Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- QRPLabs
- Messages
Search
Re: QDX build option- hybrid lo & hi version?
#qdx
Hi Stu You can buy an TinySA (plus? attenuators, I'm using 20dB + 30dB 20Watt) to check levels and harmonics It was very useful for me.?? 73 muhsin TA1MHS note: 5 watts is 37dBm, if you use two attenuators (20+30=50) -27dBm is very OK for TinySA ? |
Re: Balloon over Canada
Michael.2E0IHW
On 04/02/2023 15:03, Ron VE8RT wrote:
... As it will be over areas with a high density of amateur operatorsAnd/or download its "weather data ? Bouncing greetings back to the originator might not be approved, of course... Michael 2E0IHW |
Re: Balloon over Canada
Interesting idea. I do not have anyone in range but I've read articles
on microwave two way QSOs using scatter from the tops of thunderstorm clouds. In the past I've used scatter from aircraft flying nearby (on 2M). As it will be over areas with a high density of amateur operators I'd think that a few people might try using it as a reflector. Ron VE8RT On Fri, 03 Feb 2023 21:53:09 -0800 "J P Watters via groups.io" <jpwatters@...> wrote: Ron, -- Ron VE8RT <ve8rt@...> |
Re: QCX
You just need to rewind?all the toroids, remove C5, and replace C25, 26, 27, 28 and 30. The instructions?only go up to 17 meters, so you need to wind them using the 17 meter instructions with 2 turns less on the large winding of T1 and 1 turn less on the rest as a starting point, then do a reset and start the alignment process. Good luck... 73 ... Ron On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 5:53 AM UPNORTHOF48 : <trevorogden66@...> wrote: This is what I¡¯m looking for!? I have a spare 40m QCX, and would like to change it to 15m.? Is is simple as changing the windings on the toroids, or something more involved?? I was planning on just going through the construction manual, noting the differences, and doing a reset. ? |
Re: Balloon over Canada
Many
On 04/02/2023 09:07, Stewart G3YSX wrote: because they knew when they would be overhead.I worked with a guy who had lived in Novosibirsk and worked on missiles nearby. When the iron curtain came down he didn't believe it would last and so packed a few clothes in a bag and made his way to the west. He was a good programmer. Anyway, where he worked they had a party member who had the printout of when the US spy satellites were due each day. Had to be someone trustworthy with that info ;-) The guy's job was to sit around outside drinking coffee/vodka and tell the crews working outside that the satellite was due. The workers then threw assorted camouflage nets etc. over stuff in yards, lorries etc. and went for a drink. Later he'd give the all clear, camouflage was removed and worked continued. With a balloon that lingers you seriously hamper such evasion techniques. Still amusing to see the indignation shown by Uncle Sam et al. when someone does what they do back to them. Question: for years the US has been selling off its Helium reserves cheap. Is this balloon full of US Helium. Uncle Sam hoisted by their own Petard. Or Helium in this case! Andy (part American so I'm laughing at my own kin here) |
Re: QDX V4 after changing out the finals with 4 new transistors noted the unit dont seem to receive any Ft8 Signals but does TX at the full 6W
The band filter for RX is switched by IC3.
The LPF (RX and TX) is controlled directly by the IC-8 microprocessor and a few MOSFets. Hint 12V is really 12V, use a meter to verify that, or risk another failure. -- Allison ------------------ Post online only, please no email. |
Re: QDX V4 after changing out the finals with 4 new transistors noted the unit dont seem to receive any Ft8 Signals but does TX at the full 6W
Check your computer clock, it MUST be accurate to within a couple of seconds.
The filter switching is tested when you do the filter sweeps. The 20m filter does not look good but it works and is known about. |
Re: Balloon over Canada
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýThe Times commented on it this morning. Unlike LEOs the balloon can loiter for long periods of time. If you read (for example Jacobson¡¯s book Area 51) about the development of the stealth and spy aircraft you will see that they actively hid from the spy sats because they knew when they would be overhead. They also played some deception games with them. You cannot evade an observation ballon of this type in the same way, and of course being lower than a satellite they would capture a lot more detail.Stewart/G3YSX On 3 Feb 2023, at 18:30, Bob W7DIT <cent@...> wrote:
|
Re: Balloon over Canada
K
On 3 Feb 2023, at 13:35, William Smith <w_smith@...> wrote:It would be easy to change height by putting more gas in the envelope to go up, and of course releasing it to go down. However in a sophisticated ballon with a relatively heavy payload and solar power as this seems to be, you could extract gas from the envelope and compress it into a cylinder to preserve the gas for future use. Stewart/G3YSX |
Re: Balloon over
The USA has spy satellites spinning round the world gathering intelligence and are worried about a balloon , unbelievable.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Saturday, 4 February 2023, Shanon Herron <ka8spw@...> wrote:
|
Re: Balloon over Canada
Missed opportunity?
I wonder if from the ground, last heard it was at about 60K feet, if the payload has as much reflective surface as the first communications satellite, Echo 1. Its too far from me, but is anyone up for trying VHF and up DX by reflection off of it? Ron VE8RT in DP22 On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 10:29:30 -0800 "Bob W7DIT" <cent@...> wrote: There is an outcry to shoot it down, I hope they capture it. Maybe a -- Ron VE8RT <ve8rt@...> |
Re: QDX not receiving after replacing blown transistors
On 3 Feb 2023 at 20:06, 9V1SA wrote:
Or is it just a case of pot luck then cover the wires withread the comments in this thread. many postings have indicated units that have been found to have NO RFI problems ... the ones I recently posted are perfectly clean in my experience. w2jc |
Re: Balloon over
I bet it has a self destruction device.... On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 10:33 PM Mark <venchant@...> wrote: Sounds like a job for our newly created Space Force to have fun with a goal of bringing it down safely? over US territory and give it a good examination. |
Re: Balloon over
¿ªÔÆÌåÓýIf you can¡¯t enjoy the absurdity of it all, please just mute this topic..... these interruptions to windings and blown components are relaxing. ?And to boot many folks here actually fly balloons and it is interesting if not hilarious, hey, some want to send an F-22 after a balloon.... that¡¯s not a fair fight !John KK4ITX? Visit: ?. ? ? On Feb 3, 2023, at 22:33, Mark <venchant@...> wrote:
|
Re: QCX+ 20m Receiver sensitivity way down
#20m
#problem
#troubleshoot
RESOLVED: Turns out IC4, the FST3253, was the culprit.
Thanks to everyone how responded and helped out. Its a testament to how awesome this group is. -- regards, Bryan, N0LUF |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss