开云体育

That was about as helpful as anything I've read re: some direction in understanding this puzzle. Thanks, Roy Graves ________________________________ Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 6:57:33 PM To:

I will try to post this week about how to use the FTDNA BigY Match screen and what to ignore as well as the best things to do with your BigY results. I'm glad the information I posted today has helped

? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 31 January 2017 Thank you for this helpful and timely posting for a beginner like myself who is awaiting my Family Tree Big Y test results in February to supplement my

This group is pretty new and we have a lot of new members so I thought I would write a series of posts over the next few weeks on topics covering some genetic genealogy terms and concepts. I’ll put

*I haven’t had chance yet to look at the results from the Xmas Big Ys so if you have suggestions for improving the panel please let me know.* Ray, It looks like there are five new blocks under

That’s a fair summary Chris. I haven’t had chance yet to look at the results from the Xmas Big Ys so if you have suggestions for improving the panel please let me know. The target audience for

I actually answered a long time ago but it never posted. So I tried again and it didn't post. When it finally posts I guess it will post twice :) R1b-S6881@...> wrote:

It's kind of weird. I replied to this but it never showed up. Here's what I said: He's really telling me because I asked him for this information. Ray commissioned and paid for YSEQ (a third party

He's really telling me because I asked him for this information. Ray commissioned and paid for YSEQ (a third party company) to put together a panel of SNPs that he chose to represent a good test for

Mary, there is a company, Yseq, where we can given them a list of SNPs that are in our clade. These SNPs are examined by them are either determined to be of good quality or not. There are a minimum

Chris can you tell me what Ray is referring to here? I don’t understand what he’s tell us. Mary E Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 3:46 PM To: R1b-S6881@... Subject: Re: [R1b-S6881]

Thanks, Ray. I've marked it down so I'll remember. Chris [R1b-S6881] <R1b-S6881@...> wrote:

Well bummer. You are right he is basically a first cousin because we are only considering the male line. duh Will have to regroup. Thank you so much. I’ll leave the airwaves quiet for a

The one you are considering is too close. He's just a first cousin to Keith if I understood it correctly. He's Keith's uncle's son so they share a grandfather. They usually recommend a 3rd or 4th

Thanks again Chris. I appreciate your quick answers. I had our sons 111 completed but figured a Big Y would not benefit anything. I had thought of asking Keith's brother but figured he wouldn't

Thanks, Ray, yes I remember you set this panel up but I don't remember what SNPs it covers. Can you tell me again? I recommended to Cynthia that she think about using it to weed out the Graves and

Well, the questionable singleton will usually come from being in a hard to read area or not a good read so they aren't sure if it's real. The kits that these appear on can be analyzed by a third party

Just wanted to make you aware of the S6881 panel at YSEQ which I created as a cheap way to fit likely or confirmed S6881 people into the S6881 tree. However I note Chris's tree has some extra SNPs. If

First let me say THANK YOU....that is a wonderful explanation. It helps a lot and seemed very understandable to me. In hoping that I did understand correctly, I'd like to ask a couple more questions