On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 05:36 AM, Andrew O'Brien wrote:
AA-35
|
Re: Using for coax testing ?
I watched this AA-55 video , alas many of the items he reviews are not available in the AA-35. When In go to the “tools” menu on the AA-35, the only thing available to me is “Self Test”. i
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Oct 30, 2021, at 5:07 PM, Andrew O'Brien via groups.io <andrewobrie@...> wrote:
? OK , I watched the suggested video . It was not clear on how to enter TDR mode on the instrument. I do see a TDR tab in Antscope 2 . Anyway , with my reading of the AA-35 Zoom manual and entering R X mode on the instrument , I see the following (attached picture . Am I correct in assuming this illustrates a short ??  On Oct 28, 2021, at 7:51 PM, Andrew O'Brien via groups.io <andrewobrie@...> wrote:
? Many thanks ! On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 7:13 PM Keith Ballow KN5G < keith@...> wrote: Maybe this will help. ?Can someone point me to a link that provides information on how to use my Rig Expert to test old coax to see if it is “still good “ ? I have had it lying outside , unused , for a couple of years .
Andy
-- Andy
|
Re: Using for coax testing ?
This video review covers the built in features of the AA-55 ZOOM, which is similar to the AA-35.? Under the Tools menu, there are options for checking coax cable length and loss.
|
Re: Using for coax testing ?
OK , I watched the suggested video . It was not clear on how to enter TDR mode on the instrument. I do see a TDR tab in Antscope 2 . Anyway , with my reading of the AA-35 Zoom manual and entering R X mode on the instrument , I see the following (attached picture . Am I correct in assuming this illustrates a short ?? 
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Oct 28, 2021, at 7:51 PM, Andrew O'Brien via groups.io <andrewobrie@...> wrote:
? Many thanks ! On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 7:13 PM Keith Ballow KN5G < keith@...> wrote: Maybe this will help. ?Can someone point me to a link that provides information on how to use my Rig Expert to test old coax to see if it is “still good “ ? I have had it lying outside , unused , for a couple of years .
Andy
-- Andy
|
Re: Using for coax testing ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 7:13 PM Keith Ballow KN5G < keith@...> wrote: Maybe this will help. ?Can someone point me to a link that provides information on how to use my Rig Expert to test old coax to see if it is “still good “ ? I have had it lying outside , unused , for a couple of years .
Andy
|
Re: Using for coax testing ?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Oct 28, 2021, at 5:34 PM, Andrew O'Brien <andrewobrie@...> wrote:
?Can someone point me to a link that provides information on how to use my Rig Expert to test old coax to see if it is “still good “ ? I have had it lying outside , unused , for a couple of years .
Andy
|
Can someone point me to a link that provides information on how to use my Rig Expert to test old coax to see if it is “still good “ ? I have had it lying outside , unused , for a couple of years .
Andy
|
Hi Andy,
Yes, the full range is always used. You cannot reduce it.
In fact, the wider the range, the more accurate the result we will
get.
Regards, Alex
21.10.2021 22:43, DupyRail пишет:
When
doing the cable loss measurements, does it always scan from 0 >
1gig or can the scan width be narrowed down as well as increasing
the level of loss on the left side of the screen?
Andy? K9ATX
--
|
When doing the cable loss measurements, does it always scan from 0 > 1gig or can the scan width be narrowed down as well as increasing the level of loss on the left side of the screen?
Andy? K9ATX
-- "Where the Old Soo crossed the New Soo" Duplainville, Wisconsin
Web page at: www.dupyrail.com
|
Re: 650-Zoom Bluetooth to Microsoft Surface Pro
#aa-650-zoom
Hi Bruce, hello everyone.
The AntScope2 software, when working with RigExpert analyzers,
accepts input data from the analyzer in two ways:
1 - via the HID interface. This option is possible only when the
analyzer is physically connected to a PC via a USB cable. Works
only for analyzers of the Zoom and Stick family.
2 - via the COM port. This works for old models of analyzers and
when the analyzer is connected via Bluetooth with the Classic
protocol.
The Bluetooth module with the classic protocol has only the
analyzer AA-55 Zoom of the first revision (serial number type
1.**).
All other analyzers have a BLE module that "cannot" create serial
ports.
The AntScope2 software was created in the qt5 framework in the C
++ language.
The implementation of the BLE protocol stack in Windows 10 must be
carried out in the .NET framework.
This requires a complete redesign of the program, which is
difficult and time-consuming.
Our programmers are looking for an alternative way - the creation
of an intermediate module that can communicate both with the core
of the operating system and with AntScope2 to implement the
capabilities of the BLE analyzer connection.
As soon as we have the results, we will report.
Best regards, Alex Antonov /UT2UM/
16.09.2021 6:52, Bruce пишет:
An
update, I received a Asus BT500 dongle today and installed
the Asus
driver
downloaded from their site.? This is a Bluetooth 5.0 unit.
I
plugged in the unit and paired it to the 650 ZOOM.
In
Device Manager it shows up in the Bluetooth tree and looking
at the
properties
it indicates as working correctly with no errors.
The
driver install package did install Bluetooth LE drivers
because these also
show
up in the Bluetooth tree.
Running
the AntScope2 it shows that no analyzer is connected
although all other
indicators
have the Bluetooth connection working properly.
This
is on a Win 8.1 64 bit laptop that does not have Bluetooth
built in.
The
question is why the AntScope2 program does not detect the
ZOOM unit?
The
spec indicates 4.2 LE so the BT500 does cover this entirely
via the drivers.
I
have the latest 1.7 firmware loaded in the ZOOM unit and the
latest AntScope 1.2.2.
When
can we expect to download a package that includes all
necessary files
in
order to work correctly between the 650 ZOOM and the
AntScope program?
Bruce?
N7XGR?
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 2:49
AM Alex RigExpert via <support= [email protected]>
wrote:
Dear friends!
A couple of minutes of your attention. Important
information.
Bluetooth, as a wireless connection protocol, has two
branches:
- Bluetooth Classic (BC)
- Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)
Connection via the BC protocol creates a virtual serial
port.
The BLE connection does not create virtual serial ports.
All RigExpert analyzers (except for AA-55 Zoom of the
first revision) use Bluetooth modules with BLE protocol.
RigExpert analyzers with Bluetooth are designed to connect
to mobile gadgets (Android and iOS).
Until recently, the Windows OS at the kernel level could
not work with devices using the BLE protocol. This
opportunity has recently appeared.
At the moment, our developers are working to ensure that
analyzers with the BLE module can work natively with
AntScope2.
Sincerely, Alex Antonov
30.07.2021 5:01, Keith Ballow KN5G пишет:
There was only the one COM Port
device to choose from and it only appeared in the
ANTScope2 software after I jumped through all the hoops to
pair the 650 Zoom and assign a COM Port to it.?
I removed the “Paired” device and associated COM
Port from the Microsoft Surface Pro with the intention
of adding it again just to see if I got any different
results.
I received this message when I tried to connect
to the 650 Zoom. Not sure what this message is
trying to tell me. Maybe that the software sees a
COM Port but there isn’t anything talking over it?
I did notice that after I removed and then added the
650 Zoom back into the list of Bluetooth devices on
the Surface Pro that it is now reporting as an
“AA-55 Zoom”. That seems odd to say the least.
Unless I am doing something wrong in the
setup/configuration of the Bluetooth Device on the
Surface Pro (and that is totally possible), I have
to conclude that there is a glitch somewhere in the
Bluetooth implementation and the 650 Zoom and the
Surface Pro are having problems setting up a solid
Bluetooth communications link between them.
I probably will not send a lot more time trying
to get these to talk to each other and just use the
USB cable, unless or until there is a firmware
upgrade to the 650 Zoom that might address this
issue. I still love the Analyzer and I’m hoping that
eventually it will be able to talk via Bluetooth to
the Surface Pro laptop because the iPad just leaves
a little to be desired compared to a full blown
laptop.
?On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 04:08 PM,
Keith Ballow KN5G wrote:
I fooled around on the Surface and got
it to “Pair” with the 650 Zoom, and even
managed to get the Surface to assign the
650 Zoom a COM Port.
?
In the AntScope2 software settings, the
COM 3 port shows up and I can click on the
“Connect Analyzer” button but the software
never seems to connect to the 650 Zoom.
The top line of the software continues to
show, “Analyzer Not Connected”.
If you look in the drop down menu is there
another COM port other than COM3 assigned to the
Zoom?? If so try select that port and try it.?
Roger
--
--
|
Re: 650-Zoom Bluetooth to Microsoft Surface Pro
#aa-650-zoom
An update, I received a Asus BT500 dongle today and installed the Asus driver downloaded from their site.? This is a Bluetooth 5.0 unit. I plugged in the unit and paired it to the 650 ZOOM. In Device Manager it shows up in the Bluetooth tree and looking at the properties it indicates as working correctly with no errors. The driver install package did install Bluetooth LE drivers because these also show up in the Bluetooth tree. Running the AntScope2 it shows that no analyzer is connected although all other indicators have the Bluetooth connection working properly. This is on a Win 8.1 64 bit laptop that does not have Bluetooth built in. The question is why the AntScope2 program does not detect the ZOOM unit? The spec indicates 4.2 LE so the BT500 does cover this entirely via the drivers. I have the latest 1.7 firmware loaded in the ZOOM unit and the latest AntScope 1.2.2. When can we expect to download a package that includes all necessary files in order to work correctly between the 650 ZOOM and the AntScope program?
Bruce? N7XGR?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 2:49 AM Alex RigExpert via <support= [email protected]> wrote:
Dear friends!
A couple of minutes of your attention. Important information.
Bluetooth, as a wireless connection protocol, has two branches:
- Bluetooth Classic (BC)
- Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)
Connection via the BC protocol creates a virtual serial port.
The BLE connection does not create virtual serial ports.
All RigExpert analyzers (except for AA-55 Zoom of the first
revision) use Bluetooth modules with BLE protocol.
RigExpert analyzers with Bluetooth are designed to connect to
mobile gadgets (Android and iOS).
Until recently, the Windows OS at the kernel level could not work
with devices using the BLE protocol. This opportunity has recently
appeared.
At the moment, our developers are working to ensure that analyzers
with the BLE module can work natively with AntScope2.
Sincerely, Alex Antonov
30.07.2021 5:01, Keith Ballow KN5G
пишет:
There
was only the one COM Port device to choose from and it only
appeared in the ANTScope2 software after I jumped through all the
hoops to pair the 650 Zoom and assign a COM Port to it.?
I removed the “Paired” device and associated COM Port from
the Microsoft Surface Pro with the intention of adding it
again just to see if I got any different results.
I received this message when I tried to connect to the
650 Zoom. Not sure what this message is trying to tell me.
Maybe that the software sees a COM Port but there isn’t
anything talking over it?
I did notice that after I removed and then added the 650
Zoom back into the list of Bluetooth devices on the Surface
Pro that it is now reporting as an “AA-55 Zoom”. That seems
odd to say the least.
Unless I am doing something wrong in the
setup/configuration of the Bluetooth Device on the Surface
Pro (and that is totally possible), I have to conclude that
there is a glitch somewhere in the Bluetooth implementation
and the 650 Zoom and the Surface Pro are having problems
setting up a solid Bluetooth communications link between
them.
I probably will not send a lot more time trying to get
these to talk to each other and just use the USB cable,
unless or until there is a firmware upgrade to the 650 Zoom
that might address this issue. I still love the Analyzer and
I’m hoping that eventually it will be able to talk via
Bluetooth to the Surface Pro laptop because the iPad just
leaves a little to be desired compared to a full blown
laptop.
?On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 04:08 PM, Keith
Ballow KN5G wrote:
I fooled around on the Surface and got it to
“Pair” with the 650 Zoom, and even managed to get
the Surface to assign the 650 Zoom a COM Port.
?
In the AntScope2 software settings, the COM 3
port shows up and I can click on the “Connect
Analyzer” button but the software never seems to
connect to the 650 Zoom. The top line of the
software continues to show, “Analyzer Not
Connected”.
If you look in the drop down menu is there another COM
port other than COM3 assigned to the Zoom?? If so try
select that port and try it.?
Roger
--
|
Re: Antscope 2 V1.2.2 with AA-230 PRO
Thanks Alex, The drivers installed and I can now connect to the AA-230 PRO with both Antscope 1.0 and Antscope 2.0. Both programs are able to read and display the stored data from the AA-230 PRO
-ken-
You wrote: Hi Ken,
To exchange data with a PC, the analyzers use an FTDI chip.
You can download the drivers on the website of the manufacturer of
this chip:
Regards, Alex
Sent From My Desktop Via EMClient.
|
Re: Antscope 2 V1.2.2 with AA-230 PRO
Hi Ken,
To exchange data with a PC, the analyzers use an FTDI chip.
You can download the drivers on the website of the manufacturer of
this chip:
Regards, Alex
13.09.2021 21:04, Ken пишет:
Thanks Alex. I suspected as much. I re-installed Antscope 1.0
v0435 but can't get it to connect to the AA-230. Device Manager
shows the AA-230 under Other Devices with no drivers installed.
Where are the drivers?
-ken-
Sent From My Desktop Via EMClient.
--
|
Re: Antscope 2 V1.2.2 with AA-230 PRO
Thanks Alex. I suspected as much. I re-installed Antscope 1.0 v0435 but can't get it to connect to the AA-230. Device Manager shows the AA-230 under Other Devices with no drivers installed. Where are the drivers? -ken-
Sent From My Desktop Via EMClient.
|
Re: Antscope 2 V1.2.2 with AA-230 PRO
Dear Ken,
Alas, but through AntScope2, it will not be possible to load the
saved data from the memory of the AA-200/230/500/520 analyzers.
These analyzer models use a binary data format that is not
supported in AntScope2.
You can save data via AntScope. And then use a special
utility to convert files into an understandable format for
AntScope2.
Best regards, Alex Antonov
13.09.2021 8:32, Ken пишет:
I haven't used
Antscope with the AA-230 PRO for a long time. I want to transfer
the saved data to the PC. I don't see anything in the Antscope 2
V1.2.2 menues about loading data from the analyzer.
--
|
Antscope 2 V1.2.2 with AA-230 PRO
I haven't used Antscope with the AA-230 PRO for a long time. I want to transfer the saved data to the PC. I don't see anything in the Antscope 2 V1.2.2 menues about loading data from the analyzer.
|
SAA2 cannot working, setting window say connect SAA2,but main window say not Connected. By the way, Dear Alex, how to turn it to beta test mode ?
Best Regards Andy Lu
|
Re: 650-Zoom Bluetooth to Microsoft Surface Pro
#aa-650-zoom
Alex, Thanks for your time and effort to comment on this item. As you can see in the screen shot my AA-650 Zoom reports as an AA-55 Zoom in the ANTScope software. Is this an issue? You mentioned that the BLE does not need to create a virtual COM Port, so should the 650 Zoom not have to be paired with a Virtual COM Port in the laptop, just Paired with the laptop as a BLE device? Looking in the Window’s bluetooth devices screens the 650 Zoom shows up as a 650 Zoom but in the ANTScope2 software it shows up as an AA-55 Zoom. Does this indicate an issue in the Bluetooth configuration in the 650 Zoom maybe?
If there is anything I can check on this end that would be helpful please let me know and I’ll do my best to check it out here on my end.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Jul 30, 2021, at 1:50 AM, Alex RigExpert via groups.io <support@...> wrote:
?Dear friends!
A couple of minutes of your attention. Important information.
Bluetooth, as a wireless connection protocol, has two branches:
- Bluetooth Classic (BC)
- Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)
Connection via the BC protocol creates a virtual serial port.
The BLE connection does not create virtual serial ports.
All RigExpert analyzers (except for AA-55 Zoom of the first
revision) use Bluetooth modules with BLE protocol.
RigExpert analyzers with Bluetooth are designed to connect to
mobile gadgets (Android and iOS).
Until recently, the Windows OS at the kernel level could not work
with devices using the BLE protocol. This opportunity has recently
appeared.
At the moment, our developers are working to ensure that analyzers
with the BLE module can work natively with AntScope2.
Sincerely, Alex Antonov
|
Re: 650-Zoom Bluetooth to Microsoft Surface Pro
#aa-650-zoom
Dear friends!
A couple of minutes of your attention. Important information.
Bluetooth, as a wireless connection protocol, has two branches:
- Bluetooth Classic (BC)
- Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)
Connection via the BC protocol creates a virtual serial port.
The BLE connection does not create virtual serial ports.
All RigExpert analyzers (except for AA-55 Zoom of the first
revision) use Bluetooth modules with BLE protocol.
RigExpert analyzers with Bluetooth are designed to connect to
mobile gadgets (Android and iOS).
Until recently, the Windows OS at the kernel level could not work
with devices using the BLE protocol. This opportunity has recently
appeared.
At the moment, our developers are working to ensure that analyzers
with the BLE module can work natively with AntScope2.
Sincerely, Alex Antonov
30.07.2021 5:01, Keith Ballow KN5G
пишет:
There
was only the one COM Port device to choose from and it only
appeared in the ANTScope2 software after I jumped through all the
hoops to pair the 650 Zoom and assign a COM Port to it.?
I removed the “Paired” device and associated COM Port from
the Microsoft Surface Pro with the intention of adding it
again just to see if I got any different results.
I received this message when I tried to connect to the
650 Zoom. Not sure what this message is trying to tell me.
Maybe that the software sees a COM Port but there isn’t
anything talking over it?
I did notice that after I removed and then added the 650
Zoom back into the list of Bluetooth devices on the Surface
Pro that it is now reporting as an “AA-55 Zoom”. That seems
odd to say the least.
Unless I am doing something wrong in the
setup/configuration of the Bluetooth Device on the Surface
Pro (and that is totally possible), I have to conclude that
there is a glitch somewhere in the Bluetooth implementation
and the 650 Zoom and the Surface Pro are having problems
setting up a solid Bluetooth communications link between
them.
I probably will not send a lot more time trying to get
these to talk to each other and just use the USB cable,
unless or until there is a firmware upgrade to the 650 Zoom
that might address this issue. I still love the Analyzer and
I’m hoping that eventually it will be able to talk via
Bluetooth to the Surface Pro laptop because the iPad just
leaves a little to be desired compared to a full blown
laptop.
?On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 04:08 PM, Keith
Ballow KN5G wrote:
I fooled around on the Surface and got it to
“Pair” with the 650 Zoom, and even managed to get
the Surface to assign the 650 Zoom a COM Port.
?
In the AntScope2 software settings, the COM 3
port shows up and I can click on the “Connect
Analyzer” button but the software never seems to
connect to the 650 Zoom. The top line of the
software continues to show, “Analyzer Not
Connected”.
If you look in the drop down menu is there another COM
port other than COM3 assigned to the Zoom?? If so try
select that port and try it.?
Roger
--
|
Re: 650-Zoom Bluetooth to Microsoft Surface Pro
#aa-650-zoom
There was only the one COM Port device to choose from and it only appeared in the ANTScope2 software after I jumped through all the hoops to pair the 650 Zoom and assign a COM Port to it.? I removed the “Paired” device and associated COM Port from the Microsoft Surface Pro with the intention of adding it again just to see if I got any different results.
I received this message when I tried to connect to the 650 Zoom. Not sure what this message is trying to tell me. Maybe that the software sees a COM Port but there isn’t anything talking over it?
 I did notice that after I removed and then added the 650 Zoom back into the list of Bluetooth devices on the Surface Pro that it is now reporting as an “AA-55 Zoom”. That seems odd to say the least.
Unless I am doing something wrong in the setup/configuration of the Bluetooth Device on the Surface Pro (and that is totally possible), I have to conclude that there is a glitch somewhere in the Bluetooth implementation and the 650 Zoom and the Surface Pro are having problems setting up a solid Bluetooth communications link between them. I probably will not send a lot more time trying to get these to talk to each other and just use the USB cable, unless or until there is a firmware upgrade to the 650 Zoom that might address this issue. I still love the Analyzer and I’m hoping that eventually it will be able to talk via Bluetooth to the Surface Pro laptop because the iPad just leaves a little to be desired compared to a full blown laptop.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Jul 29, 2021, at 6:45 PM, Roger Need via groups.io <sailtamarack@...> wrote:
?On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 04:08 PM, Keith Ballow KN5G wrote:
I fooled around on the Surface and got it to “Pair” with the 650 Zoom, and even managed to get the Surface to assign the 650 Zoom a COM Port.
?
In the AntScope2 software settings, the COM 3 port shows up and I can click on the “Connect Analyzer” button but the software never seems to connect to the 650 Zoom. The top line of the software continues to show, “Analyzer Not Connected”.
If you look in the drop down menu is there another COM port other than COM3 assigned to the Zoom?? If so try select that port and try it.? Roger
|