¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

QMX sensitivity, QMX+ bands


 

Hi,

Two quick questions:

1. What is the sensitivity of the QMX transceiver, in uV, on different
bands? I don't seem to be able to find this information anywhere :(

2. What bands exactly does QMX+ cover? It says 160-6m, but it's 12 bands.
Does it really cover all of them?

- 160m
- 80m
- 60m
- 40m
- 30m
- 20m
- 17m
- 15m
- 12m
- 10m
- 8m
- 6m

Thanks.


 

Hi Adam,
?
1.? There is some variability in each kit's specs due to the individual nature of the construction.? Both the QMX and QMX+ have diagnostic tools built in to allow the builder to adjust filters to maximize performance.? Regardless, it's still reasonable to expect "pretty good" sensitivity when adjusted properly.
?
2.? Yes.

Cheers,
John VA7JBE


 

The sensitivity of my QMX+ is pretty good, but I don't have a spec for you.? I have not had any problems with the receiver.? Being a QRP rig, you will be able to hear many more stations than can hear you.? I have been using mine primarily for FT8 and I am almost always giving the other station a much better signal report than they are giving me, which tells me the receiver has more than adequate performance for 2 way communication.
?
It does cover all of the bands on your list, except 8m.? It also covers 11m for the regions where that is allowed.
?
--
Steve KA0SM


 

I know I¡¯ve shared this opinion before but, I was in love with my original qcx. The rx was great. Couldn¡¯t believe that the qmx would top it. Then I plugged it in and used it. I was wrong. It¡¯s not night and day or anything like that, but it is very slightly better. If I have both listening to a weak station barely able to copy, the qmx is more enjoyable to listen to. Which flies in the face of all my bias. ??¡á? sometimes I¡¯m wrong. I prefer the rx on the qrp labs radios (all) over the rx on a 7300 all day everyday. I don¡¯t own any elecraft but people that do have rated these little radios favorably in comparison. My wallet agrees. Plus I get to build it! ?Anyway I¡¯m sorry I don¡¯t have a uV number to give but in practical terms it¡¯s a very good rx.?


 

Steve M <steven@...> wrote:

The sensitivity of my QMX+ is pretty good, but I don't have a spec for
you.? I have not had any problems with the receiver.? Being a QRP rig,
you will be able to hear many more stations than can hear you.? I have
been using mine primarily for FT8 and I am almost always giving the
other station a much better signal report than they are giving me, which
tells me the receiver has more than adequate performance for 2 way
communication.

It does cover all of the bands on your list, except 8m.? It also covers
11m for the regions where that is allowed.
Thanks for all the responses!

Actually 8m is forbidden where I live (Poland, IARU 1), so I wouldn't use
it anyway.

My issue (and my thinking) is this. In the last CQ WW CW I was able to
contact almost all stations I heard, so maybe the sensitivity is actually
bad compared to what I'd get on a rig like Yaesu? Maybe I didn't hear
these weak stations that wouldn't hear me from 5 W?

I only have QMX (and QDX) and I'm pretty happy with it, but I don't have
comparison, and I'm thinking about something else (QMX+ is an option,
because I'd like to try some higher bands too).

I also tried increasing the output power with QCX's 50 W PA (with QDX). PA
ended up self-oscillating and frying four chips in the QDX's input stage
(plus overheating PA's input attenuator resistors). I was able to replace
the chips, but I'm reluctant to connect it again.

Maybe some low-pass filter just before the gates of the transistors would
prevent it, but looking at the design I can't think of an elegant way to
do it and I don't want to experiment and fry another rig...


 

I ?played in the CQ WW CONTEST and concluded that it can go two ways with QRP. Sometimes the other station will try to dig out a weak signal for points; sometimes nothing gets through other strong signals from QRO contest stations. Using full breaking is helpful in saving frustrating calls. JS6TMW