Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
QMX logging - feature?
Hello Samantha ?
I don't know which Elecraft Rig you are referring to specifically. But for example:
Currently QMX settings use a total of 1,497 bytes out of the 131,072 bytes in the EEPROM (1.1%). There's also a (little used) log file taking up another 6K (4.7%) so it means the QMX EEPROM is over 94% free, for our future dreams! I specifically chose a large EEPROM chip so that we would have plenty of space for storing user-defined BASIC scripts, and for logging. I have not devoted ANY attention to it yet, but I dream of a far more sophisticated logging tool than just recording transmitted or decoded received CW. Of course this is future item, it will take time to get to it. I did design the QMX hardware with a lot of planned future capabilities.? 73 Hans G0UPL |
Of course, Joe ;-) 73 Hans G0UPL On Thu, Aug 1, 2024, 18:18 Joe AI5DD via <josefius=[email protected]> wrote:
|
You tease :D?
?
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 08:28 PM, Hans Summers wrote:
|
I'd love to build a multi-band QCX-mini. Just sayin...
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
.rr On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 03:28 PM, Hans Summers wrote:
I'll have to start designing some new kits for you to build! |
Isn't that what the QMX basically is?!
?
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 08:34 PM, va3rr wrote:
I'd love to build a multi-band QCX-mini. Just sayin... |
*cough*QSX*cough* -- Matt N3AR On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 12:28?PM Hans Summers via <hans.summers=[email protected]> wrote:
|
Both feature direct conversion receivers with I/Q output, but the QCX has analog active filtering, while the QMX is an powerful SDR. A multi-band QCX could be great on a small battery pack..
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 04:04 PM, Danny Bower wrote:
|
? Both feature direct conversion receivers with I/Q output, but the QCX has analog active filtering, while the QMX is an powerful SDR.? A multi-band QCX could be great on a small battery pack.. According to the web page a QCX-mini has 72mA current consumption at 12V and a QMX has 80mA. So there's hardly any difference. And in fact QCX-mini would also have to increase its RX current if there were band-switching mechanisms too (even if there was space for such a thing inside it). TX current of the QCX-mini is better than QMX because QCX-mini is Class-E vs push-pull Class-D in QMX. But considering there would be 50-60mA extra for PIN diode filter switching on TX (which is much less on QMX due to the buck converter)... it's not really practical on a QCX-mini nor beneficial, for many reasons.? 73 Hans G0UPL ? |
? So, an evolutionary dead end?? That's a shame, as it is a fun CW rig to operate.? I must say I am using my QMX almost exclusively ATM.? It is indeed a marvel... I still love my 20m QCX too, it's an original QCX Classic (Rev 4 PCB) built into an enclosure along with the original prototype 50W PA kit . I have had many happy QSOs with this rig.? I have no plans to discontinue the successor rigs QCX+ and QCX-mini, actually I have 500 more of each in production right now. 20,833 of the QCX-series have been sold since the August 2017 debut. QCX is coming up to 7 years old. It's the first QRP Labs transceiver and a huge landmark for QRP Labs and for me personally.? Nevertheless - the chip is full, it's very hard to make any more codespace inside; QCX-mini is maximally compact. It's hard to see a beneficial direction of evolution for the QCX-series, particularly in the shadow of QMX.? ? 73 Hans G0UPL |
20,833 of the QCX-series have been sold since the August 2017 debut.
?
Maybe for the ten year anniversary,? you could do a limited release anniversary special of the og QCX..
?
I have the 40m QCX, it was my first kit, and still use it regularly.?
?
I just love your kits. Just really grateful they are qrp-labs prices not elecraft prices... I would have had to have sold both kidneys and my spleen by now....? |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss