¿ªÔÆÌåÓý

ctrl + shift + ? for shortcuts
© 2025 Groups.io

QMX RF power line diode switches


 

Did anyone test at what power output those ¡°reverse biased¡± diodes begin to conduct? At that point I think the RF amp output is practically shorted to the ground unless operating on the lowest band of the filter bank and may blow the finals.

If real PIN diodes are used this would be almost nonissue but with a rectifier pn junction the reverse bias voltage is often the limiting factor.


 

Hi Ryuji,

Hans had posted how he came about using the 1n4007 as a PIN diode for the LPF switches.? You bring up one point that he found that there needs to be higher than the peak plus diode drop to ensure the diode does not conduct.? That is why there is a voltage doubler.? The voltage is used to keep the non-selected diodes off.? A failure of that circuit could cause the issue.? To the best of my knowledge, none have been reported.

Others may have more information and the link to the post that describes his investigation into using the 1n4007.

73
Evan
AC9TU


 

Find any message from Hans.
At the top left of the message, find his name and Left-Mouse Click on it.? This opens a selection box containing "Find All Messages By This User".? Click that.
This displays a list of Hans' messages.? It also puts his user ID in the search box at the upper right.? Now the search box contains "posterid:202164".
Add 1n4007 to the seach box, so it reads "posterid:202164 1n4007".? Press Return or click the magnifying glass icon to do that search.
Now you have a list of all of Hans' posts in which he mentioned 1n4007.
Hopefully you'll find what you need.? There are only a dozen messages found.? Some relate to the 50W amplifier, some relate to adapting QRP-Labs transceivers to lower frequency bands.


 

Ryuji,

Evan is correct. The clever voltage doubling reverse bias circuit should prevent that from ever being a problem.

The 1N4007 achieves its high reverse breakdown rating by being a true PIN structure. It just happens to be sold in a PTH leaded package for a very low price. We hams can be grateful for small favors!

A "true" PIN diode would also need strong smart reverse bias. The old saying TINSTAAFL applies here.

JZ


On Mon, Sep 25, 2023, 12:38 PM Evan Hand <elhandjr@...> wrote:
Hi Ryuji,

Hans had posted how he came about using the 1n4007 as a PIN diode for the LPF switches.? You bring up one point that he found that there needs to be higher than the peak plus diode drop to ensure the diode does not conduct.? That is why there is a voltage doubler.? The voltage is used to keep the non-selected diodes off.? A failure of that circuit could cause the issue.? To the best of my knowledge, none have been reported.

Others may have more information and the link to the post that describes his investigation into using the 1n4007.

73
Evan
AC9TU


 

Rich Evan thanks for the pointers. I¡¯ll have to research the past archive from my desk later

I was trying to see the safe limit if the output power the other day by increasing the powe and supply voltage. Around 12V supply I got 10W output. A bit above the finals blew and I was doing the postmortem analysis. The final transistors should be able to push more power easily and I was thinking of a possibility of what went wrong. I suspect the diodes of the ¡°off¡± LPF branches conducted and the RF current went straight to the ground. 10w on 50 ohm is about 25v rms so that may be the problem.

So using LDMOS and 1:1 output transformer there¡¯s great amplifier reserve capacity but the danger line is also right there.

It¡¯s a bit of heavy duty soldering work to replace the finals but I¡¯d rather know the limits before I take it to the field. I¡¯ll need a supply voltage limiter once I find out a good supply voltage with enough safety margin. The burnt chip smelled bad and the drain contact that I soldered looked like spot welded - I couldn¡¯t unsolder it.


 

Ryuji,

You are a fearless experimenter! Kudos, OM!

73 KJ4A?

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023, 2:26 PM Ryuji Suzuki AB1WX <ab1wx@...> wrote:

Rich Evan thanks for the pointers. I¡¯ll have to research the past archive from my desk later

I was trying to see the safe limit if the output power the other day by increasing the powe and supply voltage. Around 12V supply I got 10W output. A bit above the finals blew and I was doing the postmortem analysis. The final transistors should be able to push more power easily and I was thinking of a possibility of what went wrong. I suspect the diodes of the ¡°off¡± LPF branches conducted and the RF current went straight to the ground. 10w on 50 ohm is about 25v rms so that may be the problem.

So using LDMOS and 1:1 output transformer there¡¯s great amplifier reserve capacity but the danger line is also right there.

It¡¯s a bit of heavy duty soldering work to replace the finals but I¡¯d rather know the limits before I take it to the field. I¡¯ll need a supply voltage limiter once I find out a good supply voltage with enough safety margin. The burnt chip smelled bad and the drain contact that I soldered looked like spot welded - I couldn¡¯t unsolder it.


 

Thanks JZ. I just don¡¯t want to find out the limits at 3000 feet elevation and hours away from my bench.

I think with a pair of high performance RF transistors and 1:1 output transformer, there may not be enough safety margin at any supply voltage if the diodes are reverse biased at -2Vcc. If the rev bias can¡¯t be increased, I might have to drop the final stage supply voltage with series diodes to create the margin.

If anyone else finds their favorite final transistor, be careful high performance choices will run into this issue quickly. If the high band transmit power performance is worse than lower bands I¡¯d carefully look into heavy load situation by unwanted conduction. LPF input above the cutoff frequency will look shorted to ground from the source.


 

Ryuji,

Hans uses the same switching mechanism, including the voltage doubler, for the RX/TX switching on his 50W PA. ?So the general theory is in use up to at least that power level. ?Both QMX and the 50W PA use 1N4007 diodes.

Jonathan KN6LFB


 

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 05:31 PM, Ryuji Suzuki AB1WX wrote:

At that point I think the RF amp output is practically shorted to the ground unless operating on the lowest band of the filter bank and may blow the finals.

If real PIN diodes are used this would be almost nonissue but with a rectifier pn junction the reverse bias voltage is often the limiting factor.

Might I suggest Ryuji that you do a little research before yet another blanket statement about this design. I am am becoming a little bored with your constant rubbishing. However if you are in the midst of an entirely new radio design which will knock QRP labs into a cocked hat, I really cannot wait to see it.

Ted??


 

This is a question of the power amp output voltage swing vs the diode reverse voltage. Not the circuit topology or the diode choose. Depending on the vdssat and Ron of the final transistor the RF voltage can swing bigger than with some other transistors.


 

So the reverse bias is actually generated from the RF output transformer, not a fixed voltage, so it is not like having a fixed reverse bias. Analysis continues....


 

Ryuji,

To be clear, the reverse voltage is the higher of the voltage doubled peak of the transmitter (varies with the power out) OR the input voltage (mainly for receive and until the transmitter generates power).? One of the manuals may describe how that works (most likely the 50-watt PA).

I found a good description in section 6 of the 50-watt PA assembly manual


73
Evan
AC9TU


 

Evan, thanks for the pointer. That document is an excellent description of the design.

There are two statements that I am not fully convinced, though.

  1. the voltage doubler produces a voltage greater than the Vp-p of the RF power
  2. the bias voltage is always ahead of the RF power envelope while the power is taperd up or down.

Yeah I understand what you are saying but the scope of this thread is the switching behavior during TX so I omitted the details for the RX state.


 

Ryuji,

Hans and I went around on those about 4 or more years ago.? I tested his ideas on
a 100W amplifier for HF and verified that doubled reverse bias was effective.
Also research confirmed even with "real" pin diodes reverse bias at that level
would be required.? His design is sound and well thought out as well as
consistent with good engineering practice.?

The unit is consistent with his design goals.? If you though enough
money at it you can do better.? Id start with a board redesign and a
stiffer driver but then you will learn compromise.

FYI those drivers someone else listed are in my experience good but
have two issues, maximum drive voltage and maximum usable frequency.
The latter is a hard limit and the ti5111 was good to about 20M
(I was using it at 13.55Mhz) and much higher?it collapsed.

So learn to not blame the cow for soggy cereal.

--
Allison
------------------
Post online only,?
direct email will go to a bit bucket.


 

Allison, I am not blaming anyone! Please stop distorting my discussion points.

I don't have any drive issue. That issue is for some switching MOSFET with a bit higher Vth like FDT86256, which I am not using in my QMX.