Keyboard Shortcuts
Likes
Search
QRPp
Any tryed to mod the qcxmini for lower power and better battery life.
I like to run QRPp wirh a PP3 9v battery on a Rockmite with power 100mW, but would like to have a mod to run qcx transiever on 100mW low and 1W high.? Would like to have any tip .Posible it can use the AGC controll signal to do this or a spesial program version. |
SOTAbeams, a company in the UK, sells a "Milliwatter extreme" that is a 5 watt, 50 Ohm attenuator, with a choice of 10 dB or 17 dB attenuation. The device attenuates the transmission, but bypasses for reception. I have used mine for WSPR tests and it worked well for me.
This solution is not going to help with extending battery life, though. Ian VE6IXD |
Kjell,
When I'm in a mood for QRPp, I haul out my Zachtek "Flea" transmitter and the ATS-25 general coverage receiver I use with it. It's only 300mw, on 20, 30, and 40m. It doesn't have to be that particular receiver, I just chose that one because Harry from Zachtek used it for his own Flea and knows it works properly. The Flea handles antenna swapping between the receiver and transmitter, and it has a very imaginative frequency spotting feature that makes it dirt simple to find the transmitter frequency. It's a VERY small transmitter, about the size of an index card. The receiver is actually larger than the transmitter in my case. I power the transmitter using a USB-C Power Delivery battery bank and a 12v trigger cable with the correct DC coaxial barrel plug on it. I have a link dipole for 20/30/40m that's resonant in the CW portion of each band, so I don't even need to tune the antenna, just make sure the correct links are connected. I used this setup at Field Day a couple of years ago, and was making contacts 800+ miles away from our ham radio club's usual Philadelphia-area camp in a local State Park that has camping. I was being heard quite effectively near the Illinois-Wisconsin border and thereabouts. For those concerned, the PD setup I use is not plagued with birdies or other noise. I routinely operate out and about using such power supplies. I do have a couple of LiFePO4 12v batteries that I can bring to bear, but they're heavy and bulky, and need special chargers. (Not as heavy as the Sealed Lead-Acid Batteries I was using prior to LiFePO4 availability, but still heavier than a 10-20Ah USB-C PD power bank. I've even operated using the 4,000mAh PD bank I keep in a pouch in my pocket. Works great. I had an article in QRP Quarterly some years ago that showed my first PD trigger board (I found it on Tindie) connecting a compatible PD power bank to one of my original QCX radios. As long as I used the correct size of barrel plug, it always worked like a champ. But I do seriously recommend the Flea as a very useful QRPp transmitter. It's also relatively inexpensive.? The software for the Flea was created by Kevin Loughin, KB9RLW. He has a whole series of YouTube videos on the Flea project, from various stages in development. He also operated at Field Day, using a Malahit receiver. Kevin hasn't been doing a lot since he caught Covid and was laid low with Long Covid and is still having difficulty getting back into the swing of things. Here's his video relating his Field Day operations. Worth a look, even if you never get your own Flea. 73, Gwen, NG3P |
Links to SotaBeams switched attenuator (switched in by relay on transmit/switched out when not transmitting, on receive)
? The schematic should? be straight forward to homebrew ugly/Manhattan style, with individual choice of attenuation level(s), and? powered by a battery. In fact this is just what I plan to build very soon for QRPp WSPR but should be fine for CW 73 Chris m0pzc |
On 26/02/2024 22:52, Chris m0pzc wrote:
Links to SotaBeams switched attenuator (switched in by relay on transmit/switched out when not transmitting, on receive)Chris, With respect this sort of thing is good for black box users. But my feeling is that generating "vast" amounts of power then wasting it in an attenuator is not really true QRP. I think reducing power output on all QRP Labs TXs can be achieved by reducing PA voltage. I guess there will be a limit, even with 0 volts on the PA something will get through. 73 Alan G4ZFQ |
? With respect this sort of thing is good for black box users. It also has the potential to be wildly misleading. 10dB may be one thing but if you go much beyond that, you will *think* you are really transmitting a certain amount of power, being your produced power minus the wired in attenuation. But in reality your antenna, grounding, shack, etc just isn't an ideal perfect situation and RF radiates from somewhere else other than only going through that big attenuator you put in.? Like the occasional miraculous report of QSOs on a dummy load. Reality: your power supply cables and everything?else right down to every piece of wet spaghetti you happen to own, radiates *something*.? Not producing "vast" amounts of power in the first place not only doesn't waste power in attenuators but also ensures more accurate conclusions!? 73 Hans G0UPL |
On 27/02/2024 11:19, wb2cba@... wrote:
The easiest mod is to remove 2xBS170 and run on one BS170. QCX will be in QRPp range now with this mod.Barb, I wonder. I seem to remember that essentially the paralleled devices share the load. That has been mentioned with the U3S. Would just one be overloaded? In any case if the power was reduced to 1/3 it still would not be QRPp depending on the definition of QRPp:-) 73 Alan G4ZFQ |
Hi Barb > The easiest mod is to remove 2xBS170 and run on one BS170. > QCX will be in QRPp range now with this mod. No... all you do then is fry the BS170. The point of multiple BS170's is less about reducing the effective switch "on" resistance due to paralleling multiple devices. It's more to do with the fact that the power dissipation rating of one device is inadequate. Paralleling multiple devices shares the power dissipation. If you use only ONE BS170 in a QCX then the power output will reduce slightly (due to the higher "ON" resistance of only one) but all the power dissipation will end up in that one transistor, and it will suffer untold pain and suffering.? 73 Hans G0UPL On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 2:19?PM <wb2cba@...> wrote: The easiest mod is to remove 2xBS170 and run on one BS170. QCX will be in QRPp range now with this mod. |
Hans, ?I have QCX V1 and I adapted for usdx and used it with 1x BS170 without any problems many months. The PA efficiency is 60 to 70% which does not create significant excess heat. ?Actually that QCX is my QRPp rig which I still enjoy. I know that usdx is not the QCX firmware though I think they share the same QCX ghetto class E PA design regardless of firmware as hardware topology. I like to experiment and this suggestion was through my experiments that I carried out so ?here is the disclaimer listen to Hans and do not try this at home if you are not into experimental ham radio operation!:) 73, Barb |
Hello Barb?
The maximum power dissipation of a BS170 according to the ON Semi datasheet (these are the devices we supply) is 0.83 Watts.? If a QCX was producing 5W output at 60% efficiency the heat dissipation would be 3.33W. Rather a lot for one BS170 rated 0.83W. I'd be surprised if the BS170 could handle such a thing...? So I'm not sure what is going on there... something sounds not quite?right to me. I'd expect the output power would be somewhat reduced because the "ON" resistance is 3x what it would be with three BS170 in parallel. However I'd expect the power reduction to be relatively modest; the output power wouldn't be reduced to 1/3 of its three-transistor value...? So I'm at a loss to explain the survival of your BS170 but all power to it! (err, literally) ? 73 Hans G0UPL |
How about just using an attenuator with a bypass for receiving? QRPGuys have one for 25 dollars or so.? Don Meyerhoff WA2SWX? On Tue, Feb 27, 2024, 6:18?AM <wb2cba@...> wrote: Easiest way is to remove 2x BS170 and run on one BS170. Then you will in QRPp range. |
Correct! In my case I smoked out two of the BS170 and ended up with one heathy BS170. QDX is ?still alive and kicking with that one!:) - USB socket 5V pin goes to IC2 - 78M05 5V output pin 73, Barb |