¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io
Date   
QMX SWR measurement is not correct while using with PA 9
Hello! I've noticed that SWR protection stops TX when I try to use QMX with one of my PA. When I measure SWR with connected PA threw QMX hardware test it shows 1.8-1.9. And it causes SWR protection actuation (even if SWR protection level is 3 or 4 by the way...). When I do SWR measurement with Nano VNA or another transceiver they measure SWR = 1.1. So it looks like QMX is incorrect. That is strange... When I do not use PA then QMX SWR measurement tool provides correct figures (compared with Nano VNA). Any ideas? BR/Sergey UB3AZK
Started by Petrov Sergey @ · Most recent @
QMX CW bandwidth 3
Hi, my QCX has been modified for a passband of around 900Hz and has found more use after the modification. I have a half-built QMX+ and the specs say that cw filter is adjustable from 50-500Hz. Many seasoned cw operators prefer much wider bandwidths for general cw working. I usually listen with around 1,2kHz BW, in tougher conditions the narrower BWs are a blessing. As my QMX+ still awaits to get on the air I want to ask if it?s possible to make the bandwith wider tha 500Hz in CW mode? If that is not the case, I would like to add this to the list of changes in the software of the QMX. 72 Ari OH9VL G-QRP 2068
Started by kklonk @ · Most recent @
QMX+ RF output fluctuates wildly 23 #QMXplus #troubleshooting
Assembled my QMX+ and it's working. I had a couple of issues related to enameled wire not making good connections that were resolved. I know it's working, I've made contacts on several bands successfully, including some decent DX, all on FT8. What bothers me is that the output power seems to jump around wildly. If I go to the diagnostics screen and key the transmitter, the Bias SMPS shows fluctuations in current that correspond to the fluctuations in the output power. The Duty cycle on the Bias SMPS always shows 0%, even as the current jumps around in the red. I suspect I've managed to damage one (or more) of the surface mount semiconductors. At least that's what my reading on the subject would seem to suggest. What I need is a test that can be done with a multi-meter that would shed some light on the problem. I can probably resurrect an oscilloscope if I need it, but I'm hoping someone can lead me to a simple voltage or resistance test that could help isolate the problem. My last problem was related to soldering and enameled wire which was easily resolved. I'm hoping this issue can be resolved without major surgery as well. Thanks in advance for all of the good advice I'm about to receive. Andy WB9YXA
Started by WB9YXA @ · Most recent @
My 20M band QCX+ 4
After a few days of work I completed my new QRP-Labs Xcvr after having built several years ago a Hi Band QDX. It was a real pleasure, no surprise due to an excellent manual and the adjustement and alignment were done today without dificulty. Next step will be to connect it to my Alexloop antenna. To be sure the 6 aft connectors whould slide nicely into the holes of the back plate I had screwed this plate to the lower enclosure and slid the main PCB each time I added a connector to check its position before finishing to solder it. The first difficulties I faced were to fit the LCD module and the front panel PCB to the Front panel of the enclosure : I had to cut slightly the nylon nut close to the potentiometer and I could not put in place the other nylon nut close to the encoder, I just left it near the hole in order to keep the good distance between the LCD board and the front PCB. The Last difficulties happened when I wanted to slid the main PCB inside the enclosure after having put in place the four 12MM spacers which hold the dev kit, the nylon screws below did not slide easily and I had to push quite strongly the PCB inside the enclosure. WELL I'M HAPPY WITH THIS WONDERFUL KIT AND I'M GRATEFUL TO HANS FOR THIS NICE DESIGN.
Started by Pierre - FK8IH @ · Most recent @
SSB Cal problems with QMX (not +) 4
I have been running firmware 1_02_000 on my QMX+ with good results on CW and SSB (haven't tried Digi yet) since the release of that firmware. So yesterday, I updated my original QMX with 1_02. The update went fine, and operation on CW was great, but I can't get all the SSB calibration procedures to look right. This is an 80, 60, 40, 30, 20 QMX, built for 12v (same voltage as my QMX+). The cals failed to complete on 80, 60, and 30. On 80 and 30, I get an error message saying "Change over 30 degrees" from the phase error cal and it stops at about dac=~1100 to 1300. I got a similar error on 60m, but this cal ran successfully on 3 subsequent runs. On the USB IMD sync, the final table in the upper right says 80m:15, 60m:74, 40m:23, 30m:62, 20m:26. In addition, 80m and 40m responses were almost flat - 80m ~140, 40m~100. On the LSB IMD sync, the final table in the upper right says 80m:74, 60m:74, 40m:29, 30m:15, 20m:26. In addition, 40m and 30m were almost flat - 40m ~280, 20m ~ 250. Also, for whatever reason, the y-axis max on 80m was ~7000000, and the y-axis max on 60m was ~1000000, both 1000 times higher than all other bands. On the ADC I/Q tests, the curves looked about the right shape (compared to samples in the oper. manual), but the upper left and lower left numbers were not very symmetrical. 80m 42183/-42067 60m 52338/-52457 40m 55808/-56412 30m 53881/-54284 20m 36459/-35947 Mic test works fine. PA Mod test looks good. Diagnostics look good on all bands with the following RF outputs. 80m 4.0w 60m 4.3w 40m 4.4w 30m 3.7w 20m 5.4w All tests with dummy load with Diagnostics showing SWR around 1.1:1 Any comments or suggestions are welcome. 73, Randy, KS4L
Started by Randy @ · Most recent @
I made a protective cover for the QMX+ which also doubles as a stand and storage! 6
Hello everyone! I think this is my first post in the forums and I wanted it to be a good one. I've been thinking about a good cover for the QMX+ since i pack very compact, but don't want my QMX+ frontpanel to be destroyed. So i came up with the 3D-model below. I'd love if you like the model and come with suggestions. I am open to modify or add versions as needed! https://www.printables.com/model/1300629-qmx-frontcover-stand-and-storage The panels are all dual-sided and can be put on the front or back of the QMX+. Below are some photos:
Started by Carl Vargklint SA0CVK @ · Most recent @
QMX control widget ( FLRIG accessory) 5
A completely different approach to the HTML console published on this forum but as I use Flrig to control my rigs and flrig does not support Hans' excellent recent additions to the CAT codes, I am developing a widget which supplements flrig. Currently, this allows for the selection of new modes, indicates the LCD contents on your PC, and has meters for signal, SWR, and power. This can be seen in operation here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lr-OomSTS7U Anyone wishing to try this out, then it can be found here: https://github.com/sipsmi/qmxwidget It's just proof of concept at the moment, and I will get around to tidying it up, but it works and I find it useful. 73 Simon G0FOZ
Started by Si Smith @ · Most recent @
CW Filters 31
I just upgraded to the 027 firmware on my QMX, from 018. Being able to select the CW filter is very nice, but I don't understand how to enable cascading or compounding of two CW filters. The manual says there are two CW filters - 300 and 500 Hz, yet the submenu shows 8 filters, ranging from 50 Hz to 500 Hz. Thanks and 73, Steve, N2IC
Started by Steve N2IC @ · Most recent @
QMX+ and DTR/RTS like CW keyering 4
Hello dear all and devs, Several hams on our side have equipped themselves with the QMX+. Some would like to know if it would be possible to add a few lines of code to the firmware so that when PTT is triggered¡ªeither via CAT or through DTR/RTS emulation¡ªand the QMX+ is in CW mode, it would transmit a carrier. From our tests, this already works in Digi mode, where a tone is sent through the sound card emulation. However, in CW mode, when PTT is sent via CAT, the radio does switch to transmit, but no signal is actually emitted. It might work if the software sent a tone via the sound card, but most CW software assumes that PTT alone is sufficient. This request is therefore aligned with improving compatibility with most CW-capable software (e.g., fldigi in CW mode with PTT via CAT or RTS/DTR). One of the advantages of operating in CW with the QMX+ is also the ability to reduce receive bandwidth, onboard decoding, breakin etc. We believe only a small firmware adjustment would be needed to have the carrier generated automatically, since the radio already enters transmit mode via CAT PTT. Adding RTS/DTR handling would enable a simple and widespread configuration method for this kind of operation. Otherwise, some have considered building interfaces using FT232 chips and optocouplers, but it would be unfortunate to require extra hardware when just a few lines of code might suffice. Perhaps the addition of a CW submenu to automatically enable the carrier when PTT is activated? Thank you in advance.
Started by Olivier SCHMITT @ · Most recent @
Missing Conductors - is it safe to apply power? 3 #qmx
I received my 20m-10m QMX kit and am currently assembling it. Unfortunately, the kit I received was missing the three 33pF and the 100pF capacitors (C401, C404, C521, C516). It will probably take a while until I receive the missing parts and I wonder if it is still possible to finish the build and start testing the device (basic tests like: will it turn on etc). Or should I just let it sit and wait? 73, Dennis DM4NTZ
Started by dennis.mantz@... @ · Most recent @
QMX+ unwanted signals received #qmx #QMXp #QMXplus
Hi guys, I recently installed the new fw 1_02_00 on my QMX+. However, after listening on various frequencies I noticed that there are very strong and unwanted signals at the beginning of the band. In 20m it receives an S8 signal around 14,012.00 Khz and the same in 15 and 10m even without an antenna. I wanted to know if you also had the same problem. A friend of mine who uses the FW 1_01_003 beta let me know that with this version the problem exists but the unwanted signals are much more attenuated. 73 de IZ2BHP.
Started by Fabrizio IZ2BHP @
QMX+ unwanted signals received
Hi guys, I recently installed the new fw 1_02_00 on my QMX+. However, after listening on various frequencies I noticed that there are very strong and unwanted signals at the beginning of the band. In 20m it receives an S8 carrier signal around 14,012.00 Khz and the same in 15 and 10, even without an antenna. I wanted to know if you also had the same problem. A friend of mine who uses the beta FW 1_01_003 let me know that with this version the problem exists but the unwanted signals are much more attenuated. Thanks for your reply. 73 de IZ2BHP.
Started by Fabrizio IZ2BHP @
Audio level request 12
I would like to block Digi mode audio from going to the earphone jack. The audio levels are painfully loud when adjusted for correct usb output to WSJT-X. I am afraid to switch between sidebands or to CW without removing headphones first. Any Suggestions ? QMX+ with 1.02 . de VK6XT
Started by Rick Hill @ · Most recent @
Tune SWR on QMX+ always shows SWR <1.05 14
Hi, I wanted to tune my magloop antenna with the "Tune SWR" tool in the QMX+ menus, and no matter what I do with the antenna, the SWR never goes above 1.04 or so. That cannot be correct, as I'm using a magloop. Any tips on what I'm doing wrong?
Started by SA6ZGM Arne @ · Most recent @
QRP Labs kit shipping status 20-10 FS
The price of success! My Factory built QMX hiband can be in your hands in a week or so. 12- volt build, enclosure, .027 installed. Works perfectly. Email sfab43@ho**ail.com for more info. Steve JS6TMW/AI6KX
Started by Steve in Okinawa @
QMX+ issues 2
My QMX+ was working but when I powered it on this morning the display backlight is not on and the display shows a row of black blocks. Does anyone have any thoughts on where to start troubleshooting. +V or +12v has 12v, VCC has 5.1v, and VDD has 3.3v. I have had some issues with this unit. The 78M33 failed. When I tried to remove it the two small pads lifted. I currently have the 3.3v being supplied by a small DROC 3.3v buck converter. It was working well as of yesterday, I completed several FT8 and SSB QSOs.
Started by Eugene Pressley @ · Most recent @
QMX+: low RX sensitifity @ 6m / 22 dB noise floor / 1500 Hz wistle 15
Hello, I recently build QMX+ and noticed a huge noise floor and wistling a 6 m. Therfore I measured sensitifity using a signal generator. Band [MHz] Sens [dBm]@Noise+10dB Noise [dB] 1,85 -100,0 0 3,65 -106,0 0 5,35 -107,0 6 7,07 -107,0 0 10,14 -110,0 2 14,23 -107,0 1 18,1 -103,0 4 21,04 -99,0 9 24,9 -97,0 7 28,1 -103,0 5 50,5 -79,0 20 Method: injection of signal Rx frequency + 1,1 kHz Mode: Digi Noise: signal detected by WSJT-X Sens: Noise floor + 10 dB Noise floor is increasing by frequency, but at 6 m wistling and digital noise make RX unusable. Output at 6m is about 2 W at 9V Vbat (12V Version) 1,5 kHz wistle starts at 20 m and is increasing by frequency Using wsjt-X i evalating waterfall diagram: (QMX+ at 50 Ohm) AVE:1, cumulative Noise [dB] : signal by WSJT-X signal in waterfall diagram AU QMX+ freq [Hz] freq [Hz] freq [Hz] freq [Hz] freq [Hz] freq [Hz] Frequency [MHz] Noise [db] Noisefloor 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 1,84 0 0,2 0,2 0,2 0,8 0,2 0,2 0,2 3,57 0 0,3 0,3 0,3 0,7 0,3 0,3 0,3 5,3 1 0,5 0,5 0,5 1 0,5 0,5 0,5 7,04 5 0,8 0,8 0,8 1,1 0,8 0,8 0,8 10,1 1 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 14,1 1 0,5 0,5 1,3 2,8 2,1 0,5 1,5 18,1 5 0,8 1 1,8 2,3 2,1 1,1 2 21,1 7 1 1 2,1 2,6 2,1 1,1 2,1 24,9 7 1 1,2 2,7 2,8 2,7 1,3 2,5 28,1 7 1 1,2 2 1,5 1,5 1,2 2,2 50,3 22 1,8 2,5 3,8 4,2 3,9 2,8 3,8 At higher bands 1,5kHz signal is constant and independent from RX freuqency. At 6m additional audio signals are appearing. 6m RF Filter seems to be ok. Any suggestions to detect cause? vy 73 Michael (DF6TV)
Started by Michael @ · Most recent @
#qmx plus assembly one LP and Band filter at the time 6 #qmx
Hi Everyone I was wondering if is possible to assemble only one band filter at the time on a qmx plux rev3, this means I have assembled the all QMX leaving out only the toroids of all the filters, the LP and BP ones. Now next I have assembled only the 160m LP and BP and test the filters. The swipes look normal on the 160m. Next is to test transiting to a dummy load only this band, but I get the swr protection kicking in and no power out. voltages look normal. running a swr plot on 160m shows swr 10 on all graph. The main idea is to tune filters one by one with space for the soldering iron making it easy. I have reviewed soldering of transformer and swr brigde plus the jumper to the bnc is in place. My question is, Is it expectable that the SWR is High when only the filters for one band are on the board or this means something else is already wrong from the beginning. Thank you a lot 73 Azgael
Started by Azgael @ · Most recent @
QMX PLUS 5
Hi all I have a qmx plus and I ran 13.6 volts into it on a first time power up it worked for abt 5 min then it shut dow. Then i read about the max of 12v vcc. I am assuming that I lost the buck converter. I have replaced all the sbject transitors that showed bad via the ohm meter still no joy. does anyone of you smart ones have test point diagram fot the buck converter so i can trace it and trouble shoot . thanks you a bunch Joe
Started by LUCHOWSKI JOSEPH S @ · Most recent @
Why no AGC for digital modes, as other modes? 6
To Da Wiz; thank you, and a request, to make it better. Personally, I would appreciate the choice to use AGC, with my QMX+, or not, for all modes. I have used fast or slow AGC with my FT-990 and TS-790A for years, for different modes, and have found no noticeable performance penalty, except that the sound from no AGC was harsh and undesirable, and the S meter unusable. Some folks will not RTFMs to turn off the AGC, or properly tweak other software or hardware, and complain about imagined "bugs" - but for this ol' geezer, the choice would be appreciated, and I promise I will not whine about the consequences ;-) Thanks for a hearing, DA Ol' Dog, wa4hei
Started by Fred Murray @ · Most recent @
Current Image
Image Name
Sat 8:39am