Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
Search
Vacuum-tube final for QRP transmitters?
Hello--
Please note that I currently do NOT have a dog in any of the current digital dogfights which are consuming quantities of various MOSFETs used as final amplifiers in QRP equipment. Has anyone considered experimenting with such vintage tubes as the 1T4, 3V4, 1U5, 1LN5, 1A5-GT ?. These are available in the $5.00-$10.00 NOS price range. Objections in no particular order: Filament power? 1.4 volts @ 50 mA -- 2.8V@ 100 mA (3V4) Warm-up time? Consider running the filament at a fraction of full power; switched by MOSFET High voltage for the plate and screen?? Three 9-volt batteries connected in series = 27 V., falling to 18 volts at dropout. Bulky, fragile tubes? Don't over-miniaturize the project, and don't use it as a football. 73-- Brad? AA1IP |
Nuvistors anyone?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
73 John F5VLF On 13 Sep 2023, at 21:14, Brad Thompson <brad.thompsonaa1ip@...> wrote: |
Well, nuvistors would be an excellent idea, except for their relative scarcity nowadays.? Same with the 1V filament tubes. ? How about a 6- or 12-volt filament miniature tube?? I won't suggest compactrons, which would be an excellent idea except?for their scarcity. ? Weight will impose a penalty if you?need to string a bunch of 9 volt?batteries together and carry spares,especially for SOTA and hiking up 5,000 vertical?feet. Still, there's nothing wrong with tubes for QRP.? After all, we did it for decades, back in the beginning. 73 Jim N6OTQ On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 3:13?PM John Rabson <john.rabson07@...> wrote: Nuvistors anyone? |
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Sep 13, 2023, at 16:19, Jim Strohm <jim.strohm@...> wrote:
|
OK, I've been tempted to mute every thread about those MOSFETs, because I'm not feeling they're as critical an issue as many others evidently do.? If the horse isn't dead from the beating it's taken, it must be hurting really bad by now. ;-)
However, THIS tube idea catches my interest!? Not because it's necessary, but because it sounds like a real steampunk project for the QMX!? Like a nixie tube clock or that wood/marbles clock just mentioned - a modern SDR/tube QRP rig would just be cool! I admit I had to learn about Nuvistors... they seem like a good idea, especially if Dave was interested in finding new homes for the ones he has.? At least, at first glance. 73, Brock VA7AV |
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýI originally got the idea from an SWL (later GM8BAR) with whom I went on DXxpedition as GC3PAI/A and ON5YB in the 1960s. He had built a receiver which could best be described as the transistor equivalent of the G2DAF.? It performed very well but he was not entirely satisfied with the performance and was talking of replacing the front end with something based on Nuvistors, but ended up emigrating to Australia. He did not get as far as looking at low power PAs. 73 John F5VLF
|
Nuvisters are for receiving use and max power would be in the 2-3W range for the tetrodes.
The triodes do less and must be neutralized or they will oscillate like most triodes I happen to have worked with them and as tubes go they wer excellent to about 700-800mhz but not so much for RF power. Most of the tubes that would do any power over about 3W are costly for power consumed (heater/Filament and plate). FY look up the Hallicrafters HT37 phasing transmitter....? big and heavy and required much tuning to keep them clean as the tubes drifted with age.? I know, I have one that I fire up? from time to time.? There are others of the era.? -- Allison ------------------ Post online only,? direct email will go to a bit bucket. |
Mike Downing KC0Y
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHeathkit used the 6CL6 as a linear driver in the HW101 and
similar SB series line. Mike, KC0Y On 9/16/23 11:21 AM, ajparent1/kb1gmx
wrote:
Nuvisters are for receiving use and max power would be in the 2-3W range for the tetrodes. |
Remember the 12BY7. ? Heck, remember to look in an old-ish (early 1960s) ARRL Handbook and see what they show in the tube tables in the back.? There are plenty of options.? A 12V filament is a good fit for most portable power sources ... same with two 6V filaments in series.? You still have the issue of the plate supply, but a chopper or switcher supply is simple enough.? Remember those tube-type CB mobile leen-yah amps with the two big round PNP transistors on the back? You could even gut a 1940s VHF-lo-band mobile for its vibrator supply and 807s.? I have some of those, I think. 73 Jim N6OTQ On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 11:26?AM Mike Downing KC0Y <michael.downing.kc0y@...> wrote:
|
The 2E26 Allison mentioned is perfect for portable rigs as they were designed for VHF mobile radios (think vibrations and the like). AF4K(SK) used one in a transmitter design that worked fairly well.....unfortunately, I don't have a schematic of Bry's rig. I think he used a 6C4 or similar for the oscillator.? Lee KX4TT
On Saturday, September 16, 2023 at 12:36:23 PM EDT, Jim Strohm <jim.strohm@...> wrote:
Remember the 12BY7. ? 73 Jim N6OTQ On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 11:26?AM Mike Downing KC0Y <michael.downing.kc0y@...> wrote:
|
Here I go, dating my age again.
The acorn tube predated the nuvistor by a bit. It was a FB VHF/UHF amplifier or oscillator, and I made a very nice dip meter with one once, using a transmission line and slider for frequency control. Fun stuff! JZ On Sat, Sep 16, 2023 at 12:45?PM Lee via groups.io <kx4tt@...> wrote:
|
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýHere is my 220MHz Nuvistor converter for my NC-300 receiver back in the 60¡¯s (ARRL design). ?Also, the schematic is for my 10 meter mobile transmitter using a 2E26 with Heising modulation ¡ is was called the ¡°28-28¡± for 28 watts on 28 MHz. I used it with a HV Dynamotor in the car (see last picture) ¡ notice the relay contact to power it up on XMT. ?I also built a 2 Meter handi-talkie using Acorn tubes ¡ never got it to work. Skip ?K2RJF
|
Looks a lot like my Ameco 2M converter and my parks 432 converter both use nuvisters.
Both pretty decent.? The nuvistors wanted .135A per tube or .675 amps at 6.3V (4.2525W). The dynamotor was aybe 65% efficient in providing the 90-120V needed. I have a HE45A 6M am TRX,? uses 2E26 final.? Used Vibrator supply and all tube.? Sucks down about 4.5a on receive run the heaters and upward of 6A on TX.? IT does about 12W. Most were run off 120V AC. Back in the dark ages (1970) I used to service radios like Motorola TU44UHF For 4watts on UHF FM the standard power harness used 00guage wire direct to the battery.? Running the RX alone could kill the average car battery is less than 2 hours without the engine running. Tubes are cool but for portable their power needs are painful. Example A TBY-8 a 28 to 80mhz wwii? backpack portable using 7 tubea two for the audio, one for crystal calibrator,?and Acorn tubes for superregen RX (two tubes) and two for TX. 33 pounds complete in the pack.? About 18 pounds of that was batteries.? The 0.5W TX had a useful range of 10,000 yards.? ?I have one!, they were also known as codetalker radios. I have a three tube (1R5, and two 1u4) 80m rx, it needs 1.4V at 150ma (tube heaters) and 90V at 7ma for the whole plate load.? Ok for Am, forget SSB, too wide for CW. Generally heating the tubes was hungry for power and the high volts were short lived. The idea of a valve final for QRP assumes you car is the power source or other large battery.? As heating the tube and providing the high volts will eat many watts for maybe 15-25% efficiency (battery to RF). Acorn tube were cool but Nuvisters were way better and smaller. -- Allison ------------------ Post online only,? direct email will go to a bit bucket. |
This reminds me of the ill fated AT2 two acorn 995 tube transmitted attempt from the 2020 FDIM build-a-thon and based on the Peter Parker PP2 that once appeared in SPRAT. 60 or so of us signed up and laid out $50 for a kit. FDIM was cancelled, but eventually we received bags of apparently miscellaneous parts. The kit included highly unusual hardware, but was never really documented. I never saw that Rex a completed kit as he sent out and as far as I know no one ever successfully completed theirs.
Occasionally I think about abandoning Rex's design and starting from scratch with the parts as a base, but other projects have been more interesting. -- ? 73 ??? KD8CGH |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss