Keyboard Shortcuts
ctrl + shift + ? :
Show all keyboard shortcuts
ctrl + g :
Navigate to a group
ctrl + shift + f :
Find
ctrl + / :
Quick actions
esc to dismiss
Likes
- QRPLabs
- Messages
Search
Re: Hi SWR, sometimes
Dean,
?
there is a fault in the SWR tune function (until now). If you start the SWR tune function your last VFO frequency is shown but a per band default frequency is used. Please rotate the frequency encoder to see the real frequency and tune to your wanted f.
As far as I know this problem is on Hans list.
?
73 Ludwig |
Re: Hi SWR, sometimes
Thank you Roger!!
?
I was surprised to see the results into a dummy load so I went back to the original configuration and back to the same problem. So just curious to see my wattage I inserted a Barb-A-Watt meter in line. Now no problem with a fault.
?
I guess it was a bit of rfi on the coax tripping the SWR protection. Simple solutions to simple problems.
?
Thanks again, Dean |
Re: Hi SWR, sometimes
So i would suspect the antenna/tuner to have an intermittent connection of some sort, or to be inadequate in some way. Roger Get Dean, N2TNN via groups.io wrote:
|
Re: QMX+ RF output fluctuates wildly
#QMXplus
#troubleshooting
Obtained and replaced Q516. Diagnostics now pass Tx Bias. Stable current, all green.
More testing tomorrow.
?
Thanks for this group, helped me to track down the issue. |
Re: RIT in N1MM
Stan,
?
If I understand you correct, QMX + RIT and N1MM won't be a happy marriage by design.
The RIT switch off issue in RUN mode is kind of weird.
?
Anyway, it is a great contest radio. Enjoying it at the moment in the WPX contest where propagation could have been better.
?
73,
Roelof, pa0rdty
?
? |
Re: Hi SWR, sometimes
Does this happen into a dummy load? 73 Roger 8P6RX? Get Dean, N2TNN via groups.io wrote:
|
Hi SWR, sometimes
This seems to be a complex problem because I do not understand what is happening. I will try to explain as best as I can.
?
QMX mid bands built for 12 volts and Z-11 Pro auto tuner.
?
I start on 40 meters and go to hardware then SWR tune and start the tune. The tuner light move and ends when a <1.5 SWR is reached. I then go to iambic and send CW at about 20 wpm. After about 10 dits the tuner jumps up to over 4 and the S protection letter shows on the screen after the last number. I cycle the menu, go to hardware, SWR tune and it shows <1.5 SWR. I go back to normal CW and the same pattern shows up again.
?
It happens on multiple bands and is frustrating because I can't complete a POTA contact let alone a ragchew.
?
My sBITx is also low power 1 - 4? watts and does not do this action with the tuner.
?
Any ideas where to look?
?
73, Dean/ N2TNN |
Re: QMX+ firmware feature request
Would having the SWR sweep on the QMX display satisfy your need?
I asked Hans for this a while back but I'm not sure if he read my request (busy guy).
It seems that SWR sweep is the only terminal mode feature that is not available on the QMX display.
?
Hopefully, one of these ideas makes it onto his TBD list.
?
73, Mike KK7ER
?
|
Re: R520 Wrong component value.
I may have the same issue with my QMX+. It enters Safe Mode as soon as the key is pressed on 80m and 60m. The 40m and 30m bands work fine, although 40m and 20m have nearly zero power output, which I still need to troubleshoot. If SWR protection is disabled, the QMX+ will transmit on 80m, 40m, and 20m, but power output remains negligible on these bands. However, 30m and 60m output 5W. These test were performed transmitting into a Bird dummy load
?
When using the diagnostic SWR check I get 80m SWR 10, 60m SWR 10, 40m SWR 10, 30m SWR 10, 20m SWR 3.3. Not sure what 10 means, is this 1:1 or 10:1 SWR?
?
?
?
Dave
|
The 'scope traces from your archive of the K0IKR post do resemble the issue I am having - if anything, my gate signals look a little more balanced than what he had happening.
?
I didn't keep a note of it but I believe I tried running up the bias to see if that improved power output - something to try today, checkingthe waveform at T3 to see if it gets better.
?
I have one of those "component guesser" testers that identify a lot of things and give a little graphic of the device symbol with some measurements made at unknown test conditions. I've only ever used this as a "go -no go" function tester - I wonder if the? parameters it measures would be an adequate representation of the device's performance in the amplifier? If they match on the tester, will they be good enough for the amplifier?? Alternatively, I can do a breadboard experiment and measure the threshold voltage the hard way - lots of multimeters!
?
The other idea that came to me at 3 AM today was if my winding of the binocular core was careless, perhaps too much leakage inductance?? However, looking at my T3 and the illustration in the instruction manual shows a similar amount of windings visible at the end - it's not like I've got a 5 mm gap between the end turn and the core.
?
So, my next steps are:
- Observe T3 waveform at 100 mA bias
- Order a half-dozen IRF510s from DigiKey - and hope they don't get lost in our impending postal strike.
- Sort through the new IRF510s and pick a pair with the closest match, try them out.
?
I was relieved to find I could remove and reinstall the board without losing the silicone pads - I had feared this was a one-way-only assembly.
?
Thanks for your tips and the archived photos!
?
Bill |
QMX CW bandwidth
Hi,
my QCX has been modified for a passband of around 900Hz and has found more use after the modification.
I have a half-built QMX+ and the specs say that cw filter is adjustable from 50-500Hz. ?
Many seasoned cw operators prefer much wider bandwidths for general cw working.?
I usually listen with around 1,2kHz BW, in tougher conditions the narrower BWs are a blessing.
?
As my QMX+ still awaits to get on the air I want to ask if it?s possible to make the bandwith wider tha 500Hz in CW mode?
If that is not the case, I would like to add this to the list of changes in the software of the QMX.
?
72 Ari OH9VL G-QRP 2068
|
Re: R520 Wrong component value.
All
Thanks for all your comments. It took me a while to find this one. I kept pulling and re-winding T507. I was convinced the problem must have been something I had done. I just did not expect the problem to be one of the factory fitted SMD components. At one point I also pulled and re-wound T501 thinking that may have been at fault, changing it from the 9V version to 12V. All that did was blow the BS170s when I ran the SSB calibration process, so I need to change those as well.
Stephen On Sat, 24 May 2025 at 13:02, va3rr via <va3rr=[email protected]> wrote: Good catch, Stephen. I had one QMX with cracked and missing bypass caps, but this was seen before I started assembly and didn't require any diagnostic acumen. |
Bill,
?
If my memory serves, I found that increasing the bias of the IRF510s to 100mA over the starting current resulted in higher output power.? This makes the amp less efficient, but Class AB linear operation is 100mA per MOSFET for IRF510s, so there should be little danger to them.? I think differences in MOSFETs could cause these turn-on voltages.? Pushing the bias higher puts the one-giving issue in the more linear region.
?
The alternative is to replace both transistors with matched Vgs turn-on voltages as measured by a transistor tester.
?
It is worth a try.
?
73
Evan
AC9TU |
to navigate to use esc to dismiss