Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
- QRPops
- Messages
Search
Re: 40-meter stealth vertical for balcony
Rhona Mahony
Thanks for describing your antenna, Deon.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I had been thinking of using 12 awg stranded wire, for a little more bandwidth and to withstand the stresses of frequent extension and recoiling as I telescope the pole up and down. Good to know that even 26 awg solid wire works fine. Do you have the Jackite pole ($70, tip 3/16 inches) or the Mast Company ($115, tip 5/16 inches) or something else? Comments on what you have? Does a vertical with one elevated radial really have a pronounced null? Where is it? If my angle of separation for 2 radials would be less than 90 degrees, should I try two radials? I have the ARRL Antenna Handbook, which I find a little too theoretical, but helpful anyway. Thanks! ~~Rhona -- Rhona Mahony rmahony@... ----- Original Message -----
From: capesafari <ft7800@...> To: QRPops@... Sent: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [QRPops] Re: 40-meter stealth vertical for balcony Rhona You're not alone with the CA restrictions. (You'll be able to find a lot of info about this topic on the net too) I can add my experience, working lots of dx, at QRPp levels. (using mostly cw/digital modes/qrp). My home setup uses exactly this method, due to CC&Rs. The base of the 33ft pole is on the first story balcony for a little elevation. I push it up when I operate, and it collapses down and out-of-sight when not used. Wire thickness depends on your required bandwidth, but it does'nt matter much when you're using an antenna tuner. I use 26 swg mag wire - which is mostly invisible - 100W no problem. With this configuration I can work 40 - 10. The counterpoise situation depends on the design - and in the case of a quaterwave vertical, with elevated radials, you should easily get away with only 2x, sloping down to the ground. It's certainly not ideal and radiation angle may suffer, but it's worth the try to see what you get. To test the radiation efficiency, I sometimes use wspr for far-field radiation and propagation tests. Here's an interesting radial write-up : Also an interesting telescopic pole read here: Hope your experiments work out great and that you get on-air from home soon! 73, Deon k6wh --- In QRPops@..., Rhona Mahony <rmahony@...> wrote:
------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links |
||||
Re: 40-meter stealth vertical for balcony
capesafari
Rhona
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
You're not alone with the CA restrictions. (You'll be able to find a lot of info about this topic on the net too) I can add my experience, working lots of dx, at QRPp levels. (using mostly cw/digital modes/qrp). My home setup uses exactly this method, due to CC&Rs. The base of the 33ft pole is on the first story balcony for a little elevation. I push it up when I operate, and it collapses down and out-of-sight when not used. Wire thickness depends on your required bandwidth, but it does'nt matter much when you're using an antenna tuner. I use 26 swg mag wire - which is mostly invisible - 100W no problem. With this configuration I can work 40 - 10. The counterpoise situation depends on the design - and in the case of a quaterwave vertical, with elevated radials, you should easily get away with only 2x, sloping down to the ground. It's certainly not ideal and radiation angle may suffer, but it's worth the try to see what you get. To test the radiation efficiency, I sometimes use wspr for far-field radiation and propagation tests. Here's an interesting radial write-up : Also an interesting telescopic pole read here: Hope your experiments work out great and that you get on-air from home soon! 73, Deon k6wh --- In QRPops@..., Rhona Mahony <rmahony@...> wrote:
|
||||
40-meter stealth vertical for balcony
Rhona Mahony
Hi there gentlepersons,
This month's QST has an article (p. 44) on a 160-meter stealth vertical antenna that made me think that I could easily erect a similar one for 40 meters on my balcony. By telescoping it up only at night, I could evade my condo association's aesthetic restrictions. Because I won't be carrying this antenna, I am freer in my choice of wire diameter. What diameter do you folks like to use for home verticals and the radial(s)? My back patio is so narrow that if I use 2 radials, their angle of separation will be less than 90 degrees. Should I just use one radial? It will slope downward from the 12-foot high balcony to whatever I stake it to. Any tips? It will be great to have an antenna at home :^) ~~Rhona -- Rhona Mahony rmahony@... |
||||
Re: Fw: MB Antenna NEC File
w6dlf
Now I see why modeling software is so useful if the theoretical and actual are so close--but different from expected. Great tool to have and to learn.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Dave w6dlf --- In QRPops@..., David W Crocker <dwcae@...> wrote:
|
||||
Re: N3WG Version 2.0
w6dlf
Nick,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Beautiful pictures. Thanks for sharing Ren William with us. And congratulations to all of you. 73, Dave W6DLF --- In QRPops@..., Nick Garner <nwgarner@...> wrote:
|
||||
Re: N3WG Version 2.0
Tim Dolan
--- On Thu, 7/15/10, Nick Garner wrote:
|
||||
Fw: MB Antenna NEC File
Here is Martin's response to my request for NEC file for modeling his antenna using 4NEC2. Dave W6VYC ----- Forwarded Message ---- From: Martin Hedman
To: dwcae@... Sent: Mon, July 12, 2010 8:07:05 PM Subject: Re: MB Antenna NEC File Hello Dave! Glad to see that you enjoyed my article in QST and that you have build a 20 meter version of the antenna. Please see attached nec-file for 21 MHz. I have used a thin insulated wire which is light and strong but puts my resonance frequency 6 procent in difference when modelling and in real. So when modelling the included file you will se that it resonance on 22.6 MHz but in real with my wire used it resonance on 21.2 MHz. So resonance QRG depends on what kind of wire you use. I have built many versions of the antenna but never needed some kind of balun. At the moment I have one MH-antenna for 21 MHz and one for 18 MHz and they works nice with SWR 1,0 and good bandwidth. Good luck with your project! 73 de Martin
<-----Ursprungligt Meddelande----->
_______________________________________________________________ |
||||
Re: N3WG Version 2.0
Nick, Great news, congratulation with your new member to the Ham community. We will expect to see him soon a QRP outing. Dave W6VYC From: Nick Garner To: qrpops Sent: Thu, July 15, 2010 12:36:49 PM Subject: [QRPops] N3WG Version 2.0 ? Howdy Folks, |
||||
N3WG Version 2.0
Howdy Folks,
Ren William Garner was born this past Sunday at 0349.? He was 7 lbs. 1 oz and 19.5 inches.? He and mom are doing fine and I'm sleepy. :) I've uploaded a couple pictures to the group website. I just saw those pictures of that beam, pretty neat use of the poles. Also, if anyone has an Android based phone, I've created HamLog for that platform too.? It's still a work in progress though.? Let me know if you want a free copy. 73, Nick N3WG |
||||
Re: portable on Cape Cod
capesafari
Rhona Sounds like your station is ready for action.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
HF was overcrowded this past weekend with the IARU test. If you're curious about how your station is performing, especially at QRP levels, I find the competition weekends are great for the reason that all the big guns are using very capable receiving antennas. Don't be afraid to jump into a contest weekend, and interpret the 5nn report to mean that your signal was heard by the other side. The thrill is when the other side=dx station 6000 miles away. Proving to yourself the magic of propagation - allowing QRP levels to propagate around the earth like that. 73, - have a fun vacation. deon k6wh --- In QRPops@..., Rhona Mahony <rmahony@...> wrote:
|
||||
Re: 3-element wire beam - too fun
capesafari
Thanks for the info Dave.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I'll definitely check them out. 73, deon k6wh --- In QRPops@..., "w6dlf" <daveflack@...> wrote:
|
||||
portable on Cape Cod
Rhona Mahony
Hello there,
I am vacationing in Falmouth, Massachusetts, at a Mahony clan rendezvous. Ten of us are in a rented house with various gangs driving down and visiting. I have put up a NorCal doublet on the elevated back deck, 22 feet per leg of gauge 22 speaker wire. One leg goes to a second story window and the other leg goes through a fork in a tree in the back yard. The center support is a 20-foot telescoping graphite fishing pole. I am using my FT-817 with the Z817 tuner. I am finding 20 meters so crowded that I can't distinguish a single voice. On 40 meters, I have been hearing people all over the eastern U.S. I haven't yet managed to talk to anybody yet. I need to learn to pounce when an opportunity opens, instead of pausing politely to see whether someone else has been waiting. Pounce, Rhona, pounce! I am so impressed by your antenna experiments! Take good care! ~~Rhona, K6RHO -- Rhona Mahony rmahony@... |
||||
Re: 3-element wire beam - too fun
w6dlf
Here's a source for the 17' poles...about what I paid for my from Cabelas a few years ago.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
<> Southern Dave w6dlf --- In QRPops@..., "capesafari" <ft7800@...> wrote:
|
||||
Re: 3-element wire beam - too fun
capesafari
Congratulations!!! That looks great!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I like the hub assembly - with the free rotating mechanism. Do you keep the spreaders in position by the antenna wire tension, or do you have additional spreader rope to maintain the angles? Propagation was really favorable to EU during the IARU on 20m. I managed to work UK with 750mW and sloper on Sat night. Also the other HQ stations you mentioned were all booming in here. Did you use an antenna tuner inline? Also would be curious to know about any performance tests results. Maybe some f/b and f/s - wspr? The crappie poles work wonders. I have a few 20ft ones..but need to get myself the 16ft models...(for 20m dimensions) --- In QRPops@..., "Neil" <neil@...> wrote:
|
||||
3-element wire beam - too fun
Hi gang,
I've been working on a portable version of Martin Hedman's (SM0DTK) 3-element wire beam: The Mini Horse Antenna, QST Mar. 2010. Although it needs some optimization, Dave (W6VYK) and I got it launched and operational last Sunday. Qs with: KH6LC? Keaau, Hi.? big antenna farm and station setup for remote control, check QRZ for details. AH6NF Honolulu, Hi.? Beverly SK9HQ Karlsborg, Sweden? This is a big contest station. SN0HQ Poland?? Another big contest station. The mast was of particular interest to both of us. I've been wondering how high a mast one could make by stacking surplus 4' fiberglass pole sections. ? Our technique was to plant 2 guy lines roughly 100 degrees apart, then while keeping the mast leaning evenly against the guys, add sections from the bottom. A third guy was tensioned against the other two once we had the altitude we wanted. We quite easily managed to get the beam up 36 feet. It was a windless afternoon. Any wind at all would require a second set of guys. The beam itself is light and could be suspended from a horizontal line stretched between 2 tall trees. That combination would reduce the weight enough to make the antenna portable. I've uploaded photos of the adventure to the photo section. 73, Murf? kh6eam |
||||
Field Day
|
||||
Re: Mag Loop Help
Tim Dolan
--- On Sun, 6/20/10, Eric wrote:
|
||||
Mag Loop Help
Dear Gang:
Today I made the first tests on my qro mag loop. My goal was for it to be usable from 14 to 21 mhz at 100w. Unfortunately it tunes from 14.800 mhz to 23 mhz. Here's my question: is there a way to lower the resonance other than increasing the capacitance across the loop? Should i try increasing the feed loop diameter? Here are the design details; 10 ft loop circumference (+joints) 3/4 copper pipe in octagon shape. Feed loop 24" circumference (using 1/5 rule) made from refrigerator tubing about 1/4" dia, feed high capacitor low. Capacitor massive butterfly, measures 30-60 mf Using the wide-range tuner in my k1 i did hear a number of stations on 20m so i have high hopes! Thanks Eric WD6DBM Sent from my iPhone |