I wonder how many of you are using chatGPT/GPT4 etc to assist in various things like Ham radio, programming or work?


Paul DJ0CU G4ADF?

I have used it to generate outlines of Python code. It speeds up the initial process when I don’t know what libraries I need to use. My first try was a 3D water fall plot from a wav file of passing APT weather data.?

At work I have been using it to generate templates for corporate documents. Part of my job is to figure out problems when we have a company emergency and we don’t have a person in staff qualified to fix them. This week I have had to generate a departments SOPs. Getting a template from chatGTP and then editing it to fit our processes has greatly sped up the process.?

It is really important to understand it’s very big limits. Take a subject where you have some expertise and probe it’s knowledge. It is often very wrong! I spent 10 years making holograms as an example. If you ask it simple questions about the process it spins very inaccurate responses. It doesn’t know what it doesn’t know.?
--
Colin - K6JTH?

Yes try GPT4 its much better, and as from yesterday they are offering an Enterprise edition that keeps all company data private and safe.
Its loads better than chatgpt but costs $20 a month, well worth it.

But, everything has crashed as the USA came online, probably due to the new enterprise edition.

Paul DJ0CU.

I have not tried ChatGPT but here is what Google Bard has to say about the QMX:

Me:
Bard:??

On 31 Aug 2023 at 18:29, Mike KK7ER wrote:

QMX transceivers are commonly used in amateur radio, public safety
communications, and commercial applications. They are also used in
some military applications.

No wonder Hans cannot keep up with the production
demand ... with every soldier and sailor having a QMX
in their pocket, they will be like HF pocket phones. LOL

ChatGPT would not know about the QMX as its cut off date was the end of 2021.

For those interested, GPT4 (update from ChatGPT 3.5) now has an IQ of 150, or just below that of Einstein and Hawkin, or cleverer than
99,999% of the populalation. GPT5 is projected to have an IQ many multiples of GPT4.

I'm quite surprised so few of you seem to be using it, as it can of tremendous help in many fields. To have an AI at your fingertips on a PC or mobile device
that is many times cleverer than yourself that never tires of questions, is amazing.

Paul DJ0CU G4ADF?

On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 09:44 AM, Paul Harrison wrote:

For those interested, GPT4 (update from ChatGPT 3.5) now has an IQ of 150, or just below that of Einstein and Hawkin, or cleverer than
99,999% of the populalation. GPT5 is projected to have an IQ many multiples of GPT4.

I am a bit surprised by this...

I've tested it against subjects I know about and it seems to be good at formulating plausible answers and compiling info available on the internet. IMHO this is already a big achievement and useful but not quite comparable to a "human IQ" even if the AI might be able to pass "IQ tests" designed for humans.

73 de Yannig - F4IUJ

Are you talking about GPT4 or Chatgpt?, the latter is as you say sometimes full of BS. GPT4 is mostly a different story, and by the way, they both have no connection to the internet, so it does not compile Info from the internet, it uses tokens distributed through its neural networks just like humans.

Paul DJ0CU G4ADF?

What in the hell does any of this have to do with QRP Labs?

Andre, WT9X

On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 05:32 AM, Andre - WT9X wrote:

What in the hell does any of this have to do with QRP Labs? Andre, WT9X

Andre, why not put that question to ChatGPT?
Randy, K7RAN?

On 31/08/2023 15:16, Paul Harrison via groups.io wrote:

offering an Enterprise edition that keeps all company data private and safe.

And that's what I would tell everyone as a provider of AI services whilst ensuring I was able to mine and use all the private data to train my model and make money off what the customers where doing.

Remember: if your data/info is not on a computer in your server room on your premises then it's in someone else's computer and is only notionally secure.

Andre, why not put that question to ChatGPT?
Randy, K7RAN?

Even GPT agrees with me. Emphasis mine:

It appears that the discussion in the QRP Labs group thread veered off-topic into the capabilities of GPT-4 and its applications, including but not limited to ham radio and programming. You questioned how this discussion was related to QRP Labs, which is primarily focused on low-power amateur radio kits and radios.

To directly answer your question, the discussion about GPT-4 doesn't seem directly related to QRP Labs or its core focus, unless there's an angle where AI could be applied to amateur radio communications or the development of QRP Labs' products, which wasn't clearly articulated in the thread. It seems like the thread diverged into discussing the merits and limitations of GPT-4, rather than staying focused on QRP Labs topics.

In summary, your question about the relevance to QRP Labs is quite valid based on the information provided.

开云体育

OK, so _sometimes_ it’s hallucinations _appear_ to make sense, but if it’s not trustworthy, then what’s the point?

I have used it to write C code. Does a nice job.
Paul
? It has everything to do with the internet. The neural nets are trained on internet data.
--
? 73
??? KD8CGH

Yes Bob but before 2021, where exactly it was trained is a bit of a secret, but for sure the internet as well.

Paul DJ0CU G4ADF?

I uploaded photos of my soldered QMX boards and asked it to check for problems, solder bridges, out gave me a whole raft of tips where to look regarding Rx problems, so yes it's very much on topic with qrp-labs.

Andy it's exactly what they are guaranteeing they won't do, but that is off topic so won't expand further.

Andre, quite simply because GPT4 is beyond awesome and could be of great assistance in programming SDR Transceivers like the QMX
but nobody seems to have understood it's capabilities which is a pity.

Paul DJ0CU G4ADF