging.
By
Dan Gidzinski
·
#89578
·
|
Re: Covering material quantities
Dan, I believe mine is system 7, I only noticed a 1" small crack on the cowl scoop where the nose gear goes through and believe that happened because my nose gear is a little too close to the scoop
By
Alex Frizzell
·
#89577
·
|
Re: Covering material quantities
Alex, do you have any cracking issues with the Superflite finish? Was it System 6 or 7? My Pacer is finished with Superflite System 6 and the finish looks great, but it is brittle and has cracks in
By
Dan Gidzinski
·
#89576
·
|
Re: Covering material quantities
I can¡¯t speak for earlier examples of JC tailwinds as I only met Jim after starting my Buttercup about 5 years ago. I flew over and visited several times a year during the ButterBurger and the long
By
Jim Schmidt
·
#89575
·
|
Re: Covering material quantities
Not trying to push their product but I used the Superflite system and it was sooo much easier. the main reason was during Oshkosh airventure, they gave participating individuals a $500 voucher toward
By
Alex Frizzell
·
#89574
·
|
Re: Covering material quantities
Just saying: JClementOnFabric from files. "Fabric is Ceconite 2.7 oz. from Wicks with Air Tech finishing system. Air Tech uses 2-3 coats of primer over the bare fabric, some sanding then color coat.
By
jsnerstrom@...
·
#89573
·
|
Re: Sheet metal questions
Thanks for the link Keith! Great builder log. This is the kind of thing we look for when doing an airworthiness inspection. Some are not nearly as good as yours! Joe [email protected]> wrote:
By
Joe Norris
·
#89572
·
|