Vernon Matheson

?Hi all,

?

I have been trying to reduce the drift on my wspr tx when running 5-6 bands. I seem to be able to get one band with zero drift and the next band in sequence has some drift. See the data for 20m versus 30m below

?

I have attached a small heat sink on the 27mhz xtal as suggested but am wondering about park mode. U3S is also in a qrp labs case.

?

If I set to mode 2 and say 149.000.000 as suggested it doesn't change much.

?

Would I be better to use park mode #1 and then 149.000.000 for a frequency.

?

Vernon

?

Timestamp	Call	MHz	SNR	Drift	Grid	Pwr	Reporter	RGrid	km	az
?2017-11-09 14:24?	?VA1VM?	?14.097148?	?-22?	?-3?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?G4ZFQ?	?IO90ir?	?4509?	?59?
?2017-11-09 14:24?	?VA1VM?	?14.097165?	?-24?	?-2?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?F4GUK/SDR?	?JN18et?	?4828?	?61?
?2017-11-09 14:24?	?VA1VM?	?14.097153?	?-20?	?-3?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?K9AN?	?EN50wc?	?2102?	?263?
?2017-11-09 14:24?	?VA1VM?	?14.097157?	?-2?	?-3?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?W9HAM?	?EN64?	?1865?	?275?
?2017-11-09 14:24?	?VA1VM?	?14.097156?	?-22?	?-3?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?G0DLV?	?IO70ru?	?4286?	?60?
?2017-11-09 14:24?	?VA1VM?	?14.097150?	?-22?	?-3?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?G0LUJ?	?IO83ls?	?4305?	?55?
?2017-11-09 14:24?	?VA1VM?	?14.097157?	?-21?	?-3?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?KA4PKB?	?EN41kf?	?2287?	?268?
?2017-11-09 14:22?	?VA1VM?	?10.140154?	?-26?	?0?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?SWLKCL?	?FN03ip?	?1281?	?267?
?2017-11-09 14:22?	?VA1VM?	?10.140156?	?-9?	?0?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?SWLNXZ?	?FN13co?	?1165?	?265?
?2017-11-09 14:22?	?VA1VM?	?10.140153?	?-22?	?0?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?K9AN?	?EN50wc?	?2102?	?263?
?2017-11-09 14:22?	?VA1VM?	?10.140152?	?-18?	?0?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?VE3YX?	?FN16fd?	?1107?	?279?
?2017-11-09 14:22?	?VA1VM?	?10.140160?	?-22?	?0?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?VE3BSB?	?FN14uv?	?1020?	?272?
?2017-11-09 14:22?	?VA1VM?	?10.140153?	?-20?	?0?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?K4COD?	?EM73sc?	?2266?	?240?
?2017-11-09 14:22?	?VA1VM?	?10.140154?	?-18?	?0?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?K1BZ/3?	?FM19ne?	?1311?	?243?
?2017-11-09 14:22?	?VA1VM?	?10.140150?	?-21?	?0?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?N4CDN?	?FM18iu?	?1362?	?243?
?2017-11-09 14:20?	?VA1VM?	?7.040163?	?-27?	?0?	?FN85ij?	?0.2?	?N4TVC?	?FM18is?	?1367?	?242?

#18034

Using QCX on WSPR I found great stability at home and got my frequency accurate to within I think one Hertz, but on the back seat of the car on a warm day in VK while driving around, some drift set in. I guess that would be normal, temperature affecting and thus heat sink may surely help?

#18037

Hi Vernon

I suggest putting the sequence of the bands the other way around: start with the highest frequency and then step down.?

Park Mode 2 is useful in the gaps between transmissions but makes very little difference if the gap is only 8 seconds. So use Park Mode 2 for the long wait at the end of calibration and before the Mode 0] configuration starts. Have it sequence through starting at the highest frequencies then stepping lower.?

73 Hans G0UPL

Show quoted text

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Vernon Matheson <vmath@...> wrote:

?Hi all,
?
I have been trying to reduce the drift on my wspr tx when running 5-6 bands. I seem to be able to get one band with zero drift and the next band in sequence has some drift. See the data for 20m versus 30m below
?
I have attached a small heat sink on the 27mhz xtal as suggested but am wondering about park mode. U3S is also in a qrp labs case.
?
If I set to mode 2 and say 149.000.000 as suggested it doesn't change much.
?
Would I be better to use park mode #1 and then 149.000.000 for a frequency.
?
Vernon
?

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097148? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G4ZFQ? ?IO90ir? ?4509? ?59?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097165? ?-24? ?-2? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?F4GUK/SDR? ?JN18et? ?4828? ?61?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097153? ?-20? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K9AN? ?EN50wc? ?2102? ?263?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097157? ?-2? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?W9HAM? ?EN64? ?1865? ?275?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097156? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G0DLV? ?IO70ru? ?4286? ?60?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097150? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G0LUJ? ?IO83ls? ?4305? ?55?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097157? ?-21? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?KA4PKB? ?EN41kf? ?2287? ?268?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140154? ?-26? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?SWLKCL? ?FN03ip? ?1281? ?267?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140156? ?-9? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?SWLNXZ? ?FN13co? ?1165? ?265?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140153? ?-22? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K9AN? ?EN50wc? ?2102? ?263?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140152? ?-18? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?VE3YX? ?FN16fd? ?1107? ?279?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140160? ?-22? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?VE3BSB? ?FN14uv? ?1020? ?272?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140153? ?-20? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K4COD? ?EM73sc? ?2266? ?240?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140154? ?-18? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K1BZ/3? ?FM19ne? ?1311? ?243?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140150? ?-21? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?N4CDN? ?FM18iu? ?1362? ?243?

?2017-11-09 14:20? ?VA1VM? ?7.040163? ?-27? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?N4TVC? ?FM18is? ?1367? ?242?

Vernon Matheson

#18040

Thanks Hans...would I reduce the 150.000.000 maximum frequency by 28.200.000??

?

On 11/09/17 10:54 AM, "Hans Summers" <hans.summers@...> wrote:

Show quoted text

Hi Vernon

I suggest putting the sequence of the bands the other way around: start with the highest frequency and then step down.?

Park Mode 2 is useful in the gaps between transmissions but makes very little difference if the gap is only 8 seconds. So use Park Mode 2 for the long wait at the end of calibration and before the Mode 0] configuration starts. Have it sequence through starting at the highest frequencies then stepping lower.?

73 Hans G0UPL

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Vernon Matheson <vmath@...> wrote:

?Hi all,
?
I have been trying to reduce the drift on my wspr tx when running 5-6 bands. I seem to be able to get one band with zero drift and the next band in sequence has some drift. See the data for 20m versus 30m below
?
I have attached a small heat sink on the 27mhz xtal as suggested but am wondering about park mode. U3S is also in a qrp labs case.
?
If I set to mode 2 and say 149.000.000 as suggested it doesn't change much.
?
Would I be better to use park mode #1 and then 149.000.000 for a frequency.
?
Vernon
?

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097148? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G4ZFQ? ?IO90ir? ?4509? ?59?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097165? ?-24? ?-2? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?F4GUK/SDR? ?JN18et? ?4828? ?61?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097153? ?-20? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K9AN? ?EN50wc? ?2102? ?263?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097157? ?-2? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?W9HAM? ?EN64? ?1865? ?275?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097156? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G0DLV? ?IO70ru? ?4286? ?60?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097150? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G0LUJ? ?IO83ls? ?4305? ?55?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097157? ?-21? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?KA4PKB? ?EN41kf? ?2287? ?268?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140154? ?-26? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?SWLKCL? ?FN03ip? ?1281? ?267?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140156? ?-9? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?SWLNXZ? ?FN13co? ?1165? ?265?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140153? ?-22? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K9AN? ?EN50wc? ?2102? ?263?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140152? ?-18? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?VE3YX? ?FN16fd? ?1107? ?279?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140160? ?-22? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?VE3BSB? ?FN14uv? ?1020? ?272?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140153? ?-20? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K4COD? ?EM73sc? ?2266? ?240?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140154? ?-18? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K1BZ/3? ?FM19ne? ?1311? ?243?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140150? ?-21? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?N4CDN? ?FM18iu? ?1362? ?243?

?2017-11-09 14:20? ?VA1VM? ?7.040163? ?-27? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?N4TVC? ?FM18is? ?1367? ?242?

?

#18077

Hello Vernon

The idea of the 150MHz is that it keeps the Si5351A "busy" while not transmitting, which keeps it warm; then when it starts transmitting, it is already warm and there is not much temperature change. Sometimes 150MHz is too high and causes a drift in the other direction, and needs to be reduced for that reason. It takes some experiment to get it right. But I always found best results on a multi-band Ultimate3S by having 10m first, then 15, 20m, 30m etc going down in frequency.?

73 Hans G0UPL

Show quoted text

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Vernon Matheson <vmath@...> wrote:

Thanks Hans...would I reduce the 150.000.000 maximum frequency by 28.200.000??
?
On 11/09/17 10:54 AM, "Hans Summers" <hans.summers@...> wrote:

Hi Vernon

I suggest putting the sequence of the bands the other way around: start with the highest frequency and then step down.?

Park Mode 2 is useful in the gaps between transmissions but makes very little difference if the gap is only 8 seconds. So use Park Mode 2 for the long wait at the end of calibration and before the Mode 0] configuration starts. Have it sequence through starting at the highest frequencies then stepping lower.?

73 Hans G0UPL

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Vernon Matheson <vmath@...> wrote:

?Hi all,
?
I have been trying to reduce the drift on my wspr tx when running 5-6 bands. I seem to be able to get one band with zero drift and the next band in sequence has some drift. See the data for 20m versus 30m below
?
I have attached a small heat sink on the 27mhz xtal as suggested but am wondering about park mode. U3S is also in a qrp labs case.
?
If I set to mode 2 and say 149.000.000 as suggested it doesn't change much.
?
Would I be better to use park mode #1 and then 149.000.000 for a frequency.
?
Vernon
?

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097148? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G4ZFQ? ?IO90ir? ?4509? ?59?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097165? ?-24? ?-2? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?F4GUK/SDR? ?JN18et? ?4828? ?61?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097153? ?-20? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K9AN? ?EN50wc? ?2102? ?263?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097157? ?-2? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?W9HAM? ?EN64? ?1865? ?275?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097156? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G0DLV? ?IO70ru? ?4286? ?60?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097150? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G0LUJ? ?IO83ls? ?4305? ?55?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097157? ?-21? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?KA4PKB? ?EN41kf? ?2287? ?268?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140154? ?-26? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?SWLKCL? ?FN03ip? ?1281? ?267?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140156? ?-9? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?SWLNXZ? ?FN13co? ?1165? ?265?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140153? ?-22? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K9AN? ?EN50wc? ?2102? ?263?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140152? ?-18? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?VE3YX? ?FN16fd? ?1107? ?279?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140160? ?-22? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?VE3BSB? ?FN14uv? ?1020? ?272?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140153? ?-20? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K4COD? ?EM73sc? ?2266? ?240?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140154? ?-18? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K1BZ/3? ?FM19ne? ?1311? ?243?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140150? ?-21? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?N4CDN? ?FM18iu? ?1362? ?243?

?2017-11-09 14:20? ?VA1VM? ?7.040163? ?-27? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?N4TVC? ?FM18is? ?1367? ?242?

?

Vernon Matheson

#18088

开云体育

Thanks Hans...I redid the order of tx as you said and used park mode 2 @ 150

Mhz plus the small heat sink and all I see is zeros ( just like my bank account) LOL! So success as it also removed the small curl on the start of each dit and dah in the qrss signal. Many thanks for your help.

Vernon

Sent?from?my?BlackBerry?10?smartphone?on?the?Rogers?network.

From: Hans Summers

Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 4:40 AM

To: [email protected]

Reply To: [email protected]

Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] Frequency Stability

Hello Vernon

The idea of the 150MHz is that it keeps the Si5351A "busy" while not transmitting, which keeps it warm; then when it starts transmitting, it is already warm and there is not much temperature change. Sometimes 150MHz is too high and causes a drift in the other direction, and needs to be reduced for that reason. It takes some experiment to get it right. But I always found best results on a multi-band Ultimate3S by having 10m first, then 15, 20m, 30m etc going down in frequency.?

73 Hans G0UPL

Show quoted text

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Vernon Matheson <vmath@...> wrote:

Thanks Hans...would I reduce the 150.000.000 maximum frequency by 28.200.000??
?
On 11/09/17 10:54 AM, "Hans Summers" <hans.summers@...> wrote:

Hi Vernon

I suggest putting the sequence of the bands the other way around: start with the highest frequency and then step down.?

Park Mode 2 is useful in the gaps between transmissions but makes very little difference if the gap is only 8 seconds. So use Park Mode 2 for the long wait at the end of calibration and before the Mode 0] configuration starts. Have it sequence through starting at the highest frequencies then stepping lower.?

73 Hans G0UPL

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Vernon Matheson <vmath@...> wrote:

?Hi all,
?
I have been trying to reduce the drift on my wspr tx when running 5-6 bands. I seem to be able to get one band with zero drift and the next band in sequence has some drift. See the data for 20m versus 30m below
?
I have attached a small heat sink on the 27mhz xtal as suggested but am wondering about park mode. U3S is also in a qrp labs case.
?
If I set to mode 2 and say 149.000.000 as suggested it doesn't change much.
?
Would I be better to use park mode #1 and then 149.000.000 for a frequency.
?
Vernon
?

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097148? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G4ZFQ? ?IO90ir? ?4509? ?59?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097165? ?-24? ?-2? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?F4GUK/SDR? ?JN18et? ?4828? ?61?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097153? ?-20? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K9AN? ?EN50wc? ?2102? ?263?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097157? ?-2? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?W9HAM? ?EN64? ?1865? ?275?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097156? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G0DLV? ?IO70ru? ?4286? ?60?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097150? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G0LUJ? ?IO83ls? ?4305? ?55?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097157? ?-21? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?KA4PKB? ?EN41kf? ?2287? ?268?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140154? ?-26? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?SWLKCL? ?FN03ip? ?1281? ?267?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140156? ?-9? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?SWLNXZ? ?FN13co? ?1165? ?265?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140153? ?-22? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K9AN? ?EN50wc? ?2102? ?263?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140152? ?-18? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?VE3YX? ?FN16fd? ?1107? ?279?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140160? ?-22? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?VE3BSB? ?FN14uv? ?1020? ?272?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140153? ?-20? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K4COD? ?EM73sc? ?2266? ?240?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140154? ?-18? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K1BZ/3? ?FM19ne? ?1311? ?243?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140150? ?-21? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?N4CDN? ?FM18iu? ?1362? ?243?

?2017-11-09 14:20? ?VA1VM? ?7.040163? ?-27? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?N4TVC? ?FM18is? ?1367? ?242?

?

#18097

Excellent, Vernon! Nice to hear some good news!

73 Hans G0UPL

Show quoted text

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Vernon Matheson <vmath@...> wrote:

Thanks Hans...I redid the order of tx as you said and used park mode 2 @ 150
Mhz plus the small heat sink and all I see is zeros ( just like my bank account) LOL! So success as it also removed the small curl on the start of each dit and dah in the qrss signal. Many thanks for your help.

Vernon

Sent?from?my?BlackBerry?10?smartphone?on?the?Rogers?network.

From: Hans Summers
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 4:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Reply To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [QRPLabs] Frequency Stability

Hello Vernon

The idea of the 150MHz is that it keeps the Si5351A "busy" while not transmitting, which keeps it warm; then when it starts transmitting, it is already warm and there is not much temperature change. Sometimes 150MHz is too high and causes a drift in the other direction, and needs to be reduced for that reason. It takes some experiment to get it right. But I always found best results on a multi-band Ultimate3S by having 10m first, then 15, 20m, 30m etc going down in frequency.?

73 Hans G0UPL

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Vernon Matheson <vmath@...> wrote:
Thanks Hans...would I reduce the 150.000.000 maximum frequency by 28.200.000??
?
On 11/09/17 10:54 AM, "Hans Summers" <hans.summers@...> wrote:

Hi Vernon

I suggest putting the sequence of the bands the other way around: start with the highest frequency and then step down.?

Park Mode 2 is useful in the gaps between transmissions but makes very little difference if the gap is only 8 seconds. So use Park Mode 2 for the long wait at the end of calibration and before the Mode 0] configuration starts. Have it sequence through starting at the highest frequencies then stepping lower.?

73 Hans G0UPL

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Vernon Matheson <vmath@...> wrote:

?Hi all,
?
I have been trying to reduce the drift on my wspr tx when running 5-6 bands. I seem to be able to get one band with zero drift and the next band in sequence has some drift. See the data for 20m versus 30m below
?
I have attached a small heat sink on the 27mhz xtal as suggested but am wondering about park mode. U3S is also in a qrp labs case.
?
If I set to mode 2 and say 149.000.000 as suggested it doesn't change much.
?
Would I be better to use park mode #1 and then 149.000.000 for a frequency.
?
Vernon
?

Timestamp Call MHz SNR Drift Grid Pwr Reporter RGrid km az

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097148? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G4ZFQ? ?IO90ir? ?4509? ?59?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097165? ?-24? ?-2? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?F4GUK/SDR? ?JN18et? ?4828? ?61?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097153? ?-20? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K9AN? ?EN50wc? ?2102? ?263?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097157? ?-2? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?W9HAM? ?EN64? ?1865? ?275?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097156? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G0DLV? ?IO70ru? ?4286? ?60?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097150? ?-22? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?G0LUJ? ?IO83ls? ?4305? ?55?

?2017-11-09 14:24? ?VA1VM? ?14.097157? ?-21? ?-3? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?KA4PKB? ?EN41kf? ?2287? ?268?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140154? ?-26? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?SWLKCL? ?FN03ip? ?1281? ?267?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140156? ?-9? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?SWLNXZ? ?FN13co? ?1165? ?265?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140153? ?-22? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K9AN? ?EN50wc? ?2102? ?263?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140152? ?-18? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?VE3YX? ?FN16fd? ?1107? ?279?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140160? ?-22? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?VE3BSB? ?FN14uv? ?1020? ?272?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140153? ?-20? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K4COD? ?EM73sc? ?2266? ?240?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140154? ?-18? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?K1BZ/3? ?FM19ne? ?1311? ?243?

?2017-11-09 14:22? ?VA1VM? ?10.140150? ?-21? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?N4CDN? ?FM18iu? ?1362? ?243?

?2017-11-09 14:20? ?VA1VM? ?7.040163? ?-27? ?0? ?FN85ij? ?0.2? ?N4TVC? ?FM18is? ?1367? ?242?

?