¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

Re: FTDNA Administrators Conference 2023


 

¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

Linda

?

FTDNA announced at their conference that they will in future be using MyHeritage trees though they didn¡¯t provide details or give a timeline. However, I presume that as part of that process they have stopped developing their own family trees and fixing any bugs which may explain the difficulties you¡¯ve been experiencing. They did promise to keep existing trees as read-only versions for those users who are unable to use the MyHeritage facilities.

?

Concetta also mentioned concerns about the process of linking FTDNA matches to trees at MyHeritage. I am unclear how this will work. I can foresee difficulties if someone has a subscription and links lots of matches to their tree but then reverts to the free 250-person tree after their subscription expires. I hope the situation will be clarified in due course.

?

I¡¯ve personally never found much in the way of useful matches at FTDNA so I¡¯ve never used the tree-linking feature other than for linking my parents to get my matches sorted into the two parental sides. I focus instead on linking matches to my tree at Ancestry. ?I use the tree tags to label matches at FTDNA, MyHeritage and 23andMe.

?

?

I can¡¯t see FTDNA implementing their own version of ThruLines in the foreseeable future. They seem to be rightly focused on developing their Y-DNA and mtDNA products instead.

?

Debbie

?

From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Linda R Horton
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2023 11:04 PM
To: [email protected]; cfbandit <cfbandit@...>
Subject: Re: [R1b-U106] FTDNA Administrators Conference 2023

?

What in the world happened to FTDNA trees? I can remember at one time being able to complete linking on a new test taker's tree to all the folks who had tested before.

But at present I have a new test taker--a second cousin whose YDNA test is the one of most interest--and I have encountered nothing but frustration trying to link on his tree (uploaded by me from Ancestry) the many cousins of his whose tests I have sponsored. The search-for-name function seems not to work at all, and even when you manage to get the match list and the proper tree-branch-leaf on the screen at the same time, that drag rectangle from lefthand list to box on tree takes forever to load, if it works at all.

?

I am wary of MyHeritage trees. I would rather that FTDNA fix its own trees.

Linda Horton

On 11/21/2023 1:01 PM EST cfbandit <cfbandit@...> wrote:

?

?

Debbie, I am thinking similar to you about MyHeritage trees. I know mine is just a basic pedigree since I have the free version of MyHeritage. Its a real loss to lose the data in our FTDNA trees, as I have many of my DNA cousins mapped out and tagged there - and that won't be possible with the MyHeritage tree since there's not large enough?of a person limit (in its current iteration, not knowing what FTDNA will arrange).?

The other question would be how much integration they will have with the MyHeritage trees. As we all probably know, MH trees can be as bad, if not worse than the Ancestry trees, and another "thrulines" type product, which while it would put FTDNA and MyHeritage on par with Ancestry, would prove very annoying.?

Concetta?

?

Join [email protected] to automatically receive all group messages.