¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Pota progress
I have been? having a great time working Pota chasing Activators.? ?I have 32 states worked and 26 confirmed on Pota since June 5th.? All cw and 95% on 20m.? Using inverted L up 27ft and
By Doug Hendricks · #9736 ·
Re: LOTW UP Here is a copy of the email sent
I was just going to post that. Thanks. *MEMBER BULLETIN* July 1, 2024 Dear ARRL member, *Effective 12:00pm ET / 16:00 UTC we will be returning Logbook of The World? (LoTW?) to service*. As work
By Joy Rabins · #9735 ·
LOTW UP
73, Eric NF6S ex WD6DBM ?
By Eric · #9734 ·
6m open to HI
73, Eric NF6S ex WD6DBM ?
By Eric · #9733 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
Thanks.? That explanation is what some of us were guessing.
By Paul AA6PZ · #9732 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
Thank you Phil.? ?It was perfectly readable and reaffirms my belief in adding the diode.? ?Thanks, Doug
By Doug Hendricks · #9731 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
Doug- Attached is a rather lousy scan of the page but should be sufficient. Let me know if you have any questions. regards and 73 Phil, KD6RM
By sittners · #9730 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
Could you please post a picture of your quoted material?? I would love to read it.? Thank you.? ?Doug
By Doug Hendricks · #9729 ·
CDC shortens official COVID quarantine guidance
Eric and all, This is the latest re Covid quarantine. Hiroki AH6CY The nation is ¡°in a different place¡± with the COVID pandemic than it was four years ago, said Dr. Mandy Cohen, who directs the
By Hiroki Kato · #9728 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
Hiroki- The zener? protection diode is a common design practice and is favored by Wes Hayward, W7ZOI. In his ARRL publication "Experimental Methods..." he explains the design on 1.19, fig. #1.35.
By sittners · #9727 ·
Re: Friday
I just found out I was exposed to covid either Friday or Saturday.? What is the current thinking on quarantine?? Needless to say, I won't make Baylands.? Again.? However, the batteries in my KX2
By Eric · #9726 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
Doug and All, I took a look at Steve's ATS-4 and Doug is correct there is a 47V zener diode across the FETS in the PA, so this has been used on simple CW amp. designs for some time. I still think that
By David W Crocker · #9725 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
I also have a Q-Match manual tuner that has a tune mode with a resistive bridge that keeps the SWR below 2:1 under all load conditions. I agree, this type of tuner will protect these simple FET QRP
By David W Crocker · #9724 ·
Re: Friday
I will be out of town this Friday, so see you next week.. Dave W6VYC
By David W Crocker · #9723 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
I would like to do an infrared survey of the board and zener running into an infinite mismatch. If the power is going into the 1 Watt zener, it might be overheating. If some power is being dissipated
By Jeff Reagan · #9722 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
Connie.? Hiroki had 2 sets of finals burn out because he was operating into a high swr.? When he put the diode in the same radio, he was able to transmit for several minutes with no antenna attached
By Doug Hendricks · #9721 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
I would gladly trade a little power lost for protection, but I am not yet convinced that the diode actually provides protection. Show me a side-by-side test demonstrating that the radio is destroyed
By Connie W6EFI · #9720 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
It¡¯s possible that manufacturer(s) could retune the output circuit(s) to get that power back. We should tell them to add this zener. [email protected]> wrote:
By Jeff Reagan · #9719 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
6% is about 0.5 dB.? The difference won't be heard.?? Good to have protection for the times when something wasn't connected or the tuner wasn't or ...
By Paul AA6PZ · #9718 ·
Re: Protecting (tr)uSDX against high SWR
I have more data.? I measured the power out on the Trusdx with and without the diode protection.? ?Here is the data: Band. W/diode. WO/diode. % lost 80.? ? ? ?5.96.? ? ? ? 6.35.? ? ? ?
By Doug Hendricks · #9717 ·